These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Small clans express concern over Parliament reorganisation

Author
Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2014-01-09 09:18:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Ayallah
Constantin Baracca wrote:

I'm not sure how this could be anything but a power play against Shakor, though. It certainly wasn't his idea, it certainly reduces his role and gives his authority to others. Call me cynical, but I can't see this as anything but, at the least, an expression that Shakor's government wasn't completely effectual and representative of his peoples' interests. If that were the case, nothing would change. It was a deliberate act that strengthened the position of the chiefs at the expense of Shakor himself. He is now a non-voting advisor to the chiefs rather than leader of the entire Republic en masse. That's not a simple reorganization, nor can it be said to do much but weakening his position and centralized authority.

It may not have been done in the name of peace directly, but I can't see the chiefs all having an individual say in how their tribes interact with foreign entities doing anything but de-escalating tensions. If even one tribe decides to reallocate resources from the full-forward system that is going on now, we move a bit closer to not shooting each other for once.


I cannot emphasize this enough,
He is not Heth. This is not the Federation.

This, a return to a Tribal government has been the stated goal of the Sanmatar from the very beginning. HE was the one who organized the Tribal assembly, unified the Tribes and orchestrated this whole thing. He lead our people to this very point from the beginning. if you believe conspiracy theorists, he did so with shady manipulations and coups but either way the evidence of our new old government stands alone.

The traditional word Sanmatar was given to Shakor by the remains of the Gallentean democracy when he was elected. It was given to him to become exactly what it always has been and what it is now: A leader who renounced their Tribe to become the mediator of the Tribes.

I do not know how many times I have to say this but I will say it again.

The Sanmatar, Maleatu Shakor built this government from the ground up to be exactly this: A government of the Tribes reunited and a near mirror of what was in place and peacefully governed my people for a thousand years before the day the first damned Amarrian ever set eyes on Matar.

He is not a tyrant and never was.

Perhaps if he had not spent time with the Jovians he would have been a different man.
But it has never served me to judge someone by what they could have done.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Zenito
Lekhantsi Salvage Depot
#22 - 2014-01-09 12:46:19 UTC
Arnulf Ogunkoya wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
I am not necessarily referring to proximity with core Minmatar worlds. It am just saying that Historically as well as sociologically it only makes sense to witness minor and independent entities even - and especially - where a few major groups prevail. This, unless something very particular makes that independent groups can not basically happen, either through coercion, or something else.

Thus why I am a bit puzzled when someone claims that every Minmatar clan is affiliated to one of the Seven...


Tribes have split in the past, this is true. However, bear in mind that in the living memory of every Minmatar alive today the entire society has been under threat by the Empire. Either overtly by way of conquest and raiding, or covertly by way of indoctrination.

This sort of thing would not encourage division amongst it's opponents, unless it is on the question of exactly how to oppose it.


One doesn't have to look into the past to see splits within a Tribe.
Ever since Chief Aeboul bought the Thukker closer to the cattle-shed that is the Republic, our Tribe has experienced somewhat of an unofficial split.

There are those who wish to settle in the Republic and give up the wandering life. They turned against their former business partners in Molden Heath and Skarkon in particular, putting up the call for Clone Mercs to consolidate their own gains and curry favour with the Republicans.

Then there are those of us who stay true to the old ways, who respect our time-honoured business partners. We will never settle to graze in a fenced pasture.

For me, these recent developments are encouraging; all this talk of Tribal independence makes further Thukker integration into the Republic highly unlikely. A confederation of sovereign Tribal States, free in their own foreign affairs and business dealings, actually begins to look both tangible and appealing.

Zenitoka Katanga

Clan Chieftain

"A fair bargain leaves both sides unhappy."

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#23 - 2014-01-09 13:40:48 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:

I'm not sure how this could be anything but a power play against Shakor, though. It certainly wasn't his idea, it certainly reduces his role and gives his authority to others. Call me cynical, but I can't see this as anything but, at the least, an expression that Shakor's government wasn't completely effectual and representative of his peoples' interests. If that were the case, nothing would change. It was a deliberate act that strengthened the position of the chiefs at the expense of Shakor himself. He is now a non-voting advisor to the chiefs rather than leader of the entire Republic en masse. That's not a simple reorganization, nor can it be said to do much but weakening his position and centralized authority.

It may not have been done in the name of peace directly, but I can't see the chiefs all having an individual say in how their tribes interact with foreign entities doing anything but de-escalating tensions. If even one tribe decides to reallocate resources from the full-forward system that is going on now, we move a bit closer to not shooting each other for once.


I cannot emphasize this enough,
He is not Heth. This is not the Federation.

This, a return to a Tribal government has been the stated goal of the Sanmatar from the very beginning. HE was the one who organized the Tribal assembly, unified the Tribes and orchestrated this whole thing. He lead our people to this very point from the beginning. if you believe conspiracy theorists, he did so with shady manipulations and coups but either way the evidence of our new old government stands alone.

The traditional word Sanmatar was given to Shakor by the remains of the Gallentean democracy when he was elected. It was given to him to become exactly what it always has been and what it is now: A leader who renounced their Tribe to become the mediator of the Tribes.

I do not know how many times I have to say this but I will say it again.

The Sanmatar, Maleatu Shakor built this government from the ground up to be exactly this: A government of the Tribes reunited and a near mirror of what was in place and peacefully governed my people for a thousand years before the day the first damned Amarrian ever set eyes on Matar.

He is not a tyrant and never was.

Perhaps if he had not spent time with the Jovians he would have been a different man.
But it has never served me to judge someone by what they could have done.


Ayallah, we've had this conversation and come to a difference of opinion, which is acceptable. I'm not rehashing his style of governance or my disagreement with it. I'm saying that the chiefs asserting power over Shakor can't be, objectively, seen as anything except a vote of no-confidence in Shakor's government. It's just the way it is. Shakor will lose a lot of say in the political world, his legislative voice has been effectively neutered and he's been made into, ostensibly, an advisor to the tribes. He has no vote anymore. Considering how much control he had over the political process then as compared to now, you can't really say this isn't a significant shift in policy or that this doesn't effectively reduce his power and dole it out in greater amounts to the tribal chiefs.

This means we can deal, effectively, with the tribal chiefs alone. Not all of them are as hardline or unwilling to talk as Shakor's official policy was, and that might effectively mean we can try to de-escalate tensions that have been ratcheting up since Karin Midular was ejected from power. Just because the Matari don't like us on the whole doesn't mean it's impossible for us to get along with each other, and making peace with even two or three tribes vastly reduces the military power we have to expend "fighting the Republican menace" or whatever it's called these days.

Which would be nice; there are a few pirate organizations that we both ought to be dealing with a bit more substantially.

Regardless, all that is true even if Shakor was a completely benevolent ruler who did precisely what needed to be done. It's obvious that whatever he was doing wasn't good enough for the tribal leadership and, if the moves' popularity is any indication, the greater population of the Minmatar Republic. While the smaller clans may or may not feel left out in the cold, the move seems widely popular in the more secure worlds where a starfaring citizen is far more likely to run into an Angel patrol than an Amarrian invasion force.

It might slowly be dawning on the people that dumping ships into our warzone systems to die and re-die might be a somewhat wasteful allocation of resources considering our actual problems. Not only has it essentially made those zones worse than your average low security system for development, it's taken military power away from patrolling our trade zones for pirates and holding our outer systems. There's no reason we can't expand our space and get a few more systems rated higher on the security index if we aren't busily "defending" ourselves from each others' reckless aggression.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#24 - 2014-01-09 14:36:27 UTC
I dont know what's more impressive.

The fact that this thread has proceeded relatively civilly, or the fact that everyone just ignored the obvious flamebait early on.

Thank you to all for both.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2014-01-09 16:20:09 UTC
This discussion is starting to go in a circle.

If the Matari people and Tribal leaders did not have confidence in the Sanmatar, they would not have made him Sanmatar. Sanmatar has always meant mediator, I feel like you are disparaging the man because he did NOT seize power. They were absolutely confident in his government and trusted him for six years to run the Republic until this government could be put into place. A government he stated in the very beginning he wanted.

You are blaming an architect for following the blueprint he wrote. I seriously do not understand how it can be so alien to you that he did not seize power, he did not want to seize power, and that he chose willing to give it up. Not only that but he put everything in place so that the Tribes could govern themselves, there was no tribal assembly when he took power. There was a broken and new parliament he could have become a dictator then a hundred times over. Instead, he recreated the Tribal assembly, something that had not been seen for eight hundred and sixty nine years when the leaders of all the Tribes last ruled the Republic.

Shakor has been the leader of a political movement to 'reunite the Tribes and reestablish the Tribal government' for years. He does this and you keep saying things like it was a vote of no confidence and a move against him by the Tribes.

They named him Sanmatar

Sanmatar means 'True Matari' and was given to those who renounced their Tribe and became a mediator between Tribal chiefs. Exactly what he is now is what he was appointed to do. Not only that but HE was the one who ensured that it happened just as it was supposed to.

Seriously, I am getting frustrated trying to explain this to you. The man is not proved to be weak because he did not take the chance to seize power he is proved to be strong for he willingly created a government of the Tribes where no one person or populist government or god or corporation had power. He is not unpopular amongst the Minmatar people, he is a national hero. He is not in competition with the Chiefs or disliked by them, he serves as a mentor and mediator to them and an example to all Matari for how a Matari should behave.

HE is the one who chose to follow tradition and become a mediator.
HE is the one who made this happen.

And I am the one that is failing to explain it to you and for that I apologize.

But this is just getting ridiculous.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#26 - 2014-01-09 18:35:27 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
This discussion is starting to go in a circle.

If the Matari people and Tribal leaders did not have confidence in the Sanmatar, they would not have made him Sanmatar. Sanmatar has always meant mediator, I feel like you are disparaging the man because he did NOT seize power. They were absolutely confident in his government and trusted him for six years to run the Republic until this government could be put into place. A government he stated in the very beginning he wanted.

You are blaming an architect for following the blueprint he wrote. I seriously do not understand how it can be so alien to you that he did not seize power, he did not want to seize power, and that he chose willing to give it up. Not only that but he put everything in place so that the Tribes could govern themselves, there was no tribal assembly when he took power. There was a broken and new parliament he could have become a dictator then a hundred times over. Instead, he recreated the Tribal assembly, something that had not been seen for eight hundred and sixty nine years when the leaders of all the Tribes last ruled the Republic.

Shakor has been the leader of a political movement to 'reunite the Tribes and reestablish the Tribal government' for years. He does this and you keep saying things like it was a vote of no confidence and a move against him by the Tribes.

They named him Sanmatar

Sanmatar means 'True Matari' and was given to those who renounced their Tribe and became a mediator between Tribal chiefs. Exactly what he is now is what he was appointed to do. Not only that but HE was the one who ensured that it happened just as it was supposed to.

Seriously, I am getting frustrated trying to explain this to you. The man is not proved to be weak because he did not take the chance to seize power he is proved to be strong for he willingly created a government of the Tribes where no one person or populist government or god or corporation had power. He is not unpopular amongst the Minmatar people, he is a national hero. He is not in competition with the Chiefs or disliked by them, he serves as a mentor and mediator to them and an example to all Matari for how a Matari should behave.

HE is the one who chose to follow tradition and become a mediator.
HE is the one who made this happen.

And I am the one that is failing to explain it to you and for that I apologize.

But this is just getting ridiculous.


As I think we earlier concluded, I think we have very different views on how literally we take anything said in the government at face value. I do understand what you're saying, I just don't believe you. I'm sure if I told you that the Empress gained the willing assent of all the other family heirs by way of divine action and have followed her mandates only to a few scattered, individual rebels, you'd know I was reading the official version of events. And you would think I was lying. It doesn't mean I think the Empress is a bad leader or that I think she should be replaced, but even I'm not fool enough to tell you that's actually what happens.

Given that, I spend the most time these days in Matari space doing my job, and therefore I've got a decent handle on what the government is supposed to be, what it actually is, and what it wants to be. Perhaps it's the outsider-in-a-strange-land perspective I have; you'd probably be just as skeptical if you worked and lived in the Amarr Empire with most of your time. However, I wouldn't even begin to believe that the quick succession of Acassa Midular's appointment as a tribal chief, her speech, then the nearly immediate move to bring the tribal heads to greater political power wasn't part of an organic process.

When I first came to the Republic to work, it was initially thought it would be dangerous. However, it isn't as if you can't tell what's going on beyond your line of sight by reading the signs you see. All the tools I was taught to recognize political workings behind the scenes in the Empire translated almost directly to everywhere else I've been.

As I said before, I can hope you're right, but I'm much more apt to believe Shakor gave the tribal autonomy speech in the same vein of propaganda as the Empress gave the Reclamation speech; they didn't actually mean to have them carried out precisely the way they had been in the past. Otherwise, Shakor would have done it immediately; it isn't as if the tribes didn't have the necessary infrastructure to handle government. I can't say many of his actions as Sanmatar were necessarily advisory nor did he show a great propensity for letting the tribes handle their own affairs on anything but a superficial level. I thought that was one of Chief Midular's primary complaints about the centralized government he operated.

Perhaps you've different perspectives and evidence, but all I've ever seen him do is handle centralized affairs. My only conclusion is that the chiefs, at the very least, forced his hand and, at most, forced him to take up a campaign promise he had no intention of keeping.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2014-01-09 18:46:31 UTC
I have never seen any evidence to suggest he was not honest the entire time but I see that it is just a difference of view that will not be reconciled.

It hardly matters, the Tribal government has returned either way.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#28 - 2014-01-09 19:02:00 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
I have never seen any evidence to suggest he was not honest the entire time but I see that it is just a difference of view that will not be reconciled.

It hardly matters, the Tribal government has returned either way.


Government or governments? As an honest question, mind you, I don't have an answer to that one. I've always dealt with whoever was in power where I needed to work, which was rarely anything so large as a tribal or republican government. What happens when tribes have different policies, do you think? It's bound to happen at some point that two tribes come to different conclusions on a solution that can't be reconciled. Are we talking about laws that can change across otherwise invisible boundaries, or do you think the Republic as a whole has the final say in what sort of law is put into practice?

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Del Vikus
Sundered Core
#29 - 2014-01-09 19:56:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Del Vikus
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Ayallah wrote:
I have never seen any evidence to suggest he was not honest the entire time but I see that it is just a difference of view that will not be reconciled.

It hardly matters, the Tribal government has returned either way.


Government or governments? As an honest question, mind you, I don't have an answer to that one. I've always dealt with whoever was in power where I needed to work, which was rarely anything so large as a tribal or republican government. What happens when tribes have different policies, do you think? It's bound to happen at some point that two tribes come to different conclusions on a solution that can't be reconciled. Are we talking about laws that can change across otherwise invisible boundaries, or do you think the Republic as a whole has the final say in what sort of law is put into practice?


Conflict and disagreement is not something the Minmatar have ever shied away from. These are, in fact, the core elements of our character -- which has both benefited and restricted us, variously, in the past.

It is fitting to consider the "new" Republic as a "Tribal Republic" -- that is, a representative organization coordinated by an executive council. There is little to suggest that there cannot be a vote by Council majority in order to settle matters -- an agreement that the other members of the Council would be honor-bound to obey. The legislative body of elected Republic members would in this case be the organ of implementation of that decision-making body,

The "different policies" of a Tribe as represented on the Council would presumably be 1) covered by an overarching law as passed by the Council, or 2) not subject to the law, and thus exempt from legislation. It remains to be seen where the lines can be drawn -- and I have no doubt that at some point a Tribe might resent the interference of Tribal authority into what they consider to be a purely internal matter.

The advantage to this new structure is that the Council will, for purely pragmatic reasons, develop a framework that seeks to preserve the individual autonomy of the Tribes. It should -- theoretically -- streamline the process whereby a Tribe legislates its own affairs outside of the functions of the Council or the Parliament. In that sense, yes, the Tribal Republic may "invisibly" have ruled on what can and cannot be deemed a purely "Tribal" affair, but that is no different than any decision-making body, and in this case, it is one that explicitly determines autonomy as a prime function of legislative identity.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#30 - 2014-01-09 21:26:23 UTC
Arnulf Ogunkoya wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
I am not necessarily referring to proximity with core Minmatar worlds. It am just saying that Historically as well as sociologically it only makes sense to witness minor and independent entities even - and especially - where a few major groups prevail. This, unless something very particular makes that independent groups can not basically happen, either through coercion, or something else.

Thus why I am a bit puzzled when someone claims that every Minmatar clan is affiliated to one of the Seven...


Tribes have split in the past, this is true. However, bear in mind that in the living memory of every Minmatar alive today the entire society has been under threat by the Empire. Either overtly by way of conquest and raiding, or covertly by way of indoctrination.

This sort of thing would not encourage division amongst it's opponents, unless it is on the question of exactly how to oppose it.


But... it is not even a matter of Tribes splitting ! It is a matter of independent entities existing beyond the well established Seven Tribes.

The Seven Tribes did not exist the first day, and probably formed themselves up like any other entitiy of their magnitude, by a collection of smaller entities absorbing one another in various ways over time, some collapsing and splitting yes, and other not so much.

That way, I find it completely counter intuitive to think that absolutely no smaller independent entity continues to exist in either way, unless some significant events of various order happened at some point.
Del Vikus
Sundered Core
#31 - 2014-01-09 22:16:56 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:


But... it is not even a matter of Tribes splitting ! It is a matter of independent entities existing beyond the well established Seven Tribes.

The Seven Tribes did not exist the first day, and probably formed themselves up like any other entitiy of their magnitude, by a collection of smaller entities absorbing one another in various ways over time, some collapsing and splitting yes, and other not so much.

That way, I find it completely counter intuitive to think that absolutely no smaller independent entity continues to exist in either way, unless some significant events of various order happened at some point.


If you're asking whether these Tribes have existed since the dawn of time? Obviously not. I've answered that already, as have others.

As to whether there might be in the future some independence movement or initiative to splinter a Tribe to create a new Tribe? I cannot answer a hypothetical question. It's obviously possible. Tribes are not sacred or ideological entities. They exist in a cultural continuum, but are not immutable.

But the Council cannot form itself around a hypothetical entity. As to questions that imply the Council might somehow be oppressing a hypothetical entity...well, I cannot answer those.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#32 - 2014-01-09 23:05:23 UTC
I do not follow anymore...
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#33 - 2014-01-10 00:38:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Constantin Baracca
Lyn Farel wrote:
I do not follow anymore...


Essentially, they had a few periods of war and conflict similar to ours, but stopped short of a single culture and kept the last remaining seven in their final period of peaceful existence before our forebearers arrived. It's a bit similar to the way that we may have Ni-kunni, Khanid, and Ammatar people in our Empire, but they are all Amarrian.

Maybe a better example would be a more personal one. The House of Baracca, which my family heads and to which I belong, owes its allegiance to the Ardishapur Family. You might think that's fairly strange, given the Family which sponsors us and we don't have an awful lot in common if we're narrowed down to the details. We've been called out as liberals in the past and have constantly been at odds with our conservative lieges since even before we were raised to our present day status. However, our faith binds us, and the Ardishapur and Baracca Families have a strong bond of evangelism and trust. Just because we don't agree about many of the specifics doesn't mean we aren't joined by a greater and more powerful unifying way of life, one that binds us tighter than one might imagine.

So, apply that to the Minmatar Republic. The clans within the tribes may be wildly different from their parent tribes. There are clans of Sebiestor that aren't so keenly into science. There are clans of Brutor that are ardent pacifists. Overall, though, they are joined by bonds of tribal fellowship that trump most of the petty disagreements. Most...

Regardless, there are, to my knowledge, not a lot of ethnic Matari who aren't a member of one of the tribes, and if they aren't it's not usually for a good reason. Being of a tribe in the Republic is like being of the faith in the Amarr Empire or being employed by a corporation in the Caldari State. Not being in a tribe generally means you or your family were forcibly ejected for some reason. There are lots of clubs and divisions within the tribes, just as with any other large organization, but the tribes are very broad cultural groups that you are, at least essentially, born into.

As of right now, there are just those tribes that we know of that make up the council. I'm sure there are small groups that break away and form their own "tribes", but I'm not sure how successful that might be when it happens. Regardless, I don't think their numbers are more than negligible, statistically speaking.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#34 - 2014-01-10 19:13:33 UTC
I do not think we are understanding each other...

What you are telling me is that the seven tribes are like imperial royal families and hold power over territory and lands the same way an imperial heir does ? Which means that every clan or tribe living on their lands HAS to be affiliated to them, sharing their culture or not ?
Del Vikus
Sundered Core
#35 - 2014-01-10 19:43:21 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
I do not think we are understanding each other...

What you are telling me is that the seven tribes are like imperial royal families and hold power over territory and lands the same way an imperial heir does ? Which means that every clan or tribe living on their lands HAS to be affiliated to them, sharing their culture or not ?


I can't believe I'm going to say this, but...

No, Constantin was simply drawing an analogy, and not an entirely crazy one. But it was only an analogy.

There simply isn't the "HAS to" that you're describing, Lyn. The kind of "forced assimilation" scenario doesn't arise because there aren't any advantages to dissociation with the Tribes. I'm sure there are some who for various reasons are outcast from the society of their Tribes, but they will always remain OF the Tribe, regardless of their actions. Similarly, if someone resists inclusion, the Tribe can in no way be "forced" upon them, unless they are living within the districts of a Tribal region. For those of any Tribe who are dissatisfied with its characteristics, they are free to live as they want, as long as it is within the laws. And that is true of any free society, Tribal or not.

You seem to want to believe that being part of a Tribe is like being straightjacketed. It is not. A Tribe is a shared story, shared experiences, shared habits, and shared guidance. A Tribe will shape the laws of a place, but that is hardly a restrictive social phenomenon.



Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#36 - 2014-01-10 20:00:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
I am not trying to believe that, I just think that you assume that absolutely every clan has been part of one of the seven. And again, I have a hard time to believe that absolutely no clan or group remained outside of the seven during all Minmatar history, or that some have lived outside and never were affiliated to any of them, but still being part of the Minmatar society.

I am not necessarily referring to leavers, I am referring to independent groups that never were into one of the seven to begin with. And if those exist, then the new Council is a direct threat to their influence on Pator.
Del Vikus
Sundered Core
#37 - 2014-01-10 20:15:36 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

I am not necessarily referring to leavers, I am referring to independent groups that never were into one of the seven to begin with. And if those exist, then the new Council is a direct threat to their influence on Pator.


If you go looking for malcontents, you will find them. As to those hypothetical Minmatar you suppose to be Tribeless: they are unlikely to be found on any worlds within the four major empires.

It's not an unworthy question, to see if these exist. But if they do, they exist in such small numbers as to be unlikely to merit a full Tribal seat at the Council. And please also keep in mind that they would nonetheless be represented by who they elect to Parliament -- in this sense, maintaining the same rights as anyone, Minmatar or not, who lives on Republic worlds.
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#38 - 2014-01-10 20:35:27 UTC
Eystur? Hadaugago? These are hardly 'outer systems.' You can scarcely get closer to the bosom of Pator without falling into it.

It remains to be seen what these changes spell for those of us who must cope with the ebb and flow present in the zones affected by the Republic's proxy war. One can only hope that the reduction of the Council will also reduce the amount of white noise, and allow truly important matters to come to the fore.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#39 - 2014-01-11 09:26:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Del Vikus wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

I am not necessarily referring to leavers, I am referring to independent groups that never were into one of the seven to begin with. And if those exist, then the new Council is a direct threat to their influence on Pator.


If you go looking for malcontents, you will find them. As to those hypothetical Minmatar you suppose to be Tribeless: they are unlikely to be found on any worlds within the four major empires.

It's not an unworthy question, to see if these exist. But if they do, they exist in such small numbers as to be unlikely to merit a full Tribal seat at the Council. And please also keep in mind that they would nonetheless be represented by who they elect to Parliament -- in this sense, maintaining the same rights as anyone, Minmatar or not, who lives on Republic worlds.


That is assuming quite a lot... I honestly do not know if those exist in huge numbers or tiny percentages, or if they do not even exist... Thus why I asked. Do you have sources or surveys to study ? I would be rather interested.

However, they can not claim a seat even at the Parliament since five seats are attributed to each Tribe, which fills the reduced 35 seats available. Unless a Tribe suddenly decides to allocate one of those seats to an outsider, which I consider rather unlikely. Why would they abandon power to a foreign tribe or clan ?

And even if so, the Parliament is said to be subservient to the Tribal Council, the real holder of power here. I am still wondering what kind of power remain in the hands of the Republic Parliament, and how their power combines with the all powerful Tribal Council now. Do they have jurisdiction over the same matters, making it de facto a bicameral state ? Or are they relegated to something else ? Do they even have the right to vote or veto important processes ?

Edit : anyway, this Parliament really looks like a smokescreen... Its composition cannot change, and will therefore always reflect the composition of the Tribal Council in terms of numbers and factional ratio. Its only function corroborates what has already been stated : to be subservient to the Tribal Council, validating what they decide, probably expanding it in details, but nothing more. It sounds rather like a purely bureaucratic subpower.
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#40 - 2014-01-11 16:07:16 UTC
I should say that I do know a man who was cast out of his clan, tribe, and the Matari people. According to their legal system, he is completely without nationality as far as their government is concerned.

You have to do something fairly horrible for that to happen to you, though. I've met a lot of Matari criminals and ex-convicts, only one I've ever heard of was cast our that way. Even Matari pirates who prey on the Republic don't have their tribal identity stripped away.

I've met a fair few more that would say they aren't Matari and have no tribe, but that's more of a socio-political statement. It's on all of their legal documentation which tribe they "belong" to, they just like to say that they don't belong to it. Those aren't very common in the majority of the Republic. Everywhere has political dissidents.

As far as the government is concerned, the best way to describe it is "muddled." Generally, the more local the government, the more power they have (as opposed to the Empire, which is often governed from the top down). Your most local city governments are generally affiliated with a clan, but might contain several clans (which might be of different tribes). Generally speaking, you're legally bound by laws that pertain to the tribe of the clan that runs the city. So you might have a Sebiestor clan running a city with Sebiestor laws, but there will almost certainly be representatives of other tribes working there. That means that you need to know the laws governing every single tribe because they will change from city to city.

That was limited before by the power of the central government, but more tribal autonomy might soon mean more sharp divisions. That's not a bad thing, really, as it means that if you need to handle something that's illegal in your area, you might not have to travel far to get to a place where it's legal. You just have to watch out for the odd law that says preaching the Amarrian faith is punishable by prison time.

All in all, it affects their planetside culture more than its spacefaring culture. Given that interstellar space is largely governed directly by centralized law, you don't get that effect if you're just traveling from station to station in space. Just make sure you know your tribal law before you set foot on the ground and know whose ground you're stepping foot onto.

And have a good lawyer. Always, always, ALWAYS have a good lawyer versed in local law.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Previous page123Next page