These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why do people fly BS?

First post First post
Author
Deunan Tenephais
#321 - 2014-01-04 12:37:51 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:

If the problem lies with the guns then the ships themselves are not to blame.
Perhaps you should rename the thread, indeed.


Chances are the people complaining about them are trying to use these long range guns at short range and getting upset that they are not as effective.

If you are talking about me M. Megafleet, then I don't think 40/70 km is short range, even for large long distance turrets.
So, the only advantage in going from medium rail to large rail is the shooting distance, really ?
It's a little underwhelming...
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#322 - 2014-01-04 12:58:46 UTC
Deunan Tenephais wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:

If the problem lies with the guns then the ships themselves are not to blame.
Perhaps you should rename the thread, indeed.


Chances are the people complaining about them are trying to use these long range guns at short range and getting upset that they are not as effective.

If you are talking about me M. Megafleet, then I don't think 40/70 km is short range, even for large long distance turrets.
So, the only advantage in going from medium rail to large rail is the shooting distance, really ?
It's a little underwhelming...


Its strength is in applying good damage at very long range. You are using the wrong weapons for the job at hand.
logic principle3
Doomheim
#323 - 2014-01-04 13:11:43 UTC
Lets put a cruiser or BC against a mach, vindy, geddon, neut fit tempest, or domi. I am also forgetting an apocalypse, and a rail fit megathron or rokh. The first group of ships all have advantages, such as neuts, incredible speed, range projection, drone warfare, and int he case of the tempest, a small sig radius too. The latter group have incredible range projection and in a good fleet can be webbed/neuted to hell, and these ships can apply damage anywhere from 50km-100km.

...And then there are sniper fits. But granted, tier 3 BC's are a good role for that, although with the advent of MJD's that may change.

T3's naturally will dominate BS's, they are meant to. Saying that, when you are questioning missions, the only T3 that really does well against a L4 is the tengu. This is from experience. The legion struggles with sider drones and can end up dead in the water. The loki is ok but you need to mwd fit it, and its sig tank is gone.
Deunan Tenephais
#324 - 2014-01-04 13:20:22 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:

If the problem lies with the guns then the ships themselves are not to blame.
Perhaps you should rename the thread, indeed.


Chances are the people complaining about them are trying to use these long range guns at short range and getting upset that they are not as effective.

If you are talking about me M. Megafleet, then I don't think 40/70 km is short range, even for large long distance turrets.
So, the only advantage in going from medium rail to large rail is the shooting distance, really ?
It's a little underwhelming...


Its strength is in applying good damage at very long range. You are using the wrong weapons for the job at hand.

And just to know, could you tell me what is the maximum usable range of large blasters ?
Knowing that I prepare my heart to sink inside my chest...
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#325 - 2014-01-04 13:26:29 UTC
Deunan Tenephais wrote:
And just to know, could you tell me what is the maximum usable range of large blasters ?
Knowing that I prepare my heart to sink inside my chest...

Depends on the ship (and what you define as “usable”). They can do nasty things at ~50km if you fit (and load) for it.
Rails will happily brutalise things at 100k+ (even with shorter-range ammo), going to the full 250km if you need to, which admittedly you rarely do.
Arkady Romanov
Whole Squid
#326 - 2014-01-04 13:31:11 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:
And just to know, could you tell me what is the maximum usable range of large blasters ?
Knowing that I prepare my heart to sink inside my chest...

Depends on the ship (and what you define as “usable”). They can do nasty things at ~50km if you fit (and load) for it.
Rails will happily brutalise things at 100k+ (even with shorter-range ammo), going to the full 250km if you need to, which admittedly you rarely do.


Unless you need to murder many thousands of slowcat drones while you keep them bubbled till downtime. Then you get a Tornado, or a Naga and wait for the other side's morale to die.

Whole Squid: Get Inked.

Deunan Tenephais
#327 - 2014-01-04 13:54:29 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Deunan Tenephais wrote:
And just to know, could you tell me what is the maximum usable range of large blasters ?
Knowing that I prepare my heart to sink inside my chest...

Depends on the ship (and what you define as “usable”). They can do nasty things at ~50km if you fit (and load) for it.
Rails will happily brutalise things at 100k+ (even with shorter-range ammo), going to the full 250km if you need to, which admittedly you rarely do.

50 kilometers with the longest range ammos I guess, hey...

Ok, thanks for the infos all, I will see if a guns/drones hyperion is doable and worth it.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#328 - 2014-01-04 13:58:13 UTC
Deunan Tenephais wrote:

And just to know, could you tell me what is the maximum usable range of large blasters ?
Knowing that I prepare my heart to sink inside my chest...


100km on a kronos is the max

70km on a kronos is downright deadly to frigates, cruiser and BCs and will hurt most BS badly

40km is max effective range on most megathron hulls but the rokh will hit 50+

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
#329 - 2014-01-04 14:23:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Ioci
I see a lot of but, if's and maybe's in this thread.

tldr: The Battleship hull is a fail whale.

Longer version, back when the Battleship was added, it had a purpose. Back when 20K login was a CCP wet dream and being insta-blapped by 600 ships wasn't happening as standard practice. That was a very long time ago and now, the BS has become outmoded. It's no longer a dps hitpoint wall. Now it's a dps kite wall.

And as Goons have proven with great success, the way to win EVE is to spam junk. From the lowly Drake to any ship you can mass produce. Make lots. spam it on to the field.

R.I.P. Vile Rat

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#330 - 2014-01-04 15:06:37 UTC
Ioci wrote:
I see a lot of but, if's and maybe's in this thread.

tldr: The Battleship hull is a fail whale.

Longer version, back when the Battleship was added, it had a purpose. Back when 20K login was a CCP wet dream and being insta-blapped by 600 ships wasn't happening as standard practice. That was a very long time ago and now, the BS has become outmoded. It's no longer a dps hitpoint wall. Now it's a dps kite wall.

And as Goons have proven with great success, the way to win EVE is to spam junk. From the lowly Drake to any ship you can mass produce. Make lots. spam it on to the field.


When the battleship was added you could fit multiple MWD, had no stacking penalties to damage mods (full rack heatsink geddons) and there was no tracking. It was a time of volley the enemy before they volley you and attacking a battleship in anything other than another battleship was suicide.

In the largest fight in EVE history than happened last year my Navy Mega (dutch courage) was primaried so many times I lost count yet its armour held. I spent the entire time orbiting the station without my MWD on.


Please don't tell lies.
Pandora Barzane
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#331 - 2014-01-04 16:05:31 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Arduemont wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

No they are terrible.


I think perhaps you should stop posting. You have literally an entire thread of people facepalming over each of your posts. Saying that you can't solo roam around nullsec and catch frigates in a battleship is like saying you can't screw lightbulbs in with a Pneumatic drill.

No you can't. But you can't drill holes in the pavement with your hand either. It's a false economy. To paraphrase Einstein 'If you judge a Battleship by its ability to lock frigates, it will live its whole life believing that it is terrible.'

A thread full of blobbers who never used a battleship for pvp in small / solo scenario. As I have stated before, battleships are fine in blobs because other people pick up your slack.


"Battleships can't solo PvP" he says. Meanwhile, people are out there doing solo PvP in battleships.

I never said they cannot solo PvP. They can. Just not for long (mobility, cloakability), and not against a skilled pilot in a small ship (tracking holes, speed / sig tanking, kiting).

I challenge anyone to take up my offer. I will provide you with a T1 battleship and your desired fit (other than a dominix as it uses non BS specific main weaponry), take it to an area of null that I will select, if you manage 5 pvp kills without popping I'll concede I am wrong. Given I did the same thing in a Proteus and got 22 kills and I apparantly suck you should have no issues. Additionally I'll provide 1 billion isk per kill as a reward (trusted 3rd party).

My prediction: This is how it will end for you


just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.


baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#332 - 2014-01-04 16:10:46 UTC
Pandora Barzane wrote:


just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.




Last time infinity offered a battleship to go solo and kill stuff I accepted.

Infinity didn't deliver.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#333 - 2014-01-04 16:12:28 UTC
Pandora Barzane wrote:
just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer.

It is indeed telling: he can't seem to make a point without deliberately biasing the conditions and ignoring the larger context of his supposed evidence.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#334 - 2014-01-04 16:59:41 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Pandora Barzane wrote:

just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.

Last time infinity offered a battleship to go solo and kill stuff I accepted.

Infinity didn't deliver.

You're just a blobber.

Also dominxes are completely balanced.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#335 - 2014-01-04 17:18:00 UTC
Why do people use battleships?

From a PvE standpoint, the battleship is pretty much king of level 4 missions. Sure, the Ishtar and Tengu can also do them, but in terms of maximum buffer along with DPS, a battleship is where it's at. If you mess up and shoot a trigger early, you aren't worrying as much about the possibility of losing your ship because that huge reservoir of HP is there while you rep it up (if you're active tanked). On top of that, battleship-sized weapons provide the most damage output available, and there are only four ships in the game that can use those sized weapons while not being battleships themselves. None of them make very good level 4 missioning ships.

The Ishtar, Myrmidon, Eos and Prophecy can all field a full flight of heavy drones or sentries, allowing them to compete in that aspect with battleships in level 4s. Each can also field a decent tanks, especially with T2 resists.

In PvP it becomes a different story. In high sec the prevalence of bumping alts allows players to reliably use battleships, because it affords them increased range dictation capabilities. A Machariel bumping you is likely to prevent you from ever seeing the safety of the docking ring again. At the same time, should it prove to be a gank that same Machariel can keep the main against the station, allowing them to hide. Dodixie is a great place to watch this in action.

Battleships are big, lumbering battering rams, and that's about it. They provide big numbers when they work, but they need such stringent requirements to do so that they are most of the time not worth it. A solo PvPer or small gangs are not going to take battleships, they're going to be in a battlecruiser or below. It provides improved mobility while not sacrificing much in the way of tank or DPS. Plus, it's generally easier to maximize the capabilities of the battlecruiser long before you can do so with a battleship. When it comes right down to it, though, the battleship can and will lose to smaller ships, simply because of limiting factors (weapon tracking, smaller sig, etc.). While it might be nice to field the Megathron or Abaddon, an Ishtar can do the job as well, if not better.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Caleb Seremshur
Bloodhorn
Patchwork Freelancers
#336 - 2014-01-04 19:19:11 UTC
Pretty much any battleship is competitive when paired with a rapier/huginn and/or curse. If you're flying something that experiences difficulty applying damage or making it stick then those two bad boys are your best frienda.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#337 - 2014-01-04 21:00:17 UTC
Pandora Barzane wrote:
just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.

Ignoring for a moment that you're probably a sock puppet, the reason we haven't taken him up on it is because it fails to address the larger issue of balance. As we've made abundantly clear, you don't judge ships based on 1v1 and call it a comprehensive comparison. That's just ********. It's like judging an Olympic gymnast on their landings alone.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Eram Fidard
Doomheim
#338 - 2014-01-04 21:34:00 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Pandora Barzane wrote:
just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.

Ignoring for a moment that you're probably a sock puppet, the reason we haven't taken him up on it is because it fails to address the larger issue of balance. As we've made abundantly clear, you don't judge ships based on 1v1 and call it a comprehensive comparison. That's just ********. It's like judging an Olympic gymnast on their landings alone.


Mommy, how come his apple crushed my orange?


Poster is not to be held responsible for damages to keyboards and/or noses caused by hot beverages.

Eram Fidard
Doomheim
#339 - 2014-01-04 21:42:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Eram Fidard
Eram Fidard wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Pandora Barzane wrote:
just find it very telling that no nullseccer taken your up on this offer. Just shows how right you are.

Ignoring for a moment that you're probably a sock puppet, the reason we haven't taken him up on it is because it fails to address the larger issue of balance. As we've made abundantly clear, you don't judge ships based on 1v1 and call it a comprehensive comparison. That's just ********. It's like judging an Olympic gymnast on their landings alone.


Mommy, how come his apple crushed my orange?




I don't always quote myself but when I do, I really like to go off...

So I figure, your standard red delicious should have no problem making it through a mandarin ("christmas") orange, but might actually receive some damage upon impact with say, a small, unripened "sunkist" navel orange. The ripeness and variety of the apple would certainly come into question though, and I imagine the damage sustained by the apple would vary greatly dependent upon several factors.

Testing shall be required, but until then, the hypothesis is as follows:

That an apple* will, with a greater than 50% success rate, cause irreparable damage to an orange**, when colliding at speeds relative to an average human's arm-swinging motion, without the apple receiving irreparable damage.

*any 'standard' variety and size of apple
**any 'standard' variety and size of orange


TO THE PRODUCE DEPARTMENT!!

Poster is not to be held responsible for damages to keyboards and/or noses caused by hot beverages.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#340 - 2014-01-04 22:08:24 UTC
I like the way you think.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)