CSM Campaigns

Ragnarok.'s love is coming from Nova, Corbexx. You have our support and our vote.

I have had the pleasure of flying with Corbexx in CCRES and later in AHARM and I'd be hard pressed to put forth a more suitable CSM representative.
Corbexx knows his WHs and also has wide spread knowledge of other aspects of EVE, in particular industry and productions.
Definitely high on my list.

I do have one question for you mate.
What is your opinion on the proposed probing delay for newly spawned K162 WHs?
Given the unpopular views others from your alliance have been posting on the threadnaught on the matter, I'd like to know where you stand.

In any case, best of luck.
JM

Thanks for the question.

T3's are indeed tied to wormhole economy. It's also worth noting this will effect lower class wormholes alot more than C5 or C6 space as around 15% - 20% of thier income is from salvage. In a C2 I think its much closer to 50% from salvage and C3 is about 35% from salvage.

So yes I do see this as a added issue when T3 get their balance pass. So much so it's one of topics I have concerns with.



One of the ways I see this being sorted, would be to slightly increase the income in C1 to C4 but have this extra income as sleeper tags so the lower class wormholes are less reliant on the price of T3's. C5 and C6 space I think would be ok even if the salvage prices did drop more.

On the subject of T3, most people I have spoke to (this includes several lowsec groups a couple null groups and a tonne of wormhole people) feel T3 are fine and there benefits are made up for in the fact, they cost alot more and you lose skill points.

I'd much rather see useless subsystems made more useful, and maybe a couple more added in. I know CCP don't like to add stuff unless there is a use.

A couple that jump out to me are maybe new electronic subs

Loki get a painter sub.
Prot get a damp sub
Legion get a tracking disruptor sub.
Sort of falls down on the Tengu (still thinking about this one).

But this way you can have one bonus of the recons but not both, this might be a bit OP in large fleets mind.

Derailed a bit there but hope that answers your questions.

Looks like a solid candidate to me.

Would vote in favor!

I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them.

The Rules:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.

I believe Mynnna has already sorted this for you here.

There is in my mind, nothing at all wrong with pulsars or wolf rayets. They just need different set ups to fight in, or you run the risk of being at a disadvantage, but that's what wormhole space is about adapting.

Black holes there is issues with.

Red giants have some issues with over heating of ewar modules to get ... shall we say "interesting effects". That does need looking at and sorting.

Right, but that wouldn't actually make industry less clicky, your stated goal, for the aforementioned hi-sec folk who keep their blueprints in station. It would just give preference to those who don't. Industry being less clicky is the change I want more than any other because of the immediate benefit to my poor, beleaguered hands. Defaulting to the blueprint location might be easier, it could be done as simply as a single menu setting, with no saving of information, but if job location for each blueprint type was cached, all kinds of industrialists would benefit from the reduction in clickiness.

I understand that even that is not a complete solution, because if a character does ten invention jobs from station, they get split between two labs(max 5 invention slots). It would still only require two slot selections, one for one lab, and one for the other.

Definitely got my vote.

Not only do you provide a strong case in this thread, you also took the time to sit down with me and chat about wormholes a few months ago. I am a player new to wormholes and the help was very much appreciated. The mail you also sent was incrediably informative and very, very helpful and it wasn't exactly short, you had no reason to go out of your way like you did. Many thanks.

+1