EVE General Discussion

you keep replying that without giving any proof for your claims of banned accounts. shut up or give a proof.

Well it needs to be reevaluated.

It's giving multiboxers an unfair advantage they would normally not have without the program's existence.

At one point in time it was legal to own people. Things change, and so did the legality.

It's now known that 1 person using software to control 20 accounts gains him an unfair advantage over people trying to control 20 accounts individually. I mean, if there wasn't a need for it, it wouldn't have been invented.

Considering that their own EULA states people aren't allowed to use automation software to help them acquire resources faster than ordinary play, immediately stating afterwards that multi-boxing is allowed is a direct contradiction of their own EULA.

It's very obvious that the reason people using multiboxing programs do so because it helps them control their ships faster/easier/more efficiently. Instead of alt-tabbing between twenty different accounts, they get to control them all with singular keystrokes being automatically multiplied and dispersed to each account. Ordinary game play would be alt tabbing and telling each ship it's commands individually. 3rd party multiboxing software allows it to be done en masse through automation.

They contradict themselves, and the only option is to ask "why?"

$$$$$$$

You seem to be unfamiliar with the logistics and organisation required to simultaneously gank 20 ships in high-sec.

The supply of mining ships and modules in high-sec is for all intents and purposes inexhaustible, and they are readily available from the ice-belts in-system stations.

The cost is negligible compared to how fast you recoup the cost once the ship is icing in the field.

I understand you dont "get" it. But thats because you are not accepting the facts or refusing to recognise them.

Tell me, how does multiboxing software allow 20 accounts to acquire resources faster than another 20 accounts?

no its not. its a well defined term outside of CCPs world.
You missed one important point, we argue not about multiboxing as such but about automated multiboxing isboxer is for.


you seriously refering to an even for 5 years? In 2009 the problem of isbox wasnt an issue like it is today, you keep saying CCP bans thousands of accounts on present term but fail to give any proof of it in present time how many accounts CCP is banning TODAY.


it is advantage, you handle a fleet you wouldnt be able to handle without 3rd party software like that.
In a multiplayer game your advantage is always over other players.


link to bans?
isbox is automated tool per common definition.

Fact: You are incorrect.

…and in CCP's world, only CCP's definition matters. By their definition, multiboxing is not automation.

That was the first large and highly publicised one, that even received its own dev blog. Others have followed, with less fanfare. You can find bits and bobs about them in various fanfest economy and security talks and in the occasional CSM transcript.

What advantage? How do these 5 (or whatever) accounts perform better or do more than any 5 other accounts?

…which is utterly irrelevant since only CCP's definition matters in relation to the EULA CCP has written.
Oh, and don't ask for links to information you've already found. It's silly and dishonest.

Talking about avatars, yours resembles an elephants arse.
R u mad?
*stares at you intently, cross-eyed*


Aint worth it.

Hence, proliferation of multibox ice-mining fleets throughout high-sec. Hence TNO.
But its still not a profitable endevour to gank them. Thats just how the game is, atm.

In what way?

Its not grey, or large and it doesnt have a tail.




Wtf has profit got to do with it?

If you have a problem with them, kill them.

If you dont, why are you arguing with me?

Yup isboxer is allowed because it enables a stealth P2W model. CCP Drones can fk off.