These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Are the days of Local really numbered?

First post First post
Author
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2013-12-07 01:26:33 UTC
Well clearly nothing, because once you remove local anybody that was ever doing PVE in nullsec will just go do it in highsec. It's not as if a large number haven't already done so. So you're basically asking for the space to be just as empty as it will look without local.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2013-12-07 01:29:16 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
And saying "durrr 35k coalition" isn't an answer, because people aren't going to sit around guarding ratters for free given the above, and paying them would thin out your income even more. There's no way to make the reward/risk ratio work in your favor here. Might as well go make isk in highsec.

Grath and Marlona both know I'm right about this, they just don't want to admit it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#43 - 2013-12-07 01:30:35 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Well clearly nothing, because once you remove local anybody that was ever doing PVE in nullsec will just go do it in highsec. It's not as if a large number haven't already done so. So you're basically asking for the space to be just as empty as it will look without local.



But I thought nullsec was all about defending your space and working together and all that, and that blissfully grinding away at PVe was for lowly evil horrible game-ruining carebears in highsec.


Tell me, who are you and what you doing posting on a goon account?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#44 - 2013-12-07 01:33:56 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
And saying "durrr 35k coalition" isn't an answer, because people aren't going to sit around guarding ratters for free given the above, and paying them would thin out your income even more. There's no way to make the reward/risk ratio work in your favor here. Might as well go make isk in highsec.

Grath and Marlona both know I'm right about this, they just don't want to admit it.



Well at this point it would appear that a 35K+ coalition is possible by selling the same ISK-snatching carebearism to the members that highsec has to offer. Sorry you feel you have to compete with peoples' weaknesses by appealing to their weaknesses.

(behold the folly of looking for a solution from the same people who are part of the problem - activists take note).


And please read the article. They are not going to just remove local. They will replace it with something else. Everybody can agree on that lest D-Scan spamming becomes the new WTZ bookmark.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2013-12-07 01:34:41 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Well clearly nothing, because once you remove local anybody that was ever doing PVE in nullsec will just go do it in highsec. It's not as if a large number haven't already done so. So you're basically asking for the space to be just as empty as it will look without local.



But I thought nullsec was all about defending your space and working together and all that

Sure, when it makes sense.

Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
and that blissfully grinding away at PVe was for lowly evil horrible game-ruining carebears in highsec.

Well then you've clearly misunderstood.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2013-12-07 01:40:37 UTC
Herzog must think that ISK just falls out of the sky in nullsec and that we don't actually have to do anything for it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#47 - 2013-12-07 02:17:42 UTC
It respawns after DT.

What of my inquiry? Will you answer my question? What are you so worried about?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2013-12-07 02:20:40 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
I'm not worried, because CCP is never going to remove local without replacing it with something that effectively does the same thing.

Also, you're mistaking top-down income for bottom-up income. I don't get moon and renter ISK directly - it goes into replacing the ships that I lose, upgrades for our systems, sov bills, etc.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2013-12-07 02:21:37 UTC
Falin Whalen wrote:
Untill they make something to replace the intelligence tool that is local, we will still have local. D-Scan doesn't even cut it, so don't try to argue that.


Would you all quit if dullsec has some risk besides a nodecrash?

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#50 - 2013-12-07 02:28:36 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Sentamon wrote:
Falin Whalen wrote:
Untill they make something to replace the intelligence tool that is local, we will still have local. D-Scan doesn't even cut it, so don't try to argue that.


Would you all quit if dullsec has some risk besides a nodecrash?

Asking for local to be removed isn't asking for risk. It's asking for free kills. It's asking for CCP to take away the one thing that gives people the chance to avoid fights they can't win, provided they're paying attention.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#51 - 2013-12-07 02:49:58 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Sentamon wrote:
Falin Whalen wrote:
Untill they make something to replace the intelligence tool that is local, we will still have local. D-Scan doesn't even cut it, so don't try to argue that.


Would you all quit if dullsec has some risk besides a nodecrash?

Asking for local to be removed isn't asking for risk. It's asking for free kills. It's asking for CCP to take away the one thing that gives people the chance to avoid fights they can't win, provided they're paying attention.


I don't know. I'm pretty sure CCP goal is to cause as much ship losses as possible to fuel plex sales so we will most likely see this feature in the future.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#52 - 2013-12-07 02:53:16 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Sentamon wrote:
Falin Whalen wrote:
Untill they make something to replace the intelligence tool that is local, we will still have local. D-Scan doesn't even cut it, so don't try to argue that.


Would you all quit if dullsec has some risk besides a nodecrash?

Asking for local to be removed isn't asking for risk. It's asking for free kills. It's asking for CCP to take away the one thing that gives people the chance to avoid fights they can't win, provided they're paying attention.


I don't know. I'm pretty sure CCP goal is to cause as much ship losses as possible to fuel plex sales so we will most likely see this feature in the future.

I'll repeat myself for your benefit: it would backfire, because people would simply stop ratting in nullsec.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#53 - 2013-12-07 02:56:21 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Sentamon wrote:
Falin Whalen wrote:
Untill they make something to replace the intelligence tool that is local, we will still have local. D-Scan doesn't even cut it, so don't try to argue that.


Would you all quit if dullsec has some risk besides a nodecrash?

Asking for local to be removed isn't asking for risk. It's asking for free kills. It's asking for CCP to take away the one thing that gives people the chance to avoid fights they can't win, provided they're paying attention.


I don't know. I'm pretty sure CCP goal is to cause as much ship losses as possible to fuel plex sales so we will most likely see this feature in the future.

I'll repeat myself for your benefit: it would backfire, because people would simply stop ratting in nullsec.


See. More people are forced to buy plex through this scheme to pay for their PVP instead of just ratting for it.

It is a foregone conclusion.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#54 - 2013-12-07 02:57:18 UTC
No. Stop trolling.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#55 - 2013-12-07 03:07:59 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Local will never be removed.

It may, at some point, be replaced by something with the same functionality in a different format. But it's not going to be what the "remove local" crybabies want.

Are you capable of contributing to a thread without insulting other players who you disagree with? If not then please take your anger elsewhere. Thanks. Smile

he's at least capable of contributing, something you rarely manage

in fact the majority of your posts aren't worth the paper they're not written on
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#56 - 2013-12-07 03:16:49 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
No. Stop trolling.


Well if I was trolling the first rule is to ignore me not to acknowledge it. Otherwise it shows lack of restraint.

But as I am being serious...

I would point out that CCP makes changes to drive conflict. IE their goal is to make ships blow up.

Hard examples:

Ice mining changes made resources limited. Thereby causing competition between miners which leads to people getting mad over others who strip the belts clean. This leads to people paying gankers to blow up other people. Hell... I've given intel to people blowing up frieghters. If CCP wanted null and low to have more ice production they could have simply made ice mining in those areas quicker, but no... They made the entire resource limited and thereby driving conflict thereby causing more ships to be blown up.

Secondly, the POCO changes were meant to cause more highsec wars to blow up ships over POCO fights.

Then they made warp speed higher on bigger ships and made interceptors faster so that those bigger ships would be tackled and blown up more.

I could go on, but you see where this leads us.

If CCP can make your ship blow up they will get around to making it so.

So that might mean local will go away some day.



CCP purposely makes changes to cause ships to be blown up.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#57 - 2013-12-07 03:22:14 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
No. Stop trolling.

haha

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#58 - 2013-12-07 05:10:02 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
It's less about any threat to existing groups and more about what certain people/groups want handed to them on a silver platter.

Yes, you, you are the people that want something handed to them on a silver platter, and that is the ability to safely make money. Sorry, theres a place you can do that, its called empire.

If you say all the people that rat in Null would leave, I say sweet, that makes everything that spawns or drops in Null worth 20 times as much because there will be less people farming it, massively upping the reward compared to the risk

James Amril-Kesh wrote:
They seem to forget there's already somewhere in EVE they can go to play without local, but we all know they won't go there.


Sure, just because we think you should have to work for your intel and not just look at a window we should have to go probe down every gate to roam around, or you're an idiot, idk which one is more accurate but I have a good guess.

Your crying in this thread is fairly epic, its been stated over and over by CCP themselves (whom you can't really call wrong, its their vision and their game) that Local gives too much intel.

So when they finally get around to fixing the broken Predator Prey mechanics of 0.0, you will get some intel back in whatever new form it comes in, but you certainly won't get it all back, because again, in CCPs own words, Local is too powerful of an Intel tool.

If thats unacceptable to you and the larger portion of your ilk, then I hope you enjoy ratting in empire for 1/20th of the profits that those who prepare properly for and brave the dangers of 0.0 for their earnings. I also anticipate greatly watching you try and defend your homes while you're sitting in Empire grinding L4's.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#59 - 2013-12-07 06:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Grath Telkin wrote:
Yes, you, you are the people that want something handed to them on a silver platter, and that is the ability to safely make money. Sorry, theres a place you can do that, its called empire.

That's cute, but no. It's not as safe to make money in null as it is in empire now. There's no reason, while rewards stay as they are, that they should be made even less safe. But you're still asking for a vacant nullsec and easy targets.

Grath Telkin wrote:
If you say all the people that rat in Null would leave, I say sweet, that makes everything that spawns or drops in Null worth 20 times as much because there will be less people farming it, massively upping the reward compared to the risk

Yeah, rat bounties will totally go up. Not.
Also, faction/deadspace/officer modules at 20x their prices won't sell. So keep dreaming.

Grath Telkin wrote:
Sure, just because we think you should have to work for your intel and not just look at a window we should have to go probe down every gate to roam around, or you're an idiot, idk which one is more accurate but I have a good guess.

Damn Grath, you're so mad you can't even type coherent sentences anymore.

Grath Telkin wrote:
Your crying in this thread is fairly epic, its been stated over and over by CCP themselves (whom you can't really call wrong, its their vision and their game) that Local gives too much intel.

I can call CCP wrong all I want. I bet if I look in your posting history I'll find examples where you've said as much, so don't pretend otherwise.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#60 - 2013-12-07 06:35:57 UTC
This discussion will get a little more entertaining in a few weeks time.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016