These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment

First post First post First post
Author
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1061 - 2014-03-29 00:29:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Bael Malefic wrote:


Decision didn't go your way. Rage and tears flow.

CCP made their decision. Their brand, their service, their right to interpret their rules however they see fit.

Get over it. You are free to leave if this is not acceptable.

Freedom to leave...now that *is* real freedom.


The EXACT SAME freedom the guy getting scammed had the ENTIRE TIME he was getting scammed.

That freedom you mean?


This point bears repeating to all those trying this slant on the argument by the way. Oh and before you scream about the decision not going my way, IM a highsec miner/carebear. IM defending their right to be able to kill/scam me lol

olan2005 wrote:


let me make it simple for you. All things in moderation. By not setting iron clad rules CCP have protected the metagame and your right to extort , or blow stuff up IN-game . But again all things in moderation. Just scam them , steal from them. spy on them. hold there ship to ransom in-game in exchange for isk . Just dont torment people for hours on end , for the sole purpose of breaking them .



I said that pages ago.

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Ssieth
Celestial Inc
Dracarys.
#1062 - 2014-03-29 00:32:25 UTC
olan2005 wrote:

let me make it simple for you. All things in moderation. By not setting iron clad rules CCP have protected the metagame and your right to extort , or blow stuff up IN-game . But again all things in moderation. Just scam them , steal from them. spy on them. hold there ship to ransom in-game in exchange for isk . Just dont torment people for hours on end , for the sole purpose of breaking them .


Olan makes a saliant point here. For those who keep pushing for hard and fast rules - make sure you know what it is you're asking for and what the likely consequences are likely to be. If you push CCP into laying down a line then expect it to be very far from where you would want it be.

W-Spacer.  Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#1063 - 2014-03-29 00:32:51 UTC
Ssieth wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Am I going to find myself banned for some action I've forgotten about? Maybe when I made someone sing for their T2 exploration frigate out in nullsec last year? Someone unrelated to the event is going to decide that I'm evilbadfeelshatetorturebanned as a result? Or is it that only a CSM member can get someone banned like that?


Can you be held to the ToS/EULA despite having forgotten that you breached them? Yes, clearly. A poor memory is very rarely much of a defence for anything.

Going to an extreme real world example (as it's often easiest to demonstrate a general principal at extremis): if you killed someone 20 years ago and burried the bodies, you could ewell expect to be hauled to jail when they dug them up regardless of a hell of a lot of time passing.

You can't expect chronological distance to be a defence for breaching the rules. The simple rule of thimb should be to stay clear of EULA/ToS violation if you want to stay clear of trouble and don't rely on burrying the evidence long enough that folks thing it's a past transgression not worth digging up.


But none of those things were against the rules.

And apparently they still aren't, unless I get on Ripard Teg's bad side.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Mario Putzo
#1064 - 2014-03-29 00:33:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when the member who was wronged asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1065 - 2014-03-29 00:33:20 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
It's clear the one they've had for a while is not the same, since Erotica 1 is now banned and previously wasn't, despite not changing his MO.


It clearly is the same, or they would have announced to have changed it.

You are speculating on things you do not know, namely how long CCP has (or has not been) investigating and following Erotica1's activities + time for deliberation on what action to take.

You are implying things you have no evidence for.
How is there no evidence? Erotica 1 has been doing and publishing these for a long time, go ahead, look it up. Therefore if they are even remotely competent and they have been enforcing their rules all along, nothing would have happened. Instead there's a sudden announcement and banning. Clearly something must have changed.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1066 - 2014-03-29 00:34:53 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when a member of the community asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.


So shouldnt this guy get banned? He's torturing Erotica by denying him the ability to play

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1067 - 2014-03-29 00:35:41 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
It's clear the one they've had for a while is not the same, since Erotica 1 is now banned and previously wasn't, despite not changing his MO.


It clearly is the same, or they would have announced to have changed it.

You are speculating on things you do not know, namely how long CCP has (or has not been) investigating and following Erotica1's activities + time for deliberation on what action to take.

You are implying things you have no evidence for.
How is there no evidence? Erotica 1 has been doing and publishing these for a long time, go ahead, look it up. Therefore if they are even remotely competent and they have been enforcing their rules all along, nothing would have happened. Instead there's a sudden announcement and banning. Clearly something must have changed.


Ya, Id like to see that change in writing, not in "probablies"

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Upde
Upde Harris Industries
#1068 - 2014-03-29 00:36:31 UTC
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:


The game he was playing, I thought Eve was about shooting space pixels, I didn't realise it also involved being humiliated and then having a recording of it all placed on the internet.

Must of missed that part on the advertising, need to ask CCP to make a promo vid.


We've already gone over this, he was scammed and then given the run around for a little in TS, it's no worse than a trash talk in local. Plenty of others went through the same thing and didn't react like a lunatic because they understood being scammed and wound up is a possibility.


so 2 hours of what was then a publicly published humiliation is "the run around for a little in TS" ???

what transpired today is a direct result of a group of people not knowing the difference between a game and taking things too far out of a game. The game ended once the scam was complete. everything else that followed was simply for some depraved people to get a spot of mental masturbatory pleasure. YOu can cut a shitsandwich 5 ways and the filling is still going to be ****.
olan2005
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1069 - 2014-03-29 00:36:56 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when a member of the community asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.


So shouldnt this guy get banned? He's torturing Erotica by denying him the ability to play


ITS CCP who was the ultimate judge and executioner. Riptard simply brought it to everyone attention . And people reacted based on their views and opinions of acceptable behavior. CCP did the same
Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#1070 - 2014-03-29 00:39:04 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when a member of the community asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.


So shouldnt this guy get banned? He's torturing Erotica by denying him the ability to play


Only if you leave out the part where the rest of CSM and CCP agreed to take action on this issue, and only if you ignore the fact that Ripard by himself can't issue bans to the game. And only if by torturing Erotica you mean telling the truth about him.
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1071 - 2014-03-29 00:39:45 UTC
olan2005 wrote:
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when a member of the community asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.


So shouldnt this guy get banned? He's torturing Erotica by denying him the ability to play


ITS CCP who was the ultimate judge and executioner. Riptard simply brought it to everyone attention . And people reacted based on their views and opinions of acceptable behavior. CCP did the same


Interestingly, Kugutsumen did the same, was banned and mentioning his name was filtered on the forums for upwards of seven years. SO to go by CCP's history here, Riptard should be banned as well.

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Snupe Doggur
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#1072 - 2014-03-29 00:41:01 UTC
It's not complicated. CCP becomes aware of the sick stuff going on, and decides to end its association with an offender.

CCP cannot police everything that happens on private chat servers, and might never have learned about the Bonus Room. When the cyberbullies publish to the web, however, word gets around and eventually finds its way to the GMs. No cloak-and-dagger theories need be invented to explain some mysterious delay.

And nothing need have changed inside CCP for them to have decided not to allow EVE to be a part of the bullying.
Lazrim
Doomheim
#1073 - 2014-03-29 00:41:48 UTC
I have no dog in this particular fight, but I have been playing this game off and on for about ten years. Mostly off due to RL time constraints, but I've still seen lots of things come and go.
From a fairly disinterested and jaundiced eye I will say in this episode that Ripard Teg et al. (bloggers etc.) are no different than Erotica 1. Both parties are creepy in their own particular way.
Erotica 1 used in game scams to facilitate a meta-game where he could cause RL anguish to fellow players.
Ripard Teg et al. used their blogs to facilitate (by manipulating CCP?) a meta-game where they could cause RL anguish to Erotica 1.
So, EVE is still EVE and all parties involved, in this episode, have much more in common than they may realize.

Ssieth
Celestial Inc
Dracarys.
#1074 - 2014-03-29 00:42:50 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Ssieth wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Am I going to find myself banned for some action I've forgotten about? Maybe when I made someone sing for their T2 exploration frigate out in nullsec last year? Someone unrelated to the event is going to decide that I'm evilbadfeelshatetorturebanned as a result? Or is it that only a CSM member can get someone banned like that?


Can you be held to the ToS/EULA despite having forgotten that you breached them? Yes, clearly. A poor memory is very rarely much of a defence for anything.

Going to an extreme real world example (as it's often easiest to demonstrate a general principal at extremis): if you killed someone 20 years ago and burried the bodies, you could ewell expect to be hauled to jail when they dug them up regardless of a hell of a lot of time passing.

You can't expect chronological distance to be a defence for breaching the rules. The simple rule of thimb should be to stay clear of EULA/ToS violation if you want to stay clear of trouble and don't rely on burrying the evidence long enough that folks thing it's a past transgression not worth digging up.


But none of those things were against the rules.

And apparently they still aren't, unless I get on Ripard Teg's bad side.


CCP disagree and the long and short of it is that it's their rules and their decision. If you don't like that fact you need to take it up with them. Fortunately they've provided a nice button for petitioning and another nice button to unsubscribe if you _really_ don't like the result.

W-Spacer.  Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1075 - 2014-03-29 00:42:57 UTC
Snupe Doggur wrote:
It's not complicated. CCP becomes aware of the sick stuff going on, and decides to end its association with an offender.

CCP cannot police everything that happens on private chat servers, and might never have learned about the Bonus Room. When the cyberbullies publish to the web, however, word gets around and eventually finds its way to the GMs. No cloak-and-dagger theories need be invented to explain some mysterious delay.

And nothing need have changed inside CCP for them to have decided not to allow EVE to be a part of the bullying.


Right, just dont publish it and youre good to go. Oh, also; brain **** your target so they wont tell on you.

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Mario Putzo
#1076 - 2014-03-29 00:44:54 UTC
olan2005 wrote:
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
The fact is Ripard Teg stepped out of line by instigating and encouraging a "witch hunt". He wrote a blog story in which he publicly harassed an individual of this community, and shared that story with the broader MMO community. Not once did he ask Sohkar for his opinion on his experience, nor did he ask other past Bonus Room clients, this was solely his own vendetta against a player of this community who had without CCP involvement of any kind done this same thing to hundreds of people for nearly a year.

If this was truly a case of harassment and stepping outside the lines, then where was the ban, or warning about such things a A month ago when this particular incident was first shared with the community, 3 months ago, 6 months ago, a year ago?
Yet I am sure Ripard Teg is free of his involvement in this, he is freed of his harassment of both Erotica1 and Sohkar, whom was ejected from his corporation not because of "The Bonus Room" but because Ripard Teg put him into the public spotlight.

Frankly I think the most disgusting part of this is that a representative of this community took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner, when that should solely lie with CCP, and only be implemented when a member of the community asks them to investigate an issue.

By all rights this scenario should have been between the Client, CCP and Erotica1, not Ripard Teg, not his Jesters Trek Blog, not the MMO community, and certainly not the numerous White Knights who mounted their horses and marched off to a 400 page threadnaught calling for heads to roll.

If anyone should be banned for this it should be Ripard Teg, and his clear button pushing that has impacted Sohkar far more than anything Erotica1 did, the game moving forward for him is now forever changed, because Ripard wanted to settle a personal vendetta.


So shouldnt this guy get banned? He's torturing Erotica by denying him the ability to play


ITS CCP who was the ultimate judge and executioner. Riptard simply brought it to everyone attention . And people reacted based on their views and opinions of acceptable behavior. CCP did the same


No he put the fire into everyone. Anyone who has actually followed this game, or been active in the community, or posts on the forums has seen not 1 but literally dozens of Bonus Room shamings. This is not a new thing, it has been going on for a year, and it has only become an issue now, after Ripard Teg took it upon himself to vilify a member of the community for his own personal gratification.

Do you think Ripard cares about Sohkar? I don't. If he did he would have asked Sohkars thoughts on the subject, he would have asked if Sohkar thought it was ok for him to write about his experience, he would have asked Sohkar if it was ok with him that he would be thrust into the community limelight.

But he didn't, he punched up at least 3 different stories about this, without once asking Sohkar's opinion, nor for his consent in rehashing a month old experience.

If you think Ripard had "the best interests of the community at heart" you are kidding yourself. The only thing Ripard cares about is page views and vindication.
Ssieth
Celestial Inc
Dracarys.
#1077 - 2014-03-29 00:45:30 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Right, just dont publish it and youre good to go. Oh, also; brain **** your target so they wont tell on you.


As has been stated every time this argument has come up so far on this thread, not getting caught _probably_ is a good way not to get punished. Not doing anything that you can be caught doing is probably the best way of not getting caught.

W-Spacer.  Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#1078 - 2014-03-29 00:45:58 UTC
Ssieth wrote:

CCP disagree and the long and short of it is that it's their rules and their decision. If you don't like that fact you need to take it up with them. Fortunately they've provided a nice button for petitioning and another nice button to unsubscribe if you _really_ don't like the result.


CCP didn't disagree with the actions of E1 for more than a year. It only became against the rules when Ripard Teg decided it should be.

Like I said, I made someone sing for their explo frigate last year. They were pretty mad.

Am I randomly going to get banned, now? It's been ok for a year or more, is it going to stop being ok out of the blue?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#1079 - 2014-03-29 00:46:02 UTC
Lazrim wrote:
I have no dog in this particular fight, but I have been playing this game off and on for about ten years. Mostly off due to RL time constraints, but I've still seen lots of things come and go.
From a fairly disinterested and jaundiced eye I will say in this episode that Ripard Teg et al. (bloggers etc.) are no different than Erotica 1. Both parties are creepy in their own particular way.
Erotica 1 used in game scams to facilitate a meta-game where he could cause RL anguish to fellow players.
Ripard Teg et al. used their blogs to facilitate (by manipulating CCP?) a meta-game where they could cause RL anguish to Erotica 1.
So, EVE is still EVE and all parties involved, in this episode, have much more in common than they may realize.



Lol, the new meagame is to get CCP to ban ppl for you.

Hey wait, the Goons have been doing that for years Shocked

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1080 - 2014-03-29 00:46:34 UTC
Snupe Doggur wrote:
It's not complicated. CCP becomes aware of the sick stuff going on, and decides to end its association with an offender.

CCP cannot police everything that happens on private chat servers, and might never have learned about the Bonus Room. When the cyberbullies publish to the web, however, word gets around and eventually finds its way to the GMs. No cloak-and-dagger theories need be invented to explain some mysterious delay.

And nothing need have changed inside CCP for them to have decided not to allow EVE to be a part of the bullying.
lol
They were aware. Not only was it public, when this actual recording happened there was a whole bunch of threadnaughts then too. I'm willing to say with 100% certainty that CCP knew about this before.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.