These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

System Security: Revisited, Remade & Player Driven

Author
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#21 - 2014-02-08 21:49:01 UTC
Scuzzy Logic wrote:
CCP will start fixing CONCORD after they've fixed insurance contracts.
(Seriously, Pend Insurance is likely staffed bt griefers and their ISK and noobship factories must run on tears.)

Anyone else think it's pretty stupid CONCORD shoots the offending ship to shreds but doesn't even bother repping the damaged ship? They just sit there...


All-in-all EVE has the worst legal system ever. Even the Divine laws of the Amarr probably aren't that ********.


The prize for the worst legal system goes to Italy, but yeah concord should act more intelligently and try to prevent abuses.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#22 - 2014-02-08 21:53:02 UTC
Kaerakh wrote:
Yeah, carebears are notorious for not defending themselves or saving themselves money by making the expenses to defend themselves. They're the most unreliable, divided, arguably unproductive, arguably most harmful group to the economy, and to top it off irrational groups in the game due to their aversion to any and all player driven content.

You can't rely on them for anything.


Except for providing something like 70% of CCP's income... Roll

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#23 - 2014-02-08 21:54:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaerakh
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Kaerakh wrote:
ShahFluffers wrote:
edit:
JetStream Drenard wrote:
And who is to say that industrial power blocs wont form to combat the powerful pirate blocs.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA....

... oh wait... you're serious?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...



Yeah, carebears are notorious for not defending themselves or saving themselves money by making the expenses to defend themselves. They're the most unreliable, divided, arguably unproductive, arguably most harmful group to the economy, and to top it off irrational groups in the game due to their aversion to any and all player driven content.

You can't rely on them for anything.


And here I thought there was a differentiation between carebear (mission runnder or Deklein anomaly farmer) and industrial people, who provide the tools for 101% of the "player driven" content. But this doesn't seem to be enough, they also need to take on the job of battling. Wonderful philosophy, really.

(Possible sarcasm wholly ignored)


I didn't assert anything about what they should do, but the fact is that if they didn't exist the other player groups would adapt and fill the void because adapting to new gameplay is something that groups outside of what is classically defined as a carebear( a highsec dwelling player that avoids pvp at all costs even at their own expense) do extremely well and without much complaint. Carebears do not adapt and pour material and isk into the market without risk, which is one of the major contributing factors to the EVE economy today.

My only point is that you can't rely on them to do anything other than avoid loss. Loss of assets is what makes this game go round like it or not.

Katran Luftschreck wrote:


Except for providing something like 70% of CCP's income... Roll


Neither here nor there, and highsec is not the focus of this game or its development. Which makes me wonder if that's really true to begin with. Blink
Previous page12