These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

"DSCAN DISRUPTOR" in patch Rubicon 1.1.

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Thead Enco
Domheimed
#1 - 2013-12-15 02:15:26 UTC

Reported Here

Is this a troll or true? Have the prayers of millions of carrier pilots been answered?
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#2 - 2013-12-15 04:06:02 UTC
Now we just need one to kill local and we'll be set. Twisted

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2013-12-15 04:28:06 UTC
Oh look, some very powerful modules CCP is going to half-ass and break everything for months to come.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-12-15 04:28:35 UTC
Lets hope thats true. Would be sweet to mask yourself from DSCAN's during covert ops cyno deployment.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#5 - 2013-12-15 04:47:55 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Oh look, some very powerful modules CCP is going to half-ass and break everything for months to come.



Nah. If the Rapid Light Missile Launchers (and the heavies version) is any clue as to how they operate, expect this new module to be changed beyond use for most players after a patch or two. They'll probably make it work for only 30 seconds and then require a 3 hour cooldown.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2013-12-15 04:58:02 UTC
Thead Enco wrote:

Reported Here

Is this a troll or true? Have the prayers of millions of carrier pilots been answered?


I honestly hope this isn't true. This is a terrible idea, and anyone who likes it needs to HTFU and pay attention to their surroundings.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#7 - 2013-12-15 05:48:09 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Thead Enco wrote:

Reported Here

Is this a troll or true? Have the prayers of millions of carrier pilots been answered?


I honestly hope this isn't true. This is a terrible idea, and anyone who likes it needs to HTFU and pay attention to their surroundings.


I would presume its part of a package that includes changes to local. It appears to be a tool to make finding the rabbit harder, which will probably be balanced against making it harder for the rabbit to see the fox.
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2013-12-15 05:50:36 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Thead Enco wrote:

Reported Here

Is this a troll or true? Have the prayers of millions of carrier pilots been answered?


I honestly hope this isn't true. This is a terrible idea, and anyone who likes it needs to HTFU and pay attention to their surroundings.



awww, it'll be a little harder to find people ... HTFU and LTP. Lol

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-12-15 06:02:09 UTC
if this module is part of package which introduces delayed local, im all for it.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#10 - 2013-12-15 06:08:14 UTC
D-Scan is an even more overpowered intel tool than local when you think about it.

And it encourages manic clicking every second to keep it up to date.

Good riddance, lets kill local next.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#11 - 2013-12-15 06:12:26 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
it encourages manic clicking every second to keep it up to date.

Good riddance, lets kill local next.

You'll still have to D-scan every second, twice every second if they remove local.

Oh god.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2013-12-15 06:13:56 UTC
Delayed local is still just as stupid as the other billion times you people have suggested it.
A module to fool dscan is not sufficient to counterbalance that.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2013-12-15 06:14:57 UTC
Besides dscan itself is utterly **** and they shouldn't introduce modules to fool it before iterating the entire mechanic.
Press butan every second is not good gameplay.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
auraofblade
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#14 - 2013-12-15 06:16:11 UTC
Don't we already have this? Isn't it called a "Cloak"?
Anomaly One
Doomheim
#15 - 2013-12-15 06:16:50 UTC
DSCAN disruptor will be just like DSCAN except this time you spam a button to disrupt
essentially

*neutral enters local
DSCAN
DSCAN
DSCAN

will now be countered by

*ratter
DSCAN DISRUPT
DSCAN DISRUPT
DSCAN DISRUPT

who ever misclicks wins

Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4 Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#16 - 2013-12-15 06:37:33 UTC
Personally I hate D-scan and Local. "SURPRISE! I'M HERE!" is much better.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2013-12-15 07:37:29 UTC
Xuixien wrote:
Personally I hate D-scan and Local. "SURPRISE! I'M HERE!" is much better.

You've made your opinions on the subject quite clear. Fortunately for you you already have the option of avoiding both.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-12-15 09:12:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarod Garamonde
Tauranon wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Thead Enco wrote:

Reported Here

Is this a troll or true? Have the prayers of millions of carrier pilots been answered?


I honestly hope this isn't true. This is a terrible idea, and anyone who likes it needs to HTFU and pay attention to their surroundings.


I would presume its part of a package that includes changes to local. It appears to be a tool to make finding the rabbit harder, which will probably be balanced against making it harder for the rabbit to see the fox.



I rather like being compared to a fox. It suits me.
And not just because my Army MOS was 13F (pronounced Thirteen-Fox for the non-savvy among us), neither... although that is a factor.

Although, this fox prefers to hunt other foxes.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-12-15 09:16:41 UTC
Ooooooooooooh No. This is bad and whoever thought it up should feel bad.

No d-scan disruptor, CCP!

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2013-12-15 09:20:11 UTC
It says "Dscan Disruptor", not "Probe Scan Disruptor."

I see no problem here.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
123Next pageLast page