These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rules Of Eve

First post First post
Author
dilly nay
State War Academy
Caldari State
#101 - 2014-01-18 01:06:18 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
dilly nay wrote:
Actually I've a degree as a Custodian. As you may see I've a steady demand for work.


That's like a janitor, right?


It's Latin for "shrink".
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#102 - 2014-01-18 01:09:40 UTC
dilly nay wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
dilly nay wrote:
Actually I've a degree as a Custodian. As you may see I've a steady demand for work.


That's like a janitor, right?


It's Latin for "shrink".


Ah, see, I thought you meant the custodial arts.

I hadn't heard such a fanciful thing since the PHD in Dueling.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#103 - 2014-01-18 01:11:53 UTC
dilly nay wrote:
Please refrain from doing so friend.


Please refrain from failing at reading comprehension. Your literal definition of consent, as it pertains to your skewed view of EVE, was never at question. I merely questioned your qualifications to be defining anyone's behavior as that of a sociopath.

Since we now know that you are a custodian, I am left to assume that when you dabble in psychoanalysis, you diagnose your patients' maladies from a dictionary as well, as opposed to a recognized statistical manual.

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#104 - 2014-01-18 01:13:13 UTC
dilly nay wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
dilly nay wrote:
Actually I've a degree as a Custodian. As you may see I've a steady demand for work.


That's like a janitor, right?


It's Latin for "shrink".


No, it's really not.
dilly nay
State War Academy
Caldari State
#105 - 2014-01-18 01:22:18 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:

Please refrain from failing at reading comprehension. Your literal definition of consent, as it pertains to your skewed view of EVE, was never at question. I merely questioned your qualifications to be defining anyone's behavior as that of a sociopath.


Ok, you do think I am wrong. Why not just say so to begin?

According to you correcting the literal interpretation of one word(consent) does not qualify me to literally define someones actions based on another word(sociopath). Ok so you've conceded consent was misused but that it's misuse, if taken literally, does not define the behavior of a sociopath. And your reasoning for this is due to my lack of education as a trained professional.

Are you further suggesting that labeling someone as a masochist, psychopath, sadomasochist, ect, much like sociopath cannot be determined by anybody without proper background to help these people? Which is what a professional does... they dont just diagnose- they help. That's the difference and I never made any such claim. You however fail to make the distinction.

Please, friend.
Acushla De'Hart
Free Lunch
#106 - 2014-01-18 01:37:40 UTC
personal opinion only

Rule #1 do not fly what you can't replace at least twice
Rule # 2 do not fly uninsured
Rule # 3 do not fly in a valuable ship to pick up the weapons and tank for that ship
Rule #4 Avoid hauling into-through low-sec
Rule #5 If you must break rule 4 bring friends (preferably well armed friends)
Rule #6 NEVER use autopilot
Rule #7 when hauling high value items regardless of ship type or location do not linger any longer than necessary in vicinity of gate.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2014-01-18 05:01:21 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
OK, thanks to all those who posted new rules, definitely will look them over and add them to the list, maybe with some slight changes. I'd also like to thank those who posted suggestions and or amendments to the existing rules.

Just a reminder, these rules should not be real specific. They should be more generalized and generic so that a larger portion of the player base can relate to them. Also having a bit of humor mixed in with some truth is always a good thing, such as Rule 10.

Usually the very first thing most players hear in reference to Eve is don't trust anyone, even if you're sleeping with them.

Blink

Rule 1 is perfect as it is, especially for Eve. Naturally Rule 2 and 3 go right along with it.

Rule 4, I see a lot of people suggesting 'Don't fly what you can't afford to replace....or lose, etc'. Well, using the term 'afford' brings to mind ISK. Players don't actually need ISK to replace something, especially with duplicate items in assets. As such, I don't really see a reason to amend the 4th Rule Of Eve.

Rule 5 is still basically true when kept generalized ..... now if a cute Caldari guy at Jita 4-4 does the Falcon in my Captains Quarters with Peanut Butter and Whipped Cream, then Rule 5 definitely needs to be amended.

Roll

Rule 6, after thinking about it I do agree it isn't accurate and definitely needs to be re-worded. As such until a better descriptive phrase is suggested this is now Rule 6 :
Quote:
6th Rule Of Eve = Undock from station can incite PvP aggression.

Rule 7 is still an excellent referral for Rule 4, 5 and 6.

Rule 8 needs to be amended as well. There's a lot of different ways to accomplish the same goal in this game, with each one being as good as the next. Keeping that in mind however, there is indeed wrong ways to play this game. So to make Rule 8 a more generalized statement :
Quote:
8th Rule Of Eve = There is no right way to play.

Rule 9, while being a fact it's still a rule, especially when pertaining to espionage. Also let's not forget this game is an MMO.

Rule 10 is just a little bit of humor with some truth mixed in. Gotta admit it fits well with Rule 8 and 9. I did amend it slightly to make it more generic :
Quote:
10th Rule Of Eve = To play Eve, refer to Rule 8 and 9.



Now to address a few concerns about Rule 11, 12 and 13. These are just an example, posted with a little tongue in cheek. Granted Rule 12 is a bad joke but generally speaking most players would say the forums are filled with alts. Now if everyone want's these to be included on the list as well, it's fine by me.

Anyway, the example was to illustrate how new rules should be formatted : Each set of stated rules within a group has the last rule referring back to the previous rules.

Lastly I'd like to remind everyone to please stay on topic. Definitely don't need any 'Report Cards' filled out.


DMC
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#108 - 2014-01-18 06:17:00 UTC
dilly nay wrote:


Please, friend.


I'm not your friend, and nothing about you pleases me.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#109 - 2014-01-18 09:54:44 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
dilly nay wrote:


Please, friend.


I'm not your friend, and nothing about you pleases me.

Please stay on topic. No need to incite a flame war.


DMC
Luhley Skarr
Doomheim
#110 - 2014-01-18 11:04:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Luhley Skarr
1st Rule of EVE: Never trust anyone.

So, how can I trust any of you with these rules if I am not to trust anyone ???????? Ever ?????

UghUghUgh
Luhley Skarr
Doomheim
#111 - 2014-01-18 11:08:51 UTC
Luhley Skarr wrote:
1st Rule of EVE: Never trust anyone.

So, how can I trust any of you with these rules if I am not to trust anyone ???????? Ever ?????

UghUghUgh



Ok, I've thought about it.
If I follow Rule 1, I should not trust any of these rules so I should not trust Rule #1.

Thus, I should trust everyone.... always. So I should apply rule #1 and not trust anyone ever ... and not follow Rule #1

QuestionOopsWhat?

This game is too complex, I quit. And no, you cannot have my stuff, I don't trust you... or do I?
Falken Falcon
#112 - 2014-01-18 11:23:06 UTC
Hevymetal wrote:
Rule #16 When entering Jita, minimize local and forget about it.

Ignoring jita chat?
You can get the best laughs from there and if not that you can also play the "who finds a legit trade first" game with your copr mates.

Aye, Sea Turtles

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#113 - 2014-01-18 12:23:08 UTC
dilly nay wrote:
Again, you confuse consent with something entirely different. If you require an analogy think of it like this. Assuming you knew you could get away with murder or it was "allowed", remaining inside this uncivil scenario, if you were to walk into a gun store and purchase a gun this does not give you the consent to shoot the man. Regardless of whether or not your reasoning was "he sold me the gun" or "he knew the risks of my purchase".

I'll repeat myself when I say this is a perverse view of an opportunity you may take.

Of course this is just a video game and of course people will derive their own fun. I am perfectly aware of the risk Eve presents but your use of consent here is that of a sociopath. Neither is it a clever thought.
OK I'll change it ever so slightly, implied consent is probably a better term if you want to go all dictionary definition on us.

implied consent
n. consent when surrounding circumstances exist which would lead a reasonable person to believe that this consent had been given, although no direct, express or explicit words of agreement had been uttered.

You're playing a PvP game, as such it is reasonable for us to believe that you have consented to PvP, despite the lack of direct, express or implicit agreement from yourself.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Renegade Heart
Doomheim
#114 - 2014-01-18 13:08:44 UTC
It's almost silly for me to say this, but a lot of people seem to forget this one.

My most important rule: Have fun!
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#115 - 2014-01-18 15:03:53 UTC
Luhley Skarr wrote:
1st Rule of EVE: Never trust anyone.

So, how can I trust any of you with these rules if I am not to trust anyone ???????? Ever ?????

UghUghUgh


There will be times when you need to trust someone but you can apply the other rule, so you trust people only with that which you can afford to have stolen from you.
Spurty
#116 - 2014-01-18 15:16:07 UTC
Rule #69 all females are males (except for 0.05%).
Rule #70 never pick up ISK off the floor of the blue oyster
Rule #71 pod jumping is expensive but worth it of you failed to read rules #69 & #70

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP

Shaera Taam
Khanid Prime Free Irregulars
#117 - 2014-01-18 15:38:03 UTC
For what theyre worth, Shaera Taams rules to live by...

Rule#1: The Griefers Rule : EVE is only a game.
Rule#2: Your ship is not your character.
Rule#3: Never fly what you cant afford to lose.
Rule#4: Always have a backup ship.
Rule#5: Learn something new every day.
Rule#6: Always have an up-to-date clone.
Rule#7: Bookmark the wormhole once you get inside, dammit!
Rule#8: Its better to be corrected than wrong.
Rule#9: Keep your training queue full.
Rule#10: Fly frosty! Revenge only kills you and your friends. Again.
Rule#11: The PvP Rule: Never engage the enemy on their terms. Make them come to you.
Rule#12: The Other PvP Rule: If it looks like a trap, then its a f'kin trap!
Rule#13: Don't Smack Talk in Local: Even bona fide pirates think it's rude.
The Last Rule : Dying makes no difference. Its what you do before you die that makes a difference.

Good luck with your list, DMC!

Thus Spake the Frigate Goddess!

Sebastian N Cain
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#118 - 2014-01-18 20:09:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Sebastian N Cain
Debora Tsung wrote:
Rule 34: War is good for business

Rule 35: Peace is good for business

Wrong.

Rule 34 is that there is p**n about eve. Case in point: CCP Falcons post.Oops

I got lost in thought... it was unfamiliar territory.

LuisWu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#119 - 2014-01-18 21:13:39 UTC
Rules of eve

Quote:
OTEC and the B0TLRD Accords

Objectives:
The objectives of OTEC and the B0TLRD Accords are to to continue along the road paved two years ago under the initial OTEC agreement by securing the territories and income generating abilitys of both CFC and PL.

OTEC
No "sov fuckery" or organized renter harassment in designated home regions.
Further defined to include the following actions:
*shooting (or repping) of infrastructure towers, money towers, stations, SBUs, TCUs, IHUBs, POCOs
*siphoning of moons or using future idiotic CCP modules like the new ESS
*harassment of renters (individual fuckery will be cracked down on through best efforts)
*assisting non-signatories in doing any of the above

B0TLORD Accords
Neither PL nor CFC are restricted by this agreement with regard to their bluelists, and this agreement does not necessitate a "blue" relationship between the two entities. The goal of the B0TLRD accords is to maintain space and income levels amidst a myriad of proxy-wars and territorial disputes.

Both CFC and PL agree to prohibit the following actions in one anothers designated "home space"
*attacking signatory supercapitals, supercapital fleets, and capital fleets
*bringing any caps greater than five triage carriers and a bridging Titan
*bringing a strategic-level subcapital force (more than 250 subcaps)

The following restrictions apply to so-called Buffer Regions:

CFC agree not to assist any non-signatory in the conquest or capture of Buffer Regions. Attending fights with non-strategic level fleets (no caps/supers beyond five triage and a bridge titan, no more than 250 subcaps) is perfectly acceptable. There are no such restrictions should the CFC decide to invade the buffer regions to take them for the CFC. The buffer regions are to be controlled by PL-allies or the CFC should they decide to invade. Allowing non-signatories to base out of signatory sov in the buffer zone constitutes a violation (Black Legion cannot stage in CFC sov in a buffer zone, nor can NCdot stage out of PL sov in a buffer zone).

In buffer zones, CFC will not contest future PL sov attempts should they desire to expand their empire. These are designated 'expansion zones' and should PL/BOT seize them, they will be considered home regions for the purposes of this treaty.

Regarding attacks on non-signatories within designated home regions:

Each side may initiate an unrestricted attack in home regions against assets, structures, and fleets of non-signatories. If a signatory responds by aiding the non-signatory, both sides may escalate to caps and supers as desired, but will still not violate any of the sov/structure aspects of the above provisions.

If a signatory is currently using non-signatories in a combined action against a third party while on home territory, it is not permissible to intervene. For example, if a combined PL and NCdot fleet is being used to defend Malpais, it is not permissible for the CFC to attack the NCdot segment of the combined PL/NCdot fleet. Similarly, if the CFC is working with Black Legion against a third party, it is not permissible for PL to attack the BL segment of the combined fleet.


Regarding NPC Space within Home Regions:

While PL has a special situation with its need for renter regions and buffer zones, the CFC has a special situation regarding NPC space littering the galactic West. Therefore, special understandings apply.

In the regions of Pureblind and Fountain CFC reserve the right to refuse PL transport carrier groups, should the area be deemed a war zone, the presence of PL a destabilizing force, or for any other reason. PL is to ask permission of the CFC before sending any sizeable (20+) transport carrier group into NPC Pure Blind or NPC Fountain. The other areas of NPC sov designated as Home Regions (Syndicate, Outer Ring, Venal, NPC Delve) can be convoyed to freely without any need for a diplomatic request.

Within NPC Home Regions, all of the above provisions of B0TLRD and OTEC apply normally.

Regarding proxywars in relation to the B0TLRD Accords:

Should the sovereignty of Home Regions or Buffer Regions be markedly affected by the direct support of either party, the terms of the B0TLRD Accords may be deemed void. Of course since the objective of this agreement is to secure income security for both parties, an open dialog is expected - and notice given - before this type of action is taken.

Should one side flagrantly and intentionally violate either B0TLRD or OTEC (rather than a negotiated withdrawal before any violation occurs) , both treaties will be considered void. Example: if a PL capfleet drops on a CFC capfleet in Fountain, this is technically only a violation of B0TLRD, but it will scrap OTEC as well.

"Fuckups happen" rule:
Non-catastrophic violations, i.e. rogue members, do not necessarily constitute nullifying the above agreements but an open line of communication is to be expected.

Definitions:

CFC Home Regions:

Branch, Tenal, Venal, Vale of the Silent, Tribute, Deklein, Fade, Pure Blind, Cloud Ring, Outer Ring, Syndicate, Fountain, Delve, Period Basis, Querious. This is minus BL/SOLAR sov, as they are not signatories.

PL Home Regions:

PL/BOT sov in Oasa, Outer Passage, Malpais, The Spire, and the spattering of SOV 5 systems currently under PL control. This is minus N3 sov, as they are not signatories.

PL Buffer Zones:

Perrigen Falls, Kalevala Expanse, Etherium Reach, Cache, Insmother, Detorid

F*** This Game

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#120 - 2014-01-19 00:47:59 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
LuisWu wrote:
Rules of e̶v̶e̶ CFC & PL

Quote:
..........Lot's of Sov stuff.............

Fixed it for you.


DMC