These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Question about ISBOXER!! - Shock Shock HORROR SHOCK

First post
Author
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#41 - 2014-01-03 05:57:44 UTC
Rainbow Dash wrote:
I'm sure CCP will be very happy with all the money you'll be paying them for these 3000 accounts.

3000 accounts sounds hard to manage, even with isboxer

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#42 - 2014-01-03 08:07:09 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Prie Mary wrote:
Its a legitimate question really. If this program is allowed. Then people can do some pretty game breaking things with it

ISBoxer is not allowed but neither is it disallowed. It's what you do with it that matters.

^^ This. ISBoxer is a non-factor; it's the action that matters.

Spamming people is probably not something that the GMs will look kindly on, no matter how you do it.
Tuttomenui II
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2014-01-03 08:07:14 UTC
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/

Quote:
1. You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.


So pretty sure NO.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#44 - 2014-01-03 08:23:54 UTC
Tuttomenui II wrote:
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/
Quote:
1. You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.

So pretty sure NO.

Excessive applications to a corp... how cruel.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Tuttomenui II
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2014-01-03 08:27:41 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Tuttomenui II wrote:
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/
Quote:
1. You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.

So pretty sure NO.

Excessive applications to a corp... how cruel.


Whats funny is excessive doesn't really cover it. For each mail sent to corp, a copy would be sent to the CEO, all directors and any recruitment officers.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#46 - 2014-01-03 08:36:29 UTC
Tuttomenui II wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Tuttomenui II wrote:
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/eve-tos/
Quote:
1. You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: filing support tickets with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or support tickets; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.

So pretty sure NO.

Excessive applications to a corp... how cruel.

Whats funny is excessive doesn't really cover it. For each mail sent to corp, a copy would be sent to the CEO, all directors and any recruitment officers.

Well, we already know the mittani doesn't log in, and we have very few director directors for security.

we do have a ton of people recruiting though

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#47 - 2014-01-03 08:37:10 UTC
Batelle wrote:
Since OP specifically wants to dance around the limits of what is OK or not OK, then OP should realize he's playing with fire if he actually does this.


Since OP isn't engaging in an activity deliberately intended to break the game (such as, say, deploying hundreds of drones at once, or repeatedly logging in and out in the hopes of stressing the login servers to the point of crashing a battle in progress), not engaging in RMT and not harassing any particular individual, I doubt any action will be taken.

It's not like the OP is a one-person corporation being harassed by email spam from every member of a 4000-player alliance.

Other types of communication that have not resulted in players being banned include the coordinated issue of chat requests from a large number of players with the intention of crashing the player's client: "the logs show nothing."

When accusing someone of playing with fire, it's helpful to know whether they're watching paper matches burn down to their fingers, or whether they have doused themselves in kerosene oil and are about to set light to it.

It's also worth noting that corporations can turn off recruitment, meaning no application to join can ever be made. By a similar token, players can have their client automatically reject chat requests from unknown others. Thus since you already have the tools to mitigate the nuisance of OP's crazy idea, I don't see that CCP needs to take further action.

I suspect the OP will suffer carpal tunnel syndrome long before the desired number of corporation applications are delivered. ISBoxer or not, any action to automate the process will be bannable. Thus the OP will need to be clicking that mouse button quite often.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#48 - 2014-01-03 09:37:22 UTC
As if the reports from skymarshal Lyris chronicles of Nairn(ia) weren't enough, these threads make me really curious about isboxer

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Apocryphal Noise
Close Encounters of the EVE Kind
Goonswarm Federation
#49 - 2014-01-03 09:48:48 UTC
Prie Mary wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
You want to apply 350 alts to goonswarm?



Mayyyyyybbbbee, maybe more 9000!


It'll give one of the director's something to do for an afternoon. Go for it!
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#50 - 2014-01-03 09:51:33 UTC
Apocryphal Noise wrote:
Prie Mary wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
You want to apply 350 alts to goonswarm?

Mayyyyyybbbbee, maybe more 9000!

It'll give one of the director's something to do for an afternoon. Go for it!

Not actually directors, we have a group of people who are given the roles to accept/deny applications and they chew through them.

It's a spacejob, not too inaccurately compared to Papers, Please

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2014-01-03 10:22:07 UTC
Grr Goons.

I always laugh how people always think that Goons are the bad guys, and they must go out of their way to "harm" the Goonswarm. And for future reference, spam is not allowed last time I checked.

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik

Prie Mary
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#52 - 2014-01-03 10:52:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Prie Mary
Alavaria Fera wrote:
3000 accounts sounds hard to manage, even with isboxer


You can not only control accounts on 1 computer, but other computers in a network. The only issues you would get is cpu partitioning and FPS drop when broadcasting the mouse pointer to other clients. But networked across a few systems it would work.

I have access to about 75 +/- "reasonable" systems which could be used for these shenanigans. So realistically 75x3 accounts per desktop would be the limit..... So 225 applications people would need to manually click through to my what.. 3 mouse clicks?




Started out as a crazy idea... but now really has me thinking how to implament this properly Lol

Side note - If this is "legal" the entire recruitment channel could be pretty much shut down

Dont just [u]think[/u] outside the box, [u]Live[/u] outside of it...

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#53 - 2014-01-03 11:27:23 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
As if the reports from skymarshal Lyris chronicles of Nairn(ia) weren't enough, these threads make me really curious about isboxer

ISBoxer is sweet. Nothing beats having eyes on gates in 8 surrounding systems on the one monitor when you're stealing Goon complexes.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#54 - 2014-01-03 11:29:40 UTC
Prie Mary wrote:
Side note - If this is "legal" the entire recruitment channel could be pretty much shut down

…but as has being pointed out, spamming like that is not “legal”.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#55 - 2014-01-03 11:35:19 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
As if the reports from skymarshal Lyris chronicles of Nairn(ia) weren't enough, these threads make me really curious about isboxer

ISBoxer is sweet. Nothing beats having eyes on gates in 8 surrounding systems on the one monitor when you're stealing Goon complexes.

I'm glad you're wasting money on that when dscan works perfectly fine.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Abon
Pandorum Research Incorporated
#56 - 2014-01-03 11:49:06 UTC
wow really? common sense should tell you that this will probably not end well for you.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2014-01-03 11:50:30 UTC
I think he left common sense at the door when he tried to apply to Goonwaffe despite knowing that wasn't going to work.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Prie Mary
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#58 - 2014-01-03 12:11:33 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I think he left common sense at the door when he tried to apply to Goonwaffe despite knowing that wasn't going to work.



Everything is done for a reason, seeing how fast your auth guys were.. answer - pretty fast

Dont just [u]think[/u] outside the box, [u]Live[/u] outside of it...

Kristopher Rocancourt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#59 - 2014-01-03 12:21:38 UTC
Prie Mary wrote:
So, Isboxer is allowed.....

However before I buy this software I would like to check if I would get in trouble or even banned for using it in my proposed way.

I'd like to spam a certain corperation *caugh* GOONWAFFE *Caugh* with a crazy amount of applications.

Would using ISBOXER for this purpose actualy be in breach of the ToS or EULA?


**SPAM BOT LAZER TARGETTED ON GOONWAFFE, JUST WAITING THE GO CODES**

Beep Bop Beep 10010101010101001010101001 bout 350?

I'd Like to add, all inputs would be made by myself, a human and not a script BEEP BOP BEEP



You should be smacked in the face for posting in such bad format and grammar.

http://killalliance.co.uk/tears/tears-holeysheet/

Prie Mary
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#60 - 2014-01-03 12:29:22 UTC
With the The Oxford English Dictionary none the less

Dont just [u]think[/u] outside the box, [u]Live[/u] outside of it...