EVE General Discussion

Feyd you representing highsec is like Ted Cruz being elected as democratic candidate for President of the U.S.

While there have been positive changes for nullsec -

How has the ESS or the mobile syphon helped further the nullsec agenda? If anything these would **** off big and little power blocks alike.

Highsec: The wardec mechanics (with the option to surender), revamping the tutorials, Exploration UI improvements (scanning / probes). They've all helped newer players and to some extend bears.

Mobile tractor unit / mobile depot: You can't tell me (even after they fixed the drone exploit) that these didn't result in infinite amounts of tears for mission runners (and continues to do so)?

CCP has added tools that really benefit those that use them creatively. It seems to me they have done a good job of trying to preserve a multitude of play styles from Scamming, AWOX, NPC missioners/miners, High Sec War-Decers (while helping to make the wars escapable for the truly risk adverse), ganking, piracy, faction warfare, null bears, power blocks, etc.

No one in those groups got 'nothing.'

Do I want the majority of the CSM to be nullsec based players? No. But having them there hasn't resulted in the planned elimination of highsec NOR in making highsec perfectly safe.

i have no idea who to vote for...

is there a matching website like last year?

dude bamboo shoots dipped in kerosene and then inserted under the finger nail and lit on fire.

well that is awesome....

litterally thats going to decide who i vote for...

I agree with some points in your post. However, your main purpose seems to be that every player in EvE (highsec) should be forced to play your way. I honestly find that hard to swallow.

While I have never dropped corp for a war-dec (and I've lost stupidly fit ships during said war-decs), I respect the need for a system that makes largely PVE groups viable. So, what you're telling me is you want HS to line up and fight you whether they want to or not? With all the grief mechanics available, corp theft, awox, suicide ganking, bumping, suspect baiting, MTU etc, it's not enough?

Wanting only your play style to be valid hardly feels like it's a nullsec CSM problem. The war-dec system is a useful tool for players that mouth off, or want to stir up some content, I also think it's rediculous to force someone into a style of play they don't enjoy in a game they are paying for. i.e. I can haul in an NPC/player corp - and I can mitigate risk - and still get ganked, but there at least is a risk/reward ratio weighted into it. Instead of - all industrialists can be engaged at will because I paid some isk to do it their playstyle be damned.

Anyway, stop thread jacking this and lets talk about the individual candidates a bit, yeah?

Has everyone that's running announced that they are running yet? Any thread links?

Also this is the person that's running the vote/match website - I found one of the threads. I suggest you give input before it is finalized:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326319&find=unread

At this stage I'm really starting to lean towards "unable" :/

One of these days someone should represent the scammers of Jita. While I don't condone scamming, they should still have a voice.

Whomever pushes a "Re-INCARNA" agenda... WIS needs to rise from the dead like so many lost bodies from Hurricane Katrina, but without the smell of Decomp because it will take a thermonuclear fire to get that kind of stink out of that ratty little carpet in my CQ.

If a CSM representative is hisec, lowsec, nullsec, pirate, carebear, indy, blobber, solo, up, down, strange, sideways, sex appeal or peppermint is 100% irrelevant.

What matters is if you think that the persons you vote for can work with CCP and help them bring us a better game.