These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Limited Edition Reskins vs. Ship Painting

Author
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#1 - 2014-03-06 18:59:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Hello

I'll try to keep this post brief.

As many of us are aware, limited edition reskins are already prevalent in EVE. While we have things such as the Inner Zone Shipping Imicus which is very inexpensive and common, we also have things such as the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, which is priced well into the billions.

In the interests of being a completely functional and choice laden feature, I think most of us want even those ships to be available under Ship Painting. However, there are collectors who spent an order of magnitude more ISK on the ships when they first came out, than they would on the ships under Ship Painting's equivalent costs.

How can we reconcile this?


  • Should the LE ships be excluded from Ship Painting?
  • Should they be priced under Ship Painting differently from their hull equivalents? (i.e. higher prices)
  • Should they be offered at the same costs as their equivalent hull types, collectors be damned?


What do you think would be the best solution to the problem?

Note to ISD:

While I understand if you are forced to lock this thread, I am hoping to get some useful information for CCP gathered in this thread regarding the opinions of players on this specific topic. I feel doing so here under this specific topic (as long as posters can stay on topic) would be more helpful than trying to ask opinions in the excited milieu of the DevBlog thread.

Katrina Oniseki

Lilliana Stelles
#2 - 2014-03-06 19:00:56 UTC
I think LE patterns should be excluded from ship painting.
Problem solved.
The Ishukone Scorpion also has gimped stats IIRC.

Not a forum alt. 

KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-03-06 19:01:20 UTC
Anything more than one paragraph isnt brief!

And I guess the logo will still be different...

I honestly dont care about the limited edition ships or their value, I just wanna mess around with ship colours.

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.

Joshua Foiritain
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#4 - 2014-03-06 19:02:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Joshua Foiritain
CCP clearly stated the Ishukone Scorp was never supposed to be rare, its a gift they intended to spam around to whoever they wanted. If someone paid a lot of money for one then tough luck for that person, its no reason to leave the one ship out of the skinning system.

The Coreli Corporation is recruiting.

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#5 - 2014-03-06 19:02:49 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Hello

I'll try to keep this post brief.

As many of us are aware, limited edition reskins are already prevalent in EVE. While we have things such as the Inner Zone Shipping Imicus which is very inexpensive and common, we also have things such as the Ishukone Watch Scorpion, which is priced well into the billions.

In the interests of being a completely functional and choice laden feature, I think most of us want even those ships to be available under Ship Painting. However, there are collectors who spent an order of magnitude more ISK on the ships when they first came out, than they would on the ships under Ship Painting's equivalent costs.

How can we reconcile this?


  • Should the LE ships be excluded from Ship Painting?
  • Should they be priced under Ship Painting differently from their hull equivalents? (i.e. higher prices)
  • Should they be offered at the same costs as their equivalent hull types, collectors be damned?


What do you think would be the best solution to the problem?


The Ishukone Scorpion was given out freely with the understanding that it was never intended to be a limited-edition ship, only a reward for people who contributed an outsize amount of content or community support to the game.

Unless CCP specifically says, "this is a limited edition ship," it's not a limited edition ship, and collectors should make their purchases with that in mind.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

AnotherUseless Alt
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#6 - 2014-03-06 19:02:55 UTC
CCP doesn't care.
If you invested in something that CCP now decides it wants to sell that to people cheap, well, welcome to EvE.

"Self help is all in your head"

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#7 - 2014-03-06 19:06:53 UTC
I cant wait for the trade hub painted ship scams to begin! ::tingles::


Also: Stealth ship painting thread is still ship painting thread.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2014-03-06 19:08:49 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
I cant wait for the trade hub painted ship scams to begin! ::tingles::


Also: Stealth ship painting thread is still ship painting thread.

why would you paint a trade hub on a ship
Lilliana Stelles
#9 - 2014-03-06 19:10:27 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
I cant wait for the trade hub painted ship scams to begin! ::tingles::


Also: Stealth ship painting thread is still ship painting thread.


I swear to god it's a Widow! I just "renamed" it to "Scoprion Red and Black Edition" to be ironic!

Not a forum alt. 

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#10 - 2014-03-06 19:16:47 UTC
So, would you players be okay with the concept of offering these Limited Edition ships again through the painting store, without regards to the current rarity market enjoyed by what few have already been released?

Katrina Oniseki

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#11 - 2014-03-06 19:20:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Batelle
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
In the interests of being a completely functional and choice laden feature, I think most of us want even those ships to be available under Ship Painting. However, there are collectors who spent an order of magnitude more ISK on the ships when they first came out, than they would on the ships under Ship Painting's equivalent costs.

How can we reconcile this?


  • Should the LE ships be excluded from Ship Painting?
  • Should they be priced under Ship Painting differently from their hull equivalents? (i.e. higher prices)
  • Should they be offered at the same costs as their equivalent hull types, collectors be damned?


What do you think would be the best solution to the problem?


Katrina Oniseki wrote:
So, would you players be okay with the concept of offering these Limited Edition ships again through the painting store, without regards to the current rarity market enjoyed by what few have already been released?


The best solution is for collectors to suck it. Their value is based entirely on rarity and speculation, CCP is under no obligation to protect them. Specifically in the case of the IWS, CCP said they would consider releasing more in the future. IF CCP decides to release those skins as part of general options for any ship (or something), then its safe to assume the value of the IWS will plummet. If you paid money for rarity, you should enjoy it while its still rare. Demanding uniqueness or rarity to persist forever is unreasonable (except when explicitly stated otherwise).

However, I would expect many of these LE ships to remain as distinct typeIDs in the database rather than being completely converted into whatever scheme CCP has for reskinning other stuff (without defining thousands of new item types). They often have flavor text and the ISW doesn't refine into minerals.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#12 - 2014-03-06 19:25:52 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
[why would you paint a trade hub on a ship


Because corp and alliance logos would be too mainstream.... duh.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Jasmine Assasin
The Holy Rollers
#13 - 2014-03-06 19:33:13 UTC
As someone that collects ships, I don't care.

My ship collection is for my enjoyment, I sometimes undock them for others to enjoy as well when I have the time to "go visit" them. I don't treat them as an investment, and people that do probably aren't "true" collectors (ie. market speculators) anyway. Those of us that collect because that's what we like generally aren't as worried about the actual value as some might believe.

My .02 ISK.

Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#14 - 2014-03-06 19:34:48 UTC
To be honest, I've been anticipating this issue ever since I got back in and saw a bunch of cosmetic 'limited edition' ships.

LE should be made special in some way, sure-- but it'd be asinine to have gaps in the ship skins because marketing got to the old Incarna assets before the game developers could get them in.

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#15 - 2014-03-06 20:43:37 UTC
Ishukone Watch Scorpion is this "limited edition"

Painted one would be - Scorpion Ishukone Edition Roll

Why exclude "standard" skin like Ishukone just beacause there is a LE ships that has it.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
#16 - 2014-03-06 23:27:30 UTC
Give Somer millions of ship paintjobs for distribution. Maybe as a bonus for GTC sales.

See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2014-03-06 23:29:39 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
I cant wait for the trade hub painted ship scams to begin! ::tingles::


Also: Stealth ship painting thread is still ship painting thread.

why would you paint a trade hub on a ship




To scam people into thinking your Jita of course :D
Salvos Rhoska
#18 - 2014-03-06 23:37:42 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Also: Stealth ship painting thread is still ship painting thread.


Except that nobody can see a stealth ships paint job.
hur hur
I Riven I
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2014-03-07 00:00:58 UTC
they should be called legendary and should NOT be available in painting schemes feature.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#20 - 2014-03-07 01:30:04 UTC
I Riven I wrote:
they should be called legendary and should NOT be available in painting schemes feature.


Can you be more specific?

Do you mean they should be renamed, and be distinct in that way? Or do you mean that color scheme should not be available at all in the paint store?

Katrina Oniseki

12Next page