These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Customer Support lifting previous restrictions regarding war decs

First post First post First post
Author
ShipToaster
#361 - 2011-11-22 05:15:57 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
I have sat back and have tried to come-up with a proper, functional solution to this problem. One that does not require policing by CCP. I am coming-up blank, I have no solution, no ideas which could be implemented in code.

Good grief, the mechanics of it are a nightmare! Sit back and try it, I dare you. Anyone out there with a viable, functional solution that can be coded ?

It's so easy for us to complain, it's way more difficult to find a working solution though. The current situation is horrible, but what to do ? Policing it actively with GM's is not a good answer, it apparently never worked properly anyway.


The solution of wardecs depends on how you define the problem and what you see as the failures of the current system. Three problems are easy to fix.

1. Dropping to avoid wardecs. ISK penalty applied to corps and players who do this. Pay it to attackers as a penalty for additional fun and games.

2. Dec shields. This exploit was introduced with the patch that scaled war dec fees depending on number of wars declared. Remove the X Aliiance, or Privateer Alliance, nerf. Flat fees but remember not everyone does incursions and is isk rich so dont price wars out of reach of even the smallest groups.

3. Joining in space. Remove this but keep leave in space. This fixes the last of the petitionable offences in wardecs.

These are the most basic fixes required and the level of code changes compared to other suggestions is minimal.

Not a problem but change the name of wardecs to something else so people dont keep thinking in terms of classical set piece wars with defined victory/loss conditions as this is not something a sandbox game needs. Oh, and post somewhere that you actually pay CONCORD to sanction the war and that people are not bribing CONCORD in any way to let them fight illegal wars.

.

Lithalnas
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#362 - 2011-11-22 05:28:11 UTC
Unless i am totally mistaken, the unsticky of this thread means the discussion is now closed?

https://www.facebook.com/RipSeanVileRatSmith shoot at blue for Vile Rat http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73406

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#363 - 2011-11-22 05:40:07 UTC
Lithalnas wrote:
Unless i am totally mistaken, the unsticky of this thread means the discussion is now closed?
No. That would have been the locking of the thread.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#364 - 2011-11-22 06:25:51 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lithalnas wrote:
Unless i am totally mistaken, the unsticky of this thread means the discussion is now closed?
No. That would have been the locking of the thread.


Discussion is still opened. Yet it will change nothing until overhaul of wardec mechanism.
ShipToaster
#365 - 2011-11-25 11:43:21 UTC
Anything happening on the wardec fixing front?

.

Prince Kobol
#366 - 2011-11-25 12:23:39 UTC
For me personally the problem becomes when you have a group of ex-null sec players, all have 40mil+ SP, war dec'ing a small corp of players who mostly are under a year old.

They stand no chance of fighting these guys... not one.

There only real options are to either drop from the corp, don't log on other then to update their skills or just quit.

I have no problem with war decs as such (other then they are way way way too cheap) but its more when you get these types of mismatches.

How do you solve a problem this.. I honestly don't have any idea and I don't think CCP do either.

Before I started to play Eve I had this idea in my head that High Sec wars were between indy / manufacturing corps fighting for resources, to stop their competition etc etc.

What I didn't realise was that most high sec wars are just basically a lot of bored, Highly SP Pilots with a **** load of isk, (who usually have got their ass handed to them in null / low at some point) picking fights with noobs.

I equate it to a group of adults going into a nursery (kindergarten) and picking fights with 2 - 4 yr olds.

Either way we need high sec wars but how to stop the stomping.. your guess is good as mine.

Molly Molotov
Doomheim
#367 - 2011-11-25 12:25:38 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lithalnas wrote:
Unless i am totally mistaken, the unsticky of this thread means the discussion is now closed?
No. That would have been the locking of the thread.


Discussion is still opened. Yet it will change nothing until overhaul of wardec mechanism.


I'm not sure if forum discussion has ever changed anything.
Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#368 - 2011-11-25 12:52:29 UTC
Molly Molotov wrote:
I'm not sure if forum discussion has ever changed anything.


check the average number of players logged in to EvE at the minute then take a second to rethink your answer.
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
Molly Molotov
Doomheim
#369 - 2011-11-25 13:18:35 UTC
Rellik B00n wrote:
Molly Molotov wrote:
I'm not sure if forum discussion has ever changed anything.


check the average number of players logged in to EvE at the minute then take a second to rethink your answer.


i dun think dat CCP evar heard playas on da forum and did change cuz of dem ya heard me?
ShipToaster
#370 - 2011-11-25 14:06:53 UTC
Molly Molotov wrote:
Rellik B00n wrote:
Molly Molotov wrote:
I'm not sure if forum discussion has ever changed anything.


check the average number of players logged in to EvE at the minute then take a second to rethink your answer.


i dun think dat CCP evar heard playas on da forum and did change cuz of dem ya heard me?


1/10

.

Dutarro
Ghezer Aramih
#371 - 2011-11-25 14:17:44 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
For me personally the problem becomes when you have a group of ex-null sec players, all have 40mil+ SP, war dec'ing a small corp of players who mostly are under a year old.

They stand no chance of fighting these guys... not one.

There only real options are to either drop from the corp, don't log on other then to update their skills or just quit.


There are other options. Find other enemies of your attackers and team up with them. Scatter your corp members far across the EVE universe, so that your enemies have to go 30 jumps for each kill. Move to low sec or wormhole space, where war targets are no more or less dangerous than any other player. And of course there are the less honorable, but now CCP-sanctioned tactics of corp-flipping (making a new corp and moving all members to it), dec-scraping (joining an alliance then quitting it) and dec-shielding (dec'ing yourself with bogus alt corps to drive up the cost). All of these are within reach of a character a couple of months old.

A corp, even the newest corp, can deal with an occasional war, and may even find it challenging and fun. The only problem with the war dec system IMO is that some new corps can become almost perpetual war targets, dec'ed by one enemy after another so that they rarely are at peace. At that point, many of the members realize they will never be able to play EVE the way they want (except maybe in an NPC corp) and quit the corp or quit EVE altogether.

Farrina
Doomheim
#372 - 2011-11-27 03:19:41 UTC
Quote:
you don't understand "griefing" as defined by the devs...


Except the Devs don't run the game. The players do.
Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#373 - 2011-11-27 11:20:19 UTC
Molly Molotov wrote:
Rellik B00n wrote:
Molly Molotov wrote:
I'm not sure if forum discussion has ever changed anything.


check the average number of players logged in to EvE at the minute then take a second to rethink your answer.


i dun think dat CCP evar heard playas on da forum and did change cuz of dem ya heard me?


either:
1. this forum needs /sarcasm tags for your original point
2 it doesnt need /sarcasm tags because you were blatantly trolling and i got sucked in
3. you were completely serious and you have replied because you have just realised how dumb you are.

for personal reasons im going to choose 3, it being the option that makes me look less dumb.

now, any news on those wardec changes?
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
ShipToaster
#374 - 2011-11-28 06:05:01 UTC
Rellik B00n wrote:
now, any news on those wardec changes?


Does not look like it.

Was there not a big push at CCP toward better communication for some reason earlier this year? it has been six weeks with still nothing said about this.

Farrina wrote:
Quote:
you don't understand "griefing" as defined by the devs...


Except the Devs don't run the game. The players do.


Read the official definition of griefing in this game, not hard since it is a couple of paragraphs that say there is almost nothing that is officially griefing except for baiting noobs (and now taking advantage of them in the noob channel).

.

Lord Zeel
Doomheim
#375 - 2011-11-28 07:12:08 UTC
Posting in an epic griefer tears thread. Please continue.
ShipToaster
#376 - 2011-11-30 15:04:34 UTC
Any updates?

Patch Notes wrote:
Insurance is no longer paid out for players who are killed by CONCORD.


Does this mean that if players are killed by other players before CONCORD can do so that the insurance is still paid out?

.

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#377 - 2011-12-01 02:37:41 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
Any updates?

Patch Notes wrote:
Insurance is no longer paid out for players who are killed by CONCORD.


Does this mean that if players are killed by other players before CONCORD can do so that the insurance is still paid out?

Taking that to the logical conclusion - does it mean incurance is not paid out when concord get the FINAL blow, or just if they are on the killmail???

The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal
#378 - 2011-12-01 02:52:08 UTC
Posting in a thread that has made my existence possible. If anyone wants to abuse these bugs, feel free to contact me and we'll get you started down the path.
Tylerskji
Scroat-um Inc
#379 - 2011-12-03 20:26:12 UTC
Useful service to us smaller corps with no way to defend ourselves to grief corps other than pay stupid amounts of money to merc corps.

I support this
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#380 - 2011-12-04 00:30:46 UTC
Tylerskji wrote:
Useful service to us smaller corps with no way to defend ourselves to grief corps other than pay stupid amounts of money to merc corps.

I support this


That is complete and utter crap

1) You miss out on the most fun thing to do in Eve
2) These so called "grief" corps actually reward people who fight back and try with isk/replacement ships and will teach them about PvP
3) You can potentially make friends who will counter dec the next time your corp gets a dec.
4) You've shown your corp members that your corp lacks the spine/guts to tough it out and would rather run from a challenge