These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Alliance Logos & You - Clarification on submissions

First post First post
Author
Uma D
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#161 - 2014-02-14 08:31:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Uma D
Xindi Kraid wrote:
Arkady Romanov wrote:


TheMittani is. I'm sure amongst the 37000 odd CFC members we could scrounge up a couple more.

Mittens hasn't posted here.

Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Xindi Kraid wrote:
I love how people keep talking about US law or German law or {COUNTRY_NAME} law.
You seem to be forgetting an important part: CCP Hf. is a company in Iceland subject to Iceland law.

I'm not saying this seems to be a good move, but your arguments why aren't very sound. I should also note, most of you aren't lawyers anyways.


You have no idea who is or isn't a lawyer in this thread aside from myself potentially and it's already been explained that Icelandic copyright law means precisely **** in this situation. Cool post though I guess if by cool post I mean you may as well have just said nothing as the content would be identical.

:edit: Also "HOW DO I INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS" "WHAT IS THE EU ECONOMIC ZONE" just read something before you open your mouth and humiliate yourself with your ignorance

Is being a gigantic douchebag a requirement for membership in goonswarm? If you're really worried about CCP having your IP, maybe you should change it to something more accurate like Assholes Anonymous, and not give CCP the name and logo.
===
You're right I don't know who is a lawyer, but I can be sure most of the people who post on these forums aren't, but are just blowing smoke out their ass. In fact one of the people I was referring to specifically state they weren't a lawyer, and I wasn't referring to your posts at all, and, again the posts I was referring to don't mention internationally recognized, just "Well I don't really know legalese but this one paragraph in my one country seems legit"

You could just read what I posted before stepping up to stroke your own self importance. If you wanna get mad why don't you get mad at ALL the ignorant posts.



True.. i said i am not a lawyer, but i am an audiovisual mediadesigner so i get in contact with copyright laws every day. And if you look at my last post, where i copied everything regarding transactions of IP (which also is covered by International trade agreements) from the german copyright law, you might see where the problem is.

And as german citizen german law applies to me and the law clearly protects my IP from anything ccp is trying to do here. So how about instead of playing the "internet lawyer card" acting as CCP Whiteknight, you get your own facts straight. You do not need to be a lawyer to learn things about the law.

And ccp can write that crap into their EULA a million times, that does not put ccp above the law.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#162 - 2014-02-14 08:39:40 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Kismeteer wrote:
Why are you going after goonswarm's logo?

In your list of example logos, all of these are dead groups. That is, except for Goonswarm's, which lives on under Goonswarm Federation. And I know that someone paid for a copyright on it as well.

KenZoku. - Dead 2009 - eve wiki on Ken ,evewho
Ascendant Frontier - Dead 2011 - eve wiki on ASCN, evewho
Veto Corp - Dead 2012 - TMC article on Veto closing, evewho
Mercenary Coalition - Dead 2009ish - eve wiki on MC, evewho
Goonswarm - Dead 2010 - (Lives on as Goonswarm Federation, same logo evewho )
Morsus Mihi - Dead 2011 - eve wiki on MM , evewho
Lotka Volterra - Dead 2007 - eve history on LV, evewho
Electus Matari - Dead 2012 - Went to faction warfare, 18 people evewho

Just kind of strange that goonswarm seems to be singled out here, since we're the only one you specifically listed still using our logo actively. (courtesy of Avalloc)


I randomly selected a group of logos from a folder I had on my computer and uploaded them to make the blog pretty.

No tinfoil required Smile

As for the questions that have come up in this thread, I'll see if we can get them answered for you buy legal over the weekend and early into next week Smile



It doesn't take CCP Legal to answer a question about the ingredients of the paint in your offices.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#163 - 2014-02-14 08:47:59 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:

No tinfoil required Smile

THis is EvE. Tinfoil is always required.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#164 - 2014-02-14 09:53:48 UTC
Does this mean CCP will also provide ally logo creation services ? Lol

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Dreiden Kisada
State War Academy
Caldari State
#165 - 2014-02-14 10:37:35 UTC
I've noticed a few pieces of Legal Advice being snipped by CCP mods.

I wonder if they're declaring ownership of that legal advice (it did get posted on their forums afterall) and using it to figure out a way out of this mess.
Anna Karhunen
Inoue INEXP
#166 - 2014-02-14 11:30:36 UTC
*eats popcorn* I wonder if this debacle will end up with the movie and comic projects getting scrapped due to CCP's partners wanting (and possibly not getting) assurance that alliances won't be able to sue them for using the logos in the comics/movies.

As my old maths teacher used to say: "Statistics are like bikinis: It's what they don't show that's interesting". -CCP Aporia

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#167 - 2014-02-14 11:33:35 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
For example, Alice creates a logo, and a group.

Bob takes this logo and uploads it to EVE Online.

Bob is now in violation of the EULA between him and CCP (he did not have the rights to transfer ownership to CCP). Alice does not care about the relationship between Bob and CCP.

Alice is aware that her logo is portrayed within the fiction of EVE Online, and considers that fair use.

If CCP were to start monetizing the logo Bob uploaded (by say - selling a T-shirt with the logo on it), Alice would now be in a position to sue CCP. Bob might also have legal troubles with perhaps both CCP and Alice.
I see what you did there!

So, since your shameless ploy got me hooked to this lame Ally McBeal menage-a-trois, at least tell me if Bob and Eve will rekindle their love next season and if Alice has to go to court to find out who the real father of her logo is.
Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
#168 - 2014-02-14 12:33:57 UTC
Wait, the wiki says logos will be community vetted now first? Good luck getting anything passed through.
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#169 - 2014-02-14 13:05:04 UTC
Jack Tronic wrote:
Wait, the wiki says logos will be community vetted now first? Good luck getting anything passed through.

I'm sure that's Community department, not the community.
CCP Falcon
#170 - 2014-02-14 14:16:55 UTC
Bagehi wrote:
Ortho Loess wrote:
Quote:
CCP’s ownership of everything used in the game client is necessary under current intellectual property law

Could you expand on this?

The argument for pursuing a policy that is so clearly against the interests of your users seems to hinge on this point, but it's not explained why you need to own the logos.

This is IP law. CCP can't use a copyrighted name/image in a product/service they sell to customers. This isn't true in some case (eg parody, news reporting, etc) but it wouldn't stop CCP getting dragged into court proceedings because some genius makes a "Ford Sucks" alliance or something along those lines. Basically not even touching copyrighted material at all means much less legal costs for CCP, even if they are in the right.

Why CCP claims copyright on alliance logos is so that I can't create a logo, upload it to Eve Online, later change my mind and send a cease and desist to CCP to remove all traces of my copyrighted material from their game. Imagine me claiming I own the rights to GSF's logo, as another example. Even if I didn't make it, it would still kick in the legal proceedings and costs associated with that. Knowing some of the insane drama that happens in Eve, that has either already happened or would most definitely happen. So, again, legal costs for dumb stuff sucks.


This is part of why we need to have ownership of the logos. Our legal team are currently reading over this thread, and will be giving some responses as soon as possible.

For the record, I'm in a position where I've also uploaded an Alliance logo in the past, and have actively sold Alliance themed merchandise in the past as a player.

I can completely understand the concerns here, and the community team will continue to work with legal to make sure that your concerns are heard. Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#171 - 2014-02-14 14:33:19 UTC
No, you don't need ownership. Whoever told you that was lying.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#172 - 2014-02-14 14:43:33 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Kismeteer wrote:
Why are you going after goonswarm's logo?

In your list of example logos, all of these are dead groups. That is, except for Goonswarm's, which lives on under Goonswarm Federation. And I know that someone paid for a copyright on it as well.

KenZoku. - Dead 2009 - eve wiki on Ken ,evewho
Ascendant Frontier - Dead 2011 - eve wiki on ASCN, evewho
Veto Corp - Dead 2012 - TMC article on Veto closing, evewho
Mercenary Coalition - Dead 2009ish - eve wiki on MC, evewho
Goonswarm - Dead 2010 - (Lives on as Goonswarm Federation, same logo evewho )
Morsus Mihi - Dead 2011 - eve wiki on MM , evewho
Lotka Volterra - Dead 2007 - eve history on LV, evewho
Electus Matari - Dead 2012 - Went to faction warfare, 18 people evewho

Just kind of strange that goonswarm seems to be singled out here, since we're the only one you specifically listed still using our logo actively. (courtesy of Avalloc)


I randomly selected a group of logos from a folder I had on my computer and uploaded them to make the blog pretty.

No tinfoil required Smile

As for the questions that have come up in this thread, I'll see if we can get them answered for you buy legal over the weekend and early into next week Smile



I humbly await the re-wording of the re-clarification, which like this will claim to have said the same thing all the while!

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#173 - 2014-02-14 14:48:04 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
No, you don't need ownership. Whoever told you that was lying.


When you're billing by the hour, it helps to give very long, complex answers, ideally needing re-drafting and re-checking after one or two rounds of rebuttal.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#174 - 2014-02-14 14:48:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Hops
CCP Falcon wrote:
This is part of why we need to have ownership of the logos. Our legal team are currently reading over this thread, and will be giving some responses as soon as possible.


You don't need ownership.

You need a license to use the logos.

Even facebook - a widely derided company - does not try to claim ownership of uploaded content. They claim a license only.
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#175 - 2014-02-14 15:33:37 UTC
So, if I'm understanding correctly, if someone used his real name as his in-game character name, CCP now claims to own that name (through some kind of IP transfer-majiggy), and that player is now required to apply for a provisional license issued by CCP in order to continue using his name in real life? This is friggin' hilarious Lol!

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#176 - 2014-02-14 15:39:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Weaselior
CCP Falcon wrote:

This is part of why we need to have ownership of the logos. Our legal team are currently reading over this thread, and will be giving some responses as soon as possible.

No it's not (and you don't have legal ownership of the logos, except the rare few created under copyright regimes without a requirement for a signed writing to transfer the copyright and/or trademark): non-revocable licences that are everything ownership is except the ability to stop the owner from doing things are a thing and that's what you actually need. Trying to get ownership is just being grabby (mostly because your legal team probably figures no lawyer ever got fired or in trouble for getting their client too much).

The licence in the EULA that it gets you when your attempt to grab ownership is what you actually need for the sort of defense against IP litigation you're looking for. The only distinction between that and ownership for CCP is ownership gives you the ability to try to block alliances from using their own logo as they see fit, which is completely unnecessary if CCP's interest here is defensive instead of offensive.

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Singoth
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2014-02-14 15:44:11 UTC
CCP, your legal department employees are apparently a bunch of selfish sharks.
Please get it out of their heads that they are the only ones who know how copyright law works.



1: Intellectual Property.

If you MADE the logo, then it is YOUR intellectual property. Under NO circumstance in ANY country (apart from regimes like China, North Korea, etc) are people forced to give up their Intellectual Property. YOU made it, it is YOURS to own and distribute.


2: License to use.
However, sometimes you want others to help distribute your logo/design/whathaveyou. At this point, you, as the owner, are the only one to have copyright on what you made. But you can EXTEND this copyright by giving a license to the entity (people or companies) to use your logo and distribute as they see fit. This also gives them the right to modify your logo and use it in alternative ways than just digital use as long as you mention that in your license.

This license needs to be accepted by the distributor. In this case: CCP.
But you, as the designer, still have full ownership of the design, and you can terminate licenses as you see fit.


What CCP is doing is NOT the industry standard, it's actually quite the opposite and they attempt to use the opposite. Their reasoning is: players want to use OUR game, THEY have to sacrifice their intellectual property for it. This is selfish and unneccesary.
If they truly respect their playerbase, they only want to loan the design for use in the game for the benefit of the player alliances that use it, but still allow the original creators to maintain full ownership of the item.


It's that simple.

Less yappin', more zappin'!

ZergRushJohnny
The Order of Atlas
#178 - 2014-02-14 16:15:44 UTC
I'm amazed at how many lawyers are in Eve Online! I had no idea it was the majority of the player base!
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#179 - 2014-02-14 16:29:04 UTC
ZergRushJohnny wrote:
I'm amazed at how many lawyers are in Eve Online! I had no idea it was the majority of the player base!

who would have thought a game best known for its byzantine mechanics that require years to learn fully and that really rewards sociopathy would get a disproportionate number of lawyers

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#180 - 2014-02-14 17:37:11 UTC
Some of us use those silly corp logos that we generate in game on shirts, etc.. for fanfest and other purposes. Are there going to be issues with this?

Or putting the words: EVE Online Fanfest on a t -shirt?