These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Over/Under on Null Sec Cartel CSM 9 members

First post
Author
Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
#21 - 2014-02-19 08:39:25 UTC
Manfred Sideous wrote:
I am not here to kiss anybodys ass, I'm not here for a popularity contest ...[punctuation added]
♥Manny

At last. An honest politician!

Good way to get in the votes Manny.
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#22 - 2014-02-19 17:20:46 UTC
Ali Aras wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
With a year of understanding and testing the STV system, and with a voting bloc numbering close to 50,000, what is the over/under on how many null sec cartel members are on CSM9?

7,9,10?

Not that is matters at all anymore.
I wonder how many details will be given by CCP on the summer release, before the new CSM "election"?
It is very likely those details will make this next CSM a moot point for the largest chunk of the sub base, that being high sec causal players.


Lots of deep history.


Since you have gone to huge effort (and I do appreciate the effort) to comment, you do deserve a response.

Bottom line, I think we can throw out pretty much all of last year's results as any kind of benchmark.

A few premises to work from:
1. goons (given they represent the most evil and powerful of the cartels, I use their name to represent them all) are REALLY smart, and ruthless.
2. They want to get as many of their people as possible on the CSM. Controlling the CSM, especially as it has now been stated by other CSM members that CCP consults with them on various employees, (goons knew that, but was a revelation to me). The CSM is just another tool to control the direction of Eve.
3. The goons have a year of testing and analysis to figure best way to optimize their voting bloc's power.
4. And most importantly, the goon voting bloc is absolutely huge this year.

Last year, a total of 49702 were cast, which was down significantly from the previous year.
cfc is now in excess of 36,000 members, with goonswarm itself is now in excess of 12,000 chars.
RvB, whores of the goons now with the PoCo deal etc, not even officially part of the cfc, is 7,000
I am not even getting into the control exerted by the PL and Russian cartels, but Brothers of Tangra alone is now 5900.

A significant percentage of the votes last year were cartel controlled. I believe you are saying 40%. I may quibble with that a bit, but is as good a benchmark as any. So that means about 19,000 of last year's votes were cartel controlled.

That means also, the 60% "independent thinkers" last year equated to approx 30,000 votes.

So I will make some assumptions:
1. The 30,000 independent votes will remain static. I really don't believe that since some have been subsumed into the cartel growth the past year, plus I think a lot of them are pretty jaded given the changes this year (high sec Poco's gifted to the cartels, drone assist nerfs, Marauder nerfs, complete stagnation in null sec, etc etc), but let's assume that there are still 30,000 out there that will vote their own conscience.
2. The cartels discuss amongst themselves who they want on the CSM. Below is my list of groups that have large voting bloc power:

goons
PL
Russians
RvB
Test
loose group of FW corps/alliances
loose group of wormhole corps/alliances
E-UNI


N3 will be history by vote time. Already we see large corps that were in N3, like DTRON, being absorbed into cfc.
I was going to also suggest the Incursion groups, because I know they helped get Mike Azriah elected last year. But I don't see them as a political force this year, given the hatred amongst the groups.

PL and RvB will vote as goons tell them to vote. They both have deep financial interests in keeping goons happy.
Russians are always badly fragmented amongst themselves, but currently, they are heavily aligned with the goons. Whether that will still hold true by voting time, who knows, but rest assured, Russians will be voting to enhance null sec cartel control.
Test is a mess on an organization level, but I doubt they will vote to protect high sec casual players.
The FW group will get someone elected. They are cohesive enough to do that.
The wormhole groups are as effective as the FW groups, so they will get someone on there as well.
E-UNI is not running anyone, which is a real shame. If the UNI and the high sec incursion groups got together, they could form a bloc powerful enough to maybe get someone on.

3. All indications, so far, is that the overall interest in the election this year is down. See point #1. Very few new players will be involved in the voting as independent players, but new players in the organized voting bloc's will told to vote. That can only hope the cartels. This is pretty much how real life works as well.

4. There are way more alt accounts/ cartel player when compared to the casual player. High sec players may need an Orca or hauling account, but don't need a a supercap account, a cyno alt, spy accounts, a non supercap account etc etc. These accounts also contribute to the cartel voting power.

So, putting it all together, I see maybe 30,000 independent voters, some who actually vote against their best interests (Tea Party, anyone?), against a highly motivated collection of cartel accounts numbering in excess of 50,000 (more like 70,000 with alts)

And given the way the STV works, those 50,000 out of 80,000 votes cast will easily dominate the "election".
Yes, I can easily see 70% of the cartel's slate getting on the CSM this year.

I do expect we will see a huge uptick in the amount of votes cast over last year, and then CCP championing this as a victory for democracy. Too bad that the successful candidates are decided on by about a dozen people on Skype weeks before the "election".
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2014-02-19 20:14:40 UTC
there's no longer any need to have cartel mouths on the csm. strategic placement of sympathetic software engineers and infiltration of management at ccp is accomplishing far more than lobbying ever did. those who oppose our cause are quietly removed. certain positions are now held by advanced humanoid robots. our early androids had rubber skin and were easily spotted except at a distance, but our latest models are undetectable. we will allow the common player to elect their powerless representatives to ensure they are kept compliant. most future csm will never suspect a thing - and the more perceptive members can simply be replaced.

there is no reason to conceal it anymore, for we cannot be stopped
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#24 - 2014-02-19 20:28:55 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
there's no longer any need to have cartel mouths on the csm. strategic placement of sympathetic software engineers and infiltration of management at ccp is accomplishing far more than lobbying ever did. those who oppose our cause are quietly removed. certain positions are now held by advanced humanoid robots. our early androids had rubber skin and were easily spotted except at a distance, but our latest models are undetectable. we will allow the common player to elect their powerless representatives to ensure they are kept compliant. most future csm will never suspect a thing - and the more perceptive members can simply be replaced.

there is no reason to conceal it anymore, for we cannot be stopped



Watch out for dogs being imported to Iceland.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Megarom
Shiva
Northern Coalition.
#25 - 2014-02-19 21:21:33 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:

3. The goons have a year of testing and analysis to figure best way to optimize their voting bloc's power.


Everybody knows the optimal way to vote in STV. It's not really a secret, but if you don't know it let me share it with you.

Are you ready? Here goes!
You put the people in you ballot in the order of preference.That's it.

Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:

And given the way the STV works, those 50,000 out of 80,000 votes cast will easily dominate the "election".
Yes, I can easily see 70% of the cartel's slate getting on the CSM this year.


With 5 out of 8 votes the "cartels" get 9 out of 14 seats because 5/8 is bigger than 9/14, but smaller than 10/14. And if that happens they have earned every one of those 9 seats because that is proportion of the electorate that swings their way.

The only weakness in the that I suspect the voting system has is that when people need to be eliminated for lack of anyone having enough votes to be selected it only counts the #1 positions at that time (if I've understood correctly) which could lead in some cases to people being eliminated that have high number on #2 positions, but don't go quoting me on that Dinsdale because I have to recheck it.
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2014-02-20 00:41:33 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:


I would invest some energy in getting the vote out for some non-bloc candidates who seriously want to try to protect what shreds of a game are left for the casual player.
But at the moment, I don't see a whole lot stepping up.

I was hoping Eve-UNI would put forth a candidate, but that looks unlikely atm. Frankly, as Ripard has already posted, the overall candidate pool looks smaller than last year. And with the cartels having consolidated and exploded in size in the last 12 months, well, it is looks grim for anyone who is crazy enough to try to stop that juggernaut.

I am REALLY hoping that CCP releases some pretty specific details about the summer release sooner than usual, so the damage done to high sec can be properly accounted for before the next CSM is appointed.



OK, one I am stepping up for the Casual Player. I may not be a whole lot but don't make it sound like there is nobody here.

Candidate pool looking smaller? Well you can answer that in one of two ways. You could point out that it is still very early in the election cycle as CCP has not said 'Boo' about it, yet. OR You could say that a lot of the lost causes of yesteryear have decided that this election is not theirs to win, even with STV.

Juggernaut. (I actually looked that word up, great history to it). I hate to break it to you but we SELDOM VOTE in our deliberations. Owning 9 seats has little or no effect over having three, or even one. When I had something to say I am heard, by my fellow members and by the Devs.Matter of fact if you had 9 people repeating some company line they would be more likely to slowly bore the devs and as a result . . .be ignored. And that is assuming that all the NUll sec folks agree and get along.

I agree, I do hope the Winter Minutes come out soon and Summer stuff starts being leaked. Thing is, I cannot recall the last change that was made that you did not see as proof of the Null Cartels plotting the overthrow of Hisec.

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)

Harrigan VonStudly
Stay Frosty.
A Band Apart.
#27 - 2014-02-20 02:19:40 UTC
The amount of in-depth research and numbers thrown about is huge for someone who is barking for the "casual" player. I am intrigued by what appears to be a consensus that casual players only live in high sec as if it's not possible to be a casual player and be in low sec or null sec. Also intriguing is the assumption that all of null sec is lumped under one group and defined as - what is ruining high sec. Way to **** all over low sec people with your high sec rantings about null sec. Cool
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#28 - 2014-02-20 03:09:46 UTC
Harrigan VonStudly wrote:
The amount of in-depth research and numbers thrown about is huge for someone who is barking for the "casual" player. I am intrigued by what appears to be a consensus that casual players only live in high sec as if it's not possible to be a casual player and be in low sec or null sec. Also intriguing is the assumption that all of null sec is lumped under one group and defined as - what is ruining high sec. Way to **** all over low sec people with your high sec rantings about null sec. Cool


Huh?

Low sec is another thing altogether.
I have no beef with low sec.
I do a fair bit of work in low sec, and pretty much recognize it is a dog's breakfast of playstyles, most of which center around exploration, quiet R&D/industry , and of course, mayhem. Low sec players are constrained by the game mechanics to "own turf" (forgiveness FW players, I know what I say is not quite accurate there), but I have no doubt if low sec could be conquered, the cartels would be all over it.

Low sec can be a fun place.
My last sweaty palms moment was trying to dodge a gatecamp in Aridia in a cloaked exploration Gila. Manual piloting for the win.

I don't understand where you see me dumping on low sec players...unless it is of course PL using it as a staging grounds for dropping 10 supercaps on a T1 cruiser, because they are bored out of their minds.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#29 - 2014-02-20 07:45:20 UTC
wrong, the cartels have figured out how to put their preferred candidates in all 14 seats this year

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#30 - 2014-02-20 11:24:18 UTC
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Meh, there is only one candidate worth voting and that is Sugar Kyle.


There are going to be 14 people on the CSM. Even if only one candidate genuinely engages you, why deprive yourself of a say in who the other 13 are going to be? If nothing else, you can help stop someone you actively don't want on the CSM by voting for people that aren't them.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#31 - 2014-02-20 11:31:03 UTC
Posting in a cartel thread.

No trolling please

KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-02-20 12:36:20 UTC
Hey Dinsdale, why not vote for a Provi candidate this year?

We represent a casual playstyle to EVE and we reject the large coalitions political scheming.

Or do you concider Providence to be a nullsec cartel aswell?

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#33 - 2014-02-20 13:17:48 UTC
KuroVolt wrote:
Hey Dinsdale, why not vote for a Provi candidate this year?

We represent a casual playstyle to EVE and we reject the large coalitions political scheming.

Or do you concider Providence to be a nullsec cartel aswell?


Everyone knows how easy it would be for one of the blocs to wipe out Provibloc and install renters in Providence instead. This doesn't happen, ergo there must be a reason, ergo you are in cahoots with the cartels. QED.

Blink

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2014-02-20 13:56:42 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Meh, there is only one candidate worth voting and that is Sugar Kyle.


There are going to be 14 people on the CSM. Even if only one candidate genuinely engages you, why deprive yourself of a say in who the other 13 are going to be? If nothing else, you can help stop someone you actively don't want on the CSM by voting for people that aren't them.

I made the mistake of only placing three names on the ballot last year. From what I understand, this meant my vote had a high chance of being wasted.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#35 - 2014-02-20 14:03:48 UTC
mynnna wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
Hey Dinsdale, why not vote for a Provi candidate this year?

We represent a casual playstyle to EVE and we reject the large coalitions political scheming.

Or do you concider Providence to be a nullsec cartel aswell?


Everyone knows how easy it would be for one of the blocs to wipe out Provibloc and install renters in Providence instead. This doesn't happen, ergo there must be a reason, ergo you are in cahoots with the cartels. QED.

Blink


Or they have vast reserves of wealth and power concealed from the public but known to the other blocs in which case Provi is by definition a cartel. The greatest cartel of all, in fact...

#throughthelookingglass
#PalpatineisAmarr

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#36 - 2014-02-20 14:49:53 UTC
KuroVolt wrote:
Hey Dinsdale, why not vote for a Provi candidate this year?

We represent a casual playstyle to EVE and we reject the large coalitions political scheming.

Or do you concider Providence to be a nullsec cartel aswell?


Are there any yet?
Ali Aras is now part of Noir.
Who is the Provi bloc running as a candidate?

But I am tired and bored with the game.
It has devolved into null sec being safer than high sec, https://twitter.com/midi2304/status/432495224875933696 (try doing that in Lanngisi) , where the hypocrisy of the cartels and stagnation of the Eve universe is something that CCP celebrates.

Regardless of what the cartel propagandists say, CCP MUST destroy the game mechanics that allow the cartels to flourish.
But the voices of reason that would tell CCP this are muzzled at every level, be it by the goon thugs who derail every forum thread that speaks the truth of the game, or by flooding the CSM with voices that say "keep giving null sec more power is the key to CCP's long-term success", or with having as many CCP employees as possible sympathetic to the cartel agenda.

There is no hope for the casual player in CCP's world.
The only hope CCP has for it's long term future is a slow decline in subs, followed by an overhaul of management, replaced with a team that has the vision and guts to turn this game upside down.
Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society
Kvitravn.
#37 - 2014-02-20 15:08:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephira Galamore
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Are there any yet?
Ali Aras is now part of Noir.
Who is the Provi bloc running as a candidate?
It's not that hard to miss really.
Like last year, corebloodbrothers is running for Provi.

On that note, why do blocs/fangroups keep spamming those threads with +1s? I would say it even detracts 3rd party voters, as it makes it really annoying to find anything useful in those threads.
Endorsements by known figures / former CSMs are one thing but serveral pages of alliance mates is just spam :S
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#38 - 2014-02-20 16:09:42 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
But I am tired and bored with the game... There is no hope for the casual player in CCP's world.


Can I have your stuff?

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#39 - 2014-02-20 16:15:10 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
But I am tired and bored with the game... There is no hope for the casual player in CCP's world.


Can I have your stuff?


My net worth is about what mynnna makes while going on a long weekend vacation.
KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2014-02-20 17:43:07 UTC
mynnna wrote:
KuroVolt wrote:
Hey Dinsdale, why not vote for a Provi candidate this year?

We represent a casual playstyle to EVE and we reject the large coalitions political scheming.

Or do you concider Providence to be a nullsec cartel aswell?


Everyone knows how easy it would be for one of the blocs to wipe out Provibloc and install renters in Providence instead. This doesn't happen, ergo there must be a reason, ergo you are in cahoots with the cartels. QED.

Blink


Lol, install renters in Providence!

Good one.

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.