These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Fix logistic concord warning!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#1 - 2011-11-27 04:13:37 UTC
This is a rage QQ post for CCP introducing something that broke something else big time (surprise?). You have been warned.

Logistics getting warnings and concord algorithm disabling their cap transfers is ANNOYING AS HELL AND MUST BE FIXED.
When I am in the same corp as my logi parter and our whole alliance is at war with a second alliance concord algorithm (which is probably made by a group of drunk and corrupted cops!) gives me a warning and disables my energy transfers to my logi partner while we try to keep out fleet alive.

Oh, and how many time does this happen on a timescale of say 1-2 min. combat? It happens 3 times. Seriously? You are trying to "protect" me by disabling my energy transfers with my corp mate who is in the same war as we both are repping alliance members?

Do you know how big of a pain this is? We aren't even neutral logistics for the love of god.
Please fix the code for this Sad

*collapses on ground and starts crying*
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#2 - 2011-11-27 04:15:33 UTC
idgi

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#3 - 2011-11-27 04:16:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Ammzi
Andski wrote:
idgi


Help me out here.
I don't give i...?

edit: I don't get it?
Well goons aren't really rumored to be the brightest in the EVE playground.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4 - 2011-11-27 04:18:09 UTC
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Azitek
Serenity Labs
#5 - 2011-11-27 04:32:35 UTC
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

Confirming that basilisks are completely useless in every situation, and the only logis that use cap chains. Roll
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#6 - 2011-11-27 04:36:42 UTC
Azitek wrote:
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

Confirming that basilisks are completely useless in every situation, and the only logis that use cap chains. Roll


You're hilariously dumb since the only other logistics hull bonused for cap transfers is the Guardian, an armor logi.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Liam Mirren
#7 - 2011-11-27 04:38:56 UTC
Andski wrote:
Azitek wrote:
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

Confirming that basilisks are completely useless in every situation, and the only logis that use cap chains. Roll


You're hilariously dumb since the only other logistics hull bonused for cap transfers is the Guardian, an armor logi.



You should probably have your sarcasm detector checked, it's obviously not working correctly.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#8 - 2011-11-27 05:00:33 UTC
Andski wrote:
Azitek wrote:
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

Confirming that basilisks are completely useless in every situation, and the only logis that use cap chains. Roll


You're hilariously dumb since the only other logistics hull bonused for cap transfers is the Guardian, an armor logi.


*facedesks* I don't care if this is serious or a troll. Both versions are incredibly fail.
And I who thought goons were good at trolling Sad
ACE McFACE
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#9 - 2011-11-27 05:53:03 UTC
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

YES, SCIMITARS ARE SO MUCH BETTER BUT EVERYONE WANTS BASILISKS FOR NO GOOD REASON EXCEPT SLIGHTLY BETTER REPPING AND NO TRACKING LINKS

/raeg

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#10 - 2011-11-27 05:55:44 UTC
ACE McFACE wrote:
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh

YES, SCIMITARS ARE SO MUCH BETTER BUT EVERYONE WANTS BASILISKS FOR NO GOOD REASON EXCEPT SLIGHTLY BETTER REPPING AND NO TRACKING LINKS

/raeg


slightly better repping that requires an incoming cap transfer that goes away the instant your cap buddy gets popped, hell yeah

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#11 - 2011-11-27 06:02:33 UTC
add in a check mark declaring never show me this again.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Liam Mirren
#12 - 2011-11-27 06:21:40 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
add in a check mark declaring never show me this again.


No, because then it won't warn when you need it. What needs to happen is the warning (in regards to wardecs) not being given if you rep a corp/alliance member.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#13 - 2011-11-27 06:38:54 UTC
Tell that to the Im about to shoot somone without a war declartion message then.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Vmir Gallahasen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2011-11-27 08:02:23 UTC
+1. I had the same issue as OP (also energy xfers incidentally) with CONCORD shutting down xfers at critical moments. I thought it was related to the fact that I'd just been caught by Caldari State with boosters in cargo seconds before engaging enemy fleet, though.
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#15 - 2011-11-27 09:59:19 UTC
Vmir Gallahasen wrote:
+1. I had the same issue as OP (also energy xfers incidentally) with CONCORD shutting down xfers at critical moments. I thought it was related to the fact that I'd just been caught by Caldari State with boosters in cargo seconds before engaging enemy fleet, though.


See boys? The sooner you accept that CCP just doesn't want you to fight in high sec, the sooner you will become carebears like me. Can't we all just get along? /troll
Tore Vest
#16 - 2011-11-27 10:03:45 UTC
My scimi dont need cap transfer Cool

No troll.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2011-11-27 10:04:11 UTC
Andski wrote:
tell me you're not flying shield logis oh god, if you are you should be using scimitars, basilisks are ugh


at which scale ?

solo sure / 30 logis ... dont know bassilisks seems to perform better.

Point is ... if what OP wrote is correct, that the "warning, and turning off modules" should not happen and it is happening.
n00n3r
Malicious Destruction
#18 - 2011-11-27 10:53:11 UTC
Liam Mirren wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
add in a check mark declaring never show me this again.


No, because then it won't warn when you need it. What needs to happen is the warning (in regards to wardecs) not being given if you rep a corp/alliance member.


in order to do that, i'm pretty sure they are going to have to change the way aggression is applied. And that will require a entire overhaul of the aggression mechanics.

do-able yes, but a lot of work for just a single annoying fix.

Interested in Incursions? Check out our recruitment thread!  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=12104&find=unread
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#19 - 2011-11-27 13:15:51 UTC
n00n3r wrote:
Liam Mirren wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
add in a check mark declaring never show me this again.


No, because then it won't warn when you need it. What needs to happen is the warning (in regards to wardecs) not being given if you rep a corp/alliance member.


in order to do that, i'm pretty sure they are going to have to change the way aggression is applied. And that will require a entire overhaul of the aggression mechanics.

do-able yes, but a lot of work for just a single annoying fix.


Now I wouldn't know how the code is actually written or how it's executed, but having a check-mechanism for the two connecting pilots to see whether they are in the same alliance/corp and if so not executing the concord message would be a bliss.
I wouldn't know either if this would take too much processing power.
Buruk Utama
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#20 - 2011-11-27 14:51:48 UTC
Ammzi wrote:
n00n3r wrote:
Liam Mirren wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
add in a check mark declaring never show me this again.


No, because then it won't warn when you need it. What needs to happen is the warning (in regards to wardecs) not being given if you rep a corp/alliance member.


in order to do that, i'm pretty sure they are going to have to change the way aggression is applied. And that will require a entire overhaul of the aggression mechanics.

do-able yes, but a lot of work for just a single annoying fix.


Now I wouldn't know how the code is actually written or how it's executed, but having a check-mechanism for the two connecting pilots to see whether they are in the same alliance/corp and if so not executing the concord message would be a bliss.
I wouldn't know either if this would take too much processing power.


It shouldn't take much. It is essentially a hidden flag if/then check such as if both are in same corp then the flag trip shouldn't occur.
123Next page