CSM Campaigns

Hello, my name is Riverini. I have been an avid EVE Online player for over six years. I am mostly known for my role in running the largest dedicated EVE Online news site; EVE News 24. Many of you, whom I might have had the pleasure of flying with will know my passion for this game. With that, as of now I would like to announce my candidacy for CSM. I hope to show all of you my desire to see EVE grow beyond the current state of stagnation. Most importantly- to give back to this community and help it grow for all of us, including you.

EVE Online is a great game, but a game which at the moment needs change; a better focus on unfinished efforts and much needed new features. At the moment a good deal of the development time is spent on making changes to appeal to as many players as possible, regardless of how beneficial these changes could actually be to the game. Something which goes in detriment of more pressing game changes, changes which indeed are big steps that so far CCP Games have neglected to take.

Let me tell you about my platform, which many of my peers have branded as an ambitious one. Yet, I do strongly feel that “ambition” is something which has always been lacking within the Council of Stellar Management.

Here are a few of the points on my platform:

- I will advise on the need for proper and long term conflict drivers, both in lawful (high security space) and in lawless space (low and null security). I feel the current and past CSM members have failed in this regard, and the current state of null warfare is proof of it.

- I believe static resources should allow for depletion and new riches should cycle throughout the galaxy. This would allow new professions to be born as a result of these new dynamics in our ever changing universe.

- I also have experienced first hand the awful state of an aged user experience which plagues (but is not limited to) industrial and corporate management affairs. This is something which affects more players than you can imagine. I will propose creative solutions to this issue - CCP Games is already aware of the need for proper iteration and simply advocating for this won’t change anything as time have proven. This must change!

- Communicate with CCP Games on issues which matter! There has been tons of changes some of which have ranged from superficial to merely cosmetic. There is a long list of forgotten issues which players have delved their hearts and souls into, proposing viable and sound solutions to annoying in game problems.

- Serve as a much needed bridge between CCP Games and a once thriving third party content creation of our community.

- Provide meaningful feedback on the need to reshape the current state of null-sec affairs.

- Contribute greatly and communicate the need for focus toward in-game innovation, on why a clear and proper feature iteration for EVE Online needed.

- Great focus on a "from the ground up" approach of alliance resources income; advocating for an approach which benefits the “grunts first, leadership later” approach.

- Generate a focus on active income sources over passive for alliances - this is something which is only talked about by powerbloc candidates during election time - makes you wonder why?

- Holding large areas of unused SOV should be made something strategically and economically undesirable for any alliance.


- Renting is a reality within the game, why don’t we provide the players with the proper tools to rent?

- Active PVE needs a refocus which should include social aspects and an actual sense of achievement beyond a wallet tick.

- Moving around EVE should not only be challenging, but also enjoyable at the same time - there are plenty of ideas. I believe, there should be pressing reasons to go to places in EVE Online, and a proper reward about the risks involved.

- DUST needs to be meaningful to the EVE Online player experience, advocating for a further integration is only a start.

- Super capital pilots should not be locked inside their ships, this not only affects individual player experience, but also make them less prone to take risks.

- The need for Incarna is a reality within EVE Online. I do see Incarna as an ill advised, missed opportunity for CCP Games to open the game to a new generation of EVE online players. An open minded CSM are needed to make sure CCP Games does not repeat their past mistakes.

If I am elected I will work toward the greater benefit of EVE Online as a game - providing a more open CSM which would go beyond a “circle of friends, acquaintances or a powerbloc’s demands.” More importantly I want to be a voice for the players - a voice which would go both ways ensuring a much needed synergy between players and developers - for this reason, I'll be running for the ninth Council of Stella Management office.

I will be taking CSM related questions to the twitter hashtag #riveriniforcsm9 - which I will be responding in video form, hopefully this way you will get to know me and my platform better.

riverini

@elriverini

I'd really like to see you to specify what issues matter to you, and by extension which ones you feel matter to the player base, as well as your viable and sound solutions to these issues. Points like this on your platform tell us next to nothing

Ah River in I

Owner of FOXnews24 or Copy/Pasta News24!

Welcome to the CSM race!

A few questions if you don't mind?

- Last year you promised to stop running Gelvon Goblin articles.
Why are you still running them?

- What happened to all the Botting and RMT guides on your website?

- With your incredibly biased opinion. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
To prove this during the Fountain War, I fed you every article (uknu...remember?) For a *Snip* Please refrain from using profanity. ISD Ezwal. ton of ISK! Oh how you paid billions for FALSE INFORMATION and no fact checking!

- Since your site does nothing in the field of fact checking. How can the average voter be assured that you'd check facts on proposed changes? *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

- What's your stance that CCP might have dropped the Carbon code? I.E. Space Panties!

What's your view on killmails and assists?

Ship A kills Ship B, and Ship C was remote repping/linking/Rsebo/etc. Ship A, while A killed B. Should C get on A's killmail to better explain the fight?

Two things...

First, why aren't you addressing questions on here? This is where most of the voting base will be seeing the info and conversations between the player base and CSM hopefuls. By addressing them in twitter only...alienating immediately anyone who doesn't have a twitter acct. Then only doing video reply where an active conversation between two parties cannot take place. You're essentially snubbing most of the player base. Which is kinda rude and ignorant.

I really hope that you reconsider this and be active within this thread and answer all questions. Regardless of how hard they are! Instead of preventing a good chunk of the people from asking you any questions. Then Cherry Picking questions anyone can toss your way, which can be fake Twitter accounts with questions designed to make yourself look better.

The other thing I was going to ask, but I won't. You said you'd only reply to twitter, and my questions have more then 140 characters in them.

I wish you luck in your campaign!

We at the Cap Stable Podcast are eagerly looking forward to having him as a guest on our show as well.

We even sent him an in game invitation.

Uhh... I think I'll have to let someone else handle that one this year... >.>

That's all fine and good, but he doesn't seem at all willing to, you know, communicate with the community he wants to elect him to CSM. Perhaps if he directed efforts towards answering questions here, as well as on your GoogleHangout show he would be doing himself a favor.

I don't want to derail Riv's thread or his ideas, however because you asked for it two step, I am here to provide you a link to the drinking game.

http://freebooted.blogspot.com/2012/03/eve-radios-great-debate-mittarini.html

Now I'm just going to step out over here... If any of you are thinking of playing the drinking game while listening to that recording, please reconsider. I'm pretty sure someone probably almost died from it.

Please at least setup a debate with some of the other candidates and Riverini. Maybe Mittens could chair the debate as an impartial mediator?