These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ali Aras for CSM9

First post First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#61 - 2014-03-07 07:34:42 UTC
Ali, you brought up something I wanted to touch on, actually. And it's best to speak to you as an incumbent CSM in that regard, as you were involved.

TOS-Gate was not resolved. It was back-burner'ed and left in a corner until most people forgot about it. They might have backpedalled on the bonehead statements made by the GM staff early on, but there was no final word, no summation, or finalization.

It was just quitely swept aside and ignored. For goodness sakes the third-to-last post on it was mine, in November.

What are your thoughts on this?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#62 - 2014-03-07 19:56:38 UTC
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected?

Do you feel that perhaps CSM members in CSM 9 should work with publications such as TheMittani.com, EVENews24.com, CrossingZebras.com, etc. to put out their statements and/or opinions on changes CCP are making, so long as they are not in violation of the NDA? Much like how Two-Step commented on CCP's actions numerous times, and so forth?

How do you plan to continue communication between the CSM and the community? What do you feel CSM 8 did wrong in the way of communicating with the player base? What do you feel they did correct? What do you feel is the biggest fault with CSM 8? What is their biggest accomplishment? i.e. "didn't communicate with the community enough" "didn't push for community proposal X enough" etc.

As an EVE player do you look towards any person and/or group as inspiration? As a potential "politician" do you have any real world experience in managing a community and the communications therein that would apply to your role on CSM? (not so much as a game designer etc. but as a "people person")
Xander Phoena
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2014-03-07 23:03:46 UTC
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected?

Do you feel that perhaps CSM members in CSM 9 should work with publications such as TheMittani.com, EVENews24.com, CrossingZebras.com, etc. to put out their statements and/or opinions on changes CCP are making, so long as they are not in violation of the NDA? Much like how Two-Step commented on CCP's actions numerous times, and so forth?


I don't want to steal Ali's thunder here but CSM8 have been interviewed once a month on CZ and Ali has appeared a few times personally. At the start of CSM8's term, I asked if I could interview them once a month and they have kept up to that schedule without any problem with the vast majority actively taking part. And several times, their opinions on what CCP are up have been quite negative.

www.crossingzebras.com

Ali Aras
Deep Talent Pool
Diplomatic Incidents.
#64 - 2014-03-08 00:57:53 UTC
Jayne Fillon wrote:
Ali, since I've asked other members of the CSM this same question, how would you go on about introducing more small gang into 0.0 warfare?

In all seriousness: A la a recent article by mynnna on TMC, allow alliances to build up, not out. Make space improvements more granular than large structures which require huge fleets and time commitments to contest. In short, build the farms and fields thing into the way alliances can choose to hold space.

I think the ESS is a good example of a kind of thing that would work for this: it improves space (increases income) but can be disrupted by a few pilots without undue effort-- as long as it's undefended.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Ali, you brought up something I wanted to touch on, actually. And it's best to speak to you as an incumbent CSM in that regard, as you were involved.

TOS-Gate was not resolved. It was back-burner'ed and left in a corner until most people forgot about it. They might have backpedalled on the bonehead statements made by the GM staff early on, but there was no final word, no summation, or finalization.

It was just quitely swept aside and ignored. For goodness sakes the third-to-last post on it was mine, in November.

What are your thoughts on this?

Alas, the winter minutes are not out yet-- we actually discussed this at the summit, quite productively. There were internal discussions running concurrently to the thread, we agreed to have a better one at the summit, and it was among the highest on the list of sessions CSM brought to CCP. CCP had already scheduled it.

I'll follow up again-- it's been a little while since the summit, and I can see where things are at now. But, no, it wasn't dropped at all.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Ali Aras
Deep Talent Pool
Diplomatic Incidents.
#65 - 2014-03-08 04:40:33 UTC
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected?

I know you're asking everyone this but-- should continue as present, or increase, seeing as how I'm already on the CSM Blink. I'll be honest-- I don't log on as much as I used to, but that's if anything improved of late.

Quote:

Do you feel that perhaps CSM members in CSM 9 should work with publications such as TheMittani.com, EVENews24.com, CrossingZebras.com, etc. to put out their statements and/or opinions on changes CCP are making, so long as they are not in violation of the NDA? Much like how Two-Step commented on CCP's actions numerous times, and so forth?

How do you plan to continue communication between the CSM and the community?

So, I'm going to sort of sum up a conversation we had on jabber here so everyone else can read it. Xander's right: we were on CZ, and I did use TheMittani.com as a platform for CSM stuff occasionally. We also started http://csm8.org, whose main purpose ended up being "here's a place to read all the blogs in one place." Ripard wrote weekly updates, and while the occasional lack of content was frustrating to some, they were consistently in one place and readable.

We are talking about perhaps condensing these into monthly updates, similar to the ones TMC runs about other areas. This could be good-- there *are* improvements CSM 9 can make (and I would like to help them make) to the communication process. It'd be great to talk more clearly about the stuff we're working on or frustrated about, although by necessity some of it ends up being very very vague ("today I was annoyed because it felt like we were going in circles about a thing, and I really do think it should be changed before release").

CSM should have its own clear communications outside of the minutes, and institutionalizing this and making it awesome is a good goal for CSM 9. CSM 8 has in a lot of ways taken the work CSM 7 did in setting up a CSM/CCP relationship and run with it: CCP has been cutting us in on a lot more, even some surprising stuff, across a lot of different levels. We've been working with a lot more teams, and we've had direct influence and effects on various aspects of development. The stakeholder system has been working well. All that's great, and now we should be bringing that back to the community better.

One specific idea I had: create a little graph app that shows CSMs self-reporting "I meaningfully interacted with CCP over a feature". CSMs push butan to sign off, and you get a nice little scrolling ticker of CSM activity, so you can see the ebbs and flows of days and release cycles.
Quote:

What do you feel CSM 8 did wrong in the way of communicating with the player base? What do you feel they did correct?

Wrong: No clear central location / not enough attention on csm8.org. Right: we did do it a lot, just didn't advertise it as broadly.
Quote:

What do you feel is the biggest fault with CSM 8? What is their biggest accomplishment? i.e. "didn't communicate with the community enough" "didn't push for community proposal X enough" etc.

I talked about some of this earlier: "Failing: Collectively, probably the speed/visibility of our response on the Somer controversy? We responded quickly in private, and several CSMs were publicly posting things about it, but there was less of a Unified Statement Thing the way there was with the TOS response."

Accomplishment: Ugh I have to pick one. SMA loot drop was pretty good, though, and then getting the whole thing un-NDA'd so we could showcase how it works when ~the system works~.

Quote:

As an EVE player do you look towards any person and/or group as inspiration? As a potential "politician" do you have any real world experience in managing a community and the communications therein that would apply to your role on CSM? (not so much as a game designer etc. but as a "people person")

This is the hardest out of the set. I still really love my old corp, Valkyries of Night, which contains a lot of smart people with whom I "grew up" in the game. Several are also RL friends, so they're probably the ones I talk to about the CSM the most. Brave Newbies, going from zero to a huge and wildly successful organization, just absolutely blows me away, especially in that they've got the whole classy cultural thing going on.

I was "social director" for my college job? Lol In seriousness, most of my experience with communities comes from in-game ones. Obviously, I've served out 3/4 of a year on CSM 8, but back in the day in WoW I had the really bright idea to start a coalition of smaller/more casual guilds to run Molten Core content, and sorted out all the fighting cats stuff therein (it was a trainwreck we were scrubs). I've learned to do groups of people there, and real-life social skills I just happened to pick up at some point. Communications I've been learning as I go, and I think I've gotten better at it as the term has continued on.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society
Kvitravn.
#66 - 2014-03-12 10:16:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephira Galamore
Hi Ali!
I know this hasn't got anything to do with your CSM candidacy _directly_ but could you comment on what Marlona Sky wrote here?

Tbh, it sounds like something I would not expect from you as a person, and I would really like to see your point of view on that.

If you think this is completely out of place here and would clutter the campaing thread, consider replying on Reddit instead.
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#67 - 2014-03-12 10:17:05 UTC
Hi ali was just wondering if you could get round to answering my question , its been over a week now.
Ali Aras
Deep Talent Pool
Diplomatic Incidents.
#68 - 2014-03-13 06:11:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Ali Aras
corbexx wrote:

In wh space when some one gets invaded (evicted) normally its fight or die if the defending group loses they basically lose everything in that wh.

Null sec has just started "dead zoning" do you think it would be just easier to allow stations to be destroyable?

Frig, whoops, I missed this in the back-and-forth.

No, I don't. At least not without a hell of a lot of forethought and preparation first.

Null-sec outposts function differently from w-space POSes; they hold the accumulated **** of a ton of players (more than w-space) including some who've unsubbed. They're harder to deploy and more costly. The cost to destroying them is higher, therefore, but they're not actually that much harder to destroy thanks to the bigger blobs you can bring to bear.

In w-space, it takes a determined effort to burn out an entity you detest: you have to roll to find their hole, you have to seed it with ships, you have to get whatever friends you want to bring in routes to the hole once you've started the invasion. Lower-class holes provide less-valuable but still worthwhile living space. I haven't heard about anyone getting their **** kicked over in w-space just because a big c6 group was bored; the effort involved is just too great. Instead, w-space tends to invade for territory, for hatred, or for fights (or to punish lack of fights, see hatred).

Meanwhile, in nullsec, if stations were destructible? BOOM, burn the stations of your enemies just because. Or don't-- why do that when you can burn Providence to the ground? You don't even need to do a hellcamp. Sure, it means people might be able to evac, but maybe they don't log in in the four days it takes a station to go from hale and hearty to flipped. Maybe they're military and they've been deployed for a month, so there's no *way* they get in in time. Sure, there exist proposals to allow people who used to have stuff in station to get it back via warping to a structure, but it sucks in a big way. Implementing destructible stations right now would only contribute to the big blue blob mechanics that everyone hates.

Fix sov and fix nullsec, and then we'll talk.

Sephira Galamore wrote:
Hi Ali!
I know this hasn't got anything to do with your CSM candidacy _direcly_ but could you comment on what Marlona Sky wrote here?

Tbh, it sounds like something I would not expect from you as a person, and I would really like to see your point of view on that.

If you think this is completely out of place here and would clutter the campaing thread, consider replying on Reddit instead.

Yeah, that doesn't look much like me in that comment Blink. Tegiminis, on his AMA thread, has the real reasons why we let him go-- he was really difficult to work with, primarily. I was fed up with dealing with it, I suggested firing him, the other editors agreed. We pushed the button and sent a brief note so it wasn't just a wordless disconnect, and prior to today, that's where I've left it. Random people pestered me for details, I told 'em to get lost, because I bear no ill-will towards Marlona. Hell, I liked his piece on power projection (I have a draft reply I need to post to my blog, which I'd have fired off if I wasn't out all night). I admire his writing skills in trying to paint me as mad with power and/or trying to back up my alliance, but it was a lot more banal than that.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#69 - 2014-03-15 16:20:27 UTC
Xander Phoena wrote:
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected?

Do you feel that perhaps CSM members in CSM 9 should work with publications such as TheMittani.com, EVENews24.com, CrossingZebras.com, etc. to put out their statements and/or opinions on changes CCP are making, so long as they are not in violation of the NDA? Much like how Two-Step commented on CCP's actions numerous times, and so forth?


I don't want to steal Ali's thunder here but CSM8 have been interviewed once a month on CZ and Ali has appeared a few times personally. At the start of CSM8's term, I asked if I could interview them once a month and they have kept up to that schedule without any problem with the vast majority actively taking part. And several times, their opinions on what CCP are up have been quite negative.


Of course you're not stealing her thunder. I was just asking her the same question I've been asking most CSM candidates etc.
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
Masters of Flying Objects
#70 - 2014-03-22 19:08:35 UTC
Any word on when the minutes will be out for the winter summit?

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#71 - 2014-03-22 23:22:31 UTC
Ali Aras wrote:
I have a few regrets about the 9UY engagements, actually. That said, if folks from Providence want to talk Provi politics, I'm happy to do so somewhere off-thread (podcasts? A separate thread, perhaps on a Provi forum?). I'll be sticking to CSM stuff from here on out in here, though. With that in mind...
entroncas wrote:

1 - what have you done for the NRDS comunity during the entire year? I would dare to say NOTHING!!

2 - About ESS: have you realized the ESS alongside with the syphon units are the most ******** features since encarna?

I've raised the alliance standings thing. It hasn't happened yet-- I'd love it if it would, and I'll bring it up again. However-- and this gets to a point raised in the post after yours-- the CSM can only persuade, not directly commit changes to the game's codebase. We win some, we lose some. The more incremental the change, the easier to win, so I'll be bringing this up again.

I've nudged a few noobs in the direction of Providence when it seemed like it'd fit their needs well. I've advocated for more and more interesting Live Events, which serves the RP part of that NRDS community. I spoke out on a feature, but unfortunately, can't say much more than that due to NDA.

Regarding the siphons and ESS, well. Siphons I've spoken out against repeatedly. I'm not sure if you've listened to Declarations of War, but we talked about it on Episode 61. Skip to the CSM section to hear just the siphons bit. In concept, they were supposed to *benefit* groups like Providence, by making it possible to screw with moons without going to all the trouble of knocking towers over. In practice, they're a giant kick in the balls to anyone's logistics team, promote blue-on-blue violence, and are challenging to police. Remember when I said you win some, you lose some? ;-) Multiple CSM members have kept on nagging about these.

The ESS, meanwhile, we won some on. It was released to bad community feedback, I collected and streamlined a lot of the feedback, and the structure was changed. I'm actually somewhat surprised you're not a fan-- SOUND would have used these every day in Provi. They're best when you're in an active region with viable defense gangs (like Provi...), and they provide benefit to everyone in the system, regardless of alliance (meaning there's no weirdness with neuts or blues ratting in your space as well). Assuming you can loot them, they're a bonus to ratting income as well. Hostiles can't really drop one on you, because you can just shoot it as soon as they leave. Can you say more about what you don't like about them?


This was answered a fair bit back but I wanted to chime in and say that Ali got this way all the time in discussions, something I say in the best way possible - if anything the reply here is a very concise one that hardly scratches the surface. If you're looking for someone to mind the interests of NRDS on the CSM, Ali's your person.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Jaun Pacht-Feng
Doomheim
#72 - 2014-03-23 22:02:55 UTC
What non current CSM members would you want elected?

Why would you want them elected?

"Go Goon or Go Home"

Perfect description of the biggest problem with Eve. 

Ali Aras
Deep Talent Pool
Diplomatic Incidents.
#73 - 2014-03-23 22:10:14 UTC
Salpun wrote:
Any word on when the minutes will be out for the winter summit?

We're significantly further along in the process than we were two months after the summer summit :P I'm going to push for ASAP still; we've got a lot of stuff back from CCP/revised a lot so far, but waiting on some CCP stuff and then a final back-and-forth of edits.

I've been a lot more, well, nagtastic this go 'round, so I've got a better sense for when things are coming and am following the process more closely.

Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:
What non current CSM members would you want elected?

Why would you want them elected?

I'm going to defer my answer to this to closer to the election itself-- it's a very wide field, I want to make sure everyone I like gets their passports in and all that, and I have like three hard drives' worth of interviews to listen to.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Jaun Pacht-Feng
Doomheim
#74 - 2014-03-24 09:31:31 UTC
Your interviews already answered the question.

As many Mittensdotcom writers as possible!

"Go Goon or Go Home"

Perfect description of the biggest problem with Eve. 

Lanctharus Onzo
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#75 - 2014-03-25 01:04:25 UTC
CSM9 Candidate Interview: Ali Aras
http://www.capstable.net/2014/03/14/csm9aliaras

Executive Editor, CSM Watch || Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast || Twitter: @Lanctharus

James Arget
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
#76 - 2014-03-28 04:53:07 UTC
Ali Aras for Chair. Srsly.

Her passion, persistence, and professionalism have been unparalleled.

CSM 8 Representative

http://csm8.org

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#77 - 2014-03-29 02:39:08 UTC
I have to echo James, although I'm sure he is further in the loop on Ali's performance over this last year. The reason I feel comfortable in supporting Ali is that she is so active in this community, extremely vocal, and dedicated to bettering the community in as transparent a fashion as possible.

I have had the opportunity to observe her performance over the last year, read updates, listen to her community involvement, and as a wormhole resident, I am so impressed with her ability to take time and reach out to the various communities. Ali, I still need to get you over to RCC comms to introduce the guys to who I hope can chair this next CSM, hopefully with me serving along side, but rest assured, that I will have you on my ballot and all my recommendation shy of the wormhole candidates :)

Best of luck!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Ali Aras
Deep Talent Pool
Diplomatic Incidents.
#78 - 2014-03-29 14:35:33 UTC
Thanks Proc and James :) And yeah, would love to come over-- hit me up sometime today?

Dropping the link in my campaign thread because I'm sure it's a filter issue for a lot of people-- I posted my views on the ongoing community discussion regarding standards of behavior in EVE: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4411339#post4411339 . These are the views I have been advocating when in discussions with CCP, although I've been too short on time to post them before now. DoW 71 also has a lengthy debate between me and Alekseyev Karrde on the issue, and if you're interested, I encourage you to listen to that after release.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog

Gostina Mishina
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#79 - 2014-03-30 16:13:12 UTC
I would hate to inflict another year of CSMing on anyone, but the many endorsements of Ali support my general impressions of good sense and dedication. Ali will get votes from all my accounts...and my deep and abiding sympathy. Cool
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#80 - 2014-03-31 05:32:05 UTC
Ali, as one of the CSM involved in the change to the T2 Gunnery skill tree what are your thoughts in how this has impacted on missiles, as the ability to only specialise at the tiers you wanted was often trumpeted as a huge advantage missile users had when talking about how expensive the missile support skills were.