EVE General Discussion

1) Defeat does not mean kill, but that is irrelevant, you can kill Archons and other caps with any BS fleet, regardless of the number of Archons on field. I can think of 4 different occasions CFC defeated Slow Cat fleets fielding subcaps. So pretend it didn't happen I don't really care. 2 of them were done while using less than 1600 megas too.

2) "We" as in the other people in GSF who know what they are talking about invented. I "Baltec1" an F1 monkey just reguritates what I think is the situation.

Come on son, everyone here knows you are talking mad ****. I get it though, I wouldn't my freebie saturday afternoon kills taken away either if I was a CFC knucledragger.

If grid loading and session changes are ever reduced to 0 seconds, it would have little to no reason to exist.

Gankers should get to take advantage of people who choose to gamble and lose and who sit around in space doing nothing rather make themselves safe.

He should have done it in a different order and not skipped over the steps that would have let him avoid that fate. Figuring it's Saturday should have been his first step, and those clicks should have been moved a dozen or two places down the line…

Its almost as if he is trying to show he knows nothing about what happens in his game

Name them.

It gives an incentive to warp off instead of swamping the node in jump requests.

Despite the fact that I have to resort to an e-cig and decaf coffee before the drive from hell I made time especially for you (I like you!) - so I'll try to be nice.

Capitalising Courier then attempting to talk authoritatively about the 'profession' is a bit of a giveaway that you have no idea what you are on about other than regurgitating forum spam. You threw yourself into that one beautifully tho!



Giving a lot of respect to CCP then mistrusting them with further development is both disturbing and well, utterly sensible in my eyes too! But that isn't what you've been arguing here until now so stop backpedalling.

The forums are here to facilitate player squawking and rambling regardless of the entitlement of the squatters. We don't need self appointed gatekeepers, particularly if they are twats. We already have CCP and the CSM ffs. Tippia might still be around in a year or two pedantically correcting people. The rest won't. I dare you to disagree with them (for a year or two). Just for fun.

Attacking players who are clumped en masse at a given point, whether that be anywhere in space or at a gate, is in no way shape or form exploitation or cheating.

Systems have caps. In ingame terms, those represent the capacity ofnthe NPC system Authorities to handle and service traffic in their system. They close the gates, and inform you of that, when their capacity is reached.

There is nothing wrong with that.

It is not a server issue, it is an ingame restriction imposed by the system Authorities on how many Capsuleers they will allow into their space at that time.

It is not a CCP issue, because the gate queues are caused by player behavior for which they are themselves responsibe.
Namely collectively trying to force themselves through the eye of a needle that they have been informed of, ingame, as being restricted for access by the recipient systems Authorities.

If you choose to sit in a blob at a gate, that is your independant player choice.
If someone decides to attack that blob (or individual), that is their independant choice.

There is absolutely nothing needing of correction from CCPs side, and in fact, intervention on this issue by giving Jita non-standard preferential treatment would be a violation of the unwritten rule of CCP non-intervention in player based matters.

For all intents and relevant ingame purposes, the popularity and capacity of Jita has plateued.
CCP is not blocking your access to Jita. Other players are, and you, in turn, are blocking their access as well.
CCP is not attacking you while blobbed at a gate, other players are.

Jita is FULL at times. Accept that, and formulate your ingame strategy to account for this purely player based and player caused competetive phenomenon.

Those of you who even attempt to blackmail CCP into giving Jita preferential treatment, shouldm realise that for every single on of you that tries to push their sense of entitlement against the threat of unsubbing, there are 10 people who will respond with 10 times your level of discontent should CCP intervene to modify the games base mechanics on this issue.

TLDR: Jita, just like everything else in the EVE universe, and IRL, has a maximum capacity it can service.
Adapt your strategy to:
-Either trade at other hubs or from peripheral systems.
-Adjust your use of game time so that you do your Jita business at off peaks, and something else during the peaks.
-Swap profession and begin capitalising on the xhoice of other players to blob at a gate.
-Simply continue to do as you are now, by queuing into Jita at peak, as do many others, and accpet the consequence of that by being blocked from access by other people who are choosing this same strategy as you, and whom you in turn, are also blocking, resulting in one enormous cluster**** entirely of your making.

LOL No one can.

Lack of comprehension is on you not me.