These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Auto Click Software?

Author
I Riven I
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2014-03-23 22:02:11 UTC
So what you guys saying is that keith eaton and all the isds that use macro keys to answer questions on the help channel should be banned??

Because they are typing faster than what they would if they werent using macros and hotkeys.

I can have a hotkey that when i press it mines in my hulk for 23.5 hours.. its just a hotkey, not a bot.. right?
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#42 - 2014-03-23 22:05:53 UTC
I Riven I wrote:
So what you guys saying is that keith eaton and all the isds that use macro keys to answer questions on the help channel should be banned??

Because they are typing faster than what they would if they werent using macros and hotkeys.

I can have a hotkey that when i press it mines in my hulk for 23.5 hours.. its just a hotkey, not a bot.. right?


If you go by the EULA, the hotkeys for the ISDs are not banned. Because they don't "facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status".

The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#43 - 2014-03-23 22:12:07 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
Flawed logic.
Logic used by CCP. You may not like it, but it's the one you need to follow.

Quote:
Using 20 accounts perfectly is something that cannot be done before.
Yes it is. It's actually really really simple.

And again, 20 accounts acquiring goods at the same rate as every other group of 20 accounts means there is no accelerated rate.
An AFK person traveling as fast as an at-keyboard person means there is.

Quote:
The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.
CCP aren't players, so they don't have to play by the rules. And the difference between multiboxing and macro use has already been explained.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#44 - 2014-03-23 22:19:33 UTC
Tippia wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
Flawed logic.
Logic used by CCP. You may not like it, but it's the one you need to follow.

Quote:
Using 20 accounts perfectly is something that cannot be done before.
Yes it is. It's actually really really simple.

And again, 20 accounts acquiring goods at the same rate as every other group of 20 accounts means there is no accelerated rate.
An AFK person traveling as fast as an at-keyboard person means there is.

Quote:
The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.
CCP aren't players, so they don't have to play by the rules. And the difference between multiboxing and macro use has already been explained.


A player playing on one screen, and having those actions artificially repeated onto 19 other screens is accelerated rate. They will do what they are doing 20x better than a single pilot. Without doing more "work".

ISboxer:
Same work but many times more reward.

So you agree CCP logic is flawed and you still try to defend it? Lol
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#45 - 2014-03-23 22:21:34 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
A player playing on one screen, and having those actions artificially repeated onto 19 other screens is accelerated rate.
No. It's still just 20 accounts working at the rate of 20 accounts. No acceleration there.

Quote:
So you agree CCP logic is flawed and you still try to defend it? Lol
Nope.
Miomeifeng Alduin
Lithonauts Inc.
#46 - 2014-03-23 22:34:45 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
Tippia wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
Flawed logic.
Logic used by CCP. You may not like it, but it's the one you need to follow.

Quote:
Using 20 accounts perfectly is something that cannot be done before.
Yes it is. It's actually really really simple.

And again, 20 accounts acquiring goods at the same rate as every other group of 20 accounts means there is no accelerated rate.
An AFK person traveling as fast as an at-keyboard person means there is.

Quote:
The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.
CCP aren't players, so they don't have to play by the rules. And the difference between multiboxing and macro use has already been explained.


A player playing on one screen, and having those actions artificially repeated onto 19 other screens is accelerated rate. They will do what they are doing 20x better than a single pilot. Without doing more "work".

ISboxer:
Same work but many times more reward.

So you agree CCP logic is flawed and you still try to defend it? Lol


Even if its flawed: you wont get it changed, so tough luck. They dont need to be logical, they just make the rules on which you can either accept and play, or decline and stop playing ;). Hell, they could say only non mining bots are bannable, and there's nothing you could do about it :p (not saying any bot is legal :p)
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#47 - 2014-03-23 22:51:38 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
I talked to the GMs and they weren't very helpful. They were so vague and wouldn't confirm or deny anything.

They directed me to the EULA and technically what I want to do should be okay. However the ELUA is so vague also that it raises uncertainty.

I think if somebody is allowed to ISbox 20+ accounts and make billions of isk, this shouldn't really be cared about either.


Fair enough, just try not to be too upset when it happens.


I'll just point to the EULA and the multiboxers.
And the record will show that I asked on the forums and the GMs.
Multiboxers have to click. Previously CCP have stated that as long as a physical click happens it doesn't matter how many simultaneous client clicks that generates, but if a click is generated without a physical click, then it's bannable. so what you have, which is essentially an autopilot bot, is very very bannable.

If I can find the CCP quote I'll link it.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Terminator 2
Omega Boost
#48 - 2014-03-23 23:04:15 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
I Riven I wrote:
So what you guys saying is that keith eaton and all the isds that use macro keys to answer questions on the help channel should be banned??

Because they are typing faster than what they would if they werent using macros and hotkeys.

I can have a hotkey that when i press it mines in my hulk for 23.5 hours.. its just a hotkey, not a bot.. right?


If you go by the EULA, the hotkeys for the ISDs are not banned. Because they don't "facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status".

The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.


Please give a specific reference as to where CCP has announced that ISboxer is allowed to be used with EVE.

Also please enlighten us on how you have determined that certain people definitely use ISboxer and not anything else or some software at all.

Finally i'm interested on your opinion on the banwaves of macro-users that occur once every year. How do you think pointing fingers to others will spare you from having action being taken on you?
Mario Putzo
#49 - 2014-03-23 23:12:28 UTC
It is against the EULA, and the EULA was specifically reworded to include auto click scripts.

1. EXPLOITS

An immediate permanent ban of an account may result if:

a. Investigation shows that a player has employed the use of an exploit tactic despite a public announcement being made to alert players they will be banned for using it.
b. A player who has been previously warned for exploiting and continues to exploit, whether using the same exploit or another.
c. An account holder guilty of employing “duping” exploits. Players found to have received the benefits of this exploit may also face reprimand, from removal of the items in question up to, and including, banning of their accounts.
d. A player has engaged in activity that intentionally causes others to lose connection, suffer latency issues (lag) or to crash to desktop (CTD).
e. A player renders himself invulnerable through the use of a bug.


f. A player has created, distributed or advertised an illegal 3rd party program (i.e. macro or cheat program) that disrupts game mechanics, is considered unfriendly or gives an unfair advantage by misusing game features in a way for which they were not intended.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#50 - 2014-03-23 23:18:51 UTC
Terminator 2 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
I Riven I wrote:
So what you guys saying is that keith eaton and all the isds that use macro keys to answer questions on the help channel should be banned??

Because they are typing faster than what they would if they werent using macros and hotkeys.

I can have a hotkey that when i press it mines in my hulk for 23.5 hours.. its just a hotkey, not a bot.. right?


If you go by the EULA, the hotkeys for the ISDs are not banned. Because they don't "facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status".

The same can be said about the auto clicker on the warp button, but it seems that CCP doesn't follow its own rules, because things like ISboxer are allowed and users have been banned for these kinds of macros before.


Please give a specific reference as to where CCP has announced that ISboxer is allowed to be used with EVE.

Also please enlighten us on how you have determined that certain people definitely use ISboxer and not anything else or some software at all.

Finally i'm interested on your opinion on the banwaves of macro-users that occur once every year. How do you think pointing fingers to others will spare you from having action being taken on you?


When a guy competes in the New Eden Open with ISboxer and nothing happens to him its obvious that CCP thinks its okay.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#51 - 2014-03-23 23:20:39 UTC  |  Edited by: LordOfDespair
Lucas Kell wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
I talked to the GMs and they weren't very helpful. They were so vague and wouldn't confirm or deny anything.

They directed me to the EULA and technically what I want to do should be okay. However the ELUA is so vague also that it raises uncertainty.

I think if somebody is allowed to ISbox 20+ accounts and make billions of isk, this shouldn't really be cared about either.


Fair enough, just try not to be too upset when it happens.


I'll just point to the EULA and the multiboxers.
And the record will show that I asked on the forums and the GMs.
Multiboxers have to click. Previously CCP have stated that as long as a physical click happens it doesn't matter how many simultaneous client clicks that generates, but if a click is generated without a physical click, then it's bannable. so what you have, which is essentially an autopilot bot, is very very bannable.

If I can find the CCP quote I'll link it.


So the solution is to buy a wireless mouse and carry it to the bathroom? Lol alright.


Seems like a cop out for ISboxer still... . But thats good information, thanks.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#52 - 2014-03-23 23:43:23 UTC
Tippia wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
A player playing on one screen, and having those actions artificially repeated onto 19 other screens is accelerated rate.
No. It's still just 20 accounts working at the rate of 20 accounts. No acceleration there.


An AFK mining bot is also just 1 account working at the rate of 1 account, yet that is illegal because the player is not physically doing the work.

By extension one could argue that the player is also not doing the physical work for 19 of the 20 accounts being multiboxed. The player is physically active for 1 account. The other 19 are essentially being AFK botted because it's not the player actually providing the input, it's the program.

Also it is clearly providing an advantage. When there are 20 miners in a belt and you have to activate them all manually it will take you at least a minute to activate all of them by hand. I'm sure with practice it could be done faster, but fact remains that you can never do it instantly across all windows.

So the obvious advantage, no matter how small, is that 1 minute it takes to get to the last window. That single minute you don't have to wait for action to start adds up over time. Do it for long enough and that minute turns into an hour. That hour turns into 6 hours. That 6 hours turns into 12 hours and so forth.

Without automation it is impossible for a player to physically command 20 accounts simultaneously. That's really all there is to it.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#53 - 2014-03-23 23:46:11 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
So I've made this little program that will click my mouse for me every 3 seconds.


I thought I'd use it to click jump to the next gate while I refill a drink or take a quick bathroom break.


What are the rules regarding this? I know that programs that do complex things like mining (lol) are banned obviously. But what about an auto clicker? All it does is just click the mouse.


Thanks!


I have a piece of software that tingles my jiffy every two seconds. Anybody interested?
Led Zeppelin420
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#54 - 2014-03-24 05:15:07 UTC
20 accounts working at the rate of 20 accounts......

LOLZ come on really ... are you going to try and tell me smoking doesn't cause cancer next

i don't know what this isboxer is nor do i care, but i can tell u that it is macroing, botting whatever u want to call it. Its just the next generation of it. There is no possible way for one preson to run 20 accounts at the same time. unless you have 20 hands and 20 computers and the brain power to do 20 tasks at once. or unless you have to have multiple accounts cuz that makes CCP happy in the pants.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#55 - 2014-03-24 05:23:22 UTC
Considering how everyone loves the idea of multiboxing, autoclick software should be allowed.

Even automated botting programs that mine while the player takes a nap.

We love automation here. Hell even a program that analyzes other's fits based off of the memory stored upon their "loading" in should be retrievable and useable. I mean, after killing that person you'd find out what their fit was anyways.

Make some 3rd party programs. If one camp will argue theirs is justified, they all should be justified.
Muestereate
Minions LLC
#56 - 2014-03-24 05:24:49 UTC
I disagree with a lot of the naysayers but who am I? I think its ok if you do it with a programmable keyboard. I've never looped but checked a while back as far as one key initiating multiple keystrokes consecutively. For incursions, One click turn on my tank. Now if its reading the screen and automating a whole trip warp to zero, I've heard of bans for autopilot infractions. I don't think your talking of that.
Klymer
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2014-03-24 05:25:17 UTC
gee...how did I know clicking(manually btw) on the last page of this thread, after just reading the title, that it would end up being an isboxer thread

Roll
Sarah McKnobbo
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#58 - 2014-03-24 07:45:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarah McKnobbo
If you do this and CCP detection systems pick it up, i'd put a large wager that you'll get banned. Pointing to a GM said 'ehhhhh maybe' or multiboxers won't help, if they decide to ban you, you're banned! You essentially want to circumvent the auto-pilot facility and the penalty you get for using it.

You want software to input commands with zero human input, that is the main distinction between what you want to do and what multi-boxing software does, multi-boxing requires human input which is then replicated.

But yeah, probably would have been best to keep quiet about it though Blink
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2014-03-24 08:24:04 UTC
All these whines about ISBoxer lately, you'd almost think someone...

Wait, never mind, not even worth getting into. The rules are actually quite clear, for anyone that qualifies as a halfwit. Any modification that makes it possible to do stuff in the game without requiring input from the user is what will get you in trouble. ISBoxer doesn't fall into that category, and neither does having multiple accounts logged in simultaneously. If you're jealous that one person is making more isk with multiple accounts than you are with just one, then I suggest moving to China where I hear they still have communism. If you think they aren't putting in the same amount of work per account that it takes to manage one, then I can only recommend attempting it yourself. Unless they are botting, which will get them in trouble.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Muestereate
Minions LLC
#60 - 2014-03-24 09:15:25 UTC
IS boxer is specifically distributed with a mining bot script