These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Fiction

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Null Sec vs Empires - Power Disparity, Numbers, PF retconning?

Author
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#1 - 2014-01-30 18:14:15 UTC
So.

The PF has for the most part maintained that the Empires (the 4 major Empires at least), maintain navies far in excess and in power to anything assembled by any of the capsuleers alliances in the outer regions. In numbers, ship types, force projection, you name it.

This has of course been a tricky line to walk because for many of the 'live events' the number of NPC ships on grid has been very small. (big events with ONE titan, or big events with a handful of dreadnaughts, etc) I personally chalk this up to CCP not being interested in having 100 devs multibox huge capital fleets, etc.

ANYWAY. The expansions and seeming retconning the last few patches seem to recently be going in a direction of 'capsuleer supremacy.' Suddenly the Empires are scared of the capsuleers, as seen in the frowny-faced CONCORD man in the "eve: origins" trailer. CCP seems to have a huge direction lately for 'empowering' us the players. Suddenly the null sec stuff is important (exclamation point!) to the PF, and the big capsuleer fights are suddenly the biggest and most important pew pew the cluster has ever seen.

This for me wraps up a whole ball of retconning and inconsistancies with CONCORD, Capsuleers, The Empires, etc.

Is CONCORD in charge of our capsules or are they not? Do they still cut the puppet strings? I don't see how any of this works PF-wise, if they are retconning the null groups into being the biggest and scariest things ever, CONCORD and the Empires would cut those strings right away, yes? I don't see how the capsuleers can be a threat to the Empires under the current capsuleer stranglehold for cloning/CONCORD, etc.

I feel like the old PF was of the flavor that yes big important battles happen in null sec but these are small potatoes to what happens in the Empires.

New PF retcon versions are saying null battles are the biggest and most baddest space pew pew ever seen by human eyes and the Empires are shaking in their boots at the mighty capsuleers, but they don't seem interested in deading all the clones and killing the capsuleers?)

I R Confused.

If we can establish once and for all the limits of CONCORD, their power, the power of the Empires, we can get a realistic assessment of these conflicts.

Either the Empires and CONCORD maintain all the power (pay your sov bills or lose your station!), or they maintain nothing. The current direction of expansions and some PF indicates the capsuleers are suddenly super scary and the Empires are terrified, even though they maintain control over nearly 100% of capsuleer activity.

Thoughts?

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#2 - 2014-01-30 20:10:24 UTC
It's hard to believe in supremacy of the capsuleers when CONCORD can shut off null starbase shields whenever they like.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#3 - 2014-02-05 11:54:56 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:


Thoughts?



Yes, one. What's a PF?

Apart from that, you sound right of course, although this paradox has always been there, or at least for a longer time than you think. If you take the chronicles for instance, I haven't finished reading them but so far (I started with the oldest ones) the empires are rarely commiting more than a handful battleships at a time. The "powerful empire" thing has been around for a while, but right at the beggining where bits of the story already implying the opposite.

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

Sointu Luonnotar
Doomheim
#4 - 2014-02-05 13:10:21 UTC
Altrue wrote:

Yes, one. What's a PF?


Prime Fiction, Lore, Canon. The established story as laid out by CCP, i.e. not "Fanon."
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#5 - 2014-02-06 02:59:01 UTC
If the empires ever got sick of capsuleers and pulled the plug on all services, the only capsuleers left by the end of the month would be the few in nullsec corps that owned territory with POSs with manufacturing & manufacturing and Rorquals. That's the only way a capsuleer can truly call themselves "independent" from the empires.

Even then we'd be completely at the mercy of all current BPO holders, as the only other way to get more would be copies (POS, above), which requires BPOs and the pirate BPCs that turn up from exploration. That and trying to live off meta loot like the frikkin' Road Warrior or something.

Basically, it would not end well, both in game and financially for CCP.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Miranda Shoota
Leviathan Investment Group
#6 - 2014-02-06 17:34:54 UTC
It does make relatively little sense and it is the one point where I think Eve is lacking in scale or at least its description of that.

CONCORD also pays capsuleers who deal with pirates in 0.0, as if they're some sort of lawful extension and while I keep thinking of 0.0 as more of a frontier world/place and want to treat it like that, it also does not make sense that in PF, the empires are afraid of the size and power of these 0.0 alliances.

To be quite honest, I have sort of given up on the 'story' behind 'modern' Eve and am just sort of piecing together my own for things that interest me.
Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#7 - 2014-02-07 08:50:15 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
If the empires ever got sick of capsuleers and pulled the plug on all services, the only capsuleers left by the end of the month would be the few in nullsec corps that owned territory with POSs with manufacturing & manufacturing and Rorquals. That's the only way a capsuleer can truly call themselves "independent" from the empires.



Not really, because he's still paying for his capsuleer license to CONCORD, either via PLEX or other means.
So in theory they can still pull the plug on any non-NPC capsuleer.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#8 - 2014-02-14 02:29:10 UTC
I'm glad somebody finally voiced this. I've been scratching my head as to how a few years worth of existence has somehow allowed capsuleer alliances to become greater than entrenched empires that have had centuries (at minimum) to build their military and industrial might, while having not insignificant numbers of capsuleers of their own. There isn't some great technological disparity that I've seen skewing everything in favor of the alliances, so I'm thinking media sensationalism here.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#9 - 2014-02-14 06:05:08 UTC
CONCORD is like the United Nations.
They like to think they are in charge and the like to talk big and butt into everyone's business, but at the end of the day nobody really gives a **** what they say, think or do.

Players ignore CONCORD regulations all the time routinely suicide ganking each other and podding as standard practice, and plenty of the live events and lore have the empires brazenly defying CONCORD, between ignoring them saying to stop to outright blowing up their ships.

By interstellar treaty, CONCORD is in charge, but the defacto situation differs from the de jure one.


As for empire supremacy, I don't think that's a retcon as much as something that hasn't been touched on well enough recently. Large alliances weren't always able to send a hundred titans into battle, so at one time the Empires were more powerful. CCP just needs to make a note in the lore that was 5 years ago. The reality is the situation has progressed, it's just that CCP hasn't touched on it until recently, so it only seems like the change of status is sudden.
Lucien Marbot
#10 - 2014-02-14 06:22:09 UTC
CCP must decide if they wish to have the reality of current gameplay reflected in official canon. The Null Sec Alliances are powerful enough to threaten the 4 main Human empires in space and now with Dust514 on the surface of planets as well.

The balance of power has changed, time for CCP to catch up.

Death is nothing more then the searing pain of rebirth.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#11 - 2014-02-14 15:42:21 UTC
The null blocks being more of a threat just doesn't work with current game mechanics is my point.

How can someone be a threat when CONCORD can turn off your entire starbase shields if you don't pay your rent? They can stop you from using stargates, decide whether or not you can use cyno jammers, pay you for your work, they are in charge of your clone contracts, etc, etc.

If the PF were to adapt to reflect or deal with these sorts of issues it would make more sense to me, but not as currently.

It would just be a matter of CONCORD turning off all the stargates, offlining all of the null sec starbases, pos towers, revoking all medical clones, removing all capsuleer items from the markets, etc.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#12 - 2014-02-14 17:49:59 UTC
Perhaps the solution is for the PF to say CONCORD outsourced these jobs to individual contracters who want their money or go on strike?
Lucien Marbot
#13 - 2014-02-14 18:21:44 UTC
Once Concord took any such action to embargo capsuleers movement on a major Alliance level they would identify themselves as a threat to the four empires. Concord exists thru the permission of the empires which is why they can be an impartial referee. Turn off starbase shields because you do not like the alliance and what is your next step? You start moving against the Gallente because you do not like who they elect as leader?

If Concord does anything outside their agreement with the empires they risk unraveling the order in the EVE cluster so CCP can not go down that path. CCP needs to update official canon to be more reflective of current facts in gameplay.

Shut down access to stargates and jump bridges are still available to alliances in null sec and cynos in low sec. Could Concord keep capsuleers out of highsec? It's possible in theory but what would that do to the economy of EVE? Most players are highsec residents not members of major nullsec alliances so one would easily surmise they function as part of the empires economies.

The growing power of capsuleers has to b acknowledged by CCP in the official canon at some point, even the empires are all being led by capsuleers at this point, if I am not mistaken, or have had a capsuleer recently in charge.

Death is nothing more then the searing pain of rebirth.

Lucien Marbot
#14 - 2014-02-14 18:32:36 UTC
I think the premise that the four empires and Concord retain complete power or lose all power is a false premise.

Great powers wane over time, they rarely just suddenly switch off.

The balance of power should shift and adapt to the realities of gameplay.

I for one look forward to the day a player owned alliance can rival the power of any of the four empires.

It is an evolutionary path that CCP has put this game on, it seem from day one, so buckle up, this ride is far from over in my opinion!

Death is nothing more then the searing pain of rebirth.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#15 - 2014-02-14 19:38:34 UTC
I might not have been clear with my earlier point Lucien, I meant that CONCORD still maintains a very (PF) strange stanglehold over the NULL alliances. None of their sovereignty, or player made starbases, or jump bridges, etc, work without the consent of CONCORD. That's kind of my main ?? with the PF right now.

If they establish that the null groups are completely 'on their own' and update some of the lore to reflect this then it starts reflecting the scenario you talk about.

I don't have the opinion that CONCORD has any power over the Empire Navies at all, just like you. Concord serves at the pleasure of the agreement of the 4 main factions under the Yulai Accords, and it gives concord authority to govern the 'freelance' capsuleers (that we represent as players).

Until the PF comes up with a method for the 'freelance' (us) capsuleers to cut the concord puppet strings things are in a bit of a lore-limbo.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Jandice Ymladris
Aurora Arcology
#16 - 2014-02-14 21:22:16 UTC
Concord does have a large hold on power on the 4 empires as well. This was reflected in two separate events where concord ships got destroyed.

The Caldari Prime battle kicked off because the Caldari destroyed the Concord battleship that came to inspect the State actions. On it's destruction, Concord declared the system a lawless zone, allowing the Gallente to bridge in their capitals and take down the Caldari titan and making every capsuleer flagged for a free for all shootinggallery.

A similar event lead to the Colelie incident. Concord ship gets blown up by Minmatar, Concord lifts the security clearance, allowing the Gallente & Minmatar fleets to duke it out.

If we go way back, the destruction of the Yulai Concord station does show the power Concord holds, as the moment Concord security fails, Caldari invade Luminaire to liberate Caldari Prime, Amarr Holder invades gallente & Minmatar Elder fleet raids amarr planets on an unprecedented scale to liberate slaves.

So it does seem Concord holds a great power over the 4 empires, this can actually attributed to the rivalry between the 4 factions. Neither faction is willing to reduce Concord power, as it will also mean more freedom of movement & action for their enemies. To top it off, Concord is supplied with technology superior to what the 4 nations have by grace of the Jove (due to the silence on their part, I don't know if this technological support is still ongoing)

With that in mind, it's not so strange to imagine that Concord does hold a strong influence over the Nullsec alliances. They are merely a group of warlords, building up infrastructure in nullsec. Moreover, due to the freelance nature and te growing power of these capsuleers, Concord will do what they can to retain their hold over them, simply because they would be too great a threat to the empires else.

Providing a new home for refugees in the Aurora Arcology

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#17 - 2014-02-14 21:24:46 UTC
Concords 'power' is more about their Jovian jump bridging than the actual ships themselves. They alluded to this in Empyrean Age I believe. Basically they were glad none of the Empires realized how few in number they were, and that they appear to be 'everywhere' since they can bridge into a situation instantly. But if all hell were to break loose they would be outnumbered rather fast.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Lucien Marbot
#18 - 2014-02-15 10:52:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucien Marbot
The Jovian jump bridging is an incredible force multiplier on it's own, couple it with the ability to deny stargate transit & also cyno jam and you have a potent strategic advantage.

I think the massive numbers and the multiple fronts that could be opened by a capsuleer uprising would be intense to the extreme. Perhaps CCP is planning to allow that to happen, but probably not. The four empires would have to unite to quell a capsuleer revolution and how long would they be able to not shoot at each other?

Official canon needs to address the ability of the Sansha to show up and control systems and then vanish. Such technology that trumps Jovian granted Concord systems can not forever elude all the scientific minds of the New Eden cluster. If a null Alliance had such capability things would indeed become very very interesting.

Also why can no one track down the home worlds of the Sansha? Thousands of capsuleers going in every direction and no one can find these guys who stay in striking distance of the worlds of EVE? CCP needs to further explain how this remains possible in my opinion. I will repeat CCP needs to update official canon to reflect the current reality in the daily gameplay experienced by subscribers.

Death is nothing more then the searing pain of rebirth.

Isus Jarode
Bondage Goat Zombie
Intergalactic Space Hobos
#19 - 2014-02-17 03:29:04 UTC
Let's not forget some of the major events that took place in the expansions over the last few years:

  • Loss of CONCORD HQ at Yulai
  • Frequent FW between the four empires
  • The Sansha invasions
  • The continued escalation and militarization of the nullsec capsuleer empires
  • The Dust514 development


It was fair to say a few years back that the Empires were still the dominant forces in the galaxy (at least on paper for canon) but the tables have turned in the last few years. If CCP were to theoretically cut off the infinite CONCORD fleet boogey-men and grant capsuleers the chance to conquer Empire space, I think we could all agree that it could feasibly happen - it'd be a hell of a fight, and a lot of newbs would lose their **** - but it could happen.

I've also noticed that switch in recent tone that the Empires feel threatened by the capsuleers, but if you go back and read even the earliest Chronicle stories that tone has always been there. It's only been recent developments which mean that nullsec corps are growing too powerful.

In my opinion, I think it's fairly consistent. Not to say that it's all perfect (after all - since when do the Sisters of EVE have any interest in building ships, much less exploring unknown space?) but it's all within reason.
Vulxanis Viceroy
Offworld Trading Company
Khimi Harar
#20 - 2014-04-17 21:34:53 UTC
Isus Jarode wrote:
Let's not forget some of the major events that took place in the expansions over the last few years:

  • Loss of CONCORD HQ at Yulai
  • Frequent FW between the four empires
  • The Sansha invasions
  • The continued escalation and militarization of the nullsec capsuleer empires
  • The Dust514 development


It was fair to say a few years back that the Empires were still the dominant forces in the galaxy (at least on paper for canon) but the tables have turned in the last few years. If CCP were to theoretically cut off the infinite CONCORD fleet boogey-men and grant capsuleers the chance to conquer Empire space, I think we could all agree that it could feasibly happen - it'd be a hell of a fight, and a lot of newbs would lose their **** - but it could happen.

I've also noticed that switch in recent tone that the Empires feel threatened by the capsuleers, but if you go back and read even the earliest Chronicle stories that tone has always been there. It's only been recent developments which mean that nullsec corps are growing too powerful.

In my opinion, I think it's fairly consistent. Not to say that it's all perfect (after all - since when do the Sisters of EVE have any interest in building ships, much less exploring unknown space?) but it's all within reason.



Personally I would hate for the capsuleer alliances to be able to conquer the Empires, although the empires invading and capsuleer nullsec alliances fending them off would be kind of fun. However, if the whole "pay concord to keep your stuff" should just be removed entirely from the game if you want them to be independant.

As far as plex is concerned, there should be an alternate explanation as to how you need it like fuel to fly your ships or whatever, instead of having to pay CONCORD. I have no idea how that would work, but that would need to be addressed for capsuleers to be considered really "independant".

Or at least give nullsec alliances the ability to "build" plex as well as buying them from CONCORD. It might need to be called something else so it can be considered different(maybe like black plex or something), but that would make a bit more sense. At least to me.

In Character: Only responds to "Lord Draconis"

Pronounced "Vulzanis"

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4fanm8/eve_in_a_nutshell_and_how_to_crack_it/

Public channel: VXV EVE

Twitter: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Vulxanis_Viceroy

12Next page