These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

The Missing T3 Subsystem.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#1 - 2013-12-13 04:27:57 UTC  |  Edited by: masternerdguy
It's really obvious.

We have the interdiction nullifier subsystem in propulsion.
We have the covert reconfiguration subsystem in offensive.

All we need is a subsystem that allows your T3 to fit warp disruption field generators, and it would be an engineering subsystem so that you could still use your bonused webs and bonused ECM and stuff.

Interdiction nullified, covert ops HICs would shake up the meta.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2013-12-13 04:29:20 UTC
Watch out, we got a smartass over here.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2013-12-13 04:29:46 UTC
Should also have a bastion module enabling defensive subsystem.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-12-13 04:37:53 UTC
I would support this but it'd have to be an additional sub either replacing electronics or offensive sub. Electronics probably since that's the sub that provides friction extension / immobility drivers etc and would need to be less effective range than HICs and scramble you regardless of nullifier.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#5 - 2013-12-13 04:47:07 UTC
I just want a missile/hybrid/projectile/laser nullifier subsystem and I'll be happy.

Make it so, CCP!

Mr Epeen Cool
Sean Apollo
No.Mercy
Triumvirate.
#6 - 2013-12-13 06:23:50 UTC
Well if we are gonna make it even more OP might as well allow it bastion mode

Most people hate me...
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#7 - 2013-12-13 07:51:52 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I would support this but it'd have to be an additional sub either replacing electronics or offensive sub. Electronics probably since that's the sub that provides friction extension / immobility drivers etc and would need to be less effective range than HICs and scramble you regardless of nullifier.


IMO definitely offensive because otherwise you would either have a cloaky tanky hic or a HIC thats super tanky with hac dps, and neither one of those things should be flying around. I'd much rather let a dictor-t3 keep the electronics sub.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
#8 - 2013-12-13 08:12:26 UTC  |  Edited by: I Love Boobies
I'd like to throw in a request for a subsystem since we are requesting them. I want a subsystem that allows you to use the old style Doomsday Device on a T3, ya know the super giant smart bomb, with a 10 second cool time down before you can use it again. I also want it so you can fit 5 of them on your T3. I think that would be kind of fun. Don't you? Lol

EDIT: Holy crap, this actually posted without getting eaten, and not having to use the saved draft!!! That's the first time that happened in days.
Jessica Danikov
Network Danikov
#9 - 2013-12-13 10:22:09 UTC
Well, if this is a thing, why not an industrial subsystem that lets T3s fit strip miners...
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#10 - 2013-12-13 11:36:44 UTC
Why not a wormhole generation subsystem?

...
Jove Death
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2013-12-13 12:02:23 UTC
Gallente t3 should have a sub for more drones and less guns.

Amarr should have a sub for covert jump portal gen

Caldari should have sub for warp dis gens

Minmatar should have a sub for more guns better tracking and free ductape


Ok Major coffee downer

Quoting "you will die" in EvE is fail Chars dont die in EvE. Unless you have a heart attack eek.
Chandaris
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#12 - 2013-12-13 19:48:08 UTC
WTB Tengu Siege and Triage Subsystems?
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#13 - 2013-12-13 20:09:17 UTC
Why not just install an "IWin" subsystem, one that comes with an "I win" button. Then all you have to do is press F1.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-12-13 21:05:30 UTC
Sean Apollo wrote:
Well if we are gonna make it even more OP might as well allow it bastion mode

And let it equip MJD's of course.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
Bernie Nator
Seal Club Six
Plug N Play
#15 - 2013-12-13 21:07:36 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Why not a wormhole generation subsystem?

Sure, cruiser sized black ops ship. Sounds like a great idea. Totally makes sense.
Amber Kurvora
#16 - 2013-12-13 21:12:28 UTC
Grumble, grumble, dark side.

Anyhow, T3s are supposed to be the jack of all trades and the master of none...in theory. Currently some of them can be a bit OP (Hello, carrier levels of tank from a Proteas!), but there's still a fair point that a T3 could be allowed to fit any combat role...just not as well as the dedicated ship.

Sure, let it launch bubbles, but at the expense of a paper thin tank.
Sure, let it use bastion modules, but with a curtailed DPS and tank compared to dedicated Marauder.

Just rather see constructive thoughts than the usual "LOLS, how dare you suggest that!". Give the OP reasons why it'd be game breaking to implement the ideas.
Lipbite
Express Hauler
#17 - 2013-12-13 21:17:37 UTC
WTB logi subsystem.
Amber Kurvora
#18 - 2013-12-13 21:22:30 UTC
Lipbite wrote:
WTB logi subsystem.



Don't spider tank Tengus count? *cough**cough*
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#19 - 2013-12-13 21:49:49 UTC
We already have a tackle subsystem. Proteus.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#20 - 2013-12-13 21:52:42 UTC
OP is actually right.

.
12Next page