These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Feedback to CCP

First post First post First post
Author
One Eyed Runner
GetYaTitsOut
#61 - 2014-03-29 12:57:14 UTC  |  Edited by: One Eyed Runner
Nalelmir Ahashion wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

(1) CCP should define abuse and harrassment at the lowest level possible so that essentially any potentially offensive communication is deemed unacceptable, and everyone has a clear idea of where the line is: don't say anything bad at all to another player. This is the choice of virtually every MMO in the game industry.



This is best option.

Eve is game about spaceships, about economy and simulation of economical environment (everything comes down to isks).
Latest event showed us that people in this game are not able to (Not 100% of them but major part enough) behave in an adult manner and limit themselves.

Place a red line, set the boundaries.


this ^^^

some players cant understand people that DONT PvP and just want to mine, explore or mission run

Burton's Legal Thesaurus:

harassment (either harris-meant or huh-rass-meant) n. the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands.

I live in Jita so f*ck off

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#62 - 2014-03-29 13:00:04 UTC
Option 2.

Sarah McKnobbo
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2014-03-29 13:01:22 UTC
2 please
olan2005
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#64 - 2014-03-29 13:06:13 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


(2) CCP should continue with the status quo, and trust the members of the EVE community to have the adult intelligence and humanity to exercise discretion in how far they can take their communication with other players. And having exercised that discretion, to also be aware that we're all members of the game community and that while every kind of in-game space-villainy is legitimate, we're all actual human beings behind the screen and we should be careful with our out of game actions to each other. This option is, so far as I am aware, unique to CCP and EVE; if other MMOs place this level of trust and faith in their players I am unaware of them.



i vote this one . That way they have the power to remind people use common sense and still allow the uniue aspect of the meta-game to continue
Marcia en Welle
Doomheim
#65 - 2014-03-29 13:09:49 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Continue with the status quo, including leaving with CCP the discretion to still ban asshats as they see fit. So basically continue with the status quo. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
Gajin Sensei
Poliisin Vanha Tuttu
#66 - 2014-03-29 13:11:20 UTC
Cool thread, asking for feedback and then making 2 ridiculous extremes of the spectrum as options to choose from, that no one in their right mind would support as they are.

So here, I choose 2, that's the whole purpose of this thread right ? Make it look like everything is A-OK and the community thinks that nothing needs to change.
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#67 - 2014-03-29 13:13:22 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Option 2. Amended.

By and large, the highest percentage of the community is adult.

EvE Online is unique in that it is a community that has been "branded" a certain way for 10 years. To change that brand, while possibly bringing in new subs, would alienate many in the player base. Changing that brand, will also breed a dissolution of the uniqueness that has made EvE a successful game. A game that has grown, rather than bred a "churn 'em and burn 'em" subscription model. Players become "invested." Their "friends", "corp mates," and "fellow community participants" matter to them.

Players know, when entering EvE, if they have done half their research before choosing to subscribe, what they are getting into. And anyone who doesn't do any research on an MMO which will assuredly take up quite a bit of their time as a hobby, are idiots.

You can lose anything, to anybody, at anytime. The methods by which you can are negligible.

You can be ganked, scammed, podded, ransomed, heisted, and everything else in EvE.

Our foundations speak volumes on it.

Existing organizations were built on the precept of "We are not here to ruin the game, we are here to ruin YOUR game."

Huge heists and scams have made headlines.

The newest ALOD makes all of us ::facepalm:: and share it with our little groups for a decent laugh.

We giggle at shooting blues. An entire profession in the game is based on it.

We trade killmails with one another. Our victories. Our defeats. We laugh about them, and use them to stroke our collective egos.

We all hop on TS, Mumble, or Vent and troll each other. Call each other names like "pubby," "pet," "newb."

We ransom, sing songs, have a good time. CCP Gargant....were you "hurt" or "abused?"

Hell, even CCP, with PLEX4Good went to extreme's during their livestream, lol.

The only clear cut amendment I see needing changed is the bigotry, need to infiltrate the person's life outside the realm of the game (and the common tools use to play the game, i.e. killboards, VOIP) to harm an actual player, threaten harm on another player, as well as death threats in game. Violence their spaceship, instead. Call them assholes. A little foul language doesn't hurt me. I am grown up enough. Just don't elude to race or sexual orientation in your rage and tears. It is modern times. These things should quite frankly not exist

It is easy to scapegoat an community-active scammer, with a fringe case, with one-sided facts, a month after the fact...and claim it to be abuse. Then only the sandbox-purists will come to their aid and defense. Those who understand this has been the way of things for a decade.

And when all the facts finally lay on the table, the only true victims become the scammer (who had his life threatened multiple times in game and out), the innocent newbie that was kicked from their corp (who didn't even know what the CSM was, let alone expected them to run to his aid, when he had already gotten back on his feet within days), the players the content was being created for(some of whom were booted from their respective alliances and organizations), and the sandbox.

Not meant to be a shameless plug, but more as what I am familiar with, I urge you to visit Minerbumping. Look at some of the sperging that comes from the supposed "reputable" and "upstanding" portion of the community. Over losing their ship. Roll

In my short time participating in the "outlier" communities, I have met some of the most polite and helpful individuals of the entirety of my time in this game.

Because we are playing characters.

We all understand that.

Others do not.

And we certainly do not need "elected representatives" who create chaos by singling out specific members of the whole community they represent, whether they agree with the play style or not, and making the in-game and real lives trying and difficult, with sensationalist claims. Especially when the "metagame" had gone on for a year to the wide knowledge of CCP and the community proper.

As myself, Ero, and other have shown time and time again, we have nothing to hide.

We simply love the game we play.

We express our gratitude to CCP often. (Sometimes we get frustrated, but as sohkar said...."who doesn't?")

And most of all we know that internet spaceships is not serious business. They are pixels on a screen. Intangible. Nothingness. A damn video game, regardless of how much time and/or money you have poured into it.

The losses you think are real are designed to feel that way. No different than the adrenaline rush you feel when get into a "gudfite." Hilmar himself attested to that when he talked about his friend's cruiser being blown up, and working, rather than using devhax to replace it.

It is merely another piece of the unique tone of EvE Online. And to change that would be the bastardization of everything that CCP touts. A decade's worth of building, creating, molding.......all undone in an instant.

Player creation.

Emergence.

I honestly hope that never happens. Or what we love....what many of us have spent days fighting over....will evaporate into thin air.

Option 2 for me, Malcanis.

Minus the bigotry and death threats.

And, of course, the sensationalism and lynch mobbing.

Just saying.

BlinkBig smilePirate

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2014-03-29 13:14:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
1

Currently there is far too much arbitrariness - much of the behavior that has become common in EVE actually violates the EULA and gets gags & bans when reported (which then leads to very surprised "victims" of GM actions) and a clear line has to be drawn.

EVE exists within real-life society, not apart from it.

.

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#69 - 2014-03-29 13:17:27 UTC
I don't like the wording for option 2 as it still implies an increase in regulations than are currently in place. I feel the survey has been loaded to suit your own agenda so I'll make my own choice of opinion which would be to dismantle the CSM and leave the rules about harassment as they have been up until now.
Bob Bedala
#70 - 2014-03-29 13:21:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Bob Bedala
Gajin Sensei wrote:
Cool thread, asking for feedback and then making 2 ridiculous extremes of the spectrum as options to choose from, that no one in their right mind would support as they are.


Spot on, Sensei. To summarise, and explain why 1 is the only viable solution;

3) Anarchy -- sadly proven not to work IRL because a significant proportion of people are dicks.
2) Punish you when you step over a line, but we're not going to tell you where the line is. Try raising a child or running a country that way -- hint, doesn't work, completely unfair.
1) Define the line, and the punishments, and provide examples. Imperfect, but thousands of years of human culture indicates that's the only viable option. Just define lines in a way a child can understand and communicate changes in those lines effectively.

Whether through fear of legal liability, avoidance of a hard problem, or for whatever reason CCP mainly persist with 2 but it will never work.
Jerome Gouillot
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2014-03-29 13:32:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Jerome Gouillot
(4) CCP should stand back and allow to engage in and facilitate whatever activities they desire, regardless of damage done and regardless of the clear trend of escalating unpleasantness as long as those activities are in character and part of the gameplay. This includes activities that are performed in character but on third-party-platforms. CCP wil reserve the right to discontinue service for individual players at any time, especially but not limited to cases in that the platform is used for acctions that are against applicable law in the jurisdiction that is applicable in the location the service has been provided

This would be close to (2) but less limiting. My favourite example is paintball - if two players consentually engage in a match, an injury inflicted from a shot would not qualify as a criminal act whereas it would most likely if occurded outside of a consentual match.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#72 - 2014-03-29 13:32:48 UTC
Actually I choose option 1. Hand Eve online over to the carebears so they can play the most boring PvE game in existence, get bored and quit. Let Eve die a slow and painful death for the entertainment of all us sadists.
Susitna
League of Gentlemen
The Initiative.
#73 - 2014-03-29 13:34:42 UTC
2
Xavier Holtzman
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#74 - 2014-03-29 13:42:12 UTC
2

I do not like the men on this spaceship. They are uncouth and fail to appreciate my better qualities. I have something of value to contribute to this mission if only they would realize it. - Bill Frug

Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2014-03-29 13:42:40 UTC
If you ask me, honestly..... pirates, griefers, and smal-gang PvP folks are the real upright citizens, in EVE. We sit back, enjoy our metagame style, and we never demand anything from CCP. We're content. We don't complain. We take nerfs in stride, and we adapt and overcome, every time something changes.

Carebears scream and shout and rage. They demand nerfs to combat ships and EWAR, they balk at wardec mechanics, and constantly shout for more low and mid slots and natural EHP on their dumb freaking barges, so they don't have to do anything but park in a belt and go AFK. They beg and plead to remove local, they scream and cry about buffing highsec. Let's not even go into the removal of "drone poo", and the upcoming nerf to refining modules and ships..... "gunmining" is all but dead, already, and it's about to get worse.

We've borne the brunt of their deplorable behavior for far too long. This is honestly the first time in 10 years that I've been pissed off about something in this game. I am SICK AND TIRED of carebears acting like idiots and being given nearly everything they ask for.
I want my old EVE back. I'm not going to threaten to unsub, because, let's face it.... I've been here since the beta, in one toon or another, and Garamonde is going to be my main personna for the rest of the time EVE exists. I'm too invested in this game to quit, now. Especially over something this dumb.

But, seriously. Give the easiest players to please a bone, every now and again. We're the ones who deserve it. We're the ones who are still going to be here.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Daedalus Hades
Tax Optimization
#76 - 2014-03-29 13:50:44 UTC
2
Victor Andall
#77 - 2014-03-29 13:52:28 UTC
2, please.

I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?

19.08.2014 - Dinsdale gets slammed by CCP Falcon. Never forget.

Ali Aras
Nobody in Local
Deepwater Hooligans
#78 - 2014-03-29 14:22:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Ali Aras
I'm going to chime in here in more detail than I did on the other thread.

I had been advocating #2 behind the scenes, because it is the most consistent with the EVE I know and love. We have a good community full of reasonably mature, intelligent, and interesting people. It requires some careful oversight to avoid becoming a de-facto #1-- CCP as well as the community must exercise good judgement in interactions. That said, it gives the players the most opportunities for fun and preserves the sandbox aspect best. Those who are exceptionally bad actors will be removed, while those who just beat someone else at the game are left intact. #2 in some ways makes no-one happy-- for those concerned about safety, it says that CCP will only intervene in extreme cases, leaving minor unpleasantness untouched, and for those concerned about freedom, it means there are, somewhere, limits on behavior. To the first, I say HTFU, to the second, just remember your humanity.

#1 is untenable because it will, ultimately, prevent nothing. You can find your way around just about any rule, slip through the cracks, and the worst actors, those out for harassment and abuse, will use the rules as a tool to make themselves hard to catch. We're left with a rules-lawyering dragnet that picks up the people who were just having fun and leaves us back in a position of threadnaughts and friction when we need to ban someone harming the community.

#3 is the option for those who don't trust CCP or the other players. It's cynical, it'll hurt people, and it'll ultimately make the community worse off overall. We can't have #3 and also a healthy, thriving EVE.

Edit: I left this out but it feels pertinent to add back in-- I feel like CCP can adhere to #2 and their TOS / EULA at the same time. There were TOS / EULA sections that applied in the ero1 case; these will apply in any case worth banning over as well. #2 means leaving the TOS/EULA as they are, and not trying to add anything in after the fact to deal with the situation-- that's a #1 response.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#79 - 2014-03-29 14:22:47 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
#2

Harassment is a subjective thing. In most cases it isn't realistic to expect a clear cut definition of what it acceptable and what is not. Personally I think that the use of racial, ethnic, and homophobic slurs on any in-game communication with the intent to offend should be construed as harassment. I also feel that making threats of out-of-game retribution for in-game actions should also be considered harassment. However, I am aware that if those two things always resulted in bans then CCP would be required to ban 90% of the carebears in highsec, and nobody would want that.

I would not say that I would have handled the Erotica 1 situation the same way, were I in any position to make a decision on the matter. I also will not armchair quarterback it. In general, I trust CCP to make these tough calls about their own game and to live with the implications of what they decide.

*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!

Mario Putzo
#80 - 2014-03-29 14:26:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
While I would love 3 it is ultimately unattainable.

So 2 please.


Hey Malcanis Use this!

http://strawpoll.me/1400226/r