These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

First step to create a real bond market in EVE

First post
Author
Alexander wulfgard
Korrupted Gaming
#101 - 2014-03-11 10:43:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexander wulfgard
Batelle wrote:

Claims to want to promote a private market for debt.

Proposes a system that would squeeze or obsolete player-offered bond offerings by having NPCs offer a zero-risk version of the same.



CCP issued securities are a different product than the bonds which currently exist in EVE.
Instead I believe the change of game mechanics and increased investor awareness would help player issuances and create more demand for their bonds.

1. Game mechanics will allow bonds to be traded via eve market which many will find much more compelling than going through other channels like the forum.
2. Investors can now value player bonds better due to the creation of the “risk free rate”. Better valuation = less risk = lower- yield & spread = more volume
3. Increased investor awareness will get more EVE citizens to invest in player offerings and hence increase demand for such bonds.
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#102 - 2014-03-11 11:20:20 UTC
Alexander wulfgard wrote:
...The main retaional was to expand the sandbox and eventually allow a player operated debt market to function...
Isn't the biggest issue with player operated debt now accountability?

For example, if I started a 'bank' today; and had thousands of people invest trillions of ISK... tomorrow I could just steal it all. I could sell or recycle this character and disappear... or just keep this character and there wouldn't be any recourse for those cheated to recover their money.

In a game, like EvE, in which deceit and deception are such an integral parts... how do you overcome this issue?
Alexander wulfgard
Korrupted Gaming
#103 - 2014-03-11 16:48:12 UTC
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:
Isn't the biggest issue with player operated debt now accountability?

For example, if I started a 'bank' today; and had thousands of people invest trillions of ISK... tomorrow I could just steal it all. I could sell or recycle this character and disappear... or just keep this character and there wouldn't be any recourse for those cheated to recover their money.

In a game, like EvE, in which deceit and deception are such an integral parts... how do you overcome this issue?


Yes, I agree

I have only briefly touched this area in some of the post earlier in the thread.
Fact is that EVE is a world full of Alts, No civil courts or justice system.
Characters only face reputational risk which may be bypassed via character selling or sending to biomass. So the real difficult question is; How can we increase investor protection enough for a genuine effective player operated capital market to develop?

Disclaimer: This topic is slightly out of my area of expertise and full of in-game mechanic pitfalls. I therefore will not give any “hard” advice but merely soft suggestions. I also recommend anyone with knowledge and interest of this topic to participate in the discussion.

1. As stated in the beginning of the thread under 8) “A genuine need for public money is needed”.
I suggest CCP develop a farms & field concept where corporations will need to invest heavily into infrastructure in order to create player operated industries.

2. Who can raise money?
In the OTC market everyone can participate exactly how it is today.
But if you wish to raise money through EVE Market (which acts as the exchange and regulator) rules will apply.

3. Skills: In order to get your bonds listed the CEO + some Directors will need some skills trained to 5. It could for example be a Finance, Corporate Finance and Capital Market Theory.

4. Information: The issuer is recommended to write a business plan which will be attached to the bond (in the “info” tab in-game) and required to open a thread about their IPO in the EVE forum (a new forum channel dedicated to IPOs).
The public should also have access to various statistics about the company such as:
Money and assets currently held, Income, Expenses, time members have logged on while in corp, skill points accumulated while in corp perhaps via some sort of API key.

5. Pay a non-refundable fee upfront (to a NPC investment bank for the listing service)
If the issuance is under-subscribed the IPO will be cancelled and the listing fee lost

6.Bond Covenats: I suggest a list of predefined covenants which the bond issuer can agree or not agree to prior to the Bond IPO (and this information will be available to investors and the public), Examples;
The corp will not be able to transfer or spend more than X mio ISK per X days.
The corp MUST invest X mio ISK into a Player Operated Complex within X days.
All T1 (industrial/freighter) (frigs/crus/bc/bs) ships must be insured at all time.
Must have minimum X characters, X skill points in corp
Must have minimum X mio in revenue per X days
Must have minimum X mio worth of equipment/ships in corporate hangars

7. Collateral – The bond issuer can decide to put down assets as collateral:

7.1 Ships – the CEO will have full access to ships put down as collateral, but he will not be able to sell them through EVE Market. Further I suggest all ships held as collateral will get a unique id number. If the corp defaults all ships held under collateral will be repossessed if docked. None-docked ships will get a permanent criminal status and repossessed if they dock.

7.2 Sovereign structures – at default all sovereign structures will be dismantled and repossessed
7.3 POCs – will be liquidated and any recovered money will be paid out to the bond holders
7.4 Characters – Perhaps the CEO or Directors should be able to put down their Character as collateral.

All items Repossessed should be instantly transferred to Jita and sold. However the proceedings from the sale should be subject to a deduction representing transaction-, repossessing and transport costs. Perhaps 25% for High-sec; 50% for Low and 75% for Null

Default –
If a corporate fails to pay either principal/interest when due or break any covenants on the bonds, will constitute a legal default and the bondholders will have prior legal claim over shareholders to all assets held by the corporate. In other words the CEO will be fired (all characters in the corp kicked to a NPC corp) and the bondholders would receive the proceedings from the fire sale of all corporate assets. In the event that the proceedings from the sale surpass those of the bond principal, exceeding funds will be divided amongst the shareholders.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#104 - 2014-03-11 18:04:40 UTC
A system like that can still be gamed, use a worthless figurehead CEO character, take down anything in space, etc. just before you default.
Alexander wulfgard
Korrupted Gaming
#105 - 2014-03-11 19:45:57 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
A system like that can still be gamed, use a worthless figurehead CEO character, take down anything in space, etc. just before you default.


This system was never intended to be bulletproof - just like IRL
However the majority of scammers will not be able to launch a successful bond issue. Scammers will also need to invest considerable time and effort in order to pull it off.
Scion Lex
United Mining and Hauling Inc
The Initiative.
#106 - 2014-03-12 01:31:01 UTC
There is no such thing as bullet proof.
CCP will never behave as the SEC of EVE
No player organization will ever have the leverage to be the SEC either
All of this is a moot point IF we had a functional shares system
...and why you would want to centralize the financial sector of eve is beyond me.

...in short; NO.
Far Wanderer
The New Bank of Far
#107 - 2014-03-12 08:51:44 UTC
Alexander wulfgard wrote:
Let me first say that I admire you for your alternative career path in Eve. You create content and fun beyond the normal boundaries of the game.
Thank you. Big smile


Alexander wulfgard wrote:
But as stated earlier the “risk free index/rate” do not mean you avoid all risks. It simply refers to the fact that the security does not hold default Risk.
To be honest, I don't understand all of the technical words you're using. I think I understand what you mean about no default Risk, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

I just think there ought to be some inherent risk, even in with NPC-issued bonds.

Alexander wulfgard wrote:
A form of asset backed municipal bond linked to faction ware fare is an interesting suggestion.
Thank you again.

I think it would be interesting if you could bet on faction warfare. Much like a hedge fund trader. It seems to me like there are enough big ISK players in EVE that if they could influence faction war outcomes for a payoff, they'd do it. (Who knows, maybe they already do?)

I really am wasting my breath though, when you can avoid questions from Hexxx and RAW23 like that you must have some seriously devoted investors. --Elizabeth Norn

Alexander wulfgard
Korrupted Gaming
#108 - 2014-03-12 09:11:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexander wulfgard
Scion Lex wrote:
There is no such thing as bullet proof.
CCP will never behave as the SEC of EVE
No player organization will ever have the leverage to be the SEC either



No where in my post have I argued for CCP or Players to take the regulator role.

I believe all rules and covenats should be hard (objective) and machine readable to ensure little/no human interaction.
These will then become the game rules of EVE Capital Market.


Scion Lex wrote:

All of this is a moot point IF we had a functional shares system


Why do you want to create a share market before a credit market?

Equity is the MOST junior class of investors in assets – and typically also one of the most expensive.
RL corporations will typically ensure most of their needed funding via other sources than Equity fx: Syndicated loans, bank loan accounts or debt, supplier liabilities and Corporate Bonds.
To skip all other forms of finance and rush towards one of the most advanced forms is not sensible.

Finally you will face many of the same problems trying to create a Equity market as you will with a Credit market.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#109 - 2014-03-12 22:23:50 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The rules:
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)