These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Class 7 Wormhole Suggestion

Author
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#101 - 2014-02-19 21:36:20 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
alternatively, you could just block my posts and move on with your life.

god i wish...

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#102 - 2014-02-19 21:48:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Miton
ok let me try to explain this again...

you goal is to get more people into WH space right? ok fine, that's a good goal.
so lets look at where the average newbro player goes when they start off in WHs.
do they go to C6s? C5s? no. the average entry point for new players to WHs are C2s.
this can easily be varified by the number of people that are always looking for C2s, the fact that C2 space sees the most POS kills of ANY wh class and that C2s are all populated except for a handful of C5/6 and NS static ones.

you also say you want the low class groups to move up to high class space. ok, fine, nothing inherently wrong with that either.
so what is stopping people from doing just that? is it that all C5 and C6 holes are populated? is it that is costs more? is it that theyre too hard?
no it isnt. C6s and C5s are mostly empty and finding whatever high end WH you want (with the exception of C2 statics, again theyre the most popular) takes little more than a weekend of scanning.
hell, if you want a C6, Ragarok will even hook you up for free!
so why don't they move? well, simply because they dont want to. theyre perfectly happy in low class WH space and dont care enough about isk to make the move.

so in light of these two facts, that C2s are the most popular WH class and that high end space is mostly empty with little draw for a lot of low class groups, how do you suggest we get more people into WH space?
do you suggest that we add more C2 space or add content to higher end WHs that is attractive for new players and existing low end groups?
no. you go and suggest we add more high end space which is only available for high end living groups....

please, just do the maths. C5, C6, C7, C8 whatever. fact is high end WH space is a LOT less populated than low end WH space and there are reasons for that. and you want to add MORE high end space? it just makes no sense at all to anyone who looks at WH space as a whole, not just their little corner of it.

PS: the reason I usually dont spend the time to describe in this kind of detail why youre wrong is because Id have to do it every other day and you dont listen anyway.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#103 - 2014-02-19 22:51:32 UTC
Jack gets it.

No trolling please

Quinn Corvez
Perkone
Caldari State
#104 - 2014-02-20 00:19:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Quinn Corvez
Bane Nucleus wrote:
I can't think of how a c7 would benefit anyone except a handful of people, whom are already established in deep wormhole space.

A better and more outrageous idea would be to have random wh's appearing in all classes of wormholes, ones that would end up in Jove systems. Have some sort of new PVE mechanic in those systems where you could acquire loot (much like you do now with sleeper loot) to reverse engineer.



Firstly, if CCP decided to add a C7 class that held new content, depending on how good that content was, a lot of people would want to experience it and a lot of competition would spring up between the corporations/alliances because of it..

I'm sure there are some people out there that are thinking of leaving wormhole space and C7 wormhole might make them stay, it might make ex-wormhole corporations return and it would definetly entice new players to try WH space out (depending on what the content was). One thing that I don't see C7 wormholes doing, is making people leave wormhole space.

Secondly, I like your idea of new wormhole connections and I think that could be a good feature of a C7. In addition to some of the ideas others have suggested, the C7 systems could have 7 statics - c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6 and Jove (or the new space CCP is adding). I think that would do wonders for wormhole space as a hole and ensures that when CCP introduce their planed new space, wormholes will be a part of it.

If this new content helped increase the population is WH space, we would have more voices to scream for a pos revamp but right now, CCP probably consider it good enough for the time being.
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#105 - 2014-02-20 00:26:05 UTC
What has been proposed as a new wormhole (c7) can easily be implemented in wormholes that already exist (black holes). There is no need for a new class of wormholes when you have virtually all black holes being vacant and devoid of activity. Revamp what is existing already instead of thinning out c5/c6 space even more.

No trolling please

Quinn Corvez
Perkone
Caldari State
#106 - 2014-02-20 00:39:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Quinn Corvez
^ Did you even read the original post? Your saying capital sleepers, roaming sleepers and new tech should be added to black hole systems? ... Sure, I would go for that! Big smile

Seriously guys, if you don't like an idea someone post, say why and then go away. The truly bad ideas don't need your help to stay out of the game. All that happens is the thread gets derailed because of egos and people arguing their own agenda.
Duke Wendo
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2014-02-20 00:43:24 UTC
Reading these posts makes me even more happy when I kill people in wormholes
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#108 - 2014-02-20 00:56:56 UTC
Quinn Corvez wrote:
^ Did you even read the original post? Your saying capital sleepers, roaming sleepers and new tech should be added to black hole systems? ... Sure, I would go for that! Big smile .


I totally forgot about that part hahaha! Just say no to capital sleepers! For serious though, my main point is you have a platform to add new content in wormholes where there is currently none. Use that.


Quinn Corvez wrote:

Seriously guys, if you don't like an idea someone post, say why and then go away. The truly bad ideas don't need your help to stay out of the game. All that happens is the thread gets derailed because of egos and people arguing their own agenda.


There is nothing wrong with a discussion/debate when it comes to new ideas and suggestions. While there may be some egos here, I find it fair to say that all the people that have posted thus far truly care about wormholes space, even if it some focus on a small slice of it.

No trolling please

Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#109 - 2014-02-20 03:15:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Jack Miton wrote:
ok let me try to explain this again...

you goal is to get more people into WH space right? ok fine, that's a good goal.
so lets look at where the average newbro player goes when they start off in WHs.
do they go to C6s? C5s? no. the average entry point for new players to WHs are C2s.
this can easily be varified by the number of people that are always looking for C2s, the fact that C2 space sees the most POS kills of ANY wh class and that C2s are all populated except for a handful of C5/6 and NS static ones.

you also say you want the low class groups to move up to high class space. ok, fine, nothing inherently wrong with that either.
so what is stopping people from doing just that? is it that all C5 and C6 holes are populated? is it that is costs more? is it that theyre too hard?
no it isnt. C6s and C5s are mostly empty and finding whatever high end WH you want (with the exception of C2 statics, again theyre the most popular) takes little more than a weekend of scanning.
hell, if you want a C6, Ragarok will even hook you up for free!
so why don't they move? well, simply because they dont want to. theyre perfectly happy in low class WH space and dont care enough about isk to make the move.

so in light of these two facts, that C2s are the most popular WH class and that high end space is mostly empty with little draw for a lot of low class groups, how do you suggest we get more people into WH space?
do you suggest that we add more C2 space or add content to higher end WHs that is attractive for new players and existing low end groups?
no. you go and suggest we add more high end space which is only available for high end living groups....

please, just do the maths. C5, C6, C7, C8 whatever. fact is high end WH space is a LOT less populated than low end WH space and there are reasons for that. and you want to add MORE high end space? it just makes no sense at all to anyone who looks at WH space as a whole, not just their little corner of it.

PS: the reason I usually dont spend the time to describe in this kind of detail why youre wrong is because Id have to do it every other day and you dont listen anyway.


It is not only about adding more people, but adding more quality fights and content to wh space. C2 wh's are fun and newbie friendly but all you get there is the odd drake gank and very small gang fights that are usually ganks. Serious fights in higher class wormholes are so few and when they do actually happen they are usually consensual, with no goals or strategic initiative other than winning the fight itself (incidentally the main reason that they only happen when both sides consent to the fight).

And c2's are more populated for the same reason more people do L4 missions than incursions; incursions is higher content and simply requires more cost (effort and isk) to get into to, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't aspire to make more of it, or improve upon it if it is not sufficient. c2's are also much more convenient because they have k-space connections, arguably diminishing their effects on wh space as a whole anyways.

Higher class wormholes are supposed to be dangerous and risky, all the risk you have now is if you mouthed off to wrong person in the handful of competent alliances that stayed in wh space, or blood union. Without blood union capital escalations is more risk free than incursions (yes highsec incursions).

You are content with your c2 experience? Fine all is good, but some of us want more and that is what we are asking for.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#110 - 2014-02-20 04:38:43 UTC
Guess it's the time of night where I point out I havnt lived in a C2 since 2009 *shrug*.
I now live in a C5>C5 and killed me a Legion in a C5 just last night, fun times were had, his 2 friends in their Legions were too slow to get there.

So to summarize this wonderful thread; don't fly Legions kids, they're teribad.

/thread

PS: Nice NPC alt btw.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#111 - 2014-02-20 04:46:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Jack Miton wrote:
Guess it's the time of night where I point out I havnt lived in a C2 since 2009 *shrug*.
I now live in a C5>C5 and killed me a Legion in a C5 just last night, fun times were had, his 2 friends in their Legions were too slow to get there.

So to summarize this wonderful thread; don't fly Legions kids, they're teribad.

/thread

PS: Nice NPC alt btw.


For fucks sake I just left my wormhole corp not a month ago, stop harping on the ****** npc corp, some of us take the time to do some baiting with a character before they join another corp. This has been for the past year what I posted with, I am not going to change character now because I am temporarily deciding in which corp to put him in. "If you can't argue against them call them socialists". This is the only part of the whole forum that this has been used to defuse the argument, cheap tactic at best.

But yes your retorts to the counter points I provided were amazing, really I can see your point of view now.

And from my limited experience ham legions can apply more and better dps than proteuses in a lot of circumstances (concept borrowed from pvpers much better than myself), but of course you have more to do than press f1 on your t3.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#112 - 2014-02-20 10:03:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Jack Miton wrote:

the reason I usually dont spend the time to describe in this kind of detail why youre wrong is because Id have to do it every other day and you dont listen anyway.


I try to listen to what you are saying Jack but in these type of decisions, you immediately go on the attack telling people how they are wrong, throwing around your personal opinion like they are facts.

Sometimes i agree with what you but when find your views unrealistic and illogical I'll try to explain how some people view things differently but most of the time my main argument is ignored and up arguin about off topic stuff...

Jack Miton wrote:

please, just do the maths. C5, C6, C7, C8 whatever. fact is high end WH space is a LOT less populated than low end WH space and there are reasons for that. and you want to add MORE high end space? it just makes no sense at all to anyone who looks at WH space as a whole, not just their little corner of it.


Here is an example. This thread is about adding a VERY low number of C7 wormholes (4-7) that hold new content. Ideally, i would like them to be implemented in a way that encourages people to move into C6 space because C6 is too quiet atm. You admit there is a population problem in C6 space but your answer is to focus on low end wormholes?! Surely this would make things worse.

I think most people would agree that as you go up in wormhole classes rewards should be greater because of the increased difficulty and risk. C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.

Bane was right when he said:
Bane Nucleus wrote:

I find it fair to say that all the people that have posted thus far truly care about wormholes space

I hope that one day we can respect each others opinions on these forums and discuss things rationally without the petty arguing because at the end of the day, we all want wormhole space to thrive, even if we do disagree on how that should be done.
Jezza McWaffle
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#113 - 2014-02-20 10:11:12 UTC
C7's should only have static C6's (at least 2) and the planets hold no moons :P

Wormholes worst badass | Checkout my Wormhole blog

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#114 - 2014-02-20 13:08:22 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.

this is exactly like saying C6s encourage people to move to C5s. it's nonsense.

whatever, im signing out of this thread, see my earlier post for why this idea is stupid.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#115 - 2014-02-20 13:15:09 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.


If that was even remotely true, everyone in c2 space would have moved to c6 space long ago. Instead, c2's are the most populated wormholes in Eve.

No trolling please

TurboX3
Pulling The Plug
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#116 - 2014-02-20 13:18:53 UTC
OMG this is already 6 pages long.... Boring
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#117 - 2014-02-20 13:28:00 UTC
TurboX3 wrote:
OMG this is already 6 pages long.... Boring


Come up with a c8 idea. Keep it going P

No trolling please

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#118 - 2014-02-20 13:29:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Jack Miton wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.

this is exactly like saying C6s encourage people to move to C5s. it's nonsense.

whatever, im signing out of this thread, see my earlier post for why this idea is stupid.


No it's not, it's like saying new content would attract new players. If you fail to see this then i agree, you should stay out of this thread and all others that require people to do your thinking for you. [Added to blocked list]


Bane Nucleus wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.


If that was even remotely true, everyone in c2 space would have moved to c6 space long ago. Instead, c2's are the most populated wormholes in Eve.


Wrong. People live in C2 because they prefer it there or their corp isn't strong enough yet. There is nothing wrong with C2 space, and because it's so populated, this indicates that C2 are the last wormhole system that need any improvements, so stop banging on about C2 FFS.

Every time, you guys just skip over the entire post and respond with poorly thought out arguments. I'm tried of it.
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#119 - 2014-02-20 13:40:15 UTC
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
C7 wormholes could be a way to encourage people to take the risk and move to a higher class, and it would also allow CCP to experiment more with wormhole space without screwing up what we already have.


If that was even remotely true, everyone in c2 space would have moved to c6 space long ago. Instead, c2's are the most populated wormholes in Eve.


Yes but why are they populated? And with how many people are they actually populated with? They are populated for the simple reason that they are the L4 missions of wormhole space. Decent reward, relatively low risk, and very convenient to live in. Wormhole space, other than the safe capital escalations, does not offer any high end content.

The state of wormhole space in general is declining, most competent squads if they didn't already leave are basing a bulk of their operations in k-space. The number of squads that can field 15+ active pilots on a consistent basis that mostly do wh stuff can be counted on one hand.

4 years same old ****, over and over.

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#120 - 2014-02-20 13:58:59 UTC
It's funny you say declining, because I've noticed a pretty good increase in c5 space activity from the last time I was here.

No trolling please