These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AF Ship Models!!!

Author
Stormfoot Stormfoot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2013-12-19 02:55:59 UTC
Real simple change and would just involve changing models...

How about splitting the models for AFs like HACs are

So for example...
Enyo stays as Incursus model since its like the incurus
Ishkur takes on a Tristan model... more drone focused

Harpy stays as Merlin...
Hawk takes Kestrel...

Retribution stays as punisher
Vengeance becomes tormentor

Jag as rifter
Wolf as breacher

I'm sure CCP still has the old bomber models laying around... could use those or just throw some extra dodads on the existing t1s and reskin.

Would yall like that? if so lets raise this so CCP can see this!

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#2 - 2013-12-19 03:22:48 UTC
Don't you DARE take away my Ishkur and Vengence! They are sexy as they are!
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2013-12-19 03:30:35 UTC
The breacher is scaffolding. The Rifter is iconic. You chance the wolf, or the jag, and I will cut you.
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2013-12-19 05:39:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Barrogh Habalu
Vengeance becoming Tormentor and Wolf becoming Breacher make little sense.
Other than that, while I'd like those ships being more than reskins, BC model change shows that people would rather see new models rather than having their ships changed into something they don't like, albeit temporarily.

While we are at it, Breacher could use a remodeling pass itself.
Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#5 - 2013-12-19 07:17:08 UTC
Didn't we do this discussion last week?

I am mostly ambivalent on this subject.
What concerns me more is swapping the Tormentor and inquisitor.
Clansworth
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#6 - 2013-12-19 08:23:00 UTC
The only reason I would see do doing this would be as an offshoot of the tiericide, but on the industry side. I think as long as there are tech 1 frigs with no tech 2 variants, there shouldn't be 2 or more tech 2 variants of any frig.. make sense? so sure, split the hawk off to a different hull, but there is already a tech 2 version of the Kestrel. So what that REALLY means is we need a tech 2 Bantam baby!
Janna Windforce
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-12-19 13:46:42 UTC
I like that AF models at least have some extras on them, not just pathetic recolor.
There are ships which needs new models more (eg. like all interceptors - just recolors).
Mascha Tzash
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2013-12-19 13:59:36 UTC
Xindi Kraid wrote:
Didn't we do this discussion last week?

I am mostly ambivalent on this subject.
What concerns me more is swapping the Tormentor and inquisitor.


I take the blame for bringing this up about a month ago.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=300581&find=unread
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#9 - 2013-12-19 14:54:58 UTC
We had this repeatedly already and it's always the same noobs asking and demanding this. Simple answer: NO.

Also:

Quote:
Retribution stays as punisher
Vengeance becomes tormentor


NO. You are wrong here and you should feel bad for that. If we follow the pattern, the Retri gets the Tormentor hull and the Veng stays with punisher. The other way around is, by all logical and emotional means, just wrong. For even thinking it the other way around after the CS switch, you should discontinue your account(s).

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#10 - 2013-12-19 15:10:46 UTC
no

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.