These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Naga, From My point of View...

Author
Xonk
Blue Horizon Enterprises
#1 - 2011-11-26 22:08:28 UTC
Ok folks, time to weigh in. Shocked

After spending several hours on the Test Server with a Naga, as well as with my corp mates with the other new ships...we have come to the conclusion that the suck. No, really. We each got a whip that we fly...Me, the Naga, and with the Amarr and the Galente ship. We shot at each other. I got popped by me ceo with his Galente ship. I then got my Rattlesnake, and shot at both of them, and I popped him. We tried SEVERAL different fits. I have all my shield skills to 5, but i suck at gunnery, I am better at missiles and drones. See, we feel that after testing these, that they are NOT a good PvE ship, or even PvP as they are right now. You would need SEVERAL of these ships to take down a Battleship. So, PLEASE make these a bit better, just turn them into Battleships, and add more things....for the Naga, drones and missiles, and more slots and a better cap and shields. Otherwise, I don't see where these would fit in. I am not complaining, just stating there needs to be something done, in order for these ships to be of any use. Ugh
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2 - 2011-11-26 22:52:35 UTC
Xonk wrote:
Ok folks, time to weigh in. Shocked

After spending several hours on the Test Server with a Naga, as well as with my corp mates with the other new ships...we have come to the conclusion that the suck. No, really. We each got a whip that we fly...Me, the Naga, and with the Amarr and the Galente ship. We shot at each other.


One on one fight ? Or a regular FFA brawl ? If it was a FFA brawl, then it shows nothing about how powerfull a ship is or not, because it's not 1vs1 fights.

Xonk wrote:
I got popped by me ceo with his Galente ship. I then got my Rattlesnake, and shot at both of them, and I popped him.


A Rattlesnake's tank > Every other battleships' tank (Except maybe a true overboosted Bhaalgorn). And it can still deal almost 1k DPS. So sure, you popped them without much troubles.

We tried SEVERAL different fits.

There are two possible fits. Railfit and Blasterfit.

Xonk wrote:
I have all my shield skills to 5, but i suck at gunnery, I am better at missiles and drones.


That's what I though. Testing a Zealot with stupidly low skills isn't something you want to do, because it shows nothing about the ship's possibilities.

Xonk wrote:
See, we feel that after testing these, that they are NOT a good PvE ship


Oh really ? It's like Black ops in PVE right ?

Xonk wrote:
or even PvP as they are right now. You would need SEVERAL of these ships to take down a Battleship.


You're doing something wrong them. You won't win vs a Battleship 1vs1 because the BS have the same firepower you have, but much more tank. Though you can pretty much gank every battleship in the game 3vs1 or even 2vs1 without much troubles.


All in all, I think that those ship will bring true firepower to NanoBCs and other "fastish" gangs. You can bring a Tornado (With 2 nanos) in a Nanohac fleet, it should blend in just fine (Well, it will still be a bit slower, but the x2 HAC firepower will make up for it).
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2011-11-27 00:57:50 UTC
I for one feel it's a little too tight on CPU compared to the other ships

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062

Daedalus Arcova
The Scope
#4 - 2011-11-27 11:19:10 UTC
Xonk wrote:
i suck at gunnery, I am better at missiles and drones.

There's your problem. Train some gunnery skills, Calbear.
Alexandros Balfros
Liberty Rogues
Aprilon Dynasty
#5 - 2011-11-27 11:31:20 UTC
Daedalus Arcova wrote:
Xonk wrote:
i suck at gunnery, I am better at missiles and drones.

There's your problem. Train some gunnery skills, Calbear.


There are missile PvP boats, as it stands at present we have 2 hybrid boats a laser boat and a projectile boat, really you should have a missile boat in there TBH

Rails are **** anyway and we all know it, caldari won't get a decent blaster boat so we keep getting shafted with rail platforms that can't do any damage at all and are not worth taking :)
Daedalus Arcova
The Scope
#6 - 2011-11-27 12:04:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Daedalus Arcova
Alexandros Balfros wrote:
Daedalus Arcova wrote:
Xonk wrote:
i suck at gunnery, I am better at missiles and drones.

There's your problem. Train some gunnery skills, Calbear.


There are missile PvP boats, as it stands at present we have 2 hybrid boats a laser boat and a projectile boat, really you should have a missile boat in there TBH

Rails are **** anyway and we all know it, caldari won't get a decent blaster boat so we keep getting shafted with rail platforms that can't do any damage at all and are not worth taking :)


Yes, there are some good missile PvP ships, so there's no overwhelming need for any more. But the reality is that Caldari missile boats are near-universal favourites for PvE - we certainly don't need any more ships in that mould. On the other hand, there is an overwhelming need for a functioning railgun platform. Several ships contend for that niche, but none command it.

The fact that the other three Tier 3s are all gunboats is no argument for the Naga to be any different. Missiles simply wouldn't have worked in the role. Cruise would be too effective against smaller targets, and torps would have only been useful for PvE and POS bashing.

I know rails suck. I've been one of the many people urging CCP Tallest to go further in buffing them. But the Naga is possibly the first dedicated rail platform that actually makes the damn things work.
Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
#7 - 2011-11-27 17:01:17 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Spitfire
Why is every carebear in the world trying to turn the tier 3 battlecruisers meant as fleet dps boats into *snip* Spitfire ships? Literally it was said everywhere, these ships will not be tankable and have high dps at the same time.
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#8 - 2011-11-27 19:31:07 UTC
You're terrible.


These ships are not built for 1v1 combat. Yes. You need several of them to take down battleships. They're goddamn FLEET DPS SHIPS, not 1v1 powerhouses or PvE ships. I'll be honest, I haven't bothered with a rail Naga because I've never bothered with training Large Railgun Specialization, only blasters. But in the role of a blaster ship, it's actually been rather ok, in my opinion. But I was using it in a fleet, not in a 1v1 fight.

At one time I had a 1v1, Naga (me) versus Talos (old corpmate). Both blaster setups. I got the **** kicked out of me in under fifteen seconds. If you ever manage to get within range of a Talos, you will die, that's almost universal. The Naga is more useful when it's at the edges of it's targets' range, where it'll still do at least 800 DPS IIRC. I did manage to hit the Talos once before I got TD'd, and it took out a vast chunk of his HP; these are not exactly what I'd call survivable 1v1 ships. So please, stop using them like they are and then bawling that they suck at it, because they're not designed for that role.

Xonk
Blue Horizon Enterprises
#9 - 2011-11-27 23:41:35 UTC
Yes, I understand that now. After testing them...yes, they suck at 1v1, etc. Yes, I am a carebear, lol. Heck, we're a mining/indy corp, who enjoy going on lv 4 missions. As I said, we were just seeing what they could do. The best one is the Amarr ship...and so, they would be better in a fleet. You get too close, you get popped. Oh well, it will be an expensive ship, that has to stay at long range, and hope someone doesn't alpha you. lol.
Mirei Jun
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2011-11-28 00:20:22 UTC
The OP is clueless. This last round of bonuses for the Naga make it absolutely amazing.

You'll see many in fleets and skirmishes.
Xonk
Blue Horizon Enterprises
#11 - 2011-11-28 01:12:38 UTC
Mirei Jun wrote:
The OP is clueless. This last round of bonuses for the Naga make it absolutely amazing.

You'll see many in fleets and skirmishes.


I am not even going to go there. I am just as experienced as anyone else. :) Like I said, it's my point of view. :P
Jaigar
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2011-11-28 01:25:00 UTC
Mirei Jun wrote:
The OP is clueless. This last round of bonuses for the Naga make it absolutely amazing.

You'll see many in fleets and skirmishes.


This. 1v1 is not the standard for fights, nor should it ever be. A good portion of the fight is determined before you even land on grid in a pvp scenario.

As far as the naga goes, man, that thing is dead sexy and is my favorite of the new tier 3 BCs hands down.
Cloora
APEX Unlimited
APEX Conglomerate
#13 - 2011-11-28 01:50:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Cloora
OP is an idiot. I have perfect rail skills and the Naga PWNS at extreme ranges while still being fast enough to buzz around MWDing so as probers will have a hard time getting a warp in on you.

You are doing it wrong if you aren't fitting a naga for speed, range and tracking. Range is your tank and you can fit for enough speed and cap so you can still be slippery and get away. I was fighting a Cynabal who was trying to close in on me from 220km. By the time he got close he warped out because then he was structure

http://www.altaholics.blogspot.com

Xonk
Blue Horizon Enterprises
#14 - 2011-11-28 03:07:51 UTC
Man...

Put up your opinion and get called an idiot and clueless. This is why I don't usually post on here. So, I am going to ask a dev that this be closed. Sheesh people, you all don't have to be jerks and call others names. In fact, I bet there is something in the rules about this kind of behavior. Put a sock in it and keep the names to yourselves please, and go get a life other than playing EVE from your parents's basement. Evil
Apollo Gabriel
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#15 - 2011-11-28 03:24:44 UTC
Xonk wrote:
Man...

Put up your opinion and get called an idiot and clueless. This is why I don't usually post on here. So, I am going to ask a dev that this be closed. Sheesh people, you all don't have to be jerks and call others names. In fact, I bet there is something in the rules about this kind of behavior. Put a sock in it and keep the names to yourselves please, and go get a life other than playing EVE from your parents's basement. Evil


Many of the eve posters are assholes, without any fuckin social lives, ignore them as you would **** on the ground.
Always ... Never ... Forget to check your references.   Peace out Zulu! Hope you land well!
Cloora
APEX Unlimited
APEX Conglomerate
#16 - 2011-11-28 05:26:12 UTC
Xonk wrote:
Man...

Put up your opinion and get called an idiot and clueless. This is why I don't usually post on here. So, I am going to ask a dev that this be closed. Sheesh people, you all don't have to be jerks and call others names. In fact, I bet there is something in the rules about this kind of behavior. Put a sock in it and keep the names to yourselves please, and go get a life other than playing EVE from your parents's basement. Evil


WTF do you expect posting about how a ship sucks when you don't even have good skills for its weapon system.

I'd call you an idiot IRL as well. Plus you are like the 50th person in this forum to talk about how the Naga should be a missile ship because no Caldari pilot has Hybrid skills. They don't have hybrid skills because they used to suck. Now they are a bit better and on the Naga a very viable weapon. Go train them up. Spice is the flavor of life...

Oh and I don't have a basement in the house that I own. I'm 31 and married with 3 kids. Sorry I'm an ******* I've been playing EVE too long. Sad

http://www.altaholics.blogspot.com