These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Say NO to dirty CQ!

Author
Salvia Olima
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-11-29 08:12:34 UTC
"Captains Quarters visual appearance now changesdepending on the security status of the system they are in. If the Captains Quarters look shiny and beautiful in high sec, they now get more dirty and worn deep in null sec."

No, no and no. You build a shiny new outpost with great costs and it is already worn and dirty? You fight and secure an outpost from an enemy alliance and you do not clean it out? ABSOLUTELY MAKES NO SENSE, and greatly abjects the real players of this game who had grown out from the tutorial section (highsec) and play EvE at it's full depths.

Please rethink of it CCP: even the opposite would be much more logical - overcrowded hisec stations (Jita 4/4?) with the same amount of janitors can't cope with 100x mess.

Or fix the neatness in line with the offices rent at stations. More crowded -> dirtier.

Please support with yaaay, or resent the idea with a better suggestion. Thank you for sharing.
Silence iKillYouu
Girls Lie But Zkill Doesn't
Pandemic Legion
#2 - 2011-11-29 08:13:56 UTC
who cares

EVE Mail me i dont check forums often.

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#3 - 2011-11-29 08:14:52 UTC
Salvia Olima wrote:
Please rethink of it CCP: even the opposite would be much more logical - overcrowded hisec stations (Jita 4/4?) with the same amount of janitors can't cope with 100x mess.

This please, keep our lowsec and 0.0 stations tidy while highsec should look terrible.
Angus Thermopollye
#4 - 2011-11-29 08:18:02 UTC
Srsly? No, no......srsly?

It's grrrrrrrreat!

Indeterminacy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2011-11-29 15:21:06 UTC
Salvia Olima wrote:
"Captains Quarters visual appearance now changesdepending on the security status of the system they are in. If the Captains Quarters look shiny and beautiful in high sec, they now get more dirty and worn deep in null sec."

No, no and no. You build a shiny new outpost with great costs and it is already worn and dirty? You fight and secure an outpost from an enemy alliance and you do not clean it out? ABSOLUTELY MAKES NO SENSE, and greatly abjects the real players of this game who had grown out from the tutorial section (highsec) and play EvE at it's full depths.

Please rethink of it CCP: even the opposite would be much more logical - overcrowded hisec stations (Jita 4/4?) with the same amount of janitors can't cope with 100x mess.

Or fix the neatness in line with the offices rent at stations. More crowded -> dirtier.

Please support with yaaay, or resent the idea with a better suggestion. Thank you for sharing.


Better suggestion, kill yourself (in game ofc).
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#6 - 2011-11-29 17:16:13 UTC
I think OP has a point Allaince Outposts would be better maintained than some of the pirate stations.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

Alberio
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#7 - 2011-11-29 18:42:11 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
I think OP has a point Allaince Outposts would be better maintained than some of the pirate stations.


Why? Pirates can't be tidy?
Theodoric Darkwind
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2011-11-29 18:42:40 UTC
I didn't even notice, the gallente CQ in the station im in seems pretty clean and shiny even though its in nullsec. My alts minmatar CQ in Rens is as dirty as ever (as in no difference from the incarna version)
Pytria Le'Danness
Placid Reborn
#9 - 2011-11-29 18:44:20 UTC
Frankly I'm amazed they even put that in. I'd rather have resources allocated to implement WiS or more new ships than making texture sets for dirty and clean CQs.
JagerJake
Legio Noviomagum
#10 - 2011-11-29 18:46:42 UTC
talk about a wasted thread.
AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
#11 - 2011-11-29 18:55:02 UTC
Alberio wrote:
Pirates can't be tidy?


Totally Valid Point.

I think if anything it's more likely that a materialistic opportunistically-minded narcissistically-motivated gate camper would have a strict upbringing; coupled with parents who did not communicate very well, leading to a very tidy room.

Immaculate, even.

Lest us not forget pirates are the type of people who look at their statistics...a lot.

Attention. Detail. Structure.

An inwardly complex individual with an uncomplicated exterior.

Messy it does not end.

AK




This space for rent.

Aphoxema G
Khushakor Clan
#12 - 2011-11-29 18:59:43 UTC
It's cute but impractical. Nullsec is outside the legal influence of the empires, that does not make it necessarily lawless or, by extension, without rule or order. Dirtiness should be a choice or if it's a penalty then not a penalty for where the player is located.
Captain Mastiff
#13 - 2011-11-29 19:49:35 UTC
Aphoxema G wrote:
It's cute but impractical. Nullsec is outside the legal influence of the empires, that does not make it necessarily lawless or, by extension, without rule or order. Dirtiness should be a choice or if it's a penalty then not a penalty for where the player is located.


0.0 alliances are outside the legal constraints of the great empires. Why would an alliance purely in it for the ISK be willing to pay for a set of janitors to clean a station top to bottom when they aren't following any other legislations regarding pension schemes, employment and equality.

(My attempt at role playing)
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#14 - 2011-11-29 19:52:11 UTC
It's expensive to keep slaves in nullsec.

Demigods can't be bothered with tidying up the place.

Null is dirty. Working as intended.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#15 - 2011-11-29 20:35:38 UTC
I'd like to see random showers of sparks or maybe camera shakes if an outpost is in reinforced mode. That'd be neat. :3

Katrina Oniseki

Aphoxema G
Khushakor Clan
#16 - 2011-11-29 20:38:55 UTC
Captain Mastiff wrote:
Why would an alliance purely in it for the ISK be willing to pay for a set of janitors to clean a station top to bottom when they aren't following any other legislations regarding pension schemes, employment and equality.


For the exact same reason they left Empire to live their own lives; Pride.
Aphoxema G
Khushakor Clan
#17 - 2011-11-29 20:47:52 UTC
Gogela wrote:
It's expensive to keep slaves in nullsec.

Demigods can't be bothered with tidying up the place.

Null is dirty. Working as intended.


This isn't merely a sloppy pub or the endless corridors connecting a massive, impersonal station. These are the private residences to individuals that command warships and a currency that swamps that of the public.

I don't bother with nullsec and I wouldn't really care about the appearance if I did, but this is an insult to the sensibilities of the people who do have the last word on nullsec territory they painstakingly earned. The assumption that they do not care about details like this, details that CCP has diverted massive resources into creating, is a challenge to their expectations in themselves and a thoughtless gesture from ignorance.

This is the sort of thing worth getting angry about, so shut your damned face and allow others their honest and meaningful opinion.
Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#18 - 2011-11-29 20:50:02 UTC
Of all the stupid things that are a waste of time to complain about....
Arthur Frayn
V.O.F.L IRON CORE
#19 - 2011-11-29 20:51:08 UTC
Salvia Olima wrote:
No, no and no. You build a shiny new outpost with great costs and it is already worn and dirty?


That's eve for you. No cops = people are gonna pee on the walls.
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#20 - 2011-11-29 20:53:18 UTC
Arthur Frayn wrote:
Salvia Olima wrote:
No, no and no. You build a shiny new outpost with great costs and it is already worn and dirty?


That's eve for you. No cops = people are gonna pee on the walls.


Considering most Null pilots are a bit more civilized than the rabble in highsec... >_>

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

123Next page