These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Proclus Diadochu For CSM9! *Thanks for the Support!*

First post First post
Author
Tyrant Scorn
#61 - 2014-03-14 13:58:40 UTC
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:
Tyrant Scorn wrote:
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:
Nobody else seems to be adding likes to your posts


Yeah, you're absolutely right... Getting likes is my number one goal !


Not suggesting it is but it is usually a reasonably good indication of how the community feels about your posting (In other words the general consensus is that yours blow regurgitated kebab chunks given the amount of trolling you have done and the amount of time you have been "posting"). Nicely avoided on the running for the CSM question though.



At Proc..........

Can you let us know your feelings on any kind of module or deployable intended to alter WH mass/timelines etc.

To me mass, and a healthy fear and awareness of what it can do to a blob fleet from null is what keeps the blocs at bay from our hallowed ground.

Thanks for commenting



I owe no one an explaination on why I am not running for csm. In fact, I contribute in other ways...
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#62 - 2014-03-15 22:05:13 UTC
As much as I appreciate debate. Could we perhaps keep the debate in this thread regarding the CSM9 election and possibly my candidacy in said election? I mean, you are welcome to continue this discussion and I'll even create a thread for you somewhere and facilitate this debate. I'll set up a WWF style banner and host the whole thing, but if you could keep this topic railed and on track, I'd very much appreciate it.

Thanks!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Jonny Copper
The Cadre Arareb Foundation
#63 - 2014-03-19 01:36:20 UTC
Debate? There is no debate. Its Proc4CSM9 or go home.

Nerd.
Zara Arran
Overload This
#64 - 2014-03-20 13:07:47 UTC
I am planning to put a few WH candidates on the top of my ballot who I think won't harm but rather facilitate the improvement of wormholes (and the rest of eve), you being one of them, but I would like to hear more what you stand for apart from communication...

Proclus Diadochu wrote:

... My promise to this community is to communicate and facilitate discussions, and barring NDA obligations, provide the highest level of transparency to this community. Some members of this community may wish to know my ideas for particular mechanics or ideas, and if asked, I will take the time to provide you with my thoughts and opinion, but my job as a CSM delegate will not be to work for CCP as a developer, my job will be to listen to you, understand your ideas and issues, and communicate them with CCP, then I will receive feedback, and within the limits that I’m allowed, communicate with you, the community, and further listen to your feedback. ...
.


Getting feedback from the community and deliver this to CCP and vice versa is I think indeed very important, but being able to weed out the good and bad suggestions/ideas is as well.. you cannot give CCP devs 300 ideas on every question. You might not always be getting the time needed to ask the community what they think either.

Therefore I would like to see at least some examples of your opinions/ideas/suggestions on matters that have been continuously been brought up on the WH forums (Black Hole effects, C4s, dread blapping, T3 blancing, etc.) or your own of course.
AssassinationsdoneWrong
Deep Core Mining Inc.
#65 - 2014-03-20 15:29:47 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
As much as I appreciate debate. Could we perhaps keep the debate in this thread
Thanks!


There was actually a question there under the "At Proc" bit and I did ask him to shimmy on over to WH's Forums to get pummeled.

GL

The Nexus 7's

What we fall short of in numbers we more than make up for in stupidity

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#66 - 2014-03-20 21:15:19 UTC
Zara Arran wrote:
Therefore I would like to see at least some examples of your opinions/ideas/suggestions on matters that have been continuously been brought up on the WH forums (Black Hole effects, C4s, dread blapping, T3 blancing, etc.) or your own of course.


Thank you Zara. I've edited my OP with your advice, and I will continue to update as issues and ideas are presented, resources become available, and articles are published. Hope this is in the direction that you intended :) Please feel free to provide further great advice!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#67 - 2014-03-20 21:19:22 UTC
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:
At Proc..........

Can you let us know your feelings on any kind of module or deployable intended to alter WH mass/timelines etc.

To me mass, and a healthy fear and awareness of what it can do to a blob fleet from null is what keeps the blocs at bay from our hallowed ground.

Thanks for commenting


Sorry for the oversight, and thanks for the reminder. I'm not personally in favor of any modules that impact Wormhole mass/duration. I think that rolling holes are easy enough for the most part, scanning has been made easy enough to scout a chain relatively quick, and any modules would likely disrupt the balance we have currently. So, I'd vote against any such module being implemented in wormholes. Thanks!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Sam Sabre
Fweddit
Free Range Chikuns
#68 - 2014-03-21 03:56:24 UTC
+1

Cool

S. Sabre ~ Fweddit ~ Casual Capsuleer www.casualcapsuleer.wordpress.com/

Henry Cummings
Daktaklakpak.
Mince n Tatties
#69 - 2014-03-21 19:15:56 UTC
Sam Sabre wrote:

S. Sabre ~ Fweddit ~ Casual Capsuleer
www.casualcapsuleer.wordpress.com/



Proclus Diadochu wrote:


I'm on to you, Sam. Whoever you are.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#70 - 2014-03-21 21:42:20 UTC
Henry Cummings wrote:
Sam is Proc is Sam is real


Confirming the confirmation of my esteemed Fwedditor and Henry's "discovery" Big smile

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#71 - 2014-03-21 22:02:30 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Henry Cummings wrote:
Sam is Proc is Sam is real


Confirming the confirmation of my esteemed Fwedditor and Henry's "discovery" Big smile


So, uh, how many of the other posters in here are your alts? Am I your alt?

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog

Trebor Deahdoow
Doomheim
#72 - 2014-03-21 22:59:55 UTC
Confirming there are a lot of impostors in this thread.

"I am not the CSM chairman you're looking for..."

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#73 - 2014-03-22 02:46:22 UTC
Trebor Deahdoow wrote:
Confirming there are a lot of impostors in this thread.


So awesome! Thanks for making this thread that much better. Between you and Twostep, this thread is getting classier...

Where's Mittens?

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#74 - 2014-03-22 02:48:09 UTC
Two step wrote:
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Henry Cummings wrote:
Sam is Proc is Sam is real


Confirming the confirmation of my esteemed Fwedditor and Henry's "discovery" Big smile


So, uh, how many of the other posters in here are your alts? Am I your alt?


Hah, just Sam. Although a Twostep alt would be cool to have, I suppose :)

However, saying "Founder of Fweddit" gives him away.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Winthorp
#75 - 2014-03-22 03:01:58 UTC
This "Altgate" scandal is not ok, i demand you pay your immediate fine.


Fine:
Arrow 100 Exotic dancers
Arrow 15 trit
Arrow 1 x Phoenix
Arrow 1000 red coats (To dwindle your stranglehold on the market)

Payment is to be made at SKY's home WH at the sun, deliverable in a Bhaal only. (*Bhaal may not survive)
Henry Cummings
Daktaklakpak.
Mince n Tatties
#76 - 2014-03-22 05:10:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Henry Cummings
Winthorp wrote:
This "Altgate" scandal is not ok, i demand you pay your immediate fine.


Fine:

Arrow 1000 red coats (To dwindle your stranglehold on the market)




GL with that one
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#77 - 2014-03-23 20:40:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Proclus Diadochu
CCP Fozzie leading a discussion on K162's and Signatures

My Thoughts:

By removing the option for probing and seeing a signature on scan, I feel that this will surely increase the risks and danger to wormholes. That being said, I'm of the opinion that making probing options delayed for any amount of time would unbalance the mechanic. If you can't scan, probe, see, or anything of a K162, then what option does the receiving end have?

This option gives the leg up to the aggressor without providing an alternative to those who are proactive on the receiving end of a wormhole. I am all for changing the discovery scanner to only allow an update upon session change or probing for new signatures, but making a K162 unprobable is not an option I support, Fozzie :)

Thanks for pushing discussion from the CCP side, you are doing good things. Let's go ahead and require probing to be required for Grav sites again. That is a fix that would help wormholes too. Thanks.

Please get involved in this discussion over in the Wormholes sub-forum!

Edit: There is also an extension of this discussion on Reddit.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#78 - 2014-03-24 10:51:01 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.



Edit: 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Asserted Invaluability
The Nexus 7's
#79 - 2014-03-24 14:34:18 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
*Snip* Please refrain from discussing forum moderation. ISD Ezwal.

I would still like an answer to a very sincere and pertinent question which is in response to the claims made by the candidate Proclus Diadochu and is highly appropriate given that it is a pivotal part of his claim to be a suitable candidate for wormholers on the CSM.

Do you, Proclus, ask the voting public to believe that your years of being a self-confessed max troller on all threads and a bully and that persona which you manifest it through has suddenly disappeared in the past 4 weeks and will never resurface as you represent WH's at the CSM and to CCP?

If so can you account for this reverse of character which any normal human being would find impossible to accomplish in such a short timescale?
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#80 - 2014-03-24 17:36:15 UTC
Asserted Invaluability wrote:

Do you, Proclus, ask the voting public to believe that your years of being a self-confessed max troller on all threads and a bully and that persona which you manifest it through has suddenly disappeared in the past 4 weeks and will never resurface as you represent WH's at the CSM and to CCP?

Let me first state that I'm most assuredly not the "max troller" and was definitely not in all threads.

To answer your question, if I say that I'm going to do something, I'm going to do that thing. In the past, I've told people I was going to evict them, I did exactly that. I've told people I was going to teach them PVP, and I did just that. I've told people I was going to start a Faction Warfare community for Reddit, and I did just that. I told people I was going to change my gaming style suitable to a position on the CSM, and I'm doing exactly that.

I'm running for CSM9. I'm communicating in a manner that is proper for a delegate and amicable to any players wishing to take the opportunity to communicate with me. That is what I need to do to be good at this job, and since this is a job I'm volunteering to take, I'm going to perform appropriately. You are welcome to PM your comms and we can chat, you can do exactly what Tyrant Scorn did, and we can talk about it. This wasn't some "I found God, and now I'm born again", this was that I decided to take on this responsibility and I'm going to perform accordingly.

If so can you account for this reverse of character which any normal human being would find impossible to accomplish in such a short timescale?

So in your opinion, it is impossible for someone to troll, bully, derail, or whatever in one post, then completely turn around and write a coherent post that at least attempts to conform to the rules and parameters of the forums, community, et al? Is this not exactly what you did here. You troll, name call, insult, bully, and attempt to derail in two threads, then you come in here, discuss moderation, and right after post "serious" questions and concerns. If your theory is correct, what you did is impossible... if you are a normal human.

The point is that I haven't reversed my real life "character". I play a game, and in real life, I don't extort, scam, harm, invade, and/or kill people, which is something that normal people don't do, which is something that people do in this game. You can't compare a person's playstyle to how they are in real life. The fact is that I was not a CSM, I was not a representative, but now I'm running to serve in this role. I am going to stop playing the game in the gamestyle I chose, and will serve as a CSM on CSM9 the way I should to best serve the communities I represent.

I sincerely hope this answers your questions, and I honestly would rather not debate you in this thread, as this isn't a debate thread. If you'd like to debate, chat, or whatever, I welcome you to convo me, shoot me some comms deets, or whatever else you'd like, and we can talk. This offer is always extended to anyone.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe