These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

First post First post
Author
TharOkha
0asis Group
#861 - 2014-01-15 08:42:37 UTC  |  Edited by: TharOkha
Jenn aSide wrote:


The problem isn't null sec sucking, it's that the rest of space has been buffed ...


Can I ask you to stop cherry picking and spinning of the facts? I play since 2007 and L4s, loot, salvage, etc was nerfed several times.

Quote:
i was off today and the family was out at work and school so i spent 4 hours doing SOE missions in Lanngisi, at the end of that I sold a bunch of sister's core probes and bought a plex (rather than wait for that accounts sub to lapse since in 2 weeks). I hate missions but you just can't beat that rate of return except high sec incursions of chaining FW lvl4 missions. If i'd use that same machariel in null sec anoms I might have cleared close to that much isk, but hell, WHY? I didn't even have to glance at local in lanngisi.


SOE nullsec missions pays 50% more LP than those in hisec. And yet you've done them in hisec. Its the question of security, not about nerfing/buffing missions.

Quote:
It's a broken situation, yet some people are in so much denial it's crazy.


Its not broken situation. No matter how better is the payoff in lower security space, people still prefers security over better payments.
Josef Djugashvilis
#862 - 2014-01-15 08:46:49 UTC
[quote=Seleia O'Sinnor]Obviously hisec is not broken.[/quote

Which would explain why most Eve characters choose to play there really.

This is not a signature.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#863 - 2014-01-15 14:15:04 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

Only if you ignore where people put the other 89%, sure.

Well, lets actually take a look at the different regions of eve. There are 5 distinct regions: Hi sec, Low Sec, NPC 0.0, Sov, and WH space. If there was an even population distribution, we could expect to see 20% of the population living in each region.

But, an even population distribution is a bit unrealistic. People can be risk averse, people could be inexperienced, people can simply be uninterested in pvp. Fact of the matter is, its unlikely that hi sec will ever have less than 40% or 50% of the general population.

So lets assume, for simplicity, that we have 50% of the eve population to distribute over Low sec, Npc 0.0, Sov, and WH. An even distribution between these more dangerous zones would put the population in each at 12.5%. Current Sov population levels are at 11%? Hmmmm, doesn't look that far off tbh.


None of which is the point. You said (paraphrasing) "if null sucks, why are "so many" people renting?". The fact is, renters are not a huge population and to ask that question requires you ignore thevery simple fact that the vast majority of characters aren't in null sec.

As has been explained to others there is a reason for that. Outsider think null sec is all officer spawns and deadspace loot, but why bother when you can just do high sec incursions or sisters/thukker missions in high sec (none of which is chance based like sov null pve is)?

Feel free to ignore what's right in front of you, everyone else in high sec is.

Quote:

Wrong. Facwar (and therefore lowsec isk generation) has undergone at least one high profile nerf in the last two years.


And what a fine nerf it was. . I joined minnie FW and tried it myself. I lost 2 drakes and made 500 mil in an afternoon, would have made more but some of the stations I couldn't' dock in because they belong to the amarr guys.

Some nerf.

Quote:

Hisec underwent both the incursion nerf (which was quite significant) and the meta 0 nerf which removed a considerable source of minerals from missions and therefore revenue.


Gee, i ran with TVP this weekend and made 120 mil an hour. And the proper way to run missions is to blitz for LP after you have high faction standing to burn .

Quote:

The probing changes didn't do any favors for level 5 lowsec missions and unscannable eccm tengus. Both the probing changes and meta 0 nerfs affected NPC 0.0 income as well, since pirate missions are a significant source of income for those areas.

Just because you are ignorant of nerfs to other types of space does NOT mean they didn't happen. The only one in denial here seems to be you.


This is so ignorant it's not funny anymore. Who in the blue blazes salvages pirate missions? And properly fit T3 are still very hard to scan.

You miss the point (apparently from a lack of experience). When i started playing, you wanted null income, you went to null. Now it's "you want null income, you must be a special education student, null income is a lot of hassle just to be screwed over by a random number generator".

The original question is "why are so many people renting?" . The answer has been explained: most people don't, most rent-able systems are not rented. The real question should be is "why are SMART people not renting, why are smart people flying freaking drakes and caracals in FacWar or doing high sec incursions/sister's missions under the protection of CONCORD when null sec is this magical land of milk and honey?"

Ask the right questions for a change.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#864 - 2014-01-15 14:26:51 UTC
TharOkha wrote:


Quote:
i was off today and the family was out at work and school so i spent 4 hours doing SOE missions in Lanngisi, at the end of that I sold a bunch of sister's core probes and bought a plex (rather than wait for that accounts sub to lapse since in 2 weeks). I hate missions but you just can't beat that rate of return except high sec incursions of chaining FW lvl4 missions. If i'd use that same machariel in null sec anoms I might have cleared close to that much isk, but hell, WHY? I didn't even have to glance at local in lanngisi.


SOE nullsec missions pays 50% more LP than those in hisec. And yet you've done them in hisec. Its the question of security, not about nerfing/buffing missions.


All factors combine. it's not just the security, it's the level of pay + the security. The nearly uninterpretable nature of high sec means being able to make the same (or slightly less isk) as i could doing things in null sec makes high sec 100 times more attractive than it should be.

As I've said, when i started playing, there was ample reason to brave nullsec. Sure there were sisters missions back then (I ran them in Gicodel) but that was before Wormholes (which lead to sister's probing gear being SUPER valuable even after the introduction of tech2 probe launchers). The only really broken thing back then was the high sec lvl5 mission bug which took ccp forever to fix.

But now, it's simply crazy. It's not only not necessary to go to null for that level of income anymore, it's STUPID to do so, the minor chances of an escalation or faction spawn (complete with "ammo+tag and nothing else") or the chance of a good to great drop from a plex is far outweighed by the non-random and totally steady nature of high sec incursions and sisters missions that were already spewing insane isk/lp conversion rates and that's about to get buffed again by the Nestor. And that's not mentioning Thukker missions or the insanity that faction warfare in low sec is. Hell, there's even freaking tag farming in low now.

PVE is essential in null sec because it's an opportunity for conflict and the destruction that feeds the EVE economy. CCP has been going backwards with regards to actually living in null sec for a long time (only slightly mitigated by the introduction of mobile depots and mobil cyno jammers).

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#865 - 2014-01-15 14:31:18 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:

The probing changes didn't do any favors for level 5 lowsec missions and unscannable eccm tengus. Both the probing changes and meta 0 nerfs affected NPC 0.0 income as well, since pirate missions are a significant source of income for those areas.

Just because you are ignorant of nerfs to other types of space does NOT mean they didn't happen. The only one in denial here seems to be you.


This is so ignorant it's not funny anymore. Who in the blue blazes salvages pirate missions? And properly fit T3 are still very hard to scan.

Actually, PotatoOverdose makes a good point. Whenever hi sec nerfs are discussed, the consensus from the most outspoken null sec players is that hi sec hasn't been ever nerfed because the nerfs aren't exclusively targeting hi sec. This same standard should be applied to nerfs that are not exclusive to null sec. In other words, if it's a nerf affecting other securities of space then it is NOT a null sec nerf. That you think people are idiots for salvaging/looting pirate missions is irrelevant and your own personal opinion.

Use the same standard and judging criteria you use when you claim hi sec has never been nerfed, because I'm pretty sure I've read you stating this a couple of times.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Notorious Fellon
#866 - 2014-01-15 14:43:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Notorious Fellon
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#867 - 2014-01-15 15:02:34 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.


It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.
Notorious Fellon
#868 - 2014-01-15 15:15:19 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.


It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.


Based on the post count of whines from the nullbears, one could easily assume.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#869 - 2014-01-15 15:17:41 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.


It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.


Based on the post count of whines from the nullbears, one could easily assume.


That's the problem with prejudice, it makes one unwilling to acknowledge the truth.
Josef Djugashvilis
#870 - 2014-01-15 15:27:21 UTC
Some time ago, the constant complaints from the pixel hard-men 'persuaded' CCP to nerf level 4 mission loot.

CCP complied by introducing 'metal scraps' into level 4 missions.

The same pixel hard-men then complained that the introduction of metal scraps was, in fact, a nerf against those who attacked mission ships and or got to the mission wrecks first.

I have never been able to take the complaints of those who wish to nerf hi-sec seriously since.

Some Eve Online players are professional whingers ( from hi-sec, lo-sec and null-sec ) it is unlikely CCP will ever be able to satisfy them. If CCP did decide to nerf hi-sec the professional whingers would still not be happy.

This is not a signature.

Notorious Fellon
#871 - 2014-01-15 15:31:32 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.


It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.


Based on the post count of whines from the nullbears, one could easily assume.


That's the problem with prejudice, it makes one unwilling to acknowledge the truth.


Dodging the point wont make it go away.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#872 - 2014-01-15 15:53:05 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Some time ago, the constant complaints from the pixel hard-men 'persuaded' CCP to nerf level 4 mission loot.

the meta 0 removal? that was a mining buff
Quote:

The same pixel hard-men then complained that the introduction of metal scraps was, in fact, a nerf against those who attacked mission ships and or got to the mission wrecks first.

I have never been able to take the complaints of those who wish to nerf hi-sec seriously since.

the removal of level four meta 0 loot wasn't a "highsec nerf", it was a loot nerf. and it accomplished its goal

i seriously doubt anyone but mission runners complained much
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#873 - 2014-01-15 15:56:26 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I am making an open offer right now to any and all alliances who hold Sov in null:

If it is so terrible, I will gladly take it off your hands. I will gladly rake in the profits from moon goo, PI, Anoms, Sigs and renters fees while begging for buffs to null and nerfs to every other segment of the game. Not one of you will take me up on the offer. Why? Can't afford it? Don't want to lose out on your passive free income sources of PI and Moon Goo?

You are just complaining about being forced into 10% tidi PVP or being camped by AFK cloakers. You just can't admit it. You want everyone else to suffer with lame mechanics (like AFK cloakers) and fleet battles that take 16 hours for your fast locker to tell your sentries what to do.

Meanwhile, you don't want anything changed with your precious ISK faucets.

Stop the charade. If hi sec is a better place to make ISK (while raking in the ISK profits from your null sources) then maybe we should be looking into making more space like hi sec? It is better by your own declaration. The crying in this thread is by far the most hypocritical garbage I have heard.


It's incredible how some people mistake individual players for the ENTIRE ALLIANCEs they are in lol.


Based on the post count of whines from the nullbears, one could easily assume.


That's the problem with prejudice, it makes one unwilling to acknowledge the truth.


Dodging the point wont make it go away.

you didn't have a point. the complaint isn't against null versus highsec pi or null versus highsec moon minerals. nor do i think there's complaint about sigs. the rest is ad hominem
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#874 - 2014-01-15 16:01:16 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:


The problem isn't null sec sucking, it's that the rest of space has been buffed ...


Can I ask you to stop cherry picking and spinning of the facts? I play since 2007 and L4s, loot, salvage, etc was nerfed several times.


L4 have not been nerfed.

Loot, salvage were nerfed once in all areas of space including null.
Notorious Fellon
#875 - 2014-01-15 16:05:39 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:

you didn't have a point. the complaint isn't against null versus highsec pi or null versus highsec moon minerals. nor do i think there's complaint about sigs. the rest is ad hominem


Assigning a high school debate team tactics label to someone's post doesn't change it either.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#876 - 2014-01-15 16:07:54 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Some time ago, the constant complaints from the pixel hard-men 'persuaded' CCP to nerf level 4 mission loot.

CCP complied by introducing 'metal scraps' into level 4 missions.

The same pixel hard-men then complained that the introduction of metal scraps was, in fact, a nerf against those who attacked mission ships and or got to the mission wrecks first.

I have never been able to take the complaints of those who wish to nerf hi-sec seriously since.

Some Eve Online players are professional whingers ( from hi-sec, lo-sec and null-sec ) it is unlikely CCP will ever be able to satisfy them. If CCP did decide to nerf hi-sec the professional whingers would still not be happy.


Nope.

The meta 0 nerf was to help industrialists who could not compete in the level 1 mod market due to drops.

The scrap nerf was to help miners who were being out mined by mission runners.

These nerfs happened in all areas of space.
Josef Djugashvilis
#877 - 2014-01-15 16:09:46 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
TharOkha wrote:
[quote=Jenn aSide]

The problem isn't null sec sucking, it's that the rest of space has been buffed ...


Can I ask you to stop cherry picking and spinning of the facts? I play since 2007 and L4s, loot, salvage, etc was nerfed several times.


L4 have not been nerfed.

Loot, salvage were nerfed once in all areas of space including null.[/quote

My point is that the folk who wanted the nerf, then complained when they got it.

Pixel hard-men should not be taken seriously.

This is not a signature.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#878 - 2014-01-15 16:38:06 UTC
Quote:
My point is that the folk who wanted the nerf, then complained when they got it.

Pixel hard-men should not be taken seriously.


Who? You're just saying some nebulous "they", which is apparently inappropriate when someone says it about highsec players. But it's totally ok to use some nebulous "they" about nullsec players, right?

Oh, and I would argue that blind defenders of a broken system are not be taken seriously either. They're just defending their golden goose.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#879 - 2014-01-15 17:38:46 UTC
TharOkha wrote:


SOE nullsec missions pays 50% more LP than those in hisec. And yet you've done them in hisec. Its the question of security, not about nerfing/buffing missions.

.


You honestly think anyone not in the CFC can run them?

Add to that, if we have a lot of people running missions in these systems it will show up on the map and attract gangs like moths to a light which will force the mission runners to dock up and grab their pvp ships. It can be good isk but only when you can run the missions. Good for the few who can run them but just about everyone else relies upon anoms for their income in null, these are the null equivalent of level 4 missions.

Now that we are getting yet another nerf to our income we are simply going to find that the people who have not abandoned null for isk making will most likely do so now if they can.
Spurty
#880 - 2014-01-15 17:43:57 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
TharOkha wrote:


SOE nullsec missions pays 50% more LP than those in hisec. And yet you've done them in hisec. Its the question of security, not about nerfing/buffing missions.

.


You honestly think anyone not in the CFC can run them?


Yes, next silly arrogant question?

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP