These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

new ganking ship comes to town

First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#21 - 2011-11-22 21:00:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Denidil wrote:
bitters much wrote:
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648

motherofgod.jpg ShockedUghLol
Ninyania alCladdyth
McLuvin AstroDynamics
#22 - 2011-11-22 21:03:44 UTC
Quote:
Destroyed items:

Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2
Giant Secure Container (Cargo)
Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)



Shocked
Sadayiel
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#23 - 2011-11-22 21:07:08 UTC
my market pvper senses are tingling i predict a rise in price maybe...Big smile
Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#24 - 2011-11-22 21:09:36 UTC
I approve of the new BCs as a ganking platform.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2011-11-22 21:16:24 UTC
I approve of ships exploding in Eve regardless of the cause.

It's just good business to make things go boom.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Chelone
Outside The Asylum
#26 - 2011-11-22 21:16:57 UTC
I have not heard of this "ganking", nor the ship you mention, and I was unaware of any problem with players being in highsec. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Your contribution is duly noted.
missbob
The Sword of Damocles
#27 - 2011-11-22 21:17:01 UTC
we have to get a new name for high sec

i say not so high sec pmsl
Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#28 - 2011-11-22 21:29:25 UTC
If you don't want to get ganked in High-Sec by a Teir 3 Battlecruiser, the answer is simple.

See a Teir 3 Battlecruiser show up on your overview?

Warp.

If you're afk'ing, you get what you deserve if you're ganked.

If you're not afk, you should have plenty of time to warp off.

TLDR: Afk-mining is a choice, as is staying when a gank-type-ship shows up in belt.

That choice is you amke at your own risk.
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2011-11-22 21:36:51 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Denidil wrote:
bitters much wrote:
So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648

motherofgod.jpg ShockedUghLol


Funny thing is an Itty 3 doesn't even *need* 3 cargo expanders to carry that GSC. Might atleast have made the guy put a bit more effort into it.
Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#30 - 2011-11-22 21:46:50 UTC
Alistair Cononach wrote:
If you don't want to get ganked in High-Sec by a Teir 3 Battlecruiser, the answer is simple.

See a Teir 3 Battlecruiser show up on your overview?

Warp.

If you're afk'ing, you get what you deserve if you're ganked.

If you're not afk, you should have plenty of time to warp off.

TLDR: Afk-mining is a choice, as is staying when a gank-type-ship shows up in belt.

That choice is you amke at your own risk.


More ******** comments.

You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??

Here is the real tragedy: what passes for pvp in hi-sec involves only shooting ships that, as I've pointed out elsewhere, are nortorous for not having any guns fitted.

Sad.

But anyways, as per the ******** comment above, how long before the goons hit on that one and afk park a Tier III BC in every hi-sec belt in New-Eden?

Why don't you all grow a pair.

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Jita Alt666
#31 - 2011-11-22 21:50:40 UTC
Oh well, looks like some people are going to struggle to scan down their 10/10s.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#32 - 2011-11-22 21:50:49 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??
Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid.

…and it works.
Quote:
Why don't you all grow a pair.
What for?
1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2011-11-22 21:56:53 UTC
Denidil wrote:
bitters much wrote:
Victim:
Corp:
Alliance:
Faction:
Destroyed: Iteron Mark III
System: Inaro
Security: 0.8
Damage Taken: 1668

Involved parties:

Name:
Security:
Corp:
Alliance: None
Faction: None
Ship: Tempest
Weapon: 1400mm Prototype I Siege Cannon
Damage Done: 1668


Destroyed items:

Expanded Cargohold II, Qty: 2
Giant Secure Container (Cargo)
Sisters Core Scanner Probe, Qty: 24081 (Cargo)

So the OP thinks that a player who undocks 16.8bil in an untanked T1 Industrial shouldnt be harmed ?



http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11577648


Man the loot gods hate him
5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!  If You Like My Sig, Like Me!   Remember EVE is EVErything!
Lord Ryan
True Xero
#34 - 2011-11-22 21:57:06 UTC
Amazing!

Do not assume anything above this line was typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient.

Jita Alt666
#35 - 2011-11-22 21:58:40 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:


More ******** comments.

You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??

Here is the real tragedy: what passes for pvp in hi-sec involves only shooting ships that, as I've pointed out elsewhere, are nortorous for not having any guns fitted.

Sad.

But anyways, as per the ******** comment above, how long before the goons hit on that one and afk park a Tier III BC in every hi-sec belt in New-Eden?

Why don't you all grow a pair.


1. You need to utilise EFT to understand the complete range of options when fitting ships. Align and warp in excess of 20 seconds - fit in a manner that equates to an easy target.
2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.
3. 800ish high sec systems. Average of 9 belts per system. 4500 alts on line at a time to cover belts. Would make a juicy wardec target - that would make it High Sec PVP.
Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#36 - 2011-11-22 22:10:35 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:

2. Ganking is a type of PVP. It is not the total sum of high sec PVP. It is merely the most common form of non-consensual PVP in high sec space.



I know, pathetic, isn't it.

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#37 - 2011-11-22 22:14:57 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Desert Ice78 wrote:
You can't warp off everytime another ship enters the belt, other people do actually be in belts for purposes other then mining. And if you had any clue about mining, you would know that it takes a hulk in excess of 20 seconds to align and warp off anyways. And as for the notion of remaining aligned a 3/4 speed?!?!?!? Why do wanna-be (carebear) pvper's always come up with the most ******** ideas??
Because if it's stupid but works, it's not stupid


Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......Roll

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#38 - 2011-11-22 22:40:10 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......Roll

So don't mine into a jet can, or have someone pick them up. The stationary nature of the asteroids isn't a problem.
Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#39 - 2011-11-22 22:54:47 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Ok, jet-can mining stationary asteroids while constantly moving......Roll

So don't mine into a jet can, or have someone pick them up. The stationary nature of the asteroids isn't a problem.


You must be quite the mining God Tippia.....once you gave up ganking incursion guardians...

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#40 - 2011-11-22 23:01:55 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
You must be quite the mining God Tippia.....once you gave up ganking incursion guardians...

You've got the chronology a bit mixed up, but yes. I'm indeed a mining God (but more of the deist kind).

Fortunately, you don't need to be one to do what's being suggested.