These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fix Ore Descriptions
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Arcelian
0nus
#1 - 2014-02-13 04:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Arcelian
Are we ever gonna get around to updating these? I know it's not a huge issue, but really, how hard is it...

The descriptions should be updated to reflect the new lower ends that were put in null-sec ores. Spod now contains a crap load of tritanium, bistot contains a fair amount of pyerite....etc.

Also, it would seem nocxium is most abundant in hemorphite per m3, not dark ochre....http://ore.cerlestes.de/index.html#site:ore
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#2 - 2014-02-13 14:19:41 UTC
Which descriptions ? Where ? You mention Cerlestes, and it's been updated since long ago.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882
Sar'ran Zorn
St. Albans' Refuge
#3 - 2014-02-13 20:23:54 UTC
He's referring to the in-game "Show Info" descriptions.

Spod, for example:

Quote:

Spodumain is amongst the most valuable ore types around, as it is one of only three ore types that yields the ultra-rare megacyte. Otherwise very plain, with a bit of tritanium and pyerite. 250 ore units are needed to refine.


It has quite a bit more than "a bit" of trit now.

Not something I care about, but some people get excited about the roleplay info text.
Arcelian
0nus
#4 - 2014-02-13 20:40:44 UTC
Sar'ran Zorn wrote:
He's referring to the in-game "Show Info" descriptions.

Spod, for example:

Quote:

Spodumain is amongst the most valuable ore types around, as it is one of only three ore types that yields the ultra-rare megacyte. Otherwise very plain, with a bit of tritanium and pyerite. 250 ore units are needed to refine.


It has quite a bit more than "a bit" of trit now.

Not something I care about, but some people get excited about the roleplay info text.


It's not about role-play, it's just plain wrong. The description contains factual information, such as refining portion size. It's not like the description for a ship...
Ydnari
Estrale Frontiers
#5 - 2014-02-13 20:43:56 UTC
Arcelian wrote:
Are we ever gonna get around to updating these? I know it's not a huge issue, but really, how hard is it...

We? No, we're not. Have you bug reported it?

--
Arcelian
0nus
#6 - 2014-02-13 22:04:49 UTC
Ydnari wrote:
Arcelian wrote:
Are we ever gonna get around to updating these? I know it's not a huge issue, but really, how hard is it...

We? No, we're not. Have you bug reported it?


I don't feel it really meets the criteria to be considered a bug, and I seriously doubt CCP doesn't know about it.
Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-02-13 22:25:25 UTC
Arcelian wrote:
Ydnari wrote:
Arcelian wrote:
Are we ever gonna get around to updating these? I know it's not a huge issue, but really, how hard is it...

We? No, we're not. Have you bug reported it?


I don't feel it really meets the criteria to be considered a bug, and I seriously doubt CCP doesn't know about it.


You would be very surprised then,

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
Arcelian
0nus
#8 - 2014-02-13 22:44:26 UTC
Kusum Fawn wrote:
Arcelian wrote:
Ydnari wrote:
Arcelian wrote:
Are we ever gonna get around to updating these? I know it's not a huge issue, but really, how hard is it...

We? No, we're not. Have you bug reported it?


I don't feel it really meets the criteria to be considered a bug, and I seriously doubt CCP doesn't know about it.


You would be very surprised then,


Well i did submit one, see how far it gets me.