EVE General Discussion

Last thread was closed as they called it a rant. This will be straight forward.

In it's current state a single player with director roles in the executor corp can disband an alliance. An alliance however is many times intended for sharing power and wealth amongst members evenly. Only sometimes is an alliance actually a supercorp. Thus, it becomes most logical to divide alliances into two types:

1) Supercorps. Similar to how it's setup today, one corp in the alliance has control over most facets and directors within that corp can close the alliance at their own will.

2) Cooperatives. Similar to how null-sec entities should be setup, no single corp in the alliance has any special privileges. Everything from alliance membership to the closing of the alliance is decided by popular vote. Voting strength of each corp is decided (and set in stone) when said corp joins the alliance.

This will allow null-sec entities to survive when a single leader decided he's had enough and wants to cause some damage before leaving.

Cooperatives containing thousands of members should not be at the whims of individuals. Please change this CCP.

I pressed the button to look at the large version of the OP's portrait, and shortly afterwards regretted that decision.

Note to self:

Get into leadership of large alliance. Press button. Bathe in the glorious waterfall of tears.

Of course they should.

Note to self:

Be in a position to take advantage of Unsuccessful's plan and help him to steal all of the things, before he presses the button.

What has been seen cannot be un-seen.
And no, bleaching your eyeballs won't help.

Meanwhile: I predict GREAT things for this thread!

This is a nonsensical post.

The Plague is a long part of human history. It could be a careful remainder about not keeping black rats as pets....

Broken is broken, because the devs ignore broken mechanics for years doesn't mean they shouldn't be fixed.

Corporations could be more robust and more in-line with how corporations work in real life. A CEO is selected by a board of directors. A disbanding is a decision of a majority of directors + the CEO (those online in the last x period). Even one dissenter means no disbanding.

Additionally, anyone not online in the last 90 days has roles auto-dropped

Ah. Alliance structure management is a plague that kills millions.
Or... Maybe not.

haha i just looked at a larger version of your avatar, i wonder what you saw just as that picture was taken, it looks like you saw something that cannot be unseen :P

On the subject of alliances, working as intended, if people decide they want to disband something like they they should be freely allowed to do so, in your example its entirely possible for an alliance containing an even number of corps to have votes end up in a tie in which case nothing would happen, this veto power makes it so you can just do what you want to do when you want to do it :)

Which alliance did you lose out of interest :P

... strange, I thought the OP's name was supposed to be a month of the year...