These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

[CSM9] Wormhole Discussion | Proc's Fireside Chat

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Axloth Okiah
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2014-03-02 22:25:38 UTC
Where do you stand on adding beards into character creator and hats into the apparel store?

SSC Brokering Service
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#22 - 2014-03-02 22:37:39 UTC
Axloth Okiah wrote:


Hey, Axloth, and thanks for the question.

Where do you stand on adding beards into character creator and hats into the apparel store?

So, I may need clarification, since we already have beards in the character creator, unless you are referring to more beards, Gandolf beards, and mutton chop type options added? As for hats in the apparel store, I'd personally a fan of that introduction, especially if I could have my tophat :) Overall, these are things I've not given much thought, but I'd always be open to your opinion as well!

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#23 - 2014-03-02 22:40:34 UTC
Tyrant Scorn wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
Pretty sure the fact that Red/Tyrant doesnt like you is the best argument I've ever heard for voting for a CSM candidate.

disagreeing with someone isn't disliking...

oh my bad, let me fix that up for you:

Pretty sure the fact that Red/Tyrant doesnt agree with you is the best argument I've ever heard for voting for a CSM candidate.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Axloth Okiah
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2014-03-03 08:04:51 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
So, I may need clarification, since we already have beards in the character creator, unless you are referring to more beards, Gandolf beards, and mutton chop type options added? As for hats in the apparel store, I'd personally a fan of that introduction, especially if I could have my tophat :) Overall, these are things I've not given much thought, but I'd always be open to your opinion as well!
I mean proper full wizard/lumberjack/hobo beards, not these metrosexual stubble jokes we have now. There is a strong community (at least two people in WHO) who absolutely demand this and its a condition for giving votes.

btw are you aware that every WH CSM is required to join SSC?

SSC Brokering Service
Sith1s Spectre
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2014-03-03 08:07:25 UTC
Hi Proc.

What is your thoughts on people self destructing ships in POS' ?

Resident forum troll and fashion consultant
Tyrant Scorn
#26 - 2014-03-03 08:15:42 UTC
Axloth Okiah wrote:
I mean proper full wizard/lumberjack/hobo beards, not these metrosexual stubble jokes we have now.


+1

The Tyrant King

YouTube | Twitter | Twitch
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#27 - 2014-03-03 08:23:30 UTC
Axloth Okiah wrote:


I mean proper full wizard/lumberjack/hobo beards, not these metrosexual stubble jokes we have now. There is a strong community (at least two people in WHO) who absolutely demand this and its a condition for giving votes.

Youe clarification is most appreciated. I can see how important this issue is for you, and can appreciate your concern for the lack of wizadly and other legend-like facial features. Consider this item duly noted.

btw are you aware that every WH CSM is required to join SSC?

I've heard this rumored. I'm now aware.

Sith1s Spectre wrote:


Hey Sith,

What is your thoughts on people self destructing ships in POS' ?

As a player who has led and attended quite a few evictions in my time, I was conflicted by this allowance. On one hand, I quite enjoyed the local pvp and the tally of ships we considered "kills" based on their self destruction. On the other hand, I'm quite opposed to allowing ships to be destructed in such a dishonorable manner. Personally, I feel that self destruction should not be enabled within POS shields, however as a CSM delegate, I'd be open to a discussion prior to a proposal or consideration would be made toward CCP development teams. Thanks for your question.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Winthorp
#28 - 2014-03-03 08:35:48 UTC
Hi Proc.

I liked your initial posts to do with helping out the lower end of WH space and these match up with my views as to becoming good drivers for growth in all areas of WH space but you have not mentioned what your views are on C5/6 space and if you feel personally they need any changes?

<3
Calmatt
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#29 - 2014-03-03 09:20:28 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:


As a player who has led and attended quite a few evictions in my time, I was conflicted by this allowance. On one hand, I quite enjoyed the local pvp and the tally of ships we considered "kills" based on their self destruction. On the other hand, I'm quite opposed to allowing ships to be destructed in such a dishonorable manner. Personally, I feel that self destruction should not be enabled within POS shields, however as a CSM delegate, I'd be open to a discussion prior to a proposal or consideration would be made toward CCP development teams. Thanks for your question.


While this would be a huge drive for invasions, the smaller corps in wh space would get ******* wrecked on a regular basis, that would hurt wormhole space more as a whole than a few major invasions among the large groups.
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2014-03-03 09:30:06 UTC
This isnt really a wh question but as evictions were brought up. It sort of goes in line with them.

Whats your throughts on dead zoning stations in nullsec and should these be made destroyable in the future?

Corbexx for CSM X - Wormholes still deserve better
Red Teufel
Calamitous-Intent
#31 - 2014-03-03 12:53:43 UTC
adding a greater variety of WHs would be welcomed however I am not inclined to change what is currently in the game. I also wouldn't bother pushing CCP to change pos mechanics because they are in the process of phasing them out. I would also like to see sansha invade my hole one day :P
Chitsa Jason
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#32 - 2014-03-03 14:13:34 UTC
Hey proc,

Do you feel some wormholes should be made more valuable than others (same class, not counting effect or static)?
What do you think about black holes?
Would you agree or disagree that K162 signature delay should be introduced because of the auto sig checker?

Thank you for your answers and good luck with campaign!

Burn the land and boil the sea You can't take the sky from me
Lakshata Chawla
Blue-Fire
#33 - 2014-03-03 14:52:48 UTC
What makes you greater than, equal to, or less than Bane, Chitsa, and James.
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#34 - 2014-03-03 15:41:54 UTC
Chiming in...

What is your stance on currently existing mass-limitations for all classes c1-c6 - both regarding maximum jump mass and individual jump mass? Scope is especially the barely roll-able c1-connection many people complain about in their c2/c1+hs. Does anything around that need changes, or is the current situation *fine*?

What about clone-jumping? Would you advocate anything related to the combination wormhole-clonejump? (Mainly because the meta would take a drastic shift away from T3s if you wouldn't need to scout 20 holes until you get an empire to actually get your mates back with less than 30 jumps to travel, rules to avoid exploitation apply <.<) Also asking this because you normally have either a good null, OR a good hisec entrance, but rarely both.
Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2014-03-03 20:44:58 UTC
Do you like cake?
Himnos Altar
An Errant Venture
#36 - 2014-03-04 15:30:40 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:
Do you like cake?


Follow up Question:

Do you like Waffles?
Tyrant Scorn
#37 - 2014-03-04 15:44:56 UTC
Lakshata Chawla wrote:
What makes you greater than, equal to, or less than Bane, Chitsa, and James.


You can't compare anyone to Chitsa or to James yet, the entire CSM 9 process will have to prove that. It also depends on how much room you'll have as a member of the CSM and how much CSM 9 WH members can get their point across and present their issues and points to CCP.

Compared to other wormholers I'd say Proc is the only one who's gone balls deep into the CSM election process so far, so he's got the upper hand. The others have not announced if they are running yet.

The Tyrant King

YouTube | Twitter | Twitch
bubble trout
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2014-03-04 15:54:56 UTC
Dear proc,

What is your stance on allowing 2 monoculus, or perhaps a monoculus and a laser site, to be worn at once?

Best regards,


bubbletrout
Krackie
Segmentum Solar
#39 - 2014-03-04 16:01:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Krackie
bubble trout wrote:
Dear proc,

What is your stance on allowing 2 monoculus, or perhaps a monoculus and a laser site, to be worn at once?

Best regards,


bubbletrout


Bi-monocles, good god yes... suddenly everything makes sense! :D


Also I know its a sensitive subject for some, to what extent do you feel WH residents should have influence on the other aspects of eve online, specifically sov-warfare.

Bo Jangles of EN24
Cylin Rath
#40 - 2014-03-04 16:21:30 UTC
If CCP comes to you and other members of the CSM and asks:

“What are the top ten new features and/or changes you would like us to focus on for the community you represent in the next two releases?”

How would you answer?
Previous page123Next page