CSM Campaigns

+1 for core.

+1 to core

+1 for Core.

+1 core

I asked Jayne Fillon these questions and got some good answers, so I thought I'd spread the love:

1) How are you planning to contribute to something actually getting done with respect to sov nullsec? Clearly, it's not on CSM to get it done, but the will has been there for years on both sides of the table. There is no shortage of ideas. There's been no shortage of debate. So instead of talking about ideas, let's just assume that CCP has a plan, ready for your feedback. Would you be willing to start a process of potentially disrupting nullsec over a period of (likely) years in order to start a steady trickle of features that will eventually coalesce into a new system? Would you rather try to hammer out a major release, with plenty of notice to interested parties, and accept that its release would not happen in your term, and
possibly not for some time after that? (After all, how long has it already been?) Or would you be more inclined to support whichever tactic CCP seems most inclined toward?

2) What if there's more than one way to claim and maintain sovereignty? What if it was more granular, and several alliances could share sovereignty of one system?

3) Let's say that CSM 9 has exactly the same impact on nullsec that previous CSMs have had: much discussion, some good ideas, some bad ideas, and some new shinies, but at the end of the day it's still IHUBs and TCUs and SBUs as far as the eye can see. What will you tell the people who are now hoping that you, or someone, will ~fix sov~?

first of, i think u nailed it on the head that a CSM member should forget about the idea that his solo acting or idea's /input while change eve forever. as u mentioned, history proven wrong. However that still makes a csm a valuable feedback mechanism and forum too test stuff onto. Alot of eve experience and commitment is collected in those 14 members.

Like i said in my statement, i dont feel null sec is broken at all. like anything in eve it can use attention. I was there to see sov move from pos dropping mechanism too current, which was good, can it get better sure, i am really intrested to hear CCP s goals on it, if on CSM. personally i feel content driven, localised activity should matter. As providence resident i can show u and others how localised content works and what the results are.

hope that kinda answers some of your questions

+1

+ 1 for core

+1 for core

PLUS ONE