These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ganking, attitudes, & the NPE

First post
Author
Meyr
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
OnlyFleets.
#121 - 2014-01-07 04:44:50 UTC
Mister Simms wrote:
Meyr wrote:
  • What is the goal, then, of a typical miner gank, though?

    With no strategic or economic benefit from this action, the only justification for it is psychological, meaning that it is simply the satisfaction derived by one person resulting from the destruction of another person or their assets. Pleasure resulting from destruction for no gain is not an inherent trait in most people. It's the behavior of a bully..


    I think you demonstrate a significant lack of imagination.

    Look at my bio and my corp and you will see just one reason for ganking miners. Read the bios of those that participate with me and you will see some RP reasons for them joining me.

    Also, I reject your notion that SG of miners is not profitable. It very much IS profitable. Most ganks result in a very small net gain or break even for my crew. When we screw up (which we do regularly) then of course it is a complete loss. However, there are always those few that make up for it. It always amazes me to gank an untanked Mack whose pilot is afk. Last night a pilot lost a very tasty T2 Mack fit while he was away. Even more amazing was the 179 mil in implants he lost when we podded him. We got about 35 mil in bounty from him as well as about 10 mil in dropped loot. Not bad return for 7 mil in ships. So there is economic gain for me while I help educate miners in proper fitting techniques and situational awareness.



    179 mil in implants in another player's head does precisely what for you? Economically speaking, that is. Killboard efficiency? Gevlon demonstrated conclusively that KB ratios are so easily manipulated, especially by ganking, that they're essentially meaningless.

    35 million bounty? 10 million loot/salvage?

    Thank you for making my point. Economic benefit is readily, and easily understandable.

    You made a profit. Good for you. I assume that these ships were fit for max mining output, making them stupidly easy to kill?

    I simply want, as part of the NPE, for new players to be aware that they need to be wary of other players, not merely of rats. As I stated previously, if I could, I'd also include a tutorial regarding how hostility mechanics work. Hell, I know players with two or three years worth of playing experience who don't fully understand them.

    As a side note, anyone AFK while in space deserves what happens, the same with botters. I want to educate the new players who are attempting to scale the Eve Online Learning Cliff (tm), before they rage quit.
    Marsha Mallow
    #122 - 2014-01-07 08:07:26 UTC
    Meyr wrote:
    I simply want, as part of the NPE, for new players to be aware that they need to be wary of other players, not merely of rats. As I stated previously, if I could, I'd also include a tutorial regarding how hostility mechanics work. Hell, I know players with two or three years worth of playing experience who don't fully understand them.

    As a side note, anyone AFK while in space deserves what happens, the same with botters. I want to educate the new players who are attempting to scale the Eve Online Learning Cliff (tm), before they rage quit.

    No one seems to be arguing against helping new players. You are muddling your own argument up here. If you think it should be done via the NPE - post in Features & Ideas. If you would like to help new players yourself, no one is stopping you. Even rolling the occasional starter alt and helping out in rookie chat can be productive. Quoting Gevlon doesn't help your case as he's far from expert and incredibly irritating.

    Waffling on GD about the psychological motivation for shooting other players in a PVP centric game is pretty odd tbh. What do you get out of arguing back and forth like this? Feelings of intellectual and ethical superiority? It's a hopeless position as your arguments are not convincing enough to pursuade anyone sensible to support your position. I often think if people started the game perceiving it more as an FPS rather than classic themepark MMO they would have an easier time. The victim mentality is really just a matter of perspective.

    Re the ganking argument; if you don't like it, don't do it. As other people have remarked though, after years of play some of us have never been ganked in highsec. Which suggests people who have a major issue with it are making themselves an easy target. That said ganking is always subject to tweaks and adjustments. It's there to remind people nowhere is safe, but when it's abused to the point the risk is ridiculously low, it gets nerfed. Again, a more productive discussion about this is probably better on a different subforum, but I suspect that isn't your purpose in posting here.

    Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

    Sweets > U can dd my face any day

    Herzog Wolfhammer
    Sigma Special Tactics Group
    #123 - 2014-01-07 08:19:37 UTC
    Another thread like this.

    How many people jumped all over the OP without knowing what NPE means?

    I must agree that most ganks rely heavily on the victim not knowing better. Any proposal to give more noobs knowledge early on are ridiculed almost reliably by the same people shooting them.


    Rather than call on the ever-dwindling staff of CCP to do something about this, this is something that the players will have to deal with.

    Bring back DEEEEP Space!

    admiral root
    Red Galaxy
    #124 - 2014-01-07 08:45:08 UTC
    Meyr wrote:
  • TL;DR - include ganking in the NPE

  • As a member of the New Order, I've called for this many times. Gank and pod all newbies as part of the tutorial so they understand that part of the game.

    No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

    Ramona McCandless
    Silent Vale
    LinkNet
    #125 - 2014-01-07 09:55:13 UTC
    Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
    Another thread like this.

    How many people jumped all over the OP without knowing what NPE means?

    I must agree that most ganks rely heavily on the victim not knowing better. Any proposal to give more noobs knowledge early on are ridiculed almost reliably by the same people shooting them.


    Rather than call on the ever-dwindling staff of CCP to do something about this, this is something that the players will have to deal with.



    Im betting you read a lot of newspapers.

    Shh its ok, the immigrants arent coming to steal granny's pension


    They are all moving to nullsec to steal the sites

    "Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

    "A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

    Rumtin
    Imperium Technologies
    Sigma Grindset
    #126 - 2014-01-07 12:16:54 UTC
    For F***s Sake, another whiny thread about high sec ganking... Straight

    Can somebody report these sniveling pigs to C.O.D.E please?
    Slade Trillgon
    Brutor Force Federated
    #127 - 2014-01-07 12:59:44 UTC
    Angelica Dreamstar wrote:


    A sociopath could create a bully, but not vice versa.



    I disagree. A highly intelligent child could be abused and start to bully before they have fully harnessed or understand their full capacities, but I digress.
    Iria Ahrens
    Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
    #128 - 2014-01-07 13:35:35 UTC
    Meyr wrote:


    With no strategic or economic benefit from this action, the only justification for it is psychological, meaning that it is simply the satisfaction derived by one person resulting from the destruction of another person or their assets. Pleasure resulting from destruction for no gain is not an inherent trait in most people. It's the behavior of a bully.


    Just because you don't understand the strategic or economic benefit does not mean there isn't one. Denial of enemy resources is not just a game play tactic. It can even be argued that all wars are fought over resources.

    I'm not necessarily endorsing that argument. Superlative use usually indicates a logical error somewhere.

    My choice of pronouns is based on your avatar. Even if I know what is behind the avatar.

    Ramona McCandless
    Silent Vale
    LinkNet
    #129 - 2014-01-07 13:40:31 UTC
    Iria Ahrens wrote:


    Just because you don't understand the strategic or economic benefit does not mean there isn't one. Denial of enemy resources is not just a game play tactic. It can even be argued that all wars are fought over resources.

    I'm not necessarily endorsing that argument. Superlative use usually indicates a logical error somewhere.



    Actually thats a superb point.

    A Miner called Christian Hawks who hangs out in an anti-gank EvE Channel often gets so annoyed about miners who do their job better than him that he "leaks" info about them to "gank spies" in the channel in order to get them ganked.

    "Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

    "A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

    Iria Ahrens
    Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
    #130 - 2014-01-07 13:46:32 UTC
    Ramona McCandless wrote:


    Actually thats a superb point.

    A Miner called Christian Hawks who hangs out in an anti-gank EvE Channel often gets so annoyed about miners who do their job better than him that he "leaks" info about them to "gank spies" in the channel in order to get them ganked.



    If you sell fire hoses, go light a lot of fires.

    My choice of pronouns is based on your avatar. Even if I know what is behind the avatar.

    Kimmi Chan
    Tastes Like Purple
    #131 - 2014-01-07 13:47:54 UTC
    Ramona McCandless wrote:
    Iria Ahrens wrote:


    Just because you don't understand the strategic or economic benefit does not mean there isn't one. Denial of enemy resources is not just a game play tactic. It can even be argued that all wars are fought over resources.

    I'm not necessarily endorsing that argument. Superlative use usually indicates a logical error somewhere.



    Actually thats a superb point.

    A Miner called Christian Hawks who hangs out in an anti-gank EvE Channel often gets so annoyed about miners who do their job better than him that he "leaks" info about them to "gank spies" in the channel in order to get them ganked.



    AWOXing an anti-gank channel?

    Clearly a sociopath! Blink

    A miner actually involved in PvP? How terribly clever and devious! All hail emergent gameplay!

    "Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

    www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

    Meyr
    Di-Tron Heavy Industries
    OnlyFleets.
    #132 - 2014-01-07 13:52:16 UTC
    Iria Ahrens wrote:
    Meyr wrote:


    With no strategic or economic benefit from this action, the only justification for it is psychological, meaning that it is simply the satisfaction derived by one person resulting from the destruction of another person or their assets. Pleasure resulting from destruction for no gain is not an inherent trait in most people. It's the behavior of a bully.


    Just because you don't understand the strategic or economic benefit does not mean there isn't one. Denial of enemy resources is not just a game play tactic. It can even be argued that all wars are fought over resources.

    I'm not necessarily endorsing that argument. Superlative use usually indicates a logical error somewhere.


    Strategic benefit. You said it yourself. If there is one, then ganking is readily understandable.

    Killing an enemy's miners in nullsec is certainly a valid tactic, as is cloaky camping their industry systems (PLEASE don't turn this into another "AFK cloaking is BS thread, I'm just trying to make a point).

    Randomly killing people in hisec (not lowsec or nullsec, the rules are different there) without benefit, strategic or economical, is what I mentioned as a justification for making this part of the NPE, so that players will be aware that they should regard EVERYONE who approaches them with a healthy suspicion, and be aware of the dramatic difference in survivability your decisions make.
    Rumtin
    Imperium Technologies
    Sigma Grindset
    #133 - 2014-01-07 14:04:28 UTC
    Meyr wrote:
    Iria Ahrens wrote:
    Meyr wrote:


    With no strategic or economic benefit from this action, the only justification for it is psychological, meaning that it is simply the satisfaction derived by one person resulting from the destruction of another person or their assets. Pleasure resulting from destruction for no gain is not an inherent trait in most people. It's the behavior of a bully.


    Just because you don't understand the strategic or economic benefit does not mean there isn't one. Denial of enemy resources is not just a game play tactic. It can even be argued that all wars are fought over resources.

    I'm not necessarily endorsing that argument. Superlative use usually indicates a logical error somewhere.


    Strategic benefit. You said it yourself. If there is one, then ganking is readily understandable.

    Killing an enemy's miners in nullsec is certainly a valid tactic, as is cloaky camping their industry systems (PLEASE don't turn this into another "AFK cloaking is BS thread, I'm just trying to make a point).

    Randomly killing people in hisec (not lowsec or nullsec, the rules are different there) without benefit, strategic or economical, is what I mentioned as a justification for making this part of the NPE, so that players will be aware that they should regard EVERYONE who approaches them with a healthy suspicion, and be aware of the dramatic difference in survivability your decisions make.


    Geez, once again you flip a 180. At first you were calling on high sec ganking like it was the root of all evil and those doing it should be punished. Now you talk about it as if you endorse it. Using it as a means of learning.

    Can you stop being a hypocrite in each and every post you make regarding high sec ganking?
    Mortis Betruger
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #134 - 2014-01-07 14:14:38 UTC
    I gank because in real life I am a nice guy. Eve lets me be evil. Plus its fun :)
    hedge betts Shiyurida
    State Protectorate
    Caldari State
    #135 - 2014-01-07 15:14:57 UTC
    Get rid of kill boards. No more epeen for gank wh0rs

    Miner ganks down by 90%.

    Pog mo thoin

    Ramona McCandless
    Silent Vale
    LinkNet
    #136 - 2014-01-07 15:28:05 UTC
    hedge betts Shiyurida wrote:
    kill boards
    .

    The what?

    "Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

    "A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

    Angelica Dreamstar
    Aliastra
    Gallente Federation
    #137 - 2014-01-07 15:39:23 UTC
    Slade Trillgon wrote:
    Angelica Dreamstar wrote:


    A sociopath could create a bully, but not vice versa.



    I disagree. A highly intelligent child could be abused and start to bully before they have fully harnessed or understand their full capacities, but I digress.
    How does that relate to what I wrote? It's fine if you disagree, but then explain your point properly, please.

    bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

    -- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

    silens vesica
    Corsair Cartel
    #138 - 2014-01-07 19:16:35 UTC
    hedge betts Shiyurida wrote:
    Get rid of kill boards. No more epeen for gank wh0rs

    Miner ganks down by 90%.

    Cite?

    Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

    Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

    James Amril-Kesh
    Viziam
    Amarr Empire
    #139 - 2014-01-07 19:25:44 UTC
    hedge betts Shiyurida wrote:
    Get rid of kill boards. No more epeen for gank wh0rs

    Miner ganks down by 90%.

    No.

    Enjoying the rain today? ;)

    Mister Simms
    Society for Miner Education
    #140 - 2014-01-07 22:37:22 UTC
    Meyr wrote:
    179 mil in implants in another player's head does precisely what for you? Economically speaking, that is. Killboard efficiency? Gevlon demonstrated conclusively that KB ratios are so easily manipulated, especially by ganking, that they're essentially meaningless.


    I don't care about KB ratios, and frankly have no idea as to what mine would be. Large losses by ganked miners simply demonstrate their incompetence, not my skill.

    Quote:
    I simply want, as part of the NPE, for new players to be aware that they need to be wary of other players, not merely of rats. As I stated previously, if I could, I'd also include a tutorial regarding how hostility mechanics work. Hell, I know players with two or three years worth of playing experience who don't fully understand them.


    I hang out in Help Chat a lot while online (have to do something while I wait out my criminal timer so I can undock again). Often, newer players will ask what mining barge to get and how to fit it. I ALWAYS recommend they tank it fully and inevitably that suggestion is met with scorn and derision. In the forums I recommend to players they tank their barges, and again the suggestions are most unheeded.

    So I have no problem helping newer players, and I continue to attempt to do so. However, there are those that need some concrete object lessons. That is a service that I'm happy to provide them.