These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Allow the Nestor to fit Covops Cloak as was originally intended

First post
Author
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#161 - 2014-02-23 00:13:19 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Worthwhile and Reasoned post, sorry to cut it, too long to quote.


That is a very Fair reply.

I do believe that as CCP rise states, He wishes people to aspire to it. There are important roles It can accomplish if it can warped cloaked, But yes Wormhole Space is not the only possible home for it.

I too will expand my thoughts to see If I can think of another home where It can fit in instead, as without the ability to warp cloaked, It will not find a home there.

I personally believe that the Nestor should have a limited Drone bandwidth, and not use a flight of sentries.but Instead Medium Drones with strong resists to damage signature, and the speed of small drones. 50mb bandwidth should put to rest a lot of fears. And would make the ship distinct

The lasers can then be bonused to balance damage.

This Prevents spitting out sentries as soon as you decloak.

Honestly with the delay in being able to lock, they are no more dangerous landing on a target than an uncloaked ship, If anything less so. It is the ability to travel with others who can warp cloaked T3s etc that it is missing.

The problem is that there is no excitement with this ship, yes it is white, but that is not enough to make people want to train skills, pay isk, and their time, when there is no role that leaps out at a player, yes it is a fine dominix alternative, but that is not enough reason for it to exist.

The question is where would this ship find a role? why would one want to cloak it at all? what is it good for?
The only role that this ship seems to fit that generates any excitement is Wormhole logistics and a good ship for sleeper combat sites,(not ruling out WH PvP). PvP will always find a way.

In this role it will often need to join a fleet of cloaked T3's who refit at destination.
unfortunately It really cannot join this fleet due to it's critical defect . This is not a case of liking or not liking, It is fatally flawed, It simply will not be used .

I will think if there is ANY other possibility for it, but without the ability to warp cloaked, but I fear it is simply a white elephant at the moment. I will think further,but no one seems to have found a potential use for it yet. apart from the one it currently cannot fulfil.

I suggest that CCP takes a step back and looks to see If they are happy for this ship to excel in wormholes in a balanced way.
Once they have made that decision, they should look to see if the essential requirements can be implemented in a battleship.

We have made it clear that if it cannot run with a cloaked T3 fleet, It will not achieve this end.
However, Taking a dominix painting it white and giving it a covert ops cloak, is messy and really is nothing special to get the heart pumping.

so in summation a few suggestions.

1. Be Able to travel in a t3 cloaked fleet with warping cloaked ability.
2. Reduced drone bandwidth.
3. medium drones gain a large hitpoint, reduced signature and increased speed bonus, retain the drone damage bonus as is. Do not increase it further.
4. Do not reduce time to initial lock but improve lock speed for logistics.
5. Cap, Shield, and Armor repair Bonuses. range increased to allow for mobile t3 fleet logistics.
6. Reduction in laser cap usage and rep useage.
7. Laser damage bonus improved to balance overall damage.

This would be exciting, and wanted, and rather than being overpowered, would simply be a different and new ship. With a role of it's own, replacing, nothing, but doing it's job well. And encourage people to aspire to it.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#162 - 2014-02-23 00:46:31 UTC
This is not a ship that will be commonly fielded on it's own. It is the center of a small fleet.

As such, the delay for locking upon decloaking is a non-issue. You drop cloak (or out of warp), drop sentries, and assign them to one of your fleetmates while you wait it out. You have the tank to survive until you and your fellow Nestors can lock eachother, and you were providing DPS as quick as your smallest ship could lock and fire.

Yes, Logistics cruisers can provide better reps, but they can't cov-ops cloak either, and they are not nearly as resilient as a Nestor will be, nor will they be providing more than a fraction of the firepower at the same time.

I don't do wormholes, so I have no idea if there is anything in there worth standing ground over instead of the hit and run the cov-ops are capable of. This ship isn't a skirmisher, it stands and fights.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#163 - 2014-02-23 01:00:53 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
This is not a ship that will be commonly fielded on it's own. It is the center of a small fleet.

As such, the delay for locking upon decloaking is a non-issue. You drop cloak (or out of warp), drop sentries, and assign them to one of your fleetmates while you wait it out. You have the tank to survive until you and your fellow Nestors can lock eachother, and you were providing DPS as quick as your smallest ship could lock and fire.

Yes, Logistics cruisers can provide better reps, but they can't cov-ops cloak either, and they are not nearly as resilient as a Nestor will be, nor will they be providing more than a fraction of the firepower at the same time.

I don't do wormholes, so I have no idea if there is anything in there worth standing ground over instead of the hit and run the cov-ops are capable of. This ship isn't a skirmisher, it stands and fights.



I agree totally, standing ground is EXACTLY what it needs to do,and to allow the fleet to.
It would be totally wasted as a skirmisher, The Stratios and astero fulfil this role well.

The cloak issue is purely a problem as it prevents covert travel of the fleet , Cloaked arrivals are largely irrelevant in a battleship like this.
I also agree that sentries on this ship is a poor choice, as mentioned above, Medium drones (50Mb Bandwidth same drone bay) and overall damage balanced by the lasers, is far more reasonable.
Because Dropping sentries with a drone assist, Would avoid the balancing factor of a battleships post cloak lock delay. And would not be desirable in a balanced ship with these abilities.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2014-02-23 01:05:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Onictus
Mike Voidstar wrote:
I

If you cannot find a good argument for the Nestor so completely failing as a battleship as to be objectively worse than a BLOPS at battleshiping, then how about an argument for the current state of cloaks being underpowered as to make it reasonable that a much more powerful ship be given a better cloak than current options?

That is what is needed here, either a reasoned argument for the Nestor being weak in comparison to other battleships, or a reasoned argument to change the balance point of cloaking itself. What is not needed is a list of all the wonderful ways a cov-ops cloak on the Nestor would make wormhole dwellers the happiest people in EVE.


Nestor is a turd. I'll also go and disagree that the BLOPs ships are balanced (as both a Son and Redeemer pilot)

1) The specific cloak is neither here nor there. It seriously matters little, without the re-targetting bonus (or lack thereof). Without said bonus you are looking at a ship that takes over 9 seconds to lock an armor HAC 5+ with THREE scripted SeBos, at cloaking V. Granted that drops when you don't have to apply the cloak delay to like 4 seconds (battleshp), but still that isn't exactly fast. The Black Ops ALL have a cloak delay bonus that means that they WILL lock faster even with a ghetto cloak than a Nestor would with a T2......even before the storyline cloaks that you fit to a BLOPS to get the scan penalty down.

Sounds well balanced to me.


2) If you find your drone damage sufficient, I have oceanfront in Arizona and whatnot x4 DDAs and wardens yields a whopping 560 AND cuts into the tank to the point that my CFC issued Dominix has about 10k eHP with all of the plates and resists, getting any drone DPS out of the hull means DDAs, and that cuts your tank to hell because you only have three slots + rigs, which with an EANM, suite case and 1600mm plate yields a whopping 128k eHP. Expounding there your ranges suck. Remember that we have three SeBo's? Yeah. Gardes pull the DPS up to 751, but the range with dual scripted omnis is 38.9k + 19.7 falloff.....outside of what I would call acceptable PvE or PvP for an only weapon system. That 560dps I quoted was with 4 DDAs. At this point the Rattler is a HANDS DOWN better hull, better tank, better fittings, better DPS, over a better range......any application.

I've been a drone head forever, My Istar, faster in space, faster align time, better tank (considering a simple T2 AB makes it immune to battleship damage basically in PvE) 790 drone DPS, over a much better optimal (assuming dancing the scripts), Ndomi matches the Nestor in tank AND has another mid for a third Omni/EWAR has a HALF of the cap recharge time (native) and an additional 100 drone DPS before you factor in high slot damage.

And we haven't touched the high slots yet. One would assume that you are going to do the space priest thing? Right? Right.
With three reppers running and two energy transfers at all V skills....you get 1:16 cap endurance, you need an archon to cap transfer you ifyou intend to fight for more than a couple minutes.


The. ship. IS. A. TURD.

It has next to no redeeming qualities.

This is what I used as a reference
[Nestor, Nest]

Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Damage Control II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Large Micro Jump Drive
Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script
Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script

Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Drone Link Augmentor II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Improved 'Guise' Cloaking Device II

Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I

Warden II x5
Garde II x5
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#165 - 2014-02-23 01:16:43 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Onictus wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
I

If you cannot find a good argument for the Nestor so completely failing as a battleship as to be objectively worse than a BLOPS at battleshiping, then how about an argument for the current state of cloaks being underpowered as to make it reasonable that a much more powerful ship be given a better cloak than current options?

That is what is needed here, either a reasoned argument for the Nestor being weak in comparison to other battleships, or a reasoned argument to change the balance point of cloaking itself. What is not needed is a list of all the wonderful ways a cov-ops cloak on the Nestor would make wormhole dwellers the happiest people in EVE.


Nestor is a turd. I'll also go and disagree that the BLOPs ships are balanced (as both a Son and Redeemer pilot)

1) The specific cloak is neither here nor there. It seriously matters little, without the re-targetting bonus (or lack thereof). Without said bonus you are looking at a ship that takes over 9 seconds to lock an armor HAC 5+ with THREE scripted SeBos, at cloaking V. Granted that drops when you don't have to apply the cloak delay to like 4 seconds (battleshp), but still that isn't exactly fast. The Black Ops ALL have a cloak delay bonus that means that they WILL lock faster even with a ghetto cloak than a Nestor would with a T2......even before the storyline cloaks that you fit to a BLOPS to get the scan penalty down.

Sounds well balanced to me.


2) If you find your drone damage sufficient, I have oceanfront in Arizona and whatnot x4 DDAs and wardens yields a whopping 560 AND cuts into the tank to the point that my CFC issued Dominix has about 10k eHP with all of the plates and resists, getting any drone DPS out of the hull means DDAs, and that cuts your tank to hell because you only have three slots + rigs, which with an EANM, suite case and 1600mm plate yields a whopping 128k eHP. Expounding there your ranges suck. Remember that we have three SeBo's? Yeah. Gardes pull the DPS up to 751, but the range with dual scripted omnis is 38.9k + 19.7 falloff.....outside of what I would call acceptable PvE or PvP for an only weapon system. That 560dps I quoted was with 4 DDAs. At this point the Rattler is a HANDS DOWN better hull, better tank, better fittings, better DPS, over a better range......any application.

I've been a drone head forever, My Istar, faster in space, faster align time, better tank (considering a simple T2 AB makes it immune to battleship damage basically in PvE) 790 drone DPS, over a much better optimal (assuming dancing the scripts), Ndomi matches the Nestor in tank AND has another mid for a third Omni/EWAR has a HALF of the cap recharge time (native) and an additional 100 drone DPS before you factor in high slot damage.

And we haven't touched the high slots yet. One would assume that you are going to do the space priest thing? Right? Right.
With three reppers running and two energy transfers at all V skills....you get 1:16 cap endurance, you need an archon to cap transfer you ifyou intend to fight for more than a couple minutes.


The. ship. IS. A. TURD.

It has next to no redeeming qualities.

This is what I used as a reference
[Nestor, Nest]

Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Damage Control II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Large Micro Jump Drive
Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script
Omnidirectional Tracking Link II, Optimal Range Script

Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Drone Link Augmentor II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Improved 'Guise' Cloaking Device II

Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I

Warden II x5
Garde II x5


Sadly you are right.
This can be solved If the ship can be positioned for a clear role,I have put forward suggestions above yours by a couple at the top of the page, see What you think?

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#166 - 2014-02-23 01:21:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
I'm curious what attributes players like on the Nestor. Low mass and a slightly faster warp speed are certainly good, but there have been comments that it's a tad "sluggish" (not a Machariel by any stretch). Lasers and drones continue the SoE theme, which leaves us with the RR and scanning bonuses. I know the scanning bonuses are also a SoE hallmark, but will they even be utilized? Between the low-slot requirements for drones and lasers, it seems like it would be a really thin armor tank (even with the resistance bonuses). Would you run a shield tank on a Nestor?

What if the solution for the Nestor (and to a lesser extent, the other SoE ships) was to reassign some of the mid slots to lows, ie: 2h-3m-5l on the Astero, 5h-4m-6l on the Stratios and 7h-4m-8l on the Nestor. With an armor tank you can run power diagnostics and capacitor power relays, but I don't fly any of these ships so would reassigning the slots potentially screw these up? Good idea - bad?

Two other suggestions that have been floating around are a refitting bay and clone vat bay. Even though it would have no use for me personally, I can see how the refitting bay might tie-in well with the RR bonuses. MC could probably offer some insight on the clone vat bay.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#167 - 2014-02-23 01:25:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Onictus
epicurus ataraxia wrote:


Sadly you are right.
This can be solved If the ship can be positioned for a clear role,I have put forward suggestions above yours by a couple at the top of the page, see What you think?



I've no issue with the ship having full drone bandwidth, its a PIRATE battleship, they are the creame de la creame.
I like the space priest idea (I'm a logi V traige T2 pilot was well) on a battleship hull.

Basically give the ship:
~A blops style speed bonus with the same cloaks....note not T2 coverts, though I would be fine with it if it did have a full covert cloak
~A jumpdrive
Toss that scanning crap, its crap, totally useless on a battleship
Throw the laser range bonus.

I want a ghetto carrier to drop with my redeemer.
I also recommended repeatedly that it should have 5 turret and 5 launcher slots a la Arageddon so that it can multi-role and acutally have a PvE use.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#168 - 2014-02-23 01:28:38 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
I'm curious what attributes players like on the Nestor. Low mass and a slightly faster warp speed are certainly good, but there have been comments that it's a tad "sluggish" (not a Machariel by any stretch). Lasers and drones continue the SoE theme, which leaves us with the RR and scanning bonuses. I know the scanning bonuses are also a SoE hallmark, but will they even be utilized? Between the low-slot requirements for drones and lasers, it seems like it would be a really thin armor tank (even with the resistance bonuses). Would you run a shield tank on a Nestor?

What if the solution for the Nestor (and to a lesser extent, the other SoE ships) was to reassign some of the mid slots to lows, ie: 2h-3m-5l on the Astero, 5h-4m-6l on the Stratios and 7h-4m-8l on the Nestor. With an armor tank you can run power diagnostics and capacitor power relays, but I don't fly any of these ships so would reassigning the slots potentially screw these up? Good idea - bad?

Two other suggestions that have been floating around are a refitting bay and clone vat bay. Even though it would have no use for me personally, I can see how the refitting bay might tie-in well with the RR bonuses. MC could probably offer some insight on the clone vat bay.


Personally, the low mass and POTENTIAL to be a logistics boat (not there yet) has potential. Together with what It has the chance of becoming If it's flaws are overcome.

As It stands? I am afraid like anyone else, I fail to find a role it fits, better, or even as well as other ships.

Look at post, top of page (mine) and see if you see the ideas proposed changing that?

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#169 - 2014-02-23 01:46:09 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Onictus wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:


Sadly you are right.
This can be solved If the ship can be positioned for a clear role,I have put forward suggestions above yours by a couple at the top of the page, see What you think?



I've no issue with the ship having full drone bandwidth, its a PIRATE battleship, they are the creame de la creame.
I like the space priest idea (I'm a logi V traige T2 pilot was well) on a battleship hull.

Basically give the ship:
~A blops style speed bonus with the same cloaks....note not T2 coverts, though I would be fine with it if it did have a full covert cloak
~A jumpdrive
Toss that scanning crap, its crap, totally useless on a battleship
Throw the laser range bonus.

I want a ghetto carrier to drop with my redeemer.
I also recommended repeatedly that it should have 5 turret and 5 launcher slots a la Arageddon so that it can multi-role and acutally have a PvE use.


That's a use outside of wormholes,
I agree the bonus to virus strength is of questionable value, I would not be bothered on that either way.
lasers/drone balance? Personally I believe that Drones are not in a good place at the moment. But that'll change, just be glad to use them in a Wh without being instapopped, So I lean towards lasers on this even though my drone skills are good.
Balancing reduced bandwidth with lasers could allay some fears, but the fears are pretty misplaced,so Both can work. Rebalancing towards lasers with a reduced bandwidth may well be more acceptable to implement.
cloaked speed bonus,I can see how that can be helpful, No reason not to have a covert ops cloak, It really is misunderstood. Particuarly without a lock activation bonus, and it is Fatally flawed in a wormhole without it.

missiles and lasers? both bonused accordingly to balance damage i imagine? that can work, nice to have choices.

I really cannot comment on jump drive, not experienced in them, A covert ops cloak wouldn't affect that in any way?

Thank's for the thoughts, People might want that.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#170 - 2014-02-23 01:49:49 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
As It stands? I am afraid like anyone else, I fail to find a role it fits, better, or even as well as other ships.
Look at post, top of page (mine) and see if you see the ideas proposed changing that?

1. CCP has kind of nixed the Covert Ops cloak, so as much as I'd like to see it - I just don't think it's in the cards...
2 & 3. The drone suggestion is interesting, but I can't help but wonder if we don't need to be revisiting drone bonuses as a whole on all ship classes? (you don't see other battleships getting bonuses to light or medium weapons) Removing medium and heavy drone bonuses from non-cruiser and non-battleships seems like a no-brainer. So I like the idea in premise, but it hinges on the Covert Ops cloak capability.
4. No argument here. Agility could probably be tweaked, too.
5. Ditto.
6 & 7. I think the Nestor needs a defined role before one could really look at either. Is it a drone boat - a laser boat - a logistics - something else? It's not really doing anything great right now, which is unfortunate - because there certainly is potential.

So as for any potential slot reassignment, is the current allocation for SoE ships adequate?

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#171 - 2014-02-23 02:01:41 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
As It stands? I am afraid like anyone else, I fail to find a role it fits, better, or even as well as other ships.
Look at post, top of page (mine) and see if you see the ideas proposed changing that?

1. CCP has kind of nixed the Covert Ops cloak, so as much as I'd like to see it - I just don't think it's in the cards...
2 & 3. The drone suggestion is interesting, but I can't help but wonder if we don't need to be revisiting drone bonuses as a whole on all ship classes? (you don't see other battleships getting bonuses to light or medium weapons) Removing medium and heavy drone bonuses from non-cruiser and non-battleships seems like a no-brainer. So I like the idea in premise, but it hinges on the Covert Ops cloak capability.
4. No argument here. Agility could probably be tweaked, too.
5. Ditto.
6 & 7. I think the Nestor needs a defined role before one could really look at either. Is it a drone boat - a laser boat - a logistics - something else? It's not really doing anything great right now, which is unfortunate - because there certainly is potential.

So as for any potential slot reassignment, is the current allocation for SoE ships adequate?


Thanks for that,
I sort of read CCP Rise's comment slightly differently,
To me it seemed more that it had not been planned for the ship, but I hope that when he looks at where the ship may well be used, he will take the time to think on it, Quite possibly he will realise that If the ship will be used with covert cloaked T3's that the ship is dead in the water without it. I don't think he wants to write off the ship yet.

as to slot reassignment, If he decides what the role is to be and where it will be used, and at the moment, there is only one home for it, Then the slot reassignment should fall into place, and the whole power/cap/cpu issues will follow.

So the first question to be answered Is where is it to find it's home?
The rest will follow.
Sure It will find extra roles and uses everywhere, But a tractor is at home in the fields, A car on the roads, A racing car on the track and a Nestor in a Wormhole.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#172 - 2014-02-23 04:11:04 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
So the first question to be answered Is where is it to find it's home?

Agreed. I think that unless they address the capacitor and power grid, the only solution is to reallocate 2 mid slots to low slots so that players can run reactor controls, power diagnostics or capacitor power relays. It's not an exaggeration that the Rattlesnake can run a better armor tank than the Nestor because 2 low slots are already gone just running power-related modules.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#173 - 2014-02-23 06:22:08 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

That's a use outside of wormholes

Yeah, like 2% of the players in the game actually live in holes, not to mention that the primary concern for wormholers is bang per mass. Which T3s will remain the king of (unitl CCP fucks them up as well anyway)

epicurus ataraxia wrote:

I agree the bonus to virus strength is of questionable value, I would not be bothered on that either way.
lasers/drone balance? Personally I believe that Drones are not in a good place at the moment. But that'll change, just be glad to use them in a Wh without being instapopped, So I lean towards lasers on this even though my drone skills are good.


With larger drones I've never had an issue....something about sleepers hating logi and EWAR more than drone.....but then its been years since I did anything more than use a whole to pass through.

epicurus ataraxia wrote:

Balancing reduced bandwidth with lasers could allay some fears, but the fears are pretty misplaced,so Both can work. Rebalancing towards lasers with a reduced bandwidth may well be more acceptable to implement.
cloaked speed bonus,I can see how that can be helpful, No reason not to have a covert ops cloak, It really is misunderstood. Particuarly without a lock activation bonus, and it is Fatally flawed in a wormhole without it.


The issue with lasers is going to be cap, in the fit above you need an implant to even mount mega pulses....and then after an MWD and three heatsinks you end up with 6m of cap and NO ability to mount a cap booster. So you have to either throw the plate (this ship is already at T1 tank levels) or downsize the guns.

epicurus ataraxia wrote:

missiles and lasers? both bonused accordingly to balance damage i imagine? that can work, nice to have choices.

I'd find that quite dull.

Particularly since missiles aren't in a great place and even if I wanted to beams/Tachs are completely out of the question

epicurus ataraxia wrote:

I really cannot comment on jump drive, not experienced in them, A covert ops cloak wouldn't affect that in any way?

Not in my opinion, basically the ship needs to be able to hit a covert cyno

\
Travasty Space
Pilots of Epic
#174 - 2014-02-23 07:04:36 UTC
CCP has said no and yet you guys refuse to look past the covops cloak, with this extreme bias any suggestions you have made have shown to be worthless.

What I would like to see for the nestor is the addition of:

Role:
100% bonus to remote Cap Transfer range

Amarr:
5% reduction of Cap transfer cap use per level

Gallente:
5% reduction of Remote Armor Repairers cap use per level

This would improve the cap of both single and multi-nestor groups as the biggest issue against their use is they aren't that good at being rep boats.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#175 - 2014-02-23 07:35:53 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
The issue is that the only role, where this ship seems to have a possibility to excel, is in wormhole space.
This means that the ships it will provide logistics support to will be largely cloaky T3s
Without the ability to travel while cloaked, it cannot travel where they go.
It would be the death of them.

U boats do not travel with a big logistics boat travelling above them on the surface, it is exactly the same scenario, it defeats the whole object of the fleet. The nestor is a submarine that cannot dive!

So if we give up we lose the only feasible chance of them ever being used in wormhole space.
It is simply not viable without it.

But if you see a totally different role that would encourage people to want it, that did not require an ability to travel cloaked, please let us know, as no one yet has found an alternative that people would aspire to own it for.

Your points regarding the logistics aspects do highlight at there are issues that need to be looked at here too, that does need to be taken into account before it can be useful. But without fixing the fatal flaw, anything else is irrelevant.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2014-02-23 08:14:52 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:


Your points regarding the logistics aspects do highlight at there are issues that need to be looked at here too, that does need to be taken into account before it can be useful. But without fixing the fatal flaw, anything else is irrelevant.


Just like I said in the initial thread. I'm all for a battleship classed logi.

This isn't it, the range is terrible, the cap is terrible, with a 4 repper/3 transfer set up the best I have managed is like 3 minutes in a spider with another hull THREE transfers and that is with a MWD turned off, with just am MJD you STILL only get 4:57 with a cap booster AND Navy 800s a la
[Nestor, Nest]

1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Capacitor Power Relay II
Capacitor Power Relay II
1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Script
Large Micro Jump Drive
Heavy Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800

Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Armor Repairer II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II

Large Anti-Thermic Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Large Trimark Armor Pump I

Warden II x5
Garde II x5


Applicable stats (all V, no boosts)
144k eHP
Cap 30s (lol)
Cap spidered with an identical hull 4:57
HP/S 521!
Time to lock an armor battleship 2.6 sec, battle cruiser 2.8, 3.2 sec for an armor HAC
Rep range 16.8km

Other than drone damage there is VERY VERY little selling this ship over a Guardian, and when you factor in price Archon does it better, and cheaper, and insurable. Even considering the bandwidth, Gardes are only going to do like 512dps and that over a 30+12 range without the usual

Nestor isn't a good hull, much less worthy of being called a pirate battleship.

The bonuses need to focused to something, and it either a MUCH larger capacitor, or a transfer bonus AND some help in the fitting department. The fittings are fine if and only if you are fitting it as a pure logistics ship, they are insufficient for turrets, particularly laser turrets....and trait that is intensified by the crappy cap recharge.
Mournful Conciousness
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2014-02-23 08:24:31 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
I'm curious what attributes players like on the Nestor. Low mass and a slightly faster warp speed are certainly good, but there have been comments that it's a tad "sluggish" (not a Machariel by any stretch). Lasers and drones continue the SoE theme, which leaves us with the RR and scanning bonuses. I know the scanning bonuses are also a SoE hallmark, but will they even be utilized? Between the low-slot requirements for drones and lasers, it seems like it would be a really thin armor tank (even with the resistance bonuses). Would you run a shield tank on a Nestor?

What if the solution for the Nestor (and to a lesser extent, the other SoE ships) was to reassign some of the mid slots to lows, ie: 2h-3m-5l on the Astero, 5h-4m-6l on the Stratios and 7h-4m-8l on the Nestor. With an armor tank you can run power diagnostics and capacitor power relays, but I don't fly any of these ships so would reassigning the slots potentially screw these up? Good idea - bad?

Two other suggestions that have been floating around are a refitting bay and clone vat bay. Even though it would have no use for me personally, I can see how the refitting bay might tie-in well with the RR bonuses. MC could probably offer some insight on the clone vat bay.


Moving mid slots to lows on the stratios and astero would cause me to have to rethink their pvp applicability. The ability to dual prop a stratios or fit a cap battery is essential for its ability to survive in a brawl while dual repped.

A clone vat bay in w-space? Well, I should think the players would love it. You could charge 5bn for a Nestor and we in w-space would still buy 2 each.


Embers Children is recruiting carefully selected pilots who like wormholes, green killboards and the sweet taste of tears. You can convo me in game or join the chat "TOHA Lounge".

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#178 - 2014-02-23 08:47:55 UTC
Mournful Conciousness wrote:


Moving mid slots to lows on the stratios and astero would cause me to have to rethink their pvp applicability. The ability to dual prop a stratios or fit a cap battery is essential for its ability to survive in a brawl while dual repped.

A clone vat bay in w-space? Well, I should think the players would love it. You could charge 5bn for a Nestor and we in w-space would still buy 2 each.




IN wormholes yeah I could see that. Titan pilots don't bather training it, there are a lot of issues with clone vats.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#179 - 2014-02-23 09:00:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Travasty Space wrote:
CCP has said no and yet you guys refuse to look past the covops cloak, with this extreme bias any suggestions you have made have shown to be worthless.

I suggest you re-read through most of the comments, because numerous other suggestions have been made.

Mournful Conciousness wrote:
Moving mid slots to lows on the stratios and astero would cause me to have to rethink their pvp applicability. The ability to dual prop a stratios or fit a cap battery is essential for its ability to survive in a brawl while dual repped.

A clone vat bay in w-space? Well, I should think the players would love it. You could charge 5bn for a Nestor and we in w-space would still buy 2 each.

Which is why I asked, and if those two ships are arguably working as designed then that just leaves the Nestor. Maybe it just needs a clone bay then… We'd need a subcapital version though.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#180 - 2014-02-23 14:27:41 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Travasty Space wrote:
CCP has said no and yet you guys refuse to look past the covops cloak, with this extreme bias any suggestions you have made have shown to be worthless.

I suggest you re-read through most of the comments, because numerous other suggestions have been made.

Mournful Conciousness wrote:
Moving mid slots to lows on the stratios and astero would cause me to have to rethink their pvp applicability. The ability to dual prop a stratios or fit a cap battery is essential for its ability to survive in a brawl while dual repped.

A clone vat bay in w-space? Well, I should think the players would love it. You could charge 5bn for a Nestor and we in w-space would still buy 2 each.

Which is why I asked, and if those two ships are arguably working as designed then that just leaves the Nestor. Maybe it just needs a clone bay then… We'd need a subcapital version though.


Well the other two, astero is pretty much great, stratios, really nice ship, i wonder how often it is using 4 sentries as first choice though, often see it using a flight of mediums and keeping mobile, so a little tweaking there possibly,
The nestor, well I have clearly stated where i believe that should go, but we will see.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE