These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Isboxer, why is it allowed?

First post First post
Author
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#261 - 2014-03-25 04:41:49 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:

But considering CCP allows this form of botting, it's safe to come to the conclusion that CCP will allow people to cheat as long as they get paid.


There's only one way to find out...


Yet they wont answer.

Probably because they feel it would look bad that they'll allow cheating for more money.

Even though everyone already knows it.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#262 - 2014-03-25 04:44:23 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:

But considering CCP allows this form of botting, it's safe to come to the conclusion that CCP will allow people to cheat as long as they get paid.


There's only one way to find out...


Yet they wont answer.

Probably because they feel it would look bad that they'll allow cheating for more money.

Even though everyone already knows it.


I did not mean to suggest that you ask them.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#263 - 2014-03-25 05:12:51 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Probably because they feel it would look bad that they'll allow cheating for more money.

Even though everyone already knows it.

Since CCP set the rules, "cheating" may be too strong a word..

We may not like it, but it is what it is and cheating it doesn't seem to be.
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#264 - 2014-03-25 06:35:08 UTC
IsBoxer is allowed for a very simple reason: CCP would be in deep trouble without it.
The amount of people that run multiple accounts, and a LOT of multiple accounts, is a big part of their sub base.

And if you look at the natural extension of the destruction of mining in high sec (yeah folks, the refine nerfs will hammer it, regardless of what the null sec cartel propagandists lie about here), plus the enormous gift to sov null sec mining, CCP WANTS people to run huge mining ops in null. You can be guaranteed that if you ever see massive mining fleets in the rental systems, they will be run by only a few people.

So without IsBoxer, CCP is really hammering itself.
Of course, these idiotic nerfs to high sec refining are going to hammer the subscription base, so I CCP has proven they don't seem to care much about income.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#265 - 2014-03-25 06:46:14 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
...CCP has proven...


Your standards of evidence or proof leave much to be desired.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#266 - 2014-03-25 07:26:04 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

If you have a program that lets you tell multiple accounts, with one click, to lock those crosses, and then with one more click to fire on them, that is legal.

The accounts are not taking more actions with the use of ISBoxer than the number of clicks you made. You're simply letting more accounts use the same number of clicks.

yep, the software does something, you should be doing. If you fly 5 ships you should click them all by yourself, but not automated by some tool, this is botting.

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

False. It's turning one click into one click, for twenty accounts.

1 click for 20 accounts are technically 20 clicks - you click once, the tool replicates 19 other clicks for you automatically.


Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

And no single account involved receives more than one set of input per mouse click.

Which is where the line is drawn.

CCP draws the line at your money, this is.
Single account or not is pretty irrelevant for the term automation, where CCP draws the line of their EULA is not the question here.

Remiel Pollard wrote:

No one that multiboxes with or without ISBoxer has ever had an advantage over me so, I don't know what you're doing wrong.

this thread is not about you but isboxer, automation and CCPs greed.
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#267 - 2014-03-25 07:30:05 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
IsBoxer is allowed for a very simple reason: CCP would be in deep trouble without it.
The amount of people that run multiple accounts, and a LOT of multiple accounts, is a big part of their sub base.


noone argues about multiboxing but 3rd party tool allowing automation of multiboxing by input broadcast.
Yes, CCP protects their cash cow as long as doesnt too much harm to their income (more isboxed accounts than people unsubscribing because of it).
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#268 - 2014-03-25 07:34:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Robert Caldera wrote:
...CCPs greed.


Let me know one day when you're running a business of you're own, how that works out for you. Or, when you've learned to live without money. Until then, don't even pretend like CCP's greed is a thing worth discussing in comparison to easily more than 90% of other companies out there, or is anything near a factor here, because if it was, they wouldn't ban anything.

Part of maintaining a consistent income from a product like this is reputation. Reputation means they have to care about the players, even if they don't want to. There are just way too many mongs like you who blame everything 'wrong' a company does on them being greedy. If that was the case, and everything they did was STRICTLY for money, and no other reason at all, then most of those companies wouldn't have made it to where they are today.

Every time I see someone blame something they don't like about this game on 'CCP's greed' I know I'm reading the product of a mind that could never succeed in business.

It really is just the default 'go-to' argument for you lot when something doesn't go the way you want it to in games - the company must be greedy, and not care about their product at all. It's not like an artist doesn't sell his paintings or anything, or a sculptor his statues, or a composer his music. No, none of them are trying to make money from their work at all.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#269 - 2014-03-25 07:34:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Divine Entervention
If I use my keyboard to create a "macro" off of one keystroke that does 9 more keystrokes, equaling a total of 10 keystrokes from 1 initial, that's wrong.

Yet if someone uses a 3rd party, downloaded piece of software where they use 1 keystroke and it gets repeated 19 times to 19 other accounts equaling 20 keystrokes, it's allowed.

On one hand, automation is bad. On the other, it's OK.

That's not right. It's a biased choice where cheating is being allowed since CCP profits from it.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#270 - 2014-03-25 07:38:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Divine Entervention wrote:
If I use my keyboard to create a "macro" off of one keystroke that does 9 more keystrokes, equaling a total of 10 keystrokes from 1 initial, that's wrong.


Uh... no it's not. I use a programmable keyboard, a Razor Black Widow. When I push M1, it pushes F1-F8 for me all at once. I can tell you that with confidence that I won't be banned because I'm still here, at the keyboard, in manual control of the game, rather than having a script warp my ship from belt to belt and shooting all the rats for me.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#271 - 2014-03-25 07:38:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Robert Caldera
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Let me know one day when you're running a business of you're own, how that works out for you. Or, when you've learned to live without money. Until then, don't even pretend like CCP's greed is a thing worth discussing in comparison to easily more than 90% of other companies out there, or is anything near a factor here, because if it was, they wouldn't ban anything.

Part of maintaining a consistent income from a product like this is reputation. Reputation means ...


im not blaming them for anything, I just want to keep clear the facts that CCP allows botting/automation because of money not because isbox is not an automation tool.
With all consequences for their reputation... Nothing else.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#272 - 2014-03-25 07:42:12 UTC
The way I see it, this is one of those issues that is always going to exist because new players that don't understand EVE and its rules will keep bringing it up. Every new wave of new players, there's gonna be a new 'ban ISBoxer' thread on the forums because new people don't get it. If they continue to not get it, then eventually they'll become vets that don't get it, and the game is full of them as well. Bottom line is, you just don't get it, but mostly because you're new. You'll continue to not get it if you're not very good at absorbing new information.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#273 - 2014-03-25 07:42:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Divine Entervention wrote:
If I use my keyboard to create a "macro" off of one keystroke that does 9 more keystrokes, equaling a total of 10 keystrokes from 1 initial, that's wrong.

Yet if someone uses a 3rd party, downloaded piece of software where they use 1 keystroke and it gets repeated 19 times to 19 other accounts equaling 20 keystrokes, it's allowed.

On one hand, automation is bad. On the other, it's OK.
…because one is actual automation of gameplay and the other is not.

Quote:
It's a biased choice where cheating is being allowed since CCP profits from it.
If it were a matter of profit, CCP would allow far more things than multiboxing. The notion that it's about profit becomes downright silly and ignorant when you look at the thousands of accounts they close down on a regular basis.

The profit argument simply does not gel with reality, nor does the argument that multiboxing provides any kind of advantage. If it did, it would be on the ban list as well, but since it only ever does the same as the same amount of accounts can already do (actually less, since there is no individual flexibility in action) it stays off that list.

Robert Caldera wrote:
I just want to keep clear the facts that CCP allows botting/automation because of money not because isbox is not an automation tool.
Just one problem with that “fact”: CCP does not allow botting/automation, not even for money.
They ban botters and players using automation tools by the thousands.
Prince Kobol
#274 - 2014-03-25 07:42:23 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Let me know one day when you're running a business of you're own, how that works out for you. Or, when you've learned to live without money. Until then, don't even pretend like CCP's greed is a thing worth discussing in comparison to easily more than 90% of other companies out there, or is anything near a factor here, because if it was, they wouldn't ban anything.

Part of maintaining a consistent income from a product like this is reputation. Reputation means ...


im not blaming them for anything, I just want to keep clear the facts that CCP allows botting/automation because of money not because isbox is not an automation tool.
With all consequences for their reputation... Nothing else.


Until you are able to tell the difference between a bot and IS Boxer any argument you make is invalid.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#275 - 2014-03-25 07:43:52 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Let me know one day when you're running a business of you're own, how that works out for you. Or, when you've learned to live without money. Until then, don't even pretend like CCP's greed is a thing worth discussing in comparison to easily more than 90% of other companies out there, or is anything near a factor here, because if it was, they wouldn't ban anything.

Part of maintaining a consistent income from a product like this is reputation. Reputation means ...


im not blaming them for anything, I just want to keep clear the facts that CCP allows botting/automation because of money not because isbox is not an automation tool.
With all consequences for their reputation... Nothing else.


Except that they don't allow botting or automation by modification. It's in the EULA. Maybe try reading it one day.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Prince Kobol
#276 - 2014-03-25 07:45:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Tippia wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
If I use my keyboard to create a "macro" off of one keystroke that does 9 more keystrokes, equaling a total of 10 keystrokes from 1 initial, that's wrong.

Yet if someone uses a 3rd party, downloaded piece of software where they use 1 keystroke and it gets repeated 19 times to 19 other accounts equaling 20 keystrokes, it's allowed.

On one hand, automation is bad. On the other, it's OK.
…because one is actual automation of gameplay and the other is not.

Quote:
It's a biased choice where cheating is being allowed since CCP profits from it.
If it were a matter of profit, CCP would allow far more things than multiboxing. The notion that it's about profit becomes downright silly and ignorant when you look at the thousands of accounts they close down on a regular basis.

The profit argument simply does not gel with reality, nor does the argument that multiboxing provides any kind of advantage. If it did, it would be on the ban list as well, but since it only ever does the same as the same amount of accounts can already do (actually less, since there is no individual flexibility in action) it stays off that list.


I agree with everything expect the part about ISboxer giving an advantage.

It gives me an advantage when mission running with my alts.

It significantly lessens the amount of micro management and increases my efficiency.

I am able to run missions quicker which in turns allows me to earn more LP then I would be doing by having to control x number of accounts separately.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#277 - 2014-03-25 07:48:11 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
I agree with everything expect the part about ISboxer giving an advantage.

It gives me an advantage when mission running with my alts.

It significantly lessens the amount of micro management and increases my efficiency.

I am able to run missions quicker which in turns allows me to earn more LP then I would be doing by having to control x number of accounts separately.

Do you earn more than any other group of people running the same number of accounts?
ImYourMom
Retribution Holdings Corp
Retribution.
#278 - 2014-03-25 07:54:42 UTC  |  Edited by: ImYourMom
what the hell as isboxer got to do with botting? isboxer is not a botting program at all. isboxer is just about having multi accounts showing on one screen really and the ability to control them.

there is nothing wrong with it, you are still playing the game, you cant go afk and it does it all for you. So if i have 10 accounts do you expect someone to have 10 screens, 10 mice, 10 keyboards?

isboxer is the best thing to happen for multiboxing. nothing wrong with it at all. ITS NOT A BOTTING PROGRAM!

now they may use another program to do the botting but thats not isboxer.
Erin Crawford
#279 - 2014-03-25 08:04:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Erin Crawford
I doubt very much that CCP banning / disallowing the use of Isboxer would have anything to do with 'cheating,' "increased efficiency," automation, etc...
It all comes down to CCP getting more $$$ from more active accounts used by a single player. And if they're not getting more $$$ then they can use said active accounts to promote how popular the game is and how many 'active players' they have.

Endlessly discussing and nitpicking over the EULA is pretty much pointless: CCP will probably only ban / disallow use of Isboxer once they start losing $$$ - then and only then.
Simple.

"Those who talk don’t know. Those who know don’t talk. "

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#280 - 2014-03-25 08:05:04 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
If I use my keyboard to create a "macro" off of one keystroke that does 9 more keystrokes, equaling a total of 10 keystrokes from 1 initial, that's wrong.


Not only is it not "wrong", its not against the eve online rules.
Looping your macro unattended while you sleep at night on the other hand is botting and an EULA violation.

Today's schools really need to teach critical thinking and reading comprehension, the lack of it is on ugly display in this topic.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~