These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP, what's up with the black ops?

Author
Evanga
DoctorOzz
Domain Research and Mining Inst.
#1 - 2014-01-20 07:12:06 UTC
or should i just ask for another mobile structure? Lol

Colt Blackhawk
Doomheim
#2 - 2014-01-20 07:22:07 UTC
Evanga wrote:
or should i just ask for another mobile structure? Lol



You better should^^

[09:04:53] Ashira Twilight > Plant the f****** amarr flag and s*** on their smoking wrecks.

Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-01-20 08:16:21 UTC
There is something wrong with Black Ops?


The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2014-01-20 08:30:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Nariya Kentaya
Kenrailae wrote:
There is something wrong with Black Ops?



considering theres no reason to ever use it between cost and its own weaknesses, its a super-niche ship, and at its price tag, that niche isnt worth it more often than not.
Kenrailae
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2014-01-20 08:34:33 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
Kenrailae wrote:
There is something wrong with Black Ops?



considering theres no reason to ever use it between cost and its own weaknesses, its a super-niche ship, and at its price tag, that niche isnt worth it more often than not.




Nice Edit.



There is nothing wrong with Black Ops.


PS: If it's dying, can I have your stuff?


The Law is a point of View

The NPE IS a big deal

Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#6 - 2014-01-20 10:40:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Tchulen
Evanga wrote:
or should i just ask for another mobile structure? Lol


It depends what you're actually after. CCP are unlikely to answer your initial question, as your initial question is amazingly vague and CCP generally don't answer questions in the forums anyway.

Could you be a little more specific as to what your feature and/or idea is here please?
Infiltrator2112
Untitled Goose Corporation
#7 - 2014-01-20 10:46:53 UTC
My corp does a lot of BO action and in my honest opinion they are very well viable at the moment, another buff isn't realy necessary. Tho I definately wouldn't mind some T2-resists.
twit brent
Never Not AFK
#8 - 2014-01-20 10:59:32 UTC
Blackops are awesome ships, maybe your not using them right.
Luscius Uta
#9 - 2014-01-20 12:10:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Luscius Uta
Even though that Black ops ships are usually used for no-chance-of-failing ganks, I found it silly that they have worse tanks and resists than Stealth bombers (when you compare the both to T1 ships of the same size). I think they deserve some buff, at least in that department, to justify their high price and long training time.
Also it would be nice if they would ignore or at least diminish scan resolution penalty given by cloaking devices.

Edit: Also, Black Ops issues were discussed extensively by Jayne Fillon in this thread.

Workarounds are not bugfixes.

Janna Windforce
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#10 - 2014-01-20 12:42:19 UTC
The jump range/fuel buff was supposed to be followed by changes (rumors about Attack and Combat variations), but there's just silence...

P.S.: T2 Bomb Launchers
M1k3y Koontz
House of Musashi
Stay Feral
#11 - 2014-01-20 13:22:40 UTC
Kenrailae wrote:
There is something wrong with Black Ops?




General rebalancing. CCP was talking about making two "strains" of BLOPs, one for EWar like recons, one for DPS like 3 of the 4 current BLOPs.

Also it would be nice to balance the BLOPs so I can justify a Panther rather than a Redeemer Big smile

How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.