EVE General Discussion

I think if this option were introduced, CCP would have to tweak the sec status for lots of low sec, but I don't see any real issue with that.

Would need to be High slots and drone-bay only or you end up penalizing shield supers .. however few there may be.

If you can't move supers through lowsec you essentially restrict all movement in EVE as everything would have to re route through 0.0, half of which is permanently cyno jammed.



IDGI, there are high sec carriers and dreads, so your idea is flawed from teh start, also your last line, level the playing field....do you realize what game you're playing? EVE is all about making the playing field as unlevel as possible for the other guy.

Aye, gonna be a pain and a half to move anything if null was only option.

Kind of like the idea of restricting supers to 0.1-0.2 and then having CCP manually tweak to create corridors with those ratings to create Eve equivalents to Panama/Suez and the two Horns for transit.
Depending on what else is done to limit projection that might just provide a defensive buffer where a SteamRollee can waylay a paintrain and dismantle it before it reaches the 'burps .. if nothing else, will give the spies something to do when they no longer have POS PW's to extract

No there really are not any capitals in high-sec, the second they actually do anything remotely associated with being fat-asses they are kicked out permanently .. they are for all intents and purposes museum pieces nothing more.
As for upsetting the balance on the field, wouldn't Eve be better off if that was done by superior tactics, leadership and general combat prowess rather than 'whomever has gamed the system the most/used the most bots wins' which is pretty much what supers represent.

To be wacky, I'd say that an alliance must have a pos in a low sec system to move a super through, otherwise no gates for you!

ok have fun

how bout macking empire 25% of its actual size , rest changed into lowsec , incursion payout should be 30% ,incursion npc way more powerfull , missions should pay 50% less

wardeccs should be on a 3-6h timer before agressions , isk spent on them should be less with no/minimal penalty to multiple deccs

you shouldent be able to dock witin 5min of agressing - if you engage into battle then battle is what you should do ..not station games

\o/ - then feel free to take of supers form lowsec / nullsec / wateversec

Its not hard guys, remove fighter bombers from low-sec. Everything else stays the same (EDIT - apart from the upcoming changes which i endorse). While they are in transit through low sec they use fighters, on arriving back in null, swap out to fighter bombers.

That leaves their presence in low-sec as highly buffered combat (non-triage) carriers with 3x the dps of a thanatos. 3x is still a huge leap over the class below (due to number of fighters it can field).

Sure this will still not address the RR mom blobs as such but it might further loosen the choke hold that null-sec alliances have on low-sec capital use of carriers for logistics or dreads for pos bashing. Particularly with the other changes, they might lose a super, which is the whole point after all right? ;)

It would be interesting if supers could move through losec but were unable to operate any offensive systems. That would reinforce the need for support craft to protect them and induce a greater target for roaming gangs of subcapital ships.

This.