These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Mittani for CSM

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Josef Djugashvilis
#121 - 2014-03-07 22:05:11 UTC
Lazy Eagle wrote:
Your Dad Naked wrote:

1) Leader of the largest in-game alliance, an alliance which has stated many times it's goal is to ruin EVE.
Big smile


Their goal is not to ruin the game, it is to ruin YOUR game.


I am perfectly capable of ruining my own game without any help from goonies.

This is not a signature.
Lazy Eagle
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#122 - 2014-03-07 22:11:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Lazy Eagle
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:



I am perfectly capable of ruining my own game without any help from goonies.


The people of Lowtax will gladly help you without you needing to ask. Humble are the stewards of New Eden.
Ismol Mond
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#123 - 2014-03-07 22:17:15 UTC
I agree with you guys.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#124 - 2014-03-07 22:26:18 UTC
Your Dad Naked wrote:
2) Alliance and it's leaders judge players on a mass scale due to how they play the game.


we're concerned with how random nobodies play the game as much as we're concerned about the next time we take a ****

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#125 - 2014-03-07 22:42:51 UTC
Andski wrote:
Your Dad Naked wrote:
2) Alliance and it's leaders judge players on a mass scale due to how they play the game.


we're concerned with how random nobodies play the game as much as we're concerned about the next time we take a ****



You see, that quote right there.

Now, who really wants this failed concept of democracy, this dangerous collectivism, of electing "representatives" as such we really have a system where Person A gets to impose their will on Person B.

It's because of this we all have to live in fear of each others' opinions. What if nobody's opinions mattered? What if we didn't have to labor under the weaponization and anonymization of mob rule (aka democracy) and see forum posts as if they actually mattered?

Without a CSM, we could look at posts such as the one I quoted, and have ZERO ****s to give over it.

But because of this democratic process, we now have to live in fear of stupid people imposing their will. Wanna end this "nullsec agenda ruining the game" or this "carebear agenda ruining the game" crap?

Put an end to this democracy crap. Take the teeth out of ignorance and stupidity and when CCP devs ask for feedback from the players about something, then give them feedback. But we don't need to be "represented" by anybody and the whole game is private property anyway.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Alejandro Rebenga
#126 - 2014-03-07 22:52:47 UTC
Haha, I've just re-read the past posts about this.. good read, good read.

Although I have to ask for clarification: was he banned, or did he resign to avoid the ban?

Paging CCP Xhagen?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#127 - 2014-03-07 23:04:58 UTC
Alejandro Rebenga wrote:
Haha, I've just re-read the past posts about this.. good read, good read.

Although I have to ask for clarification: was he banned, or did he resign to avoid the ban?

Paging CCP Xhagen?



he resigned from the CSM and took a 30 day suspension

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Alyth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#128 - 2014-03-08 04:00:39 UTC
Andski wrote:
Alejandro Rebenga wrote:
Haha, I've just re-read the past posts about this.. good read, good read.

Although I have to ask for clarification: was he banned, or did he resign to avoid the ban?

Paging CCP Xhagen?



he resigned from the CSM and took a 30 day suspension


He admitted he was wrong, apologised and took his punishment. I'd say that means case closed on the matter.

I fail to see how people can dislike a person they have never met and are never likely to interact with in any meaningful way. Especially the level of vehemence they display. I don't envy that aspect of his life. I'll take the trillions in moongoo though.

Mittens for CSM. Ripard Teg for psychiatric evaluation.
Inari Visas
Federal Navy Academy
#129 - 2014-03-08 09:06:44 UTC
And when he came back, all of new eden shook in fear.
And the goons took up arms and administered punishment.
And the bears sat there in awe.
And the The Mittani promised to conquer nullsec.
And he did.
And they did.
And I need a scotch.

Now we can get serious.

This thread went waaaay off topic. Its supposed to be about mittani and CSM, not eve and goons. But I guess you can't have one without the other. Sad? Sad.
Alejandro Rebenga
#130 - 2014-03-08 09:16:20 UTC
Alyth wrote:
Andski wrote:
Alejandro Rebenga wrote:
Haha, I've just re-read the past posts about this.. good read, good read.

Although I have to ask for clarification: was he banned, or did he resign to avoid the ban?

Paging CCP Xhagen?



he resigned from the CSM and took a 30 day suspension


He admitted he was wrong, apologised and took his punishment. I'd say that means case closed on the matter.

I fail to see how people can dislike a person they have never met and are never likely to interact with in any meaningful way. Especially the level of vehemence they display. I don't envy that aspect of his life. I'll take the trillions in moongoo though.

Mittens for CSM. Ripard Teg for psychiatric evaluation.


I'd like to believe you, if you didn't contradict yourself just now.
Dave stark
#131 - 2014-03-08 09:20:51 UTC
judging from the csm section of the forums, I'd rather vote for mittens over half of the irrelevant nobodies that have put their name forward.

*shrug*

If i've got to tick 14 boxes, i won't be ticking it for random nobodies over a well known (even if for the wrong reasons) community member.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#132 - 2014-03-08 10:01:43 UTC
Alejandro Rebenga wrote:
I'd like to believe you, if you didn't contradict yourself just now.

you asked a question and had it answered

the correct response is 'thankyou'
Kinis Deren
Mosquito Squadron
D0GS OF WAR
#133 - 2014-03-08 10:34:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Kinis Deren
Alejandro Rebenga wrote:
Haha, I've just re-read the past posts about this.. good read, good read.

Although I have to ask for clarification: was he banned, or did he resign to avoid the ban?

Paging CCP Xhagen?



Despite what the Grubbie revisionists might like to think, he was temp banned. There was no "accepting a suspension" about the slap down he recieved.

Please feel free to read all the details contained within two dev blogs on the matter:

The 2012 Alliance Panel at Fanfest

Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#134 - 2014-03-08 10:53:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
there is no revisionism: he resigned and got a 30 day suspension

and if you read that second devblog you'll find that he can still run for the CSM should he wish to do so, and no matter how much you cry about it he'll get elected

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#135 - 2014-03-08 10:58:44 UTC
This Thread can END now...

I would vote for him.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk
Person B
Doomheim
#136 - 2014-03-08 11:00:17 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Now, who really wants this failed concept of democracy, this dangerous collectivism, of electing "representatives" as such we really have a system where Person A gets to impose their will on Person B.

Never goona happen. I don't even like Person A.

Now CSM. I can vote for that. Who's running?
Kyperion
#137 - 2014-03-08 11:18:03 UTC
The dude has a more inexplicable cult of personality than Barack Obama. I will never understand the sheeple that blindly follow egomaniacs like them.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#138 - 2014-03-08 11:23:32 UTC
Kyperion wrote:
The dude has a more inexplicable cult of personality than Barack Obama. I will never understand the sheeple that blindly follow egomaniacs like them.

it's simple actually: sheeple can call others 'pubbies'. It makes sheeple feel important. Isn't it what all sheeples want?

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#139 - 2014-03-08 11:30:36 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Kyperion wrote:
The dude has a more inexplicable cult of personality than Barack Obama. I will never understand the sheeple that blindly follow egomaniacs like them.

it's simple actually: sheeple can call others 'pubbies'. It makes sheeple feel important. Isn't it what all sheeples want?


Conversely, the pubbies bond over their mutual hatred of people that share a common characteristic that the pubbies don't have.

Grr, Goons.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#140 - 2014-03-08 11:30:50 UTC
Kyperion wrote:
The dude has a more inexplicable cult of personality than Barack Obama. I will never understand the sheeple that blindly follow egomaniacs like them.


lol

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar