These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

ungrounded account ban

First post
Author
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#21 - 2014-01-02 01:16:08 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Wacktopia wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Can't petition, can't post on forums.
Humoring OP, what option does he really have?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4062938#post4062938

Not really an option if further petitions will be closed.

Has no options.

:frogout:

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#22 - 2014-01-02 01:24:37 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Wacktopia wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Can't petition, can't post on forums.
Humoring OP, what option does he really have?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4062938#post4062938

Not really an option if further petitions will be closed.


I did read and appreciate that but it's difficult to really discuss this further or at all in relation to this specific case. All I will say is that is the documented procedure for escalation set down by CCP itself.

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

Alyth Nerun
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
#23 - 2014-01-02 01:35:31 UTC
Who was the guy that reported you? We should give him a medal for killing a bot.
Ginger Barbarella
#24 - 2014-01-02 01:37:59 UTC
I can't wait to hear the part that he's leaving out... Pirate

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Christina Fujayu
State War Academy
Caldari State
#25 - 2014-01-02 01:59:20 UTC
You know a 30 day ban means the second offense!

Means you have been caught before with a 14 day ban!
How have you not learnt your lesson?
Or better yet, why have you not grown smarter?

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/begun-the-bot-war-has/

  • 1st strike for botting is a 14 day ban
  • 2nd strike for botting is a 30 day ban
  • 3rd strike for botting is a permanent ban
  • Any client modification is a permanent ban on first offense
  • Any involvement in RMT is a permanent ban on first offense
Thatt Guy
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2014-01-02 02:34:51 UTC
6/10
You got a few bites.

Haters gonna hate, Trolls gonna troll.

Johan Civire
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#27 - 2014-01-02 02:37:28 UTC
dong haeng wrote:
5 weeks earlier, while I was mining ores as usual, I ran into a one guy.
He was bumping my exhumers and threatened me that he will report my toons as bots.



Short while after the incident, all my accounts were banned by CCP on account of 'improper macro usage'.



At first, I was sure that there was some kind of mistake, since I HAVE NEVER used any kind of macro or automated botting 3rd-party softwares. So I petitioned for an answer.
However, the answer was that macro usage WAS detected by system monitoring and that the ban was in accordance with EULA.



As a hi-sec "care-bear" miner, I usually join the fleet with my corp-mates and chat some random stuff from time to time while I mine ores. I sent the logs and claimed that I would further provide any kind of evidence that will prove no macro usage was involved, if needed.
Still, GM returned a 'copy-and-paste' message that they are not obliged to show proofs of macro detection and this petition is hereby closed, the end.







Now, I do understand that proofs of macro usage cannot be shown, as that will allow botting script developers to come out with newer versions, bypassing the system. That is perfectly fine.
Furthermore, I am not whining about the miners griefing. I can put up some more shields, making it not gank-worth. If some guy bumps me, I can always move on. No problem with that.





The whole point is that,
the system used by CCP to detect automated botting IS somehow flawed, and there could be some more innocent guys like myself that had account banned based on false bot detection and incorrect decision.





As an EVE subscriber, I was enjoying the game just as much as everyone else, and devoting some time into it.
However, now that I know CCP could just ban account without proper proofs, I am not sure if I would have fun playing the game any more.
I was banned for 30 days, and would be able to play the game after that. But what's the point if my accounts could get banned anytime for anything?


Hell, I wouldn't be writing this if I really used botting scripts.

I would like to hear everyone's opinion on this matter.


The can not help your here end of topic.
Kehro Urgus
Dark Nebula Academy
O X I D E
#28 - 2014-01-02 03:18:31 UTC
Christina Fujayu wrote:
You know a 30 day ban means the second offense!

Means you have been caught before with a 14 day ban!
How have you not learnt your lesson?
Or better yet, why have you not grown smarter?

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/begun-the-bot-war-has/

  • 1st strike for botting is a 14 day ban
  • 2nd strike for botting is a 30 day ban
  • 3rd strike for botting is a permanent ban
  • Any client modification is a permanent ban on first offense
  • Any involvement in RMT is a permanent ban on first offense



You are mistaken. That is the previous three strikes policy. First offense is a 30 day ban, second is a permanent ban as of March 15, 2013. This is from the same article you linked. The new policy is apparently as follows:


1st strike for botting is a 30 day ban
2nd strike for botting is a permanent ban
Any client modification is a permanent ban on first offense
Any involvement in RMT is a permanent ban on first offense

I also find it doubtful that a player could determine 100% someone is botting by observation with the player client but maybe the GM's have another opinion.


Yeeee! 

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2014-01-02 03:20:54 UTC
It's not like CCP to ban multiple accounts providing multiple sources of revenue for the company because...

Oh yeah, that's right, it actually is when you've actually done something wrong. Mate, no company like losing revenue, but they'd probably lose a lot more from everyone else that unsubbed due to having to compete with cheaters. Thing is, they have solid default motivation NOT to ban you, so they'd have to have a really good reason to ban you. I'd say you're on the naughty list for just that reason.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2014-01-02 03:48:24 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
I just find it amusing all these people who in the face of evidence assume the GMs are infallible. And that a petition escalation process is fair when they refuse to hear any appeal.

See: the recent highsec carrier incident (carrier moved out of highsec just because he fit a drone control unit, no appeal allowed, finally after an article and uproar it was repealed).

I'm in no way saying OP wasn't botting. But the process needs to be revisited.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2014-01-02 03:57:35 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I just find it amusing all these people who in the face of evidence assume the GMs are infallible. And that a petition escalation process is fair when they refuse to hear any appeal.

See: the recent highsec carrier incident (carrier moved out of highsec just because he fit a drone control unit, no appeal allowed, finally after an article and uproar it was repealed).

I'm in no way saying OP wasn't botting. But the process needs to be revisited.



Yeah another example was the controversial decision that remote repairing drones can be a bannable offence.

It was never made clear exactly what circumstances are where remote drone repping becomes a bannable offence.
Pipa Porto
#32 - 2014-01-02 04:31:17 UTC
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Yeah another example was the controversial decision that remote repairing drones can be a bannable offence.

It was never made clear exactly what circumstances are where remote drone repping becomes a bannable offence.



Heck, my signature here is still a bannable offense because you're not allowed to impersonate yourself.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2014-01-02 04:35:43 UTC
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I just find it amusing all these people who in the face of evidence assume the GMs are infallible. And that a petition escalation process is fair when they refuse to hear any appeal.

See: the recent highsec carrier incident (carrier moved out of highsec just because he fit a drone control unit, no appeal allowed, finally after an article and uproar it was repealed).

I'm in no way saying OP wasn't botting. But the process needs to be revisited.



Yeah another example was the controversial decision that remote repairing drones can be a bannable offence.

It was never made clear exactly what circumstances are where remote drone repping becomes a bannable offence.

nah that was pretty clear, perma-repping them and going afk for hours is the offence
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I just find it amusing all these people who in the face of evidence assume the GMs are infallible. And that a petition escalation process is fair when they refuse to hear any appeal.

See: the recent highsec carrier incident (carrier moved out of highsec just because he fit a drone control unit, no appeal allowed, finally after an article and uproar it was repealed).

I'm in no way saying OP wasn't botting. But the process needs to be revisited.

I agree, but I think it's unlikely they're incorrect
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2014-01-02 04:55:23 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Benny Ohu wrote:
I agree, but I think it's unlikely they're incorrect

But not impossible.
I don't care about OP. I do care about the integrity of the process. I don't want to be wrongfully accused of something and banned without option of appeal. It's not the first case I've heard of and while nothing can be substantiated in any case, they're believable. These are the same GMs who follow procedure inconsistently, enforce rules inconsistently, and make changes to the TOS which make no sense. With pretty much no accountability.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#35 - 2014-01-02 04:59:22 UTC
All but the faithful shall perish.
Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
#36 - 2014-01-02 08:35:26 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
Welcome to Soviet Russia Online.

Your thread will be shortly locked and you will disappear. Any discussion of anything is simply not allowed in any form about game problems or even petitions. All hail CCP!



Anyone notice that CCP are only one C away from the Cyrillic spelling of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2014-01-02 08:46:58 UTC
No, nobody's ever noticed that before. You're the first. You've won the entire game.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Nate Hill
Rocket No. 9
#38 - 2014-01-02 09:50:28 UTC
They don't care, do they?
CCP Falcon
#39 - 2014-01-02 09:52:39 UTC
Please don't discuss warnings and bans on the forums.

File a support ticket under the correct category and Customer Support will be able to assist.

Locked.

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Previous page12