These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Heavy Attack Drone Size Reduction

Author
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#1 - 2014-03-06 10:52:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Reduce the size of heavy attack drones from the current 25m3 to 15m3 or 20m3, such that they offer more of an incentive to utilize over sentry drones. Bandwidth would remain at 25mbit per heavy drone.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
#2 - 2014-03-06 13:54:10 UTC
Yes. Make them filling the gap between Hammerhead and Sentrys.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-03-06 13:59:03 UTC
makes sense
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#4 - 2014-03-06 15:27:28 UTC
not a bad idea.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Leyete Wulf
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2014-03-06 15:51:54 UTC
While I think this is a good idea lets be honest, heavy drones will still be slow, apply damage poorly compared to sentries, and subject to close ranged and proximity weapons (screening ships/drones and smart bombs). If the object is to make heavies a comparable weapon they need to be able to out perform sentries in some category. Either by being harder hitting, more flexible, or have much more durability.

I would proposed that rather than trying to fit heavies into the space between mediums and sentries CCP should look at fitting heavies into the space between sentries and fighters. Make them use more space, more bandwidth, make them harder hitting, and give them a balance of orbit range and tank that makes them less vulnerable to proximity weapons. That way a domi/geddon/rattler pilot could have the option of deploying sentries and then camping a spot or deploying heavies for an on the run engagement.

And yes I know fighters are broke but that's a debate for another thread.
Leoric Firesword
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-03-06 16:04:38 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Reduce the size of heavy attack drones from the current 25m3 to 15m3 or 20m3, such that they offer more of an incentive to utilize over sentry drones. Bandwidth would remain at 25mbit per heavy drone.


I still wouldn't use heavy drones with this change.

1) They're slow, take a long time to get to target/start doing damage.

2) If there's still any frigs/destroyers/cruisers/battlecruisers on the field they'll get eaten alive

3) if you're more than 10-15 km from the battleship you're sending them after chances are they'll get eaten alive.

4) I can project *better* damage from sentries while outside the range of most of my enemies

The only time I've used heavies is if I'm in my BC and don't want to just orbit sentries, otherwise sentries just make more sense for all applications.
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#7 - 2014-03-06 17:06:51 UTC
Supported. This would let them serve in their niche as close-range brawlers. The lower size also means more replacements can be stored in the drone bay, so the risk of loss due to their slow speed is mitigated somewhat. Still won't see use in missions, but adds some interesting options to PvP drone boats.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-03-06 17:19:36 UTC
This would do absolutely nothing to help with the shortcomings of heavy drones.
You would basically have the choice of have more drones to lose or continue to use sentry drones.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#9 - 2014-03-06 17:23:09 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
This would do absolutely nothing to help with the shortcomings of heavy drones in missions.
You would basically have the choice of have more drones to lose or continue to use sentry drones.


Fixed that for you. Note that I agree with you, but the difference between pve and pvp uses for them does matter.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2014-03-06 17:25:18 UTC
Ines Tegator wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
This would do absolutely nothing to help with the shortcomings of heavy drones in missions.
You would basically have the choice of have more drones to lose or continue to use sentry drones.


Fixed that for you. Note that I agree with you, but the difference between pve and pvp uses for them does matter.

Figured some pompous know it all would do something like that.

And heavy drones do have plenty of practical application in missions already if you are not a complete moron.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#11 - 2014-03-06 17:37:55 UTC
They have two uses in missions.

1. They make a small pretty explosion
2. If you are within paint scraping range of another ship they might not die getting to it.

Drones need worked over, and one thing I would like to see is Heavies reduced to 20 bw and m3, with their base speed increased significantly. This would let the few 100 mb ships put out a full flight of heavies, or a short stack of sentries with room for a flight of lights for frigate suppression.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#12 - 2014-03-06 17:50:15 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
This would do absolutely nothing to help with the shortcomings of heavy drones.

It's a small change, it's an incremental change - and it would seem to be a step in the right direction. I can't see how being able to field more flights or different types of heavy drones can be perceived as a bad thing.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Cade Windstalker
#13 - 2014-03-06 17:59:04 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
They have two uses in missions.

1. They make a small pretty explosion
2. If you are within paint scraping range of another ship they might not die getting to it.

Drones need worked over, and one thing I would like to see is Heavies reduced to 20 bw and m3, with their base speed increased significantly. This would let the few 100 mb ships put out a full flight of heavies, or a short stack of sentries with room for a flight of lights for frigate suppression.


Except that a change like this would also trigger a review and re-balance of all those ships, making this a somewhat pointless objective. If they wanted those ships to field a full flight of Heavies they would have given them 125mb of Bandwidth.
Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
#14 - 2014-03-06 18:21:41 UTC
It would buff the Eos.... so its a good Idea... lol
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#15 - 2014-03-06 18:24:33 UTC
If we're really going to operate under the belief that Heavy Drones are inferior to Sentry Drones in the same way that Light Drones are inferior to Medium Drones, then I suppose I'll agree to support a modest size reduction.
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#16 - 2014-03-06 20:51:22 UTC
Except that Light drones in practice are better than medium drones, at least in PvE.

They do less damage, but they actually make it to the target, and back once they get aggroed sometimes.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#17 - 2014-03-07 01:08:22 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Heavy drones these days really are in need of major improvement, I agree ships like the stratios should be able to field a full flight, even though not capable of fielding 5 sentries, mediums, are about as slow as can be tolerated, and you still need to actively manage them, however they are starting to benefit from the increased hit points being offered by the new ships,
heavies since the drone aggression alterations in PVE are so much a second choice to sentries it is absurd.

So the idea to place them between mediums and sentries, with bandwidth a reasonable incentive , makes a lot of sense but they need to have the ability to get to the target and survive, and not just at very short range.

If they were placed between mediums and sentries regarding damage, with good survivability, and significantly improved speed, good for say up to 50km then they might have a role again.
Theres a hell of a gap between mediums and sentries, and heavies are currently not filling it.

Edit: As i have reread my post , I actually realise that I think heavies should be dropped altogether and replaced with high damage variants of mediums. it would be a far better solution. So medium combat and assault drones.

The heavy drone skill can be renamed to assault drone skill and carried over unchanged.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#18 - 2014-03-07 01:20:35 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

Edit: As i have reread my post , I actually realise that I think heavies should be dropped altogether and replaced with high damage variants of mediums. it would be a far better solution. So medium combat and assault drones.

The heavy drone skill can be renamed to assault drone skill and carried over unchanged.


Or just rebalanced to that effect. Same difference, I guess.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#19 - 2014-03-07 01:29:22 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Ines Tegator wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

Edit: As i have reread my post , I actually realise that I think heavies should be dropped altogether and replaced with high damage variants of mediums. it would be a far better solution. So medium combat and assault drones.

The heavy drone skill can be renamed to assault drone skill and carried over unchanged.


Or just rebalanced to that effect. Same difference, I guess.


True, but if you are going to give a heavy all the stats of a medium but with increased damage ability, it makes more sense to make it a new version of the medium combat drone. Much less work for CCP. and the heavy drone can be consigned to history.

I would suggest that the power should be a little less than 4/5 of the power of the applicable sentry drone, to ensure its overall damage when fielding 5, is not more than using sentries, on a ship that can only carry 4 sentries.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Alyth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2014-03-07 03:12:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Alyth
I don't know why people are saying that sentries should out-damage heavies...

Yes sentries have a complete lack of mobility however that is compensated for with long range and high damage. However heavy drones have far more cons that pros when compared to sentries i.e short range, travel time, slow speed large sig for something so small, poor tracking etc. To be honest, I believe heavy drones should out-damage sentries in the same way as close range weapon systems out-damage long range weapons. No-one complains that blasters out-damage rails for example as they trade off damage for range, the same should apply with drones as it does with every other weapon system in the game.

Anyways, my 2 (insert currency unit here) worth - increase speed by at least 75%, increase their agility, increase their tracking, increase base hp slightly and increase base damage bonus so that they deal approx 20-30% more damage than current sentries with travel time taken into account. That way you have the same choice as other weapon users, damage or range.

edit: While I am making that point, why not add light and medium sentry drones too and rebalance light and medium combat drones to match?
12Next page