These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Trust and Banks/Investments in EVE

Author
Fresnic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-11-23 03:33:24 UTC
I've been thinking about it lately and what consequences are there if you can't be trusted in EVE? I mean, what's the point of being a trusted third party that is honest when you can get rich quick by convincing some suckers to give you a few hundred million ISKs and then just disappear. I'm trying to think of real-world parallels, but can't really come up with any.

What is the point of being trustworthy, and how do we build up that trust in a game like EVE?

Adventures of an EVE Online Newb http://evenewbadventures.weebly.com/

Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2 - 2011-11-23 03:41:56 UTC
You can get a few hundred milion by convincing some suckers to give you ISK.

Or you can build up a reputation and run an honest business worth tens and hundreds of bilions.

And then run off with the money.
Ariana DeSoto
High-Tech Duct Tape
#3 - 2011-11-23 04:29:50 UTC
You build up trust by not making a post like yours.

I don't always play EvE, but when I do, I prefer it to be a masochistic sandbox hell. Stay wardecked my friends.

JitaJane
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4 - 2011-11-23 04:36:33 UTC
This is true in Eve as well as RL. Good business practices pay off long term. Scamming someone for a couple hundred million would be a net loss for me. Because I would lose billions in steady business from the people who trust me. Writ large you can make huge returns with the only commodity being your good reputation. Chribba gets a piece of most of the super-cap transactions in the game. Consider what that adds up to in the long term. I did have a general question along these lines. those of you who play the bond markets here. What are your standards for reliability in capital investments. I'm not the trusting sort. I'm just curious.

90% of of the time my posts are about something I actually find interesting and want to learn more about. Do not be alarmed.

Amrah Pserad
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2011-11-23 06:20:02 UTC
I'm new to bonds and MD as a whole so my gauge is pretty general and based on some pretty arbitrary things.

Some factors I take into account, with a sprinkling of oddness:

- Previous forum history (if they're posting crap then it says something about their attitude, one or two jabs is fine but consistent trolling is a no-go)
- Cut of their jib, if you read over their bond offering and it's worded well, articulate and polite that goes a long way for me.
- If they capitalise i's in their sentence. Seriously, if they can't make the effort to hold Shift a few times to make themselves not look dumb and uneducated then how much effort are they going to put into making their business work? (Odd I know but it's the little things for me)
- Rate of return, timing, business plan, so on and so forth.

Like I said, I'm new so I'm judging more on emotion and airy-fairy generalisations. I'm sure there are far better hard and fast economic rules and you'll pick those up as you go along (like me).

When in doubt refer to the Golden Rule: If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Amrah Pserad
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2011-11-23 06:36:05 UTC
To answer the OPs question with another question: Like in RL, what's the downside to being a trusted person in the community?

Being trusted in MD means you get pick of the litter, people take you for your word and (generally) listen to what you have to say. It also helps other gauge the validity of a bond, if RAW or flakeys are buying into it then it's usually a safe bet as those guys have been around for a while (at least in my experience).

Building trust in MD is exactly the same as building it anywhere else. Slow and steady progression through positive interactions.
flakeys
Doomheim
#7 - 2011-11-23 15:29:15 UTC  |  Edited by: flakeys
Fresnic wrote:
I've been thinking about it lately and what consequences are there if you can't be trusted in EVE? I mean, what's the point of being a trusted third party that is honest when you can get rich quick by convincing some suckers to give you a few hundred million ISKs and then just disappear. I'm trying to think of real-world parallels, but can't really come up with any.

What is the point of being trustworthy, and how do we build up that trust in a game like EVE?



Indeed there is no reason for a lot of people to be trusted in this game as it has no reall life consequences to lie/cheat/stab someone because online isk is better then your online face for them.

On the other hand for those who are keeping their word the logic is reversed , there is no reason to be distrustfull to gain game currency because their online face is worth more then online currency.

No point in debating it though as one side will not agree with the other for sure.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2011-11-23 16:00:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Florestan Bronstein
edit: don't worry. be happy. this is a positive interaction.
Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#9 - 2011-11-23 16:27:23 UTC
In terms of sheer long term isk maximization and effort minimization, it makes no sense not to scam. Any long term benefit to repeated business is offset by the ever-increasing amount you could just steal with each successful transaction.

The reasons people don't always just steal from corpies or alliance mates (though they do often enough) are that they actually like them and/or no one will want to play with them (and solo Eve sucks balls). However, neither of these reasons apply when dealing with random tards on the MD forum or elsewhere. In fact, you are probably more likely to be praised by your social circle than reprimanded because ripping off strangers is celebrated in this game.

The entire institution of public lending is a sad farce made by people to either scam big or celebrate themselves for being pointlessly "moral" in an "immoral" game, like not killing the other guy's king in chess.

The only people I trust are those to whom money is no longer an issue, so the overwhelming cold rationality of just keeping my money isn't a factor. These few people are so far beyond the concerns and need for additional wealth that the fun of being a celebrity will never be outweighed by financial concerns. Chribba charges isk for the same reason I charge my corpmates for JF services, so they won't be taken for granted. If it was about sheer isk maximization, I wouldn't do it and neither would Chribba. The trick is that you don't get to be trusted and then get obscenely rich; you get obscenely rich, and then you get trusted because you have no reason to steal. Even this is open to abuse, which is why only a few of the ultra rich are trusted.

The idea of building up trust from nothing one transaction at a time is farcical, and the direct equivalent of double your isk games in Jita, where eventually they just stop doubling people's isk. "Bonds" are no different. Thankfully after endless scams and everyone who built their "reputation" up one transaction at a time eventually scamming in the end, this institution on MD is dead. All you see now are a few latecomer tards using the same 5 shill alts over and over to puff up investments that no actual strangers buy into. Soon there won't even be that.
Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#10 - 2011-11-23 16:34:35 UTC
I will, however, add that collateralized transactions can make sense because the return to a lender from just keeping someone's collateral is much much lower relative to the potential gain from repeated business, though even this is rare. For collateralized loans I would only trust someone who is rich enough that they have run out of other more profitable uses for their money (50b+ at least) and who seem like someone who enjoys the interaction of being such a lender. Although collateralized loans remain risky, you are also taking much less of a chance, as you will only lose ~10% of your loan, and even if that is ~10% of your total wealth, that will hardly hamper you in any significant way.
flakeys
Doomheim
#11 - 2011-11-23 16:39:41 UTC


Sup elise

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#12 - 2011-11-23 16:51:51 UTC
flakeys wrote:
Sup elise


I'm sorry, is the fact that I have a new default forum character due to the need to give my corporation's recruitment thread a daily bump somehow relevant to the validity of my arguments?

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#13 - 2011-11-23 19:05:36 UTC
Darth Tickles wrote:
In terms of sheer long term isk maximization and effort minimization, it makes no sense not to scam. Any long term benefit to repeated business is offset by the ever-increasing amount you could just steal with each successful transaction.

There comes a point when you don't care about ISK anymore when you understand how easy it is to earn legitimately. Obtaining ISK via fraud becomes pointless, as do any extra digits in your wallet.
SencneS
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2011-11-23 22:05:57 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
There comes a point when you don't care about ISK anymore when you understand how easy it is to earn legitimately.


While this is true for a some, the same can be said about "Once you know how to obtain it legitimately you become bored of the game and attempt to scam to see how much you can get away with." Case in point cosmoray....

Well trusted, Liked, considered the voice of reason, could get whatever he asked for at the drop of a hat. While he could have continued on this making hundreds of billions easily he made a choice to start a long term scam. Even to the point of logging and explaining everything he did, when, and how. That type of detailed execution and the final result became his passion, and was proud of that moment..

There is also the "I'm done time to be an arse" scammer.. Ricdic takes the cake on that. He, like cosmoray after him, could ask for whatever he wanted and get it. Not only that he also had the knowledge and means to generate ISK from nothing.. (His Rags to Riches thread) - In the end he said and I quote "I was sick of giving, so I started taking."

There are four types of possible scam personalities..

1) The Out right Scammer - Plans and does things with the complete intent to scam - Example - "YouGotRipped"

2) I'm bored Scammer - Either unknown or trusted that is board with the game and wants to try something new - Example - "cosmoray"

3) Screw you all Scammer - Usually someone known at least in a small degree or niche section of EVE something bad happens like Freighter caring 70% their wealth or public investment, or they are fed up with all the crap despite their best intentions - Example - "FastLearner", "Ricdic"

4) The Desperate Scammer - Can't work out how to make any amount of ISK and see that people much intelligent people whom have a trusted history can make in a single scam and believe if they just get a fraction of the ISK they'll be set. - Example - "Jita Local" - "Terrible Written IPOs on MD"

#1 and #4 are usually pretty easy to spot, these you don't actually have to worry about often because they'll either be identified as such or their social manipulation skills just suck.

#2 and #3 hurt more because they usually get the most ISK and often cause megathreads and are remembered for a long time. The final scam affects are felt across a larger portion of their niche section of EVE. These people usually have large amounts of trust. Or at least the general perception is they are trustworthy.

The problem is, that type of trust was not built up around the the initial thought of "I'm going to scam them for everything!!" A lot of the time I feel some (now) well trusted in MD initially thought about running a long term scam, but realized just how easy ISK is gained. So they never actually execute the scam. These people can easily turn into a #2/#3 if given the right scenario.

Like you said - It makes no sense to scam after a long path of reputation building because your reputation can garnish ISK from people much easier and in larger amounts for you do things, than taking a one time installment. The one time installment scam for very trusted individuals needs to be massive, simply because at that stage they have probably proven to others and themselves they can turn a billion profit a day. It takes a change of attitude to get these people to scam even if they initially thought about a long term scam and a big payday.

Vandy ColdStone
Doomheim
#15 - 2011-11-24 03:33:44 UTC
Fresnic wrote:
... what's the point of being a trusted third party that is honest when you can get rich quick by convincing some suckers to give you a few hundred million ISKs and then just disappear......


You're chances at being trusted have been fried before you were trusted.
Mary Mercer
Doomheim
#16 - 2011-11-24 03:37:14 UTC
Vandy ColdStone wrote:
Fresnic wrote:
... what's the point of being a trusted third party that is honest when you can get rich quick by convincing some suckers to give you a few hundred million ISKs and then just disappear......


You're chances at being trusted have been fried before you were trusted.


A few hundred mil... ROFL That's not worth wrecking a reputation over trust me. That wouldn't last a month.
Vandy ColdStone
Doomheim
#17 - 2011-11-24 03:43:02 UTC
Mary Mercer wrote:
Vandy ColdStone wrote:
Fresnic wrote:
... what's the point of being a trusted third party that is honest when you can get rich quick by convincing some suckers to give you a few hundred million ISKs and then just disappear......


You're chances at being trusted have been fried before you were trusted.


A few hundred mil... ROFL That's not worth wrecking a reputation over trust me. That wouldn't last a month.


Hey now, a few hundred mil COULD have gotten you a PLEX once upon a time...
Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2011-11-24 09:53:55 UTC
SencneS' post is a nice example of revisionist history.
Shar Tegral
#19 - 2011-11-24 10:13:16 UTC
flakeys wrote:
Indeed there is no reason for a lot of people to be trusted in this game as it has no reall life consequences to lie/cheat/stab someone because online isk is better then your online face for them. On the other hand for those who are keeping their word the logic is reversed , there is no reason to be distrustfull to gain game currency because their online face is worth more then online currency.

And then there's a third kind: My online reputation means as much to me as isk does - which is nothing. Who I am, regardless of venue, is not subject for change just because I am anonymous. In fact, less accountability is the time for more responsibility.

"Character is all about who you are when no one will know."
Kirian Kador
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2011-11-24 10:56:03 UTC
Couple of years ago I was curious how much I could raise on MD for a bond without any collateral or audit or business plan for that matter except for "going to wormholes" . After some time fending off extensive, but nevertheless deserved trolling I managed to raise 6bil instead of 4bil just because one dude had a good laugh reading my thread.

I kept the bond running for a year just because I could and never tried it again. Oh and in case you are wondering I didnt scam in the end.

So is there a reason to make a bond on MD and not to scam? Sure it is a game and you can do whatever you want as long as you are having fun and willing to accept the consequences. For example exploiting in wormholes and getting fined for 60 bil by CCP.
12Next page