These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Discussion - The Fall of Battlecruisers ?

First post
Author
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#21 - 2014-02-04 11:57:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
Well I tried to compare the Navy Augoror with the Navy Harbinger, but the fittings wouldn't transfer very easily because of PG and I couldn't be bothered to fit it from scratch. As for kiting, I wouldn't know. I've never tried to kite with a Navy Augoror lol. Anyway, I feel like CBCs are just generally pretty bad ships. I've been saying it a lot lately, but I'd like to seem them rebalanced against Battleships.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#22 - 2014-02-04 12:48:37 UTC
I don't see the problem tbh, their dps is fine, EHP is fine and speed is also fine. The problem isn't so much BC, it's cruisers being slightly too fast. 1800-2100m/s is just too much for normal cruisers, lowering that by some 200m/s would make much more sense and would actually tackle the issue, if any.
Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#23 - 2014-02-04 13:00:36 UTC
BC's do exactly what they are supposed to do.

They aren't favored highly in the current meta but mechanically there is nothing wrong with them

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Denson022
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2014-02-04 16:44:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Denson022
Gregor Parud wrote:
I don't see the problem tbh, their dps is fine, EHP is fine and speed is also fine. The problem isn't so much BC, it's cruisers being slightly too fast. 1800-2100m/s is just too much for normal cruisers, lowering that by some 200m/s would make much more sense and would actually tackle the issue, if any.


Well i may be wrong but i agree with this statement.
A plated cruiser should achieve comparable speed to fast shield BC - the cyclone is the fastest of CBC.
Stabber put aside, shield cruisers have become very fast indeed. Some tweaks are welcome.

But another statement is even more true - a bunch od BS being as fast or even faster than CBC.
I'm not talking abou the machariel since it's a pirate faction BS...
But a dual plated Megathron is faster than a single plated Harbinger and does almost twice the DPS and it has good tracking.
Shield tempest has the speed of dual rep Myrmidion.


Speaking of the speed, it's true that you can't cheat on EFT numbers.
But speed , agility are more than meets the eye.
Yesterday i was on SISI and a pilot asked me for a 1 v 1 challenge with his Myrmidion.

So i took a Cap Inj X-L SB cyclone and won hands down twice in a row without activating my shield booster even once.
I have no idea what were his skills, still he had tech II drones. I perma ran my MWD to stay at 17-16km and his flight of Valkyries II were't doing that much dps, i suppose i was outruning his medium drones.
He overheated his MWD just to match mine and could not get close ... while i had the option to get away at will if needed.

I'm not a PVP king, i learn and try to stay alive when i travel in low sec...


And speaking of low sec again, since that was the theme of the blog i linked in my 1st post, i ran in a gate camp 2 days ago i my Explo Probe. The gang was a Myrmidion, Harbinger, Phobos and a Vigilant.
I can only guess that the BC role was to tank sentry guns and maybe neut the target while HAC bring dps and tackle.
I must admit i was surprised to see 2 BC on a gate camp, haven't seen them for a while.

Chessur said that using CBC as a link ship is worthless and it's better to go T3 since you can cloak and probe.

So let's say CCP removes the ability to fit Links...then what kind of Bonus could they receive instead without making em completely overpowered???
Odithia
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2014-02-04 18:56:56 UTC
Denson022 wrote:

Chessur said that using CBC as a link ship is worthless and it's better to go T3 since you can cloak and probe.

So let's say CCP removes the ability to fit Links...then what kind of Bonus could they receive instead without making em completely overpowered???

I think removing off grid link would see the glorious day of battlecruiser back in every gangs, at least as booster ships.
Now it's better to uses something the ennemy can't see, both creating surprise and preventing them from destroying the support ship.
And T3 seems much better for that.
Chessur
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#26 - 2014-02-04 22:55:26 UTC
Odithia wrote:
Denson022 wrote:

Chessur said that using CBC as a link ship is worthless and it's better to go T3 since you can cloak and probe.

So let's say CCP removes the ability to fit Links...then what kind of Bonus could they receive instead without making em completely overpowered???

I think removing off grid link would see the glorious day of battlecruiser back in every gangs, at least as booster ships.
Now it's better to uses something the ennemy can't see, both creating surprise and preventing them from destroying the support ship.
And T3 seems much better for that.


Forcing links to go on grid would be the worst thing that CCP could do. That would be a huge boost for blob warfare, and make solo / small gang really difficult. Links should be out right removed, instead of that horrible option.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2014-02-04 23:58:38 UTC
BC are fail. On old time shtere were 2 good BC, hurricane and Drake. Drake got the HM nerf. HUrricane got so many nerfs that is a pahetic shadow of its former self.

A brutix is far superior to the cane . Do better damage projection with more hitpoints and more damage.. while usign a SINGLE of its 2 bonuses.

But the tiercide also screwed up a LOT of other things. Horrible things like THorax now is faster and smaller than rupture, while fieldign more firepower.. superior damage projection on realistic engagement range ( under 10 km for such cruisers) while allt he rupture has is 5% more EHP.

Tiercide achieve nice result on shakign things up and making peopel interested, but they also DESTROYED racial identity and class roles (they focused too much ont he stupid attack vs combat concept that cannto be translated the same way all the way from frigates to Battleships).


"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2014-02-04 23:59:43 UTC
Chessur wrote:
Odithia wrote:
Denson022 wrote:

Chessur said that using CBC as a link ship is worthless and it's better to go T3 since you can cloak and probe.

So let's say CCP removes the ability to fit Links...then what kind of Bonus could they receive instead without making em completely overpowered???

I think removing off grid link would see the glorious day of battlecruiser back in every gangs, at least as booster ships.
Now it's better to uses something the ennemy can't see, both creating surprise and preventing them from destroying the support ship.
And T3 seems much better for that.


Forcing links to go on grid would be the worst thing that CCP could do. That would be a huge boost for blob warfare, and make solo / small gang really difficult. Links should be out right removed, instead of that horrible option.



aa no.. as a prime small scale warfare due. I support STRONGLY boost moved into grid. Want to use that advantage? RISK it!


"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#29 - 2014-02-05 00:27:12 UTC
BCs are probably the most useful T1 hull class, no idea what people are complaining about.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

God's Apples
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#30 - 2014-02-05 05:11:51 UTC
The Hyperion as well as many other BS are faster than at least half of the BCs. BCs are only really good for killing brawling cruisers because the only thing they beat crusiers in is eft dps and ehp numbers. They are essentially dessies just one step up. All they are good for is doing decent damage to the class right below them if they can c

"Hydra Reloaded are just jealous / butthurt on me / us because we can get tons of PVP action in empire while they aren't good enough to get that." - NightmareX

Icarus Able
Refuse.Resist
#31 - 2014-02-05 07:04:50 UTC
God's Apples wrote:
The Hyperion as well as many other BS are faster than at least half of the BCs. BCs are only really good for killing brawling cruisers because the only thing they beat crusiers in is eft dps and ehp numbers. They are essentially dessies just one step up. All they are good for is doing decent damage to the class right below them if they can c




You are talking out of your Arse. Yes top speed a 100mn Hyperion is faster than a 10mn Drake. But a 10mn Drake is gonna hit its top speed while having a fuckload more agility than the hyperion.

And the drake is the slowest BC.(not including Plated)
Chessur
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#32 - 2014-02-05 07:15:54 UTC
Icarus Able wrote:
God's Apples wrote:
The Hyperion as well as many other BS are faster than at least half of the BCs. BCs are only really good for killing brawling cruisers because the only thing they beat crusiers in is eft dps and ehp numbers. They are essentially dessies just one step up. All they are good for is doing decent damage to the class right below them if they can c




You are talking out of your Arse. Yes top speed a 100mn Hyperion is faster than a 10mn Drake. But a 10mn Drake is gonna hit its top speed while having a fuckload more agility than the hyperion.

And the drake is the slowest BC.(not including Plated)


Actually he is stating fact. Which you would be able to recognize if you PvP'd at all, or for that matter had any practical experience when it comes to PvP. BC's are in a really bad place right now, gods correctly identifys why.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#33 - 2014-02-05 08:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
Chessur wrote:
Icarus Able wrote:
God's Apples wrote:
The Hyperion as well as many other BS are faster than at least half of the BCs. BCs are only really good for killing brawling cruisers because the only thing they beat crusiers in is eft dps and ehp numbers. They are essentially dessies just one step up. All they are good for is doing decent damage to the class right below them if they can c




You are talking out of your Arse. Yes top speed a 100mn Hyperion is faster than a 10mn Drake. But a 10mn Drake is gonna hit its top speed while having a fuckload more agility than the hyperion.

And the drake is the slowest BC.(not including Plated)


Actually he is stating fact. Which you would be able to recognize if you PvP'd at all, or for that matter had any practical experience when it comes to PvP. BC's are in a really bad place right now, gods correctly identifys why.


Top speed on an MWD hype is indeed faster than top speed on MWD Drake, but the Drake has some 5 second faster alignment and that's only 75% speed. EVEN a plated harb aligns faster than the Hype but it gets dangerously close (while being slow as hell).

So far all he stated was entirely correct. If you're going to try and argue have some FACTS, you know, the stuff you accuse others of for not having.

What you MEANT to say is that there's an issue where ships "designed" to armor tank, and thus have their alignment time affected as they're "supposed" to fit plates and trimarks while having an abundance of lows, but then shield tank instead get OP alignment and speeds. That is not a BC issue, that is an slotting/plate/LSE/nanofiber issue.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2014-02-05 09:20:30 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
BCs are probably the most useful T1 hull class, no idea what people are complaining about.



USeful? They do not excel at anything. They are nto mobile enough to keep up with cruisers anymore therefore horrible in mobility warfare. And if you decide to forego mobility.. battleships outclass them completely.

The only useful BC are the attack ones when on small scale warfare.

Large number of rail brutixes can still be powerful. but blob warfare does nto matter to me

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2014-02-05 09:22:32 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Chessur wrote:
Icarus Able wrote:
God's Apples wrote:
The Hyperion as well as many other BS are faster than at least half of the BCs. BCs are only really good for killing brawling cruisers because the only thing they beat crusiers in is eft dps and ehp numbers. They are essentially dessies just one step up. All they are good for is doing decent damage to the class right below them if they can c




You are talking out of your Arse. Yes top speed a 100mn Hyperion is faster than a 10mn Drake. But a 10mn Drake is gonna hit its top speed while having a fuckload more agility than the hyperion.

And the drake is the slowest BC.(not including Plated)


Actually he is stating fact. Which you would be able to recognize if you PvP'd at all, or for that matter had any practical experience when it comes to PvP. BC's are in a really bad place right now, gods correctly identifys why.


Top speed on an MWD hype is indeed faster than top speed on MWD Drake, but the Drake has some 5 second faster alignment and that's only 75% speed. EVEN a plated harb aligns faster than the Hype but it gets dangerously close (while being slow as hell).

So far all he stated was entirely correct. If you're going to try and argue have some FACTS, you know, the stuff you accuse others of for not having.

What you MEANT to say is that there's an issue where ships "designed" to armor tank, and thus have their alignment time affected as they're "supposed" to fit plates and trimarks while having an abundance of lows, but then shield tank instead get OP alignment and speeds. That is not a BC issue, that is an slotting/plate/LSE/nanofiber issue.


Completely irrelevant. Because if you need mobility, BC one is not enough, you NEED to go down to cruiser level. If you can forego mobility than battleships.. err I mean Dominix and Armageddon (the others basically do not exist anymore) are better. The typhoon is just a giant battlecruiser on steroids.... therefore the only powerful battlecruiser that remains.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#36 - 2014-02-05 09:33:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
No, it's actually the point.

For years we're used to "get to BC because they're versatile as hell and can deal with anything" which suffocates ship choices because cruisers got assraped by them while they could still take on BS. In the current climate they're not the obvious choice and THAT means that you actually have to make a choice, which is good. That doesn't mean BC's are bad, they're just not the obvious all-round choice we were so used to any more. They still have a role and a use, just not as pronounced as before. This is a good thing because there were way too many Canes/Drakes out there making life impossible for other ships.

And THEN you get the compounding effect of shield tanking armor ships with lots of free lows.


It's also funny as how you state that Domis are fcking awesome and other BS don't exist anymore. You're mistaking ship issues with current meta weapon system issues. Domis aren't OP because they're domis, they're OP because blobs love sentry assignment.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#37 - 2014-02-05 09:38:07 UTC
Are battlecruisers being used less than they used to be? Yes, sure. That's because there has been a massive increase in the number of other viable ships, and if more people are flying ship A, then that means that less are flying ship B.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2014-02-05 09:51:09 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
No, it's actually the point.

For years we're used to "get to BC because they're versatile as hell and can deal with anything" which suffocates ship choices because cruisers got assraped by them while they could still take on BS. In the current climate they're not the obvious choice and THAT means that you actually have to make a choice, which is good. That doesn't mean BC's are bad, they're just not the obvious all-round choice we were so used to any more. They still have a role and a use, just not as pronounced as before. This is a good thing because there were way too many Canes/Drakes out there making life impossible for other ships.

And THEN you get the compounding effect of shield tanking armor ships with lots of free lows.


It's also funny as how you state that Domis are fcking awesome and other BS don't exist anymore. You're mistaking ship issues with current meta weapon system issues. Domis aren't OP because they're domis, they're OP because blobs love sentry assignment.


When certain ships bonuses are focused on exploiting these weapon system issues that scalates in the ships themselves being overpowered at end. The reason is irrelevant.


A ship that is the all around okish but not excel at anything are always failures in a competitive environmnet as eve. Check tempest (normal not fleet issue). Since the nerf to non bonused ewar, and NOS an always second grade battleships, devoid of a role. That need to ue its 2 bonsues to have less damage than any other battleship, bar the scorpion, with less tank than their peers. A bit more mobility.. but still less than typhoon, negatign the possibility of it being choosen on that role Relagated to support nos ship, but compeltely outclassed by domis and gedoons on that role as well.


Jack of all trades.. are just masters of being useless.

Since the rebalance one of the T1 ships I least see around is the hurricane, also relegated to the role of smaller, as useless tempest, tied witht he tempest itself.


Ships need strong flavor and focus to be interesting and useful in eve. That hits heavily these ships because they have their 2 bonuses focused on a single thing (damage) and still they have less damage than their peers. That make them not have a clear flavor and role, resulting in obsolecence unless their base power level is too high (as the hurricane was before the nerf) when they compensate the lack of specialization with sheer power.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#39 - 2014-02-05 10:13:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
I disagree with that, or at least partially. As I mentioned somewhere earlier in this thread fleets and blobs don't like versatile ships instead they want specialised and focussed ships&fittings, everything has a role and if you need more roles you simply bring more F1 monkeys. So if someone from a blob perspective states that "BC are now useless" then for that environment he is indeed correct, there's many uses and scenarios where BCs aren't the obvious choice any more but that doesn't mean there's something wrong with them or that it was a balancing mistake.

All it means is that CCP got tired of BC being the go-to ship for just about any use because they overshadowed other ship hulls way too much. I'm not saying they didn't get "left behind" in the rebalancing and I'm not saying they're fine for all uses like they were before. What I'm saying is that I understand the reason it happened and agree to that reasoning.

However, right now there's still issues in regards to ship speeds and shield/armor. Cruisers are slightly too fast (stated as such somewhere in this thread) and there's still the issue of LSE being too god damn powerful meaning armor focussed ships get quite good EHP from being shield fit, allowing the lows to go completely bat **** crazy.


BC needed the "nerf" but they're still fine just not for everybody or every situation, there's nothing wrong with them.



Malcanis wrote:
Are battlecruisers being used less than they used to be? Yes, sure. That's because there has been a massive increase in the number of other viable ships, and if more people are flying ship A, then that means that less are flying ship B.



Pretty much this, and it's a GOOD thing.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#40 - 2014-02-05 10:33:40 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
The typhoon is just a giant battlecruiser on steroids.... therefore the only powerful battlecruiser that remains.

Or an example of what battlecruisers could be.