These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RLML POLL

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Pew Terror
All of it
#61 - 2014-03-07 18:15:07 UTC
Yeah... easily manipulated polls are the bestest tool everest to achieve game balance.

Conclusion: OP is a bads that doesnt know how to RLML.
Brutor Trash
Doomheim
#62 - 2014-03-07 23:18:28 UTC
WOW WE ARE ALMOST AT 200. ONCE WE HIT 200 I WILL TALLY RESULTS AGAIN. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK GUYS. I AM GLAD WE GOT SOME DIFFERENT OPINIONS IN THIS THREAD NOW RATHER THAN JUST 5 PEOPLE WITH THE SAME OPINION SHITTING IT UP. ALSO LOL AT THE MADS IN HERE. IF THERE WAS A BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO CRUNCHING NUMBERS THAN A POLL ID TRY IT. ALSO, IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THIS POLL VISIT http://pollcode.com/faq.html ?? I DONT KNOW WHAT ELSE TO TELL YOU.

WHATEVER THOUGH, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK WE ARE ALMOST AT GOAL 200.
Ginger Barbarella
#63 - 2014-03-07 23:42:04 UTC
Hate: 40s reload. Stopped using them entirely and dumped stock on all the launchers because of it.

Love: How one CCP guy says "front loading" in a video and SUDDENLY everyone uses the phrase like it's some awesome explanation for completely CASTRATING a weapon system. Love that. Love the gullible "pilots" who pick up on a term and start beating it like a dead horse. Love it.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Brutor Trash
Doomheim
#64 - 2014-03-07 23:50:38 UTC
I THINK FRONT LOADED IS SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE THE LOTR MOVIE SCENE WHERE THE ENEMY LAUNCHES A HAIL OF ARROWS SO NUMEROUS THEY BLOCK OUT THE SUN FOR A WHILE EXCEPT THEY DONT HAVE 35s RELOAD.
Big Benton
Lost Legion Of Death
Help Newbes Find a Way Alliance
#65 - 2014-03-08 00:06:46 UTC
I couldn't care less either way. I do scanning and probing. However, it's curious that you have people with decent PvP history saying that it's good the way it is, but a bunch of forum alts and folks with **** or no PvP history saying it needs to change. This is very telling. Maybe if some actual decent players supported this then I could see your side of the argument. Not to mention, posting in all caps is a great way to tell people that you are a troll and not to be taken seriously. Do you think CCP is really going to listen to anything you say after they told you repeatedly not to use all caps or post attacks against people?
Brutor Trash
Doomheim
#66 - 2014-03-08 00:11:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Brutor Trash
Big Benton wrote:
I couldn't care less either way. I do scanning and probing. However, it's curious that you have people with decent PvP history saying that it's good the way it is, but a bunch of forum alts and folks with **** or no PvP history saying it needs to change. This is very telling. Maybe if some actual decent players supported this then I could see your side of the argument. Not to mention, posting in all caps is a great way to tell people that you are a troll and not to be taken seriously. Do you think CCP is really going to listen to anything you say after they told you repeatedly not to use all caps or post attacks against people?


AND IF I AM A TROLL, AND THIS THREAD IS A TROLL, SHOULD YOU LISTEN TO ANYTHING ON HERE? YOU HAVE. AND PVP HISTORY ISNT THE BEST TELL TALE SIGN OF SKILL, HOWEVER IT DOES TELL YOU IF SOMEONE IS AN ******* OR NOT. YOU SHOULDNT BE BASING YOUR INFORMATION OFF OF WHAT I SAY OR WHAT ANYONE IN THIS THREAD SAYS, YOU ARE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF... ITS ALMOST AS IF YOU WANT TO SAY "HI I LISTEN TO EVERYONE HERE EXCEPT FOR PEOPLE I DONT LIKE RATHER THAN HARD STATISTICS" THE POINT OF THIS FORUM IS A POLL. READ THE RESULTS AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. AS FAR AS CCP TAKING ME SERIOUSLY, THEY DON'T HAVE TO: THE POLL HAS HARD NUMBERS. AS FAR AS ALTS ARE CONCERNED... YOU FRICKIN ARE ONE LOL.
Brutor Trash
Doomheim
#67 - 2014-03-08 01:48:23 UTC
OUT OF A SAMPLE SIZE OF 205 EVE PLAYERS, HERE ARE THE CURRENT STATISTICS FOR THE OPINIONS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF RLML

40% OF VOTERS (83 PLAYERS) BELIEVE RLML SHOULD BE REVERTED BACK TO THEIR PRE-NERF STATE.
34% OF VOTERS (69 PLAYERS) BELIEVE RLML IS UNDERPOWERED AND NEEDS A BUFF.
2% OF VOTERS (5 PLAYERS) BELIEVE RLML IS OVERPOWERED AND NEEDS FURTHER NERF.
16% OF VOTERS (32 PLAYERS) BELIEVE RLML IS FINE AS IT CURRENTLY IS.
8% OF VOTERS (16 PLAYERS) DON'T CARE WHAT HAPPENS.

THESE ARE THE RESULTS SO FAR TALLYING 205 EVE PLAYERS. YOU CAN SEE THEM FOR YOURSELF BY FOLLOWING THE LINK PROVIDED IN THE FIRST POST.
GOOD WORK.

KEEP THE VOTES COMING.

NEXT GOAL: 300
Dato Koppla
Balls Deep Inc.
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#68 - 2014-03-08 02:14:41 UTC
Am I the only that can't take anything Brutor Trash says seriously because of his caps lock?
Mythen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2014-03-08 05:05:42 UTC
Dato Koppla wrote:
Am I the only that can't take anything Brutor Trash says seriously because of his caps lock?


Right there with ya...
Voi Lutois
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#70 - 2014-03-08 13:17:51 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Hate: 40s reload. Stopped using them entirely and dumped stock on all the launchers because of it.

Love: How one CCP guy says "front loading" in a video and SUDDENLY everyone uses the phrase like it's some awesome explanation for completely CASTRATING a weapon system. Love that. Love the gullible "pilots" who pick up on a term and start beating it like a dead horse. Love it.


Yes, RLMLs suck the ****. Please help missiles.
Mark Fjord
Gradient
Electus Matari
#71 - 2014-03-08 16:14:54 UTC
I have stopped using RLMLs since the recent changes. In the past I used RLMLs for combat and missions. A RLML Caracal would rip through a level 2 or 3 mission in no time. With the 40 second reload time you spend a lot of time orbiting waiting to resume attack. *YAWN*.

I have resigned myself to the fact that RLMLs will remain intolerable for a while longer. So while my RLMLs are gathering space dust in a hanger I will fly HML and HAM Caracals. I hold on to the hope that the powers that be will restore the RLMLs to their former utility. Or at least improve the load time and/or clip size of the current generation.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#72 - 2014-03-08 17:35:04 UTC
Quote:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

2. Be respectful toward others at all times.

The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.

22. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.

Thread locked.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department