These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What's the latest on "Logistics getting on killmails"?

First post
Author
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#101 - 2014-02-23 18:39:07 UTC
Good lord I'm agreeing with Grath again.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Dave Stark
#102 - 2014-02-23 18:41:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I still maintain that having logi on killmails would make things ridiculously convoluted.

i completely agree.

then again, the same can be said for the current system that shows a bunch of ships that activated offensive modules on a ship.
it's a killmail. nobody cares who shot the ship, we only care who killed it. just list who got the finishing blow and be done with it.

the thing is, killmails are half way between "what it says on the can" and what they "should" be. what's currently displayed on them doesn't make massive amounts of sense. it shows you more than who killed who, and less than the whole "story" of the fight.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#103 - 2014-02-23 18:43:48 UTC
Except that wouldn't a good representation at all of who killed it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Dave Stark
#104 - 2014-02-23 18:45:06 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Except that wouldn't a good representation at all of who killed it.


yes it would, one player shot at it and it went boom. he killed it. who cares who else was shooting at it, they didn't kill it. that one pilot who landed the final blow did.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#105 - 2014-02-23 18:48:54 UTC
This definition of kill you're no doubt using only for purposes of argumentation is unnecessarily narrow.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Dave Stark
#106 - 2014-02-23 18:51:27 UTC
well if we're going to have ships on the kill mail that didn't kill the ships, may as well include all of the ships that didn't kill it not just half of them.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#107 - 2014-02-23 18:54:02 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
And corp on corp violence in high sec still allows you to assist a drone to a combat ship in your corp.

What it sounds more like is that you're trying that neutral repping crap and want to get on mails, otherwise theres no reason you can't assist a drone like any other logistics pilot.


correct, neutral repping.


Oh, well from a certain point of view, this:

Dave Stark wrote:

once again facilitating =/= participating. that titan and that covops didn't participate in the fight. they were just "there", except the titan that was like 4 systems away.


Would fit you as well. You're not an active participant in the fight, you're just facilitating it Roll

You can't really be properly engaged, and as far as a handful of situations, it works in all situations (including low sec, regardless of complaints I know 100% that it works, just like all drone code its sometimes buggy) except yours.

Maybe you should, idk, nut up and actually get in the fight if you want to be on a killmail, neutral repping people get literally zero sympathy from anybody in EvE about anything.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Dave Stark
#108 - 2014-02-23 19:01:19 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
And corp on corp violence in high sec still allows you to assist a drone to a combat ship in your corp.

What it sounds more like is that you're trying that neutral repping crap and want to get on mails, otherwise theres no reason you can't assist a drone like any other logistics pilot.


correct, neutral repping.


Oh, well from a certain point of view, this:

Dave Stark wrote:

once again facilitating =/= participating. that titan and that covops didn't participate in the fight. they were just "there", except the titan that was like 4 systems away.


Would fit you as well. You're not an active participant in the fight, you're just facilitating it Roll

You can't really be properly engaged, and as far as a handful of situations, it works in all situations (including low sec, regardless of complaints I know 100% that it works, just like all drone code its sometimes buggy) except yours.

Maybe you should, idk, nut up and actually get in the fight if you want to be on a killmail, neutral repping people get literally zero sympathy from anybody in EvE about anything.


except i'm not facilitating the fight; the fight would happen with or without me.

you could just accept your solution doesn't work instead of implying i need to grow a pair.

this thread isn't about sympathy. i honestly couldn't give a **** about kill mails as a logi. in fact, i don't really care about them as a whole but the fact remains they display a strange middle distance between "the guy who made a kill" and "everyone in the fight". some people want logi on kill mails, ccp said they might put them on. trying to say they shouldn't be on there doesn't make a great deal of sense *shrug* nor should you have to create dumb situational workarounds.
Marsha Mallow
#109 - 2014-02-23 19:07:07 UTC
Lord Maldoror wrote:

...


This stuff is the only interesting counterargument I can see so far. If and when cyno alts and bridging titans demand killboard acknowledgement, we can deal with it at the time amid plenty of guffawing.

This issue wouldn't be at no. 10 on a CSM list if it didn't have some support - it's really difficult to see why anyone would argue against a review? Whilst it's nice to see Mike post to acknowledge it was discussed by CCP & the CSM, where's the plan to resolve it? It looks like it was discussed then discarded. What was the point of the list then?

All of the solutions and counterarguments so far suggest is that there are hidden benefits or out of game solutions to this, but that doesn't mean it isn't a flawed mechanic.

I'd agree with earlier posters that perhaps killboards and killmails need a more comprehensive review and overhaul. If a flag can be put in for "assist" mechanics, it could affect dedicated EWAR ships and caps on field in a support rather than DPS role - it'd make battlereports more interesting and useful.

Someone earlier mentioned LoL - it might be worth considering how other games deal with this and whether it's satisfactory. I played SWTOR warzones for a while, and they implemented a system (as per player requests) in which healers got tagged on every kill people they healed made. It did massively inflate healer killstats, but as far as I know the mechanic didn't break warzones. Scout tanks in WoT receive acknowledgement for lighting up the map. These tools other games use work, so why can't they be implemented here in some form or another?

ps. Warrior IIs are fine, except when fights exceed their range. Logis are frequently at range from DPS ships as well, which makes combat drones useless. It's nice to see some groups reward and aknowledge Logi, but the majority simply can't due to time or ISK constraints. Small groups in particular struggle to get people to continually fly logi, because of a lack of perceived reward/acknowledgement/they see it as a girly role - plus in sub BS fleets it's often an expensive ship to field. Solutions should be considered for the majority of players, not for those who play as a second job.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#110 - 2014-02-23 19:12:34 UTC
That list was pretty bullshit. There were other demands that got significantly higher support that didn't end up in the final list for whatever reason. Like having an interface to unify settings across all characters and accounts a player might own.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Dave Stark
#111 - 2014-02-23 19:17:07 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Like having an interface to unify settings across all characters and accounts a player might own.


I'd like that, too. having to use that garpa thing is nice but meh, it really should be part of the game.
Marsha Mallow
#112 - 2014-02-23 19:22:44 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Like having an interface to unify settings across all characters and accounts a player might own.


I'd like that, too. having to use that garpa thing is nice but meh, it really should be part of the game.

I remember idly scrolling through the list and thinking - heh, yeah, they're not going to do any of that. A shame.
I didn't realise Garpa did that though, good to know, I'll have a look - thanks! P

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Dave Stark
#113 - 2014-02-23 19:27:56 UTC
Marsha Mallow wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Like having an interface to unify settings across all characters and accounts a player might own.


I'd like that, too. having to use that garpa thing is nice but meh, it really should be part of the game.

I remember idly scrolling through the list and thinking - heh, yeah, they're not going to do any of that. A shame.
I didn't realise Garpa did that though, good to know, I'll have a look - thanks! P

had to actually scroll down on google (i know, right?) to find a working mirror, though.

what you're looking for is "GarpaUI"
Erufen Rito
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#114 - 2014-02-23 19:43:37 UTC
Laiannah Sahireen wrote:
Yarda Black wrote:
You're either logi or not


This is nonsense. It's a PVP game and logistics is a vital role in PVP, there's no reason for logi pilots to miss out on KMs.

Besides, you're completely missing the point. CCP have already said they plan to do this. My question was whether anybody knows what the latest news is on when we might expect it.

Well, I'm one of the first guys to hop on a logi ship when the FC calls for it. I don't really care about KMs, because I'm satisfied with knowing we did a good job and killed the hostiles and suffered minimal to no loses thanks to the job I and my fellow logibros did. I have no qualms with not whoring on KMs.

Now, IF i want to be on KMs, I'll get on the right type of ship to do so.

To answer the question "Why are logi not on KMs?" Because logi did no DPS to the target, thus didn't help kill it. "But wait! If it werent for logi, DPS ships would die!" And the dead pilot would still be on the KM. So there you have it. Logis are not meant to kill targets, they are meant to avoid or postpone lossmails.

This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165

Master Odysseus
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#115 - 2014-02-24 03:29:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Master Odysseus
QUOTE:
"""#10 on the list is to put Logistics pilots onto killmails. Mike Azariah pointed out that
Logistics pilots get part of the bounty, so it’s clearly tracked. Soundwave wondered
aloud if it’s the right solution. “Logistics pilots want recognition, but is the killmail the
right place? Is shoehorning the information into the right place?” Ripard Teg brought up
an idea from elsewhere –“ if you’re present for a kill, you get kill credit, but likewise if
you are repping someone who dies, you get points against you.” Mynnna agreed that
whatever solution is settled on here, acknowledging failure should happen as well.
Korvin argued that logistics are “just another thing” involved in a kill, like ammo,
modules, etc. and they should be recorded. Ripard Teg pointed out we’re all gamers
and are driven by achievement, and that it also is an intelligence source. “It sizes up the
sides in a fight.” Veritas pointed out that battle reports like that, such as dog .net, do not
actually exist in EVE, but if they did, that may be a more appropriate way to display
logistics participation. Soundwave concluded that he thinks they should solve it, and
he’s just not sure if killmails are the right place for it"""


So you want to punish logi's for "failing" to save the friendly? And where is the punishment of the 1000's DPS ships who "failed" to kill the enemies?

This is kinda BS imo.

And yes, KM *is* the kind of recognition logi pilot want because it's the only recognition that everyone accepts and it's the only recognition every single pvp corp / alliance / coalition judges players with and that's their killboard. And if your killboard is crap cuz you're a logi, good luck trying to prove you are not an elephant. (and I don't say that because I'm full time logi and I have crappy KB, my KB is fine, thx).

And no, Iogi's don't want to curry warrior IIs, 1 smartbomb and they're gone. And no they don't want to curry 1 sentry, one warp out and it's gone. It's not that logi ships have the drone bay of drone boats. And not much you can do when all the fight takes place outside of your drone control range cuz hey, you won't be fitting those logi high slots with drone link augmentors now, would you?

So give the logi's the recognition they deserve and give them in the KMs, imo.

Logi pilots in B-R or HED or w/e have no proof they ever existed.
They can't say "I was there".
There's no recognition of their pvp activity besides the paplink that some FCs don't even give and frankly noone cares about.

Also, there''s no "you are a logi, you care about rep-ing yoru teammates, why do you wanna KM whore"? This is invalid. Logi pilots, the second they enter the logi ship they have nothing to prove about caring for their teammates. Entering the logi ship is proof enough. So, it's not about KM whore-ing, it's about the recognition everyone else gets but the logi pilots.

And further to the above, I could say, you are in a DPS ship cuz you care about defending your space and defeating your enemies. Fine! Why do *you* care about the KM anyway? Eliminate the KMs/KBs all together!

My 2 cents.
Xia Kairui
Perkone
Caldari State
#116 - 2014-02-24 08:20:37 UTC
I dunno, I am rather happy if I am not on the kill mail. All a kill mail faciliates is giving out free intel to possible opponents, and I would gladly keep that information out of the hands of people who can use search engines. Sadly someone always posts the mails, I could really do without them.

Well, I DO use killboards to gather intel about people, so keep on posting them please.
Brusanan
Sons of Seyllin
Pirate Lords of War
#117 - 2014-02-24 10:53:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Brusanan
I think this is necessary, not because I think Logi deserve credit for kills, but because I think a killmail should not make it look like it was a solo kill when there were 6 people repping the killer.
seth Hendar
I love you miners
#118 - 2014-02-24 14:06:57 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Except that wouldn't a good representation at all of who killed it.


yes it would, one player shot at it and it went boom. he killed it. who cares who else was shooting at it, they didn't kill it. that one pilot who landed the final blow did.

yea but the final blow might not have been able to kill it, if the other(s) were not there, because he wasn't able to break the tank, or maintain it pointed or.....you get the point.

with this proposal, we could, in theory, see a carrier killed by an inty doing 1% of damage because an inty is less than 100dps, and any carrier shield natural regen is more than able to tank that.

while the current killmail will show the inty having final blow, but also the other ppl who took part in the kill thus making the kill happen.

this, iao, does also include the logi, because whithout em, many kill would not be possible.....
Brylan Grey
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#119 - 2014-02-28 02:10:23 UTC
Part of me sooooooo wants my Logi to be on kill mails and get the glory.

But my shady self realizes...

Flying Logi, my kill log seems like I am crappy. So, my enemies underestimate me. They see my loss vs kill numbers and think I don't know what I am doing.

So, I am 50-50 towards the idea of Logi on KMs.