These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Concord response time stealth changed?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#21 - 2014-03-06 20:16:12 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:


I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it.


Sweet, I have groupies...
Sarah xCalibre
Pod Liberation Authority
#22 - 2014-03-07 16:54:16 UTC
Shizuken wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:


I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it.


Sweet, I have groupies...


Or at least a stalker, eh congrats?
  • Sarah xCalibre
Alyth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2014-03-08 03:29:21 UTC
BadAssMcKill wrote:
Morganta wrote:
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


null is terrible
target rich environments is where its at

and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers



There are penguins in space?



You were unaware?
Tacomaco
No Taxes just fun
#24 - 2014-03-10 09:44:42 UTC
Oh, fail gankers made a wine thread. Nerf Concord. It's like criminals complaining about the police been to fast to respond. Maybe you should start where the newb gankers start in 0.5 or even better 0.1-0.4? Oh, wait, in low-sec other players may shoot at you.

Gankers complaining on the "Crime & Punishment" forum for failing their ganks.....pathetic.

Maybe CONCORD should degrade your security to -5.0 after the first miner gank. After all you're a pirate and you don't mind that, right?. Then you can live like a real pirate and players can remove you from your ship on site.
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#25 - 2014-03-10 10:30:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Tul Breetai
Shizuken wrote:


I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you...

Gankers don't cry, they just go grab another cat.

Anti-gankers, on the other hand...

Tacomaco wrote:
Oh, fail gankers made a wine thread. Nerf Concord. It's like criminals complaining about the police been to fast to respond. Maybe you should start where the newb gankers start in 0.5 or even better 0.1-0.4? Oh, wait, in low-sec other players may shoot at you.

Gankers complaining on the "Crime & Punishment" forum for failing their ganks.....pathetic.

Maybe CONCORD should degrade your security to -5.0 after the first miner gank. After all you're a pirate and you don't mind that, right?. Then you can live like a real pirate and players can remove you from your ship on site.

He asked if it had been changed to eliminate human error from his conclusion. He got an answer, and stated he'd simply adapt. Then you came in and started crying about your ore-fueled fantasies...

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#26 - 2014-03-10 10:32:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Tul Breetai
double post

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
Lakotnik
TSOE Po1ice
TSOE Consortium
#27 - 2014-03-10 11:27:34 UTC
Danalee wrote:
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.


Got a newsflash for you: Nullsec = Carebear Trammel lalaland, let's all hold hands and shoot structure while AFK.
Hi and lowsec is where the action is.

D.

Bear


Is that why so many l33t pvp people are in NPC corps like you? Such douchebaggery shall not be tolerated. Plenty of pvp in null all the time. Null isn't all about sieging structures, you should get out more -.D
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#28 - 2014-03-10 15:45:28 UTC
Les Strout wrote:
Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days?
Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short.

I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?


I don't think the response times have changed within the last month. That is rather like the comments that invention chance has changed which hasn't either.

It's one of two things:

1) CONCORD were already somewhere in-system.

2) An issue related to tanking on the Retriever or the type of guns or ammo you were using.

Which guns/ammo an how many of were you using?

Also if you are using the char you are posting with you won't have enough skills to do the job in time. So hopefully that is your posting alt?
Previous page12