These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Presubmit complaints/broken CSM campaign promises to Bane now!

First post
Author
joebro1060
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2014-02-16 02:56:33 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Tyrant Scorn wrote:
Thor66777 wrote:
Sorry don't take orders from scrubs.


Something we can agree on Big smile

Proclus Diadochu wrote:
this is about you being some nobody f*ckin sh*tlord who is telling everyone you are relevant and have all this experience, yet prove nothing, and also enjoy large bags of d*cks.


You really are low on IQ aren't you... Didn't I jusy try to explain to you that my experience, my character or my reputation has nothing to do with my freedom to write what I want, when I want it and where.


Since you don't have (A) experience, (B) Character, or (C) Reputation, I suppose you are correct. You don't matter.

Also, you can take your Helix Boot licking alt over to the nearest store and buy yourself a large bag... o' d*cks.



Actually,
I sell a complete "bag... o' d*ck" if you would like to substitute the d*cks for a single d*ck. It may not be as hefty as the competitor's bag, but it is just as satisfying ®.




®my d*ck compared to the most recent set of d*cks your girlfriend experienced.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#62 - 2014-02-16 03:03:31 UTC
This thread is pretty much just a buy order for Bags of Dicks™



Soo....

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Arkon Cat
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2014-02-16 03:13:34 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
This thread is pretty much just a buy order for Bags of Dicks™



Soo....



WTB 2 Dozen ® Bags of Dicks™ PM or post here plox
Arkon Cat
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#64 - 2014-02-16 03:17:08 UTC
Arkon Cat wrote:
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
This thread is pretty much just a buy order for Bags of Dicks™



Soo....



WTB 2 Dozen ® Bags of Dicks™ PM or post here plox


Almost forgot, any ® Bags o' Black Dicks™ vailable?
Tyrant Scorn
#65 - 2014-02-16 03:24:17 UTC
Well, atleast Bane knows what to ask for when he does become a CSM, we all want Bag O' dicks launchers for PvP.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#66 - 2014-02-16 03:30:09 UTC
FW: Re: Re: Re: 2 x bag of ****
From: joebro1060
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:27
To: Proclus Diadochu,


Re: Re: Re: 2 x bag of ****
From: joebro1060
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:26
To: Arkon Cat,

They do have the ® on them, but im sorry, they do not come in trhe black flavor. I believe in keeping these bags of **** with pure passive phenotypes, no carriers here! they come in white and slight pink colors only. Please set up a 1 PLEX contract to joebro1060 and he will USPS you the complete order of bag(s) of d*ck.


Re: Re: 2 x bag of ****
From: Arkon Cat
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:22
To: joebro1060,

sounds good, do they have the premium ® logo on them? Also, do you have any black dicks in stock? Or any other types?


Re: Re: 2 x bag of ****
From: joebro1060
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:19
To: Arkon Cat

premium, home grown, corn fed bags of ****. they come in half dozen and dozen sized bags


Re: 2 x bag of ****
From: Arkon Cat
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:17
To: joebro1060,

Are these premium bags with ****?


2 x bag of ****
From: joebro1060
Sent: 2014.02.16 03:17
To: Arkon Cat

I do not sell bags of dicks, but i do sell bags of ****. Would you like 2 x bags of ****?

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Tyrant Scorn
#67 - 2014-02-16 03:32:34 UTC
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#68 - 2014-02-16 09:05:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
- Make a public post on a public forum asking them for requests from the EVE public.

- Individual makes a legitimate request from any representative to share his views, because killboards doesn't show that.

- Blatantly insult and harass said individual for asking legitimate questions, then go on how he has no right to post because it's an alt, and he is right because he posts more.

- Bring his angry sisters and degrade the whole forum post

-???

- Profit?

Posting from your main is definitely a plus, but posting on your alt is not forbidden, and a view posted by an alt shouldn't be automatically stricken off, especially when it is about general subjects that don't require you to post with your main. Also this is EVE and especially in wh space sometimes anonymity is actually advisable. Having more kills on your killboard doesn't make you more right. Even then the guy actually did a podcast promoting a wh fight and eviction and got featured on evenews24 (I know they suck but it's something) and here you are being blatantly rude to him in your first post. He is adding content, and with that podcast he probably added more content for more people (by people listening to it) than all of t3 fights that year. You not agreeing with his views in the podcast doesn't make him ineligible to state his requests from someone running for office.

Rant over, here are my questions for bane:

1- Do you think there is a lack of variation and stagnant meta in serious wh fights, and what are you going to do about it if you do?

2- Do you think there is a lack of in game conflict drivers in wh space, and if you do what are you going to do about it?

3- Do you think the risk / reward ratio of capital escalations is balanced?

Thank you in advance
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#69 - 2014-02-16 09:14:34 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
@#$% #$%^ %$^&$%^& #@$%^ #$%^& $%^


Post with your main, nerd :P

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#70 - 2014-02-16 09:21:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:
@#$% #$%^ %$^&$%^& #@$%^ #$%^& $%^


Post with your main, nerd :P


I would but I don't know which 1 to pick, and this sort of became my forum posting character. I only post with 1 character on the forum so it shouldn't be an issue. She has enough history so you can have a faint idea who I PVP with, or did in the past.

But seriously I really think you took it way out of proportion. Posting with an alt is not ideal, and if it was something like, "remember the time when you killed your entire scrub gang", I would understand, but this is a general post about a representative for all wh residents (scrub or not, a vote is a vote). If he took the time to post he will take the time to vote.
Akseli Jari
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#71 - 2014-02-16 09:24:58 UTC
I want to be able to play Texas holdem in my personal or corp Starbase. The Starbase should be cool as **** looking and not have the security of a wet blanket.

Bane for csm!
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#72 - 2014-02-16 09:26:55 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
(scrub or not, a vote is a vote).


We are a community of quality, not quantity.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Gos Emyrs
Pulse Industries
Knights Collective
#73 - 2014-02-16 09:28:49 UTC
Honorable Bane Nucleus,

If you become CSM, what will you do about the severe shortage and ever rising costs of bags of dicks in this wormhole sub forum? I fear if the quantity and quality of bags of dicks does not improves in the future, it will be very hard for my fellow low classers and myself to foot the bill to hand them out to every NPC corp. alt we must purge from Bob’s realm. It is us on the frontlines of high sec that try our best to protect this filth from reaching your C5-C6 chains and Bob’s inner sanctums. Furthermore, if/when you fix this shortage, can we count on you to bring bags of dicks to the masses of forum alts that plague the official forums.

If your answer is yes to any of the above, it gives me hope that I will never have to witness our precious sub forum turn into the likes of GD, run amuck with NPC alt mouth breathers who need to just learn to keep their **** beaters off the keyboard.

Sincerely,

Galactic President Superstar McAwesomeville
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#74 - 2014-02-16 09:39:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:
(scrub or not, a vote is a vote).


We are a community of quality, not quantity.



Yes take a single sentence out of the whole post out of context and reply to it with an elitist, entitled comment, and ignore the main point of the post.

If you mean by quality, the odd weekly t3 fight where 2 guardians die and then you just jump the hole, then you can have all wh space to yourself, and by the way things are going you will.

No objectives, No goals, and No strategic initiative, just the odd grudge and weekly "fun" fights.

Enjoy your stay.
Winthorp
#75 - 2014-02-16 09:47:16 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:
(scrub or not, a vote is a vote).


We are a community of quality, not quantity.



Yes take a single sentence out of the whole post out of context and reply to it with an elitist, entitled comment, and ignore the main point of the post.

If you mean by quality, the odd weekly t3 fight where 2 guardians die and then you just jump the hole, then you can have all wh space to yourself, and by the way things are going you will.

No objectives, No goals, and No strategic initiative, just the odd grudge and weekly "fun" fights.

Enjoy your stay.


Joan i have spent a very long time ignoring your massive posts you like to do from your NPC alt of impunity, i will just add this new guy to the list.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#76 - 2014-02-16 09:48:29 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
No objectives, No goals, and No strategic initiative, just the odd grudge and weekly "fun" fights.


If you want themepark, go play a themepark mmo. This is sandbox. Although you think this community is broken, some don't agree. You are entitled to your scrubby opinion. Just like I'm entitled to tell you the same thing I told the other NPC alt.

Eat a bag of dicks.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#77 - 2014-02-16 10:17:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Nucleus
Joan Greywind wrote:

Rant over, here are my questions for bane:

1- Do you think there is a lack of variation and stagnant meta in serious wh fights, and what are you going to do about it if you do?

2- Do you think there is a lack of in game conflict drivers in wh space, and if you do what are you going to do about it?

3- Do you think the risk / reward ratio of capital escalations is balanced?

Thank you in advance


1) The meta in wormhole space is controlled by the players, and to a lesser extent wh mass. People choose to warp 6 dreads and 4 archons with T3s to their static, hoping you are dumb enough to jump through so they can pad their killboard stats. Hell, living in a Pulsar, we have been told by several groups that they wouldn't jump in to us because they don't have shield ships....Once the T3 "adjustments" are made, it will be interesting to see if anything changes.

As far as what I would do about it....nothing. I can't control what people fly. What I can do is propose suggestions made by the community on what adjustments we can make with game mechanics that would encourage a different meta.

2) Again, conflict is driven by the players. People like to blame CCP for making it stale, but they really just don't want to take responsibility for their shiitbaggery. That said, doing something like C4s having low class and high class statics and improving blackholes would certainly get people moving around more, which naturally forces us to run into each other more often.

3) Yes, it's fine. Why? Because BU can warp in on you and kill your retardedly expensive caps whenever they want P

No trolling please

Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#78 - 2014-02-16 11:44:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:
No objectives, No goals, and No strategic initiative, just the odd grudge and weekly "fun" fights.


If you want themepark, go play a themepark mmo. This is sandbox. Although you think this community is broken, some don't agree. You are entitled to your scrubby opinion. Just like I'm entitled to tell you the same thing I told the other NPC alt.

Eat a bag of dicks.


Where did you read I want a theme park? Expected of your argument skills to be like your manner and attitude. I want more conflict, I want more variation and I want strategic intiative, all of which don't exist in wh space. We are using the exact same ships and same tactics we were using 4 years ago. The game evolves and we stagnate, wh corps go in cycles, they grow they become "elite" and for all intent and purposes they move the majority of operations to k-space. The wh population is shrinking, while the game is growing, not only losing "scrubs", but losing key content creators. Wh has become an eternal game of circle the chairs with more chairs and players, and no reward for the victor.

I have said nothing about the community so stop putting words in my mouth. Your argumentative tactics are pathetic, so if you are going to just warp everything I say into whatever bad thing you want, I won't be responding to you anymore.

And we get it you don't like alts, although they have a very long post history, deal with it, this is a public forum, you have to critically respond to any of the arguments, other than I am elite and my opinion matters more.
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#79 - 2014-02-16 11:58:52 UTC
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:

Rant over, here are my questions for bane:

1- Do you think there is a lack of variation and stagnant meta in serious wh fights, and what are you going to do about it if you do?

2- Do you think there is a lack of in game conflict drivers in wh space, and if you do what are you going to do about it?

3- Do you think the risk / reward ratio of capital escalations is balanced?

Thank you in advance


1) The meta in wormhole space is controlled by the players, and to a lesser extent wh mass. People choose to warp 6 dreads and 4 archons with T3s to their static, hoping you are dumb enough to jump through so they can pad their killboard stats. Hell, living in a Pulsar, we have been told by several groups that they wouldn't jump in to us because they don't have shield ships....Once the T3 "adjustments" are made, it will be interesting to see if anything changes.

As far as what I would do about it....nothing. I can't control what people fly. What I can do is propose suggestions made by the community on what adjustments we can make with game mechanics that would encourage a different meta.

2) Again, conflict is driven by the players. People like to blame CCP for making it stale, but they really just don't want to take responsibility for their shiitbaggery. That said, doing something like C4s having low class and high class statics and improving blackholes would certainly get people moving around more, which naturally forces us to run into each other more often.

3) Yes, it's fine. Why? Because BU can warp in on you and kill your retardedly expensive caps whenever they want P



Yes, but there is no in game mechanic to drive that content. I mean let us say you go in to evict someone, currently what do you get? You get a boring tower bash and not even the killmails, if you are lucky you get some tears. What wh space is turning into sadly is glorified gankers that are very apt at scanning. In null if you win you take space, in wh if you win what do you get??

The reason of the recent change to the domis stated by CCP was because it was used 5 times as much as the next ship. Can you tell me what t3 usage percentage in serious fights? I will bet it is more than 90%. All the pvp battle reports between the serious pvp entities look the same, same ships and same fittings. If you make the ship the best you can't blame people for using it, there is something wrong with the game design and balance.

This is from personal experience, I have lived in a wh for 1 year+ and I have been consistently farming it with 4-5 guys. If we take the proper precautions it is nigh impossible to get randomly ganked. Close all holes, do not warp to the static, keep analyser open and log off a dictor in site. If a new signature pops (you don't even need to dscan) align dictor, siege red, bubble while aligning, and warp dictor to new signature and bubble up. Unless a 30 t3 man gang is rage rolling on the other side there is a small chance of being killed. The only threat is log off traps, and since it is a lower wh static it is extremely difficult and effortful to get in. Don't get me wrong if a dedicated wh group wants us out, they can easily kick or gank us, but what is the in game benefit for all their effort? It is not fair to them that they don't get rewarded for killing the farmers. If they kick us out we just go settle in of the other 1000's of empty holes.

There is something wrong when you all wh fights look exactly the same for four years.
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#80 - 2014-02-16 12:29:17 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Joan Greywind wrote:

Rant over, here are my questions for bane:

1- Do you think there is a lack of variation and stagnant meta in serious wh fights, and what are you going to do about it if you do?

2- Do you think there is a lack of in game conflict drivers in wh space, and if you do what are you going to do about it?

3- Do you think the risk / reward ratio of capital escalations is balanced?

Thank you in advance


1) The meta in wormhole space is controlled by the players, and to a lesser extent wh mass. People choose to warp 6 dreads and 4 archons with T3s to their static, hoping you are dumb enough to jump through so they can pad their killboard stats. Hell, living in a Pulsar, we have been told by several groups that they wouldn't jump in to us because they don't have shield ships....Once the T3 "adjustments" are made, it will be interesting to see if anything changes.

As far as what I would do about it....nothing. I can't control what people fly. What I can do is propose suggestions made by the community on what adjustments we can make with game mechanics that would encourage a different meta.

2) Again, conflict is driven by the players. People like to blame CCP for making it stale, but they really just don't want to take responsibility for their shiitbaggery. That said, doing something like C4s having low class and high class statics and improving blackholes would certainly get people moving around more, which naturally forces us to run into each other more often.

3) Yes, it's fine. Why? Because BU can warp in on you and kill your retardedly expensive caps whenever they want P



Yes, but there is no in game mechanic to drive that content. I mean let us say you go in to evict someone, currently what do you get? You get a boring tower bash and not even the killmails, if you are lucky you get some tears. What wh space is turning into sadly is glorified gankers that are very apt at scanning. In null if you win you take space, in wh if you win what do you get??

The reason of the recent change to the domis stated by CCP was because it was used 5 times as much as the next ship. Can you tell me what t3 usage percentage in serious fights? I will bet it is more than 90%. All the pvp battle reports between the serious pvp entities look the same, same ships and same fittings. If you make the ship the best you can't blame people for using it, there is something wrong with the game design and balance.

This is from personal experience, I have lived in a wh for 1 year+ and I have been consistently farming it with 4-5 guys. If we take the proper precautions it is nigh impossible to get randomly ganked. Close all holes, do not warp to the static, keep analyser open and log off a dictor in site. If a new signature pops (you don't even need to dscan) align dictor, siege red, bubble while aligning, and warp dictor to new signature and bubble up. Unless a 30 t3 man gang is rage rolling on the other side there is a small chance of being killed. The only threat is log off traps, and since it is a lower wh static it is extremely difficult and effortful to get in. Don't get me wrong if a dedicated wh group wants us out, they can easily kick or gank us, but what is the in game benefit for all their effort? It is not fair to them that they don't get rewarded for killing the farmers. If they kick us out we just go settle in of the other 1000's of empty holes.

There is something wrong when you all wh fights look exactly the same for four years.


Tbh T3s are versatile enough that every single one got a dozen acceptable and a few good combinations. And in a good fight, you need the sturdiest stuff you can find with the most EWAR you can squeeze onto those ships to break hostile reps/support.
It just so happens that a majority of the people can't fly CS, so they stick to strats. Both are performing pretty identical, with CS taken 200-300% of the damage by dreads. Well, happens.

In that regard: Yes, wormhole fights look veeery similiar. It's because everyone ligured out which ships to use to make the most out of limited number of pilots, and also the reason why damnations are so yesteryear - since they are a waste of a pilot compared to an eos.

Serious wormhole fights outside of a Pulsar are fought with biggest/best guns, most of the time. Doesn't mean smartbombing BS does not exist in red giants, or enyofleets does not exist around wolf-rayets. Just that Cruiser/BC-sized is the norm in wormholes for a reason, and T3s are the most expensive and useful ship. Stick two/three times the ships value in deadspace/faction mods on there and it really becomes stronk. Unlike CS, prereqs are laughable.