EVE General Discussion

I'm on record numerous times in this thread already explaining the way nullsec works, but here goes again...

There is a finite amount of sugar in each nullsec system (ded complexes). Those are my profit, and the point of living here. I get sufficient isk from that to pay the rent and be happy. This arrangement works for a character fill of 1 per system. I use (or abuse) the rent system to make sure I get them to myself, and I contest, drop insured ships ontop of and generally harass non blues trying to gypsy my system (blues mostly respect the rules).

I have a goo tower. The goo tower pays ~13m a day.
I have a PI arrangement. The PI arrangement pays ~13m a day from a single character. For various logistics reasons I could make a lot more from PI, but I would then create logistics that would bring it down to ratting hourly rates.

Gun-probing the anomolies for data (weeesearch is after all what I do) is what I do in my spare time, but I am not a linemember, I have no constraints on being deployed or ready to deploy, and I can wait out long swings in random number generators like absolutely no sigs spawning up in my system since Friday, that may go on for a week.

As I said before, If I had 10 people living in my system, I'd have done the maze 0.5 times (as an expectation), not the 5 times I've actually done it, and I would have done 4.4 plexes (expectation), instead of the 44 I've actually done.

I do however -care- about the anomaly income, because I would like to hire on people to develop a more PVP oriented corp, but its pretty plain that concentrating a lot of people into null (what is required for military strength) completely runs opposite to what makes money in null, so I'd basically have to sacrifice my income, I wouldn't be able to set the tax particularly high, and then yes I would in fact have to rat like a poor to pay rent.

It was not entirely unexpected, but a disappointment nonetheless that a nullsec system isn't actually that good a base for making a nullsec corp.

LAMO even when its in black and white text they still cant or wont accept it.

Not surprising they can't read their own links.

How does it not make sense to compare one category of income streams with the same category of income streams?

…which, of course, he didn't say in any way. Why do you keep inventing this nonsensical strawmen every time you lose?

No, it's not pointless to provide evidence to support your claims. So far, you haven't been able to. You just keep twisting peoples words and injecting irrelevant tangents when pressed to prove that you have any clue what you're talking about.

Show us the data.


Oh, and could you answer a very simple question, by the way: what does sov null have in place of highsec L4 missions?

Yes, that's a good example of trying to shift the burden of proof.
You made the claim; you do the work. By refusing to do so, you only prove that your initial claim was baseless trolling.

…and yet, that is exactly what you were doing.

The fact remains: the bounty reduction was not there to minimise inflation. They completely retracted that early statement. It was very blatantly there to incentivise the use of ESS, as the discussion in the feedback threads clearly show.

Considering how often you lie, it's a pretty good thing to call you.

Tipia its like proving there is a moon or a sun or air, or wind. Its there for all to see or feel and can be recognized by all if you accept what you see.

Once again the tipia decoy ploy. people are starting to see thru you. I could post proof in your own hand writing with your own signature and you would still continue to argue. Why is that you ask?

Because that’s just what professional forum trolls do.

Calling you and others like you forum trolls is truth as given by your own hand and by your own posting. You should plead the fifth and stop incriminating yourself.

As the thread has run its' course and has turned into trolling, off topic posts, and personal attacks, I'll just close this thread down. Thank you.